![]() |
Women are too busy to be paid equally for equal work.
Texas GOP struggles with equal pay for equal work
03/19/14 09:31 AM By Steve Benen Over the weekend, Cari Christman, the executive director of a political action committee for Texas Republican women, struggled a bit when explaining her party’s opposition to pay-equity laws. As Christman argued in a televised interview, women don’t need measures like the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act, largely because “women are extremely busy.” As reports of the comments spread, the executive director of the Texas Republican Party decided to weigh in to help put out the fire. As Laura Bassett reported, this didn’t go well, either. The day after the head of a Texas GOP women’s PAC flubbed her answer on equal pay, the executive director of the Texas Republican Party stepped in to explain the GOP’s alternative to fair pay legislation. “Men are better negotiators,” Beth Cubriel said on YNN’s “Capital Tonight.” “I would encourage women, instead of pursuing the courts for action, to become better negotiators.” Got that? As the new GOP argument goes, if women in the workplace receive less pay for equal work, the blame rests with … the women themselves, not their employers. In case there are any lingering doubts about the merits of Cubriel’s suggestion, it’s important to note that the problem is not with women’s negotiating skills. Often, women don’t even know their employers are subjecting them to wage discrimination. Indeed, conservatives may want to re-familiarize themselves with the basics of Lilly Ledbetter’s story – she was an exemplary staffer at a Goodyear tire factory in Alabama, but after nearly two decades of work, she quietly received a note informing her she’d been paid 40 percent less than her male colleagues. It was a problem that wasn’t going to be solved by becoming a better negotiator, What’s more, let’s not lose sight of the larger context here. This has become an issue of late because Greg Abbott, Texas’ Republican gubernatorial candidate, has refused to endorse pay-equity measures like the Fair Pay Act. His allies are trying to provide a coherent defense, but apparently they can’t think of anything persuasive. Complicating matters, it’s not just Texas. Laura Bassett also had this report on developments in Minnesota. A package of bills in Minnesota that would enhance women’s economic security by raising the minimum wage, providing paid family and sick leave and addressing the gender pay gap makes women “look like whiners,” a state GOP lawmaker said last week. “We heard several bills last week about women’s issues and I kept thinking to myself, these bills are putting us backwards in time,” State Rep. Andrea Kieffer (R) told colleagues at a Wednesday hearing on one of the measures. “We are losing the respect that we so dearly want in the workplace by bringing up all these special bills for women and almost making us look like whiners.” So let me get this straight. If women face discrimination in the workplace, this Republican state lawmaker believes they should just accept unequal pay and move on? If Democrats are extremely lucky, this issue will become increasingly important as the 2014 midterms draw closer. -- Nahhh...there's no Republican war on women. Except on every issue that matters. Rand Paul & Ted Cruz…your 2016 GOP nominees, because ‘Mericans deserve crazy! |
Women are too busy to be paid equally for equal work.
|
Women are too busy to be paid equally for equal work.
On 3/20/2014 12:37 PM, F*O*A*D wrote:
On 3/20/14, 12:15 PM, wrote: On Thu, 20 Mar 2014 09:27:44 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote: On 3/20/14, 1:51 AM, wrote: On Wed, 19 Mar 2014 18:15:34 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote: Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act, I wish people would stop using that term. The particular piece of legislation that carries that name really addresses a number of employment practices and it is not specifically about women. It basically lifts the normal 2 year sunset on civil actions when just about any kind of employment rights are violated and applies equally to men or women. The only reason Lily was involved at all was because her beef was raised over 2 years AFTER she retired but there were other complainants but she was the most sympathetic. Indeed, it does address the issue of unequal pay for equal work, and it does extend the time period for filing a complaint. It is clear you never actually read the legislation. It is a short bill, you can handle it. "Equal pay for women" is never mentioned or even alluded to It simply opens up the window that ANYONE can bring an action. So? You think it has nothing to do with women being able to bring action for not getting equal pay? Naive. That's not what he said, assole. |
Women are too busy to be paid equally for equal work.
On 3/20/14, 1:05 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 20 Mar 2014 12:37:02 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote: On 3/20/14, 12:15 PM, wrote: On Thu, 20 Mar 2014 09:27:44 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote: On 3/20/14, 1:51 AM, wrote: On Wed, 19 Mar 2014 18:15:34 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote: Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act, I wish people would stop using that term. The particular piece of legislation that carries that name really addresses a number of employment practices and it is not specifically about women. It basically lifts the normal 2 year sunset on civil actions when just about any kind of employment rights are violated and applies equally to men or women. The only reason Lily was involved at all was because her beef was raised over 2 years AFTER she retired but there were other complainants but she was the most sympathetic. Indeed, it does address the issue of unequal pay for equal work, and it does extend the time period for filing a complaint. It is clear you never actually read the legislation. It is a short bill, you can handle it. "Equal pay for women" is never mentioned or even alluded to It simply opens up the window that ANYONE can bring an action. So? You think it has nothing to do with women being able to bring action for not getting equal pay? Naive. No more so than men who were discriminated against and specifically protects old people who were discriminated against in the major part of the bill that I didn't quote. The word "woman/women" is never even used and there is nothing that makes it specifically about women. The only reference to Ledbetter was in the introduction of the bill and points out that she lost her suit in the SCOTUS simply because of the timing of the law suit. The intent of the bill was to expand that window. Of course I favor "covering" workers who were screwed out of equal pay for equal work by employers. That the act does not mention "women" is not relevant to its purpose. |
Women are too busy to be paid equally for equal work.
On Thu, 20 Mar 2014 14:23:23 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:
On 3/20/14, 1:05 PM, wrote: On Thu, 20 Mar 2014 12:37:02 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote: On 3/20/14, 12:15 PM, wrote: On Thu, 20 Mar 2014 09:27:44 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote: On 3/20/14, 1:51 AM, wrote: On Wed, 19 Mar 2014 18:15:34 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote: Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act, I wish people would stop using that term. The particular piece of legislation that carries that name really addresses a number of employment practices and it is not specifically about women. It basically lifts the normal 2 year sunset on civil actions when just about any kind of employment rights are violated and applies equally to men or women. The only reason Lily was involved at all was because her beef was raised over 2 years AFTER she retired but there were other complainants but she was the most sympathetic. Indeed, it does address the issue of unequal pay for equal work, and it does extend the time period for filing a complaint. It is clear you never actually read the legislation. It is a short bill, you can handle it. "Equal pay for women" is never mentioned or even alluded to It simply opens up the window that ANYONE can bring an action. So? You think it has nothing to do with women being able to bring action for not getting equal pay? Naive. No more so than men who were discriminated against and specifically protects old people who were discriminated against in the major part of the bill that I didn't quote. The word "woman/women" is never even used and there is nothing that makes it specifically about women. The only reference to Ledbetter was in the introduction of the bill and points out that she lost her suit in the SCOTUS simply because of the timing of the law suit. The intent of the bill was to expand that window. Of course I favor "covering" workers who were screwed out of equal pay for equal work by employers. That the act does not mention "women" is not relevant to its purpose. In other words, Harry is saying, "Whoops, I ****ed up." |
Women are too busy to be paid equally for equal work.
|
Women are too busy to be paid equally for equal work.
On 3/20/14, 3:24 PM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Thu, 20 Mar 2014 14:23:23 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 3/20/14, 1:05 PM, wrote: On Thu, 20 Mar 2014 12:37:02 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote: On 3/20/14, 12:15 PM, wrote: On Thu, 20 Mar 2014 09:27:44 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote: On 3/20/14, 1:51 AM, wrote: On Wed, 19 Mar 2014 18:15:34 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote: Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act, I wish people would stop using that term. The particular piece of legislation that carries that name really addresses a number of employment practices and it is not specifically about women. It basically lifts the normal 2 year sunset on civil actions when just about any kind of employment rights are violated and applies equally to men or women. The only reason Lily was involved at all was because her beef was raised over 2 years AFTER she retired but there were other complainants but she was the most sympathetic. Indeed, it does address the issue of unequal pay for equal work, and it does extend the time period for filing a complaint. It is clear you never actually read the legislation. It is a short bill, you can handle it. "Equal pay for women" is never mentioned or even alluded to It simply opens up the window that ANYONE can bring an action. So? You think it has nothing to do with women being able to bring action for not getting equal pay? Naive. No more so than men who were discriminated against and specifically protects old people who were discriminated against in the major part of the bill that I didn't quote. The word "woman/women" is never even used and there is nothing that makes it specifically about women. The only reference to Ledbetter was in the introduction of the bill and points out that she lost her suit in the SCOTUS simply because of the timing of the law suit. The intent of the bill was to expand that window. Of course I favor "covering" workers who were screwed out of equal pay for equal work by employers. That the act does not mention "women" is not relevant to its purpose. In other words, Harry is saying, "Whoops, I ****ed up." Moron. -- Rand Paul & Ted Cruz…your 2016 GOP nominees, because ‘Mericans deserve crazy! |
Women are too busy to be paid equally for equal work.
On Wednesday, March 19, 2014 6:15:34 PM UTC-4, F*O*A*D wrote:
Texas GOP struggles with equal pay for equal work 03/19/14 09:31 AM By Steve Benen NOT...by the slug, harry krause. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:59 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com