![]() |
Standing Your Ground in Rural Maryland
On 2/26/2014 4:27 PM, Poco Loco wrote:
On 26 Feb 2014 20:29:14 GMT, F.O.A.D. wrote: Poco Loco wrote: On Wed, 26 Feb 2014 15:09:56 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 2/26/14, 3:04 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 2/26/2014 12:01 PM, wrote: On Wed, 26 Feb 2014 10:14:08 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote: "One brandished a weapon and both made aggressive movements toward the homeowner, who fired shots at them in fear of his life." Aggressive movements in what direction, dopey? Towards the homeowner on the other side of the door. Home invasion. I wonder what "the weapon" was. I notice they avoided saying "gun". Is this another cop shooting someone reaching for his wallet? One of the reports mentioned a baseball bat. Is that deadlier than a bag of skittles or a rap song played too loud? :) No, but the thug life is.... Martin picked a fight against what he thought was gonna' be an easy mark for a coward... he lost... Only in the hands of an aggressor, whereupon deadly force may be used against the threat. You know, like that stand your ground situation there in Huntingtown. I predict you will be involved in a shooting. If so, the shootee will undoubtedly have deserved it. |
Standing Your Ground in Rural Maryland
On 2/26/14, 3:58 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 2/26/2014 3:46 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote: "Mr. Luddite" wrote: On 2/26/2014 3:09 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote: On 2/26/14, 3:04 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 2/26/2014 12:01 PM, wrote: On Wed, 26 Feb 2014 10:14:08 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote: "One brandished a weapon and both made aggressive movements toward the homeowner, who fired shots at them in fear of his life." Aggressive movements in what direction, dopey? Towards the homeowner on the other side of the door. Home invasion. I wonder what "the weapon" was. I notice they avoided saying "gun". Is this another cop shooting someone reaching for his wallet? One of the reports mentioned a baseball bat. Is that deadlier than a bag of skittles or a rap song played too loud? :) The skittles really had nothing to do with anything. The fact that Martin had them was played up by the anti-gun crowd and the prosecution in an attempt to paint a certain image of him in people's minds, including the jury. The most significant issue is the question of Martin being on top of Zimmerman, beating his head against the concrete. If true, and apparently the jury felt it was, that is a cause to feel in imminent danger of death or of serious bodily harm. I look at it this way: Did *Martin* have a reasonable fear that *his* life was in danger when he encountered Zimmerman? It matters not what you think of Zimmerman, his stalking of Martin (if he did) or his following him and challenging why he was there. None of those are life threatening activities. Being punched in the nose, then sat upon while having your head pounded against a concrete walkway sounds more like a situation of being in fear of death or serious bodily harm to me. Zimmerman is a violent tempered woman beating punk. He walks around armed so he can shoot people with whom he starts fights. For how many years has Zimmerman owned and carried a gun? How many people has he shot? The answers define whether your accusation that he walks around armed so he can shoot people with whom he starts fights is accurate or not. Your accusation of him being a woman beating punk also has never been proven. The punk has gotten into bar fights, several women have had "altercations" with him, abuse charges have been threatened and I think withdrawn twice, he shot a kid dead... He's a hot-headed punk. One of these days he is going to start something with the wrong guy, he'll be disarmed, and he'll have the living crap beat out of him. |
Standing Your Ground in Rural Maryland
On 2/26/14, 4:27 PM, Poco Loco wrote:
On 26 Feb 2014 20:29:14 GMT, F.O.A.D. wrote: Poco Loco wrote: On Wed, 26 Feb 2014 15:09:56 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 2/26/14, 3:04 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 2/26/2014 12:01 PM, wrote: On Wed, 26 Feb 2014 10:14:08 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote: "One brandished a weapon and both made aggressive movements toward the homeowner, who fired shots at them in fear of his life." Aggressive movements in what direction, dopey? Towards the homeowner on the other side of the door. Home invasion. I wonder what "the weapon" was. I notice they avoided saying "gun". Is this another cop shooting someone reaching for his wallet? One of the reports mentioned a baseball bat. Is that deadlier than a bag of skittles or a rap song played too loud? :) Only in the hands of an aggressor, whereupon deadly force may be used against the threat. You know, like that stand your ground situation there in Huntingtown. I predict you will be involved in a shooting. If so, the shootee will undoubtedly have deserved it. Yeah, right, someone who insults you in the WalMart parking lot, the center of your life's activities. |
Standing Your Ground in Rural Maryland
On 2/26/14, 4:31 PM, KC wrote:
No, but the thug life is.... And you are what, a thug-ette? |
Standing Your Ground in Rural Maryland
On 2/26/2014 4:14 PM, F*O*A*D wrote:
On 2/26/14, 3:58 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 2/26/2014 3:46 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote: "Mr. Luddite" wrote: On 2/26/2014 3:09 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote: On 2/26/14, 3:04 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 2/26/2014 12:01 PM, wrote: On Wed, 26 Feb 2014 10:14:08 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote: "One brandished a weapon and both made aggressive movements toward the homeowner, who fired shots at them in fear of his life." Aggressive movements in what direction, dopey? Towards the homeowner on the other side of the door. Home invasion. I wonder what "the weapon" was. I notice they avoided saying "gun". Is this another cop shooting someone reaching for his wallet? One of the reports mentioned a baseball bat. Is that deadlier than a bag of skittles or a rap song played too loud? :) The skittles really had nothing to do with anything. The fact that Martin had them was played up by the anti-gun crowd and the prosecution in an attempt to paint a certain image of him in people's minds, including the jury. The most significant issue is the question of Martin being on top of Zimmerman, beating his head against the concrete. If true, and apparently the jury felt it was, that is a cause to feel in imminent danger of death or of serious bodily harm. I look at it this way: Did *Martin* have a reasonable fear that *his* life was in danger when he encountered Zimmerman? It matters not what you think of Zimmerman, his stalking of Martin (if he did) or his following him and challenging why he was there. None of those are life threatening activities. Being punched in the nose, then sat upon while having your head pounded against a concrete walkway sounds more like a situation of being in fear of death or serious bodily harm to me. Zimmerman is a violent tempered woman beating punk. He walks around armed so he can shoot people with whom he starts fights. For how many years has Zimmerman owned and carried a gun? How many people has he shot? The answers define whether your accusation that he walks around armed so he can shoot people with whom he starts fights is accurate or not. Your accusation of him being a woman beating punk also has never been proven. The punk has gotten into bar fights, several women have had "altercations" with him, abuse charges have been threatened and I think withdrawn twice, he shot a kid dead... He's a hot-headed punk. One of these days he is going to start something with the wrong guy, he'll be disarmed, and he'll have the living crap beat out of him. He shot the skittles kid dead to save his life. You'd so the same to save your miserable hide, or maybe just for kicks. |
Standing Your Ground in Rural Maryland
On 2/26/2014 5:14 PM, F*O*A*D wrote:
On 2/26/14, 3:58 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 2/26/2014 3:46 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote: "Mr. Luddite" wrote: On 2/26/2014 3:09 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote: On 2/26/14, 3:04 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 2/26/2014 12:01 PM, wrote: On Wed, 26 Feb 2014 10:14:08 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote: "One brandished a weapon and both made aggressive movements toward the homeowner, who fired shots at them in fear of his life." Aggressive movements in what direction, dopey? Towards the homeowner on the other side of the door. Home invasion. I wonder what "the weapon" was. I notice they avoided saying "gun". Is this another cop shooting someone reaching for his wallet? One of the reports mentioned a baseball bat. Is that deadlier than a bag of skittles or a rap song played too loud? :) The skittles really had nothing to do with anything. The fact that Martin had them was played up by the anti-gun crowd and the prosecution in an attempt to paint a certain image of him in people's minds, including the jury. The most significant issue is the question of Martin being on top of Zimmerman, beating his head against the concrete. If true, and apparently the jury felt it was, that is a cause to feel in imminent danger of death or of serious bodily harm. I look at it this way: Did *Martin* have a reasonable fear that *his* life was in danger when he encountered Zimmerman? It matters not what you think of Zimmerman, his stalking of Martin (if he did) or his following him and challenging why he was there. None of those are life threatening activities. Being punched in the nose, then sat upon while having your head pounded against a concrete walkway sounds more like a situation of being in fear of death or serious bodily harm to me. Zimmerman is a violent tempered woman beating punk. He walks around armed so he can shoot people with whom he starts fights. For how many years has Zimmerman owned and carried a gun? How many people has he shot? The answers define whether your accusation that he walks around armed so he can shoot people with whom he starts fights is accurate or not. Your accusation of him being a woman beating punk also has never been proven. The punk has gotten into bar fights, several women have had "altercations" with him, abuse charges have been threatened and I think withdrawn twice, he shot a kid dead... He's a hot-headed punk. One of these days he is going to start something with the wrong guy, he'll be disarmed, and he'll have the living crap beat out of him. I agree that he seems to be hot headed and I am not defending his personality. All I am saying is (and as the evidence in the trial indicated) Zimmerman was justifiably in fear for his life or serious bodily harm. Nothing else ... his background ... Martin's background .... skittles or no skittles matters. The jury came to the same conclusion. |
Standing Your Ground in Rural Maryland
On Wed, 26 Feb 2014 17:15:56 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote:
On 2/26/14, 4:27 PM, Poco Loco wrote: On 26 Feb 2014 20:29:14 GMT, F.O.A.D. wrote: Poco Loco wrote: On Wed, 26 Feb 2014 15:09:56 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 2/26/14, 3:04 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 2/26/2014 12:01 PM, wrote: On Wed, 26 Feb 2014 10:14:08 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote: "One brandished a weapon and both made aggressive movements toward the homeowner, who fired shots at them in fear of his life." Aggressive movements in what direction, dopey? Towards the homeowner on the other side of the door. Home invasion. I wonder what "the weapon" was. I notice they avoided saying "gun". Is this another cop shooting someone reaching for his wallet? One of the reports mentioned a baseball bat. Is that deadlier than a bag of skittles or a rap song played too loud? :) Only in the hands of an aggressor, whereupon deadly force may be used against the threat. You know, like that stand your ground situation there in Huntingtown. I predict you will be involved in a shooting. If so, the shootee will undoubtedly have deserved it. Yeah, right, someone who insults you in the WalMart parking lot, the center of your life's activities. Do you think someone's attempted insults could be worse than your attempts? I've not gone to your place yet. Although I'll have to admit, that red barn of yours sure looks photogenic from the air. |
Standing Your Ground in Rural Maryland
On Wed, 26 Feb 2014 16:31:50 -0600, HanK wrote:
On 2/26/2014 4:14 PM, F*O*A*D wrote: On 2/26/14, 3:58 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 2/26/2014 3:46 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote: "Mr. Luddite" wrote: On 2/26/2014 3:09 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote: On 2/26/14, 3:04 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 2/26/2014 12:01 PM, wrote: On Wed, 26 Feb 2014 10:14:08 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote: "One brandished a weapon and both made aggressive movements toward the homeowner, who fired shots at them in fear of his life." Aggressive movements in what direction, dopey? Towards the homeowner on the other side of the door. Home invasion. I wonder what "the weapon" was. I notice they avoided saying "gun". Is this another cop shooting someone reaching for his wallet? One of the reports mentioned a baseball bat. Is that deadlier than a bag of skittles or a rap song played too loud? :) The skittles really had nothing to do with anything. The fact that Martin had them was played up by the anti-gun crowd and the prosecution in an attempt to paint a certain image of him in people's minds, including the jury. The most significant issue is the question of Martin being on top of Zimmerman, beating his head against the concrete. If true, and apparently the jury felt it was, that is a cause to feel in imminent danger of death or of serious bodily harm. I look at it this way: Did *Martin* have a reasonable fear that *his* life was in danger when he encountered Zimmerman? It matters not what you think of Zimmerman, his stalking of Martin (if he did) or his following him and challenging why he was there. None of those are life threatening activities. Being punched in the nose, then sat upon while having your head pounded against a concrete walkway sounds more like a situation of being in fear of death or serious bodily harm to me. Zimmerman is a violent tempered woman beating punk. He walks around armed so he can shoot people with whom he starts fights. For how many years has Zimmerman owned and carried a gun? How many people has he shot? The answers define whether your accusation that he walks around armed so he can shoot people with whom he starts fights is accurate or not. Your accusation of him being a woman beating punk also has never been proven. The punk has gotten into bar fights, several women have had "altercations" with him, abuse charges have been threatened and I think withdrawn twice, he shot a kid dead... He's a hot-headed punk. One of these days he is going to start something with the wrong guy, he'll be disarmed, and he'll have the living crap beat out of him. He shot the skittles kid dead to save his life. You'd so the same to save your miserable hide, or maybe just for kicks. Not foad. |
Standing Your Ground in Rural Maryland
On 26 Feb 2014 20:42:01 GMT, F.O.A.D. wrote:
Voice dictation app did not capitalize agent orange. The question remains, is Rec.boats significant enough to bother typing responses? Nah. The dictation app will have to do. === Judging from your recent typos, your dictation app sucks big time. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:44 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com