LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #5   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Mar 2014
Posts: 811
Default The Duke...

On 3/22/2014 11:36 AM, F*O*A*D wrote:
On 3/22/14, 11:30 AM, wrote:
On Sat, 22 Mar 2014 07:24:54 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote:

On 3/21/14, 11:57 PM,
wrote:


I am happy that you recognize that anything you do along the lines of
charging corporations more money is passed on to the customer or taken
away from the stock holder.
The corporation itself may actually end up making more money. You just
have to look at the tobacco companies to see that.


The problem with fines is that they do not punish the corporation
enough, and they're just another cost of doing business. Taking money
from the shareholders might help, as with Duke losing its licenses and
senior execs being prosecuted. Shareholders own the company. Perhaps it
is time to end their ability to distance themselves from the disasters
their investments cause.


Punishing the stock holder ends up punishing the public too. Most
stocks are held by pension plans, mutual funds and other public
entities. The individuals have very little influence even in which
stocks they are invested in and certainly no leverage on the
corporations who are behind those stocks.

If they really wanted to make an impact, they would go after the
person who made the decision in the first place and I doubt that
happened anywhere above the plant manager level.
It may have just been a junior staffer taking a shortcut that violated
company policy.
Did we ever actually hear what the level of the contamination was?


Ahh, but if the shareholders were exposed to civil and criminal
liability for the misdeeds of the company they owned, they might take
their duties as business owners seriously, and exert pressure on the
company to behave.

It's amazing the twists and turns top management takes to shield itself
from "junior staffers," but the reality is, *they* are in charge.

I've read about the volume of pollutants in this case, but not the
impact yet.




It's too bad that you didn't put pressure on the the owners of Krause
and company to run a legitimate company and pay their taxes. Eh Krausebag?


 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
r_Ts_004_Whaling, Hobart Bay, 1810s_William Duke, 1815-53_sqs squeegees Tall Ship Photos 0 October 3rd 10 02:03 AM
r_Ts_003_Whaling, Hobart, 1804_William Duke, 1815-53_sqs squeegees Tall Ship Photos 0 October 3rd 10 02:03 AM
r_Ts_002_Whaling, Lady`s Bay, Tasmania, c. 1848_William Duke, 1815-53_sqs squeegees Tall Ship Photos 0 October 3rd 10 02:02 AM
Duke Energy Quits Right-Wing NAM HK General 0 May 9th 09 02:44 PM
TowBoat US and sea tow duke it out Paul General 1 April 29th 06 02:59 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:25 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017