Hey John and Gregg...
 

Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 5/1/2014 9:20 AM, F*O*A*D wrote:
On 5/1/14, 9:17 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 5/1/2014 8:50 AM, F*O*A*D wrote:
On 5/1/14, 8:27 AM, Tim wrote:
Harry to me your inquiry is like wondering if a person buys a
revolver
because Matt Dillon had one?



I don't get the connection between that rifle you like and actor Matt
Dillon.

Oh, wait...you probably mean Matt Dillon, the lead fictional character
in Gunsmoke.

I thought the marshal wore a Fanner Fifty:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W8qXLxHi9_8

What is the appeal of those pseudo military semi-assault rifles in
.223?
Killing mice in the field?


You have established in virtually all subjects, issues, interests,
hobbies and personal possessions that *anything* that you don't agree
with, understand or personally own is not worth consideration by anyone
else on the planet.

You just like to troll and start arguments. I'd suggest there are much
better hobbies for 70 year olds to engage in.





You've reached the wrong conclusion...again.


Maybe in your mind, but that's certainly the way you come across in
your postings and comments.


Yep. You nailed it.

Hey John and Gregg...
 

Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 5/1/2014 9:39 AM, F*O*A*D wrote:
On 5/1/14, 9:33 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 5/1/2014 9:20 AM, F*O*A*D wrote:
On 5/1/14, 9:17 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 5/1/2014 8:50 AM, F*O*A*D wrote:
On 5/1/14, 8:27 AM, Tim wrote:
Harry to me your inquiry is like wondering if a person buys a
revolver
because Matt Dillon had one?



I don't get the connection between that rifle you like and actor
Matt
Dillon.

Oh, wait...you probably mean Matt Dillon, the lead fictional
character
in Gunsmoke.

I thought the marshal wore a Fanner Fifty:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W8qXLxHi9_8

What is the appeal of those pseudo military semi-assault rifles in
.223?
Killing mice in the field?


You have established in virtually all subjects, issues, interests,
hobbies and personal possessions that *anything* that you don't agree
with, understand or personally own is not worth consideration by
anyone
else on the planet.

You just like to troll and start arguments. I'd suggest there are
much
better hobbies for 70 year olds to engage in.





You've reached the wrong conclusion...again.


What? There aren't better hobbies for a 70 year old to engage in other
than trolling on a newsgroup and criticizing everyone else's interests?


I might take your comments a tad more seriously if you also aimed them
at others here as you do at me.


Sorry Harry. I've been a participate of this newsgroup for a long
time. I know what came first, the chicken or the egg.


His rebuttal is something you would hear on a playground.

Hey John and Gregg...
 

Hey John and Gregg...
 

F*O*A*D wrote:
On 5/1/14, 5:18 PM, Califbill wrote:
Tim wrote:
Harry, we weren't talking about makes and functions when I mentioned
Dillon and Custer. Your question was about 'styles' of weapons. You
bought a 6 shooter pistol - they carried them too.

And that ammo is more expensive than a current military caliber ammo.


So what? .22LR is half the price or less than of .223, and you can get
1000 bb's for six bucks or so. There's almost always something cheaper.

If you want loud bangs, and lots of them, them military caliber is needed
if you want to have enough money to pay your taxes.

Hey John and Gregg...
 

On 5/1/14, 8:14 PM, Califbill wrote:
F*O*A*D wrote:
On 5/1/14, 5:18 PM, Califbill wrote:
Tim wrote:
Harry, we weren't talking about makes and functions when I mentioned
Dillon and Custer. Your question was about 'styles' of weapons. You
bought a 6 shooter pistol - they carried them too.

And that ammo is more expensive than a current military caliber ammo.


So what? .22LR is half the price or less than of .223, and you can get
1000 bb's for six bucks or so. There's almost always something cheaper.

If you want loud bangs, and lots of them, them military caliber is needed
if you want to have enough money to pay your taxes.



All the non subsonic firearms rounds I've heard to date are loud enough
for me.

Hey John and Gregg...
 

On 5/1/14, 11:29 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 01 May 2014 17:31:55 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote:

On 5/1/14, 5:18 PM, Califbill wrote:
Tim wrote:
Harry, we weren't talking about makes and functions when I mentioned
Dillon and Custer. Your question was about 'styles' of weapons. You
bought a 6 shooter pistol - they carried them too.

And that ammo is more expensive than a current military caliber ammo.


So what? .22LR is half the price or less than of .223, and you can get
1000 bb's for six bucks or so. There's almost always something cheaper.

You can get an adapter that will let you shoot .22rf in your .223


That's pretty cool.

I've found that with careful mail order shopping, I can find a fairly
wide variety of ammo without a lot of trouble. Also, we have a couple of
tackle and gun shops around here that seem to have a smaller but decent
variety of ammo available at close to the mail order prices. My good
deed last week was talking a friend into buying his ammo at one of these
shops, instead of buying it at Wal-Mart. Friend says the local stores
are less expensive than Wal-Mart and have more stock and a lot more
variety on the shelves.

*If it hurts Wal-Mart, it's good for America* :)

Hey John and Gregg...
 

Hey John and Gregg...
 

On Thu, 01 May 2014 09:17:17 -0400, "Mr. Luddite" wrote:

On 5/1/2014 8:50 AM, F*O*A*D wrote:
On 5/1/14, 8:27 AM, Tim wrote:
Harry to me your inquiry is like wondering if a person buys a revolver
because Matt Dillon had one?



I don't get the connection between that rifle you like and actor Matt
Dillon.

Oh, wait...you probably mean Matt Dillon, the lead fictional character
in Gunsmoke.

I thought the marshal wore a Fanner Fifty:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W8qXLxHi9_8

What is the appeal of those pseudo military semi-assault rifles in .223?
Killing mice in the field?


You have established in virtually all subjects, issues, interests,
hobbies and personal possessions that *anything* that you don't agree
with, understand or personally own is not worth consideration by anyone
else on the planet.

You just like to troll and start arguments. I'd suggest there are much
better hobbies for 70 year olds to engage in.




Arguments with him are easily controlled by non-responses.

Hey John and Gregg...
 

On 5/4/14, 7:53 PM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On Thu, 01 May 2014 09:17:17 -0400, "Mr. Luddite" wrote:

On 5/1/2014 8:50 AM, F*O*A*D wrote:
On 5/1/14, 8:27 AM, Tim wrote:
Harry to me your inquiry is like wondering if a person buys a revolver
because Matt Dillon had one?



I don't get the connection between that rifle you like and actor Matt
Dillon.

Oh, wait...you probably mean Matt Dillon, the lead fictional character
in Gunsmoke.

I thought the marshal wore a Fanner Fifty:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W8qXLxHi9_8

What is the appeal of those pseudo military semi-assault rifles in .223?
Killing mice in the field?


You have established in virtually all subjects, issues, interests,
hobbies and personal possessions that *anything* that you don't agree
with, understand or personally own is not worth consideration by anyone
else on the planet.

You just like to troll and start arguments. I'd suggest there are much
better hobbies for 70 year olds to engage in.




Arguments with him are easily controlled by non-responses.



Ahh...the right-wing racist hobby boy returneth. Did you start a
collection of seashells down by the seashore?