On 3/13/2014 8:55 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Thu, 13 Mar 2014 20:40:11 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote:

On 3/13/14, 8:14 PM, KC wrote:

F*O*A*D wrote:

Less able? No one I know in the real world is *less able* than you
are. Hell, man, you've never been able to hang onto a real job anywhere.

I do wish you success with your web design business...just make sure
potential clients don't consider proper use of the English language
that important.


I am really not too worried harry... If there were any real issues left
one of the others here would chime in. I am sure your "observations"
here on this matter are no more informed than your opinion on the
software I used to draw the site Your opinion harry, really is
completely useless, and uninvited, but at the same time completely
predictable and expected... You are just a worthless little piece of
****, not worth the time folks here give you.

Your web page, unless you've changed it drastically since you last
posted the URL, has a good number of grammar errors and style
inconsistencies. I did not look close enough to see if there were
spelling errors, too. That you don't see any of these is not surprising,
and since your client's native language isn't English, he isn't likely
to notice, either. If I were in your shoes and trying to pass myself off
as a professional-level web guy, I'd find someone who has
professional-level knowledge of "English as she is written," because you
don't have such knowledge.

===

Style inconsistencies are *extremely* important to a guy who has a
tree that needs to come down.


One thing I did for instance was move the video that used to come up on
what would probably be the first picture folks might click on.. After
hearing Dicks CC, I decided that having a vid load first might be
offputting so I put it deeper into the site. Hopefully now the first
thing folks see, "isn't" a "please wait for video" note

See Dick, I'm listening