![]() |
|
Courtesy Call From My Health Ins. Co.
|
Courtesy Call From My Health Ins. Co.
On 5/19/14, 7:11 PM, KC wrote:
Didn't harry die yet? Sorry, the half-cocked, half-patched motorbike gang members you threatened to send down here to take me out were instead taken out by the local sheriff, who has no love for meth manufacturers. Is your daughter heading to Storrs and UConn in the fall? |
Courtesy Call From My Health Ins. Co.
On 5/20/2014 12:31 AM, wrote:
On Mon, 19 May 2014 17:31:38 -0400, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: On 5/19/2014 4:56 PM, wrote: On Mon, 19 May 2014 16:32:30 -0400, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: The ACA was passed frantically just before the Democrats lost the House and was done so in a manner that resulted in distrust. Who will ever forget Nancy Pelosi exclaiming "We need to pass it in order to see what's in it" or something to that effect. I think you mean "Senate". They lost 60 when TK died and a republican replaced him. That is what Nancy said tho. It was because if the house did not pass the frankenstein Baucus bill from the senate unaltered (and unread) it would have to go to reconciliation and another senate vote that they would never get. No, I meant "House". When the ACA was passed in 2010 the Democrats still held both the House and the Senate. Both had health care reform bills being considered but in the 11th hour the Senate's version was ratified by the Democratically controlled House. Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid worked it out. This is what really happened (references from Thomas) Bear in mind, by this time Teddy was dead and Paul Kirk was acting senator awaiting the special election. (a little drama there too) On 9/17/2009 H.R.3590 Went to Ways and Means in the House and was put on the floor of the house 10/8/2009 12:15pm: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 416 - 0 (Roll no. 768). (text: CR 10/7/2009 H10550) 10/8/2009: Received in the Senate. Read the first time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under Read the First Time. 11/21/2009: S.AMDT.2786 Amendment SA 2786 proposed by Senator Reid. (consideration: CR S11967) In the nature of a substitute. (they threw out the entire house bill and substituted the Baucus bill as Amendment 2786) This thrashed around with a lot of procedural issues, several democratic amendments and 4 or 5 cloture votes to stop GOP filibusters. December 8, 2009 Scott Brown is elected to replace Kirk so the clock was ticking. 12/23/2009: S.AMDT.2786 Amendment SA 2786 agreed to in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 60 - 39. Record Vote Number: 394. (More procedural BS) 12/23/2009: Cloture invoked in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 60 - 39. Record Vote Number: 395 12/24/2009: Passed Senate with an amendment and an amendment to the Title by Yea-Nay Vote. 60 - 39. Record Vote Number: 396. (text: CR S13890-14212) 12/24/2009: Senate ordered measure printed as passed. 12/29/2009: Message on Senate action sent to the House. At that point it was sent back to the house with the warning that if it came back to the senate after Brown took office they could not break a filibuster The house was solidly democratic and would be for almost another year. Unfortunately they were over a barrel. If they changed this bill, it would die a quiet death as soon as it hit the senate floor 3/21/2010 10:31pm: Mr. Spratt moved that the House agree to the Senate amendments. (consideration: CR H1854-1890, H1891-2153) 3/21/2010 10:31pm: The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule. (consideration: CR H2153) 3/21/2010 10:48pm: On motion that the House agree to the Senate amendments Agreed to by recorded vote: 219 - 212 (Roll no. 165). (text as House agreed to Senate amendments: CR H1920-2152 At that point it went to the president. I think that's exactly what I said in fewer words. The House, controlled at the time by the Democrats, approved the Senate version (which also had a Democrat majority). |
Courtesy Call From My Health Ins. Co.
wrote:
On Mon, 19 May 2014 15:48:05 -0400, Wayne.B wrote: On Mon, 19 May 2014 14:02:19 -0400, H*a*r*r*o*l*d wrote: I wonder what O'Bama's legacy will be. === The only thing I can think of is offing Bin Laden. That was not a trivial accomplishment and he certainly does deserve credit for approving the plan. Not everyone would have done that. Other than that he's a huge disappointment of course. I had hoped that he might provide some much needed inspiration and leadership to the inner city youth of this country but that doesn't seem to be one of his priorities. It was a rather tasteless action to invite his closest associates to watch the offing proceedings. Hillery appeared to be the only one offended by watching the event live. === I watched the World Trade Center towers being built back in the late 60s/early 70s, literally from the hole in the ground all the way to the top of the top. I worked on Wall Street a few blocks from there, and after the towers were completed, enjoyed quite a few lunches, dinners and parties from the top floor at Windows on the World restaurant. Great place. And then on 9/11 within the space of a few hours I saw the north tower burst into flames, the second plane hit the south tower, and both towers collapse. My old IBM sales rep was killed, a beautiful charming woman with two small children, as well as countless friends-of-friends and relatives of friends. Personally I would have paid just about anything to watch the Bin Laden offing. My brother in law worked for the phone company (Bell Atlantic/Verison) and he was in WTC7 the day before the attack. He knew several people who died and lots who were affected by the collapse. He feels the same as you about it. I do question anyone who thinks any president would not have taken the shot. It certainly would not have been any of the neocons (Reagan, either Bush or Clinton) who would have given OBL a pass ... maybe Carter. I can't even think of another one who would have even hesitated. Guys like FDR,Truman, Eisenhower, Kennedy, or Nixon loved killing people covertly as opposed to war. That was why we had a clandestine service. And we should go back to that policy. Instead of having a massive, expensive war, just off the unwanted person. Why spend a trillion bucks invading Iraq when for less than a million bucks, we send in a Delta team of assassins? |
Courtesy Call From My Health Ins. Co.
F*O*A*D wrote:
On 5/19/14, 12:56 PM, KC wrote: On 5/19/2014 11:43 AM, Wayne.B wrote: On Mon, 19 May 2014 10:20:54 -0400, H*a*r*r*o*l*d wrote: On 5/19/2014 9:55 AM, Wayne.B wrote: On Mon, 19 May 2014 01:56:55 -0400, wrote: Virtually everyone in that 1% had tax shelters that prevented them from ever paying anything close to the 90% rate. It was Reagan who made those tax shelters go away in 1986 === And it was long over due. I have always regarded that and breaking the Air Traffic Controllers union as Reagan's two biggest accomplishments. Of course some would say that his "Star Wars Missile Defense" plan led to the demise of the former Soviet Union, and to the extent that it might be true, that would be his biggest accomplishment of all. I wonder what O'Bama's legacy will be. === The only thing I can think of is offing Bin Laden. That was not a trivial accomplishment and he certainly does deserve credit for approving the plan. Not everyone would have done that. Other than that he's a huge disappointment of course. I had hoped that he might provide some much needed inspiration and leadership to the inner city youth of this country but that doesn't seem to be one of his priorities. I am with you on that. In the very beginning I thought I might even vote for him, then I realized he had not experience at all whatsoever that would be necessary in a POTUS. Either way, still had big hopes when he won, the first black president and all hoped he would be looked at as great in history, but now I doubt it. I think his "legacy" will be "he was a liar"... His legacy will be a long list of accomplishments for the American people, a list that would have been a lot longer without the asshat obstructionists in the GOP. There might have even been job training and job placement for an incompetent little turd like you, Somehow, you hate the idea of Checks and Balances, when it applies to Liberal Democrats. eh? |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:51 AM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com