Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #81   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
Tim Tim is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Nov 2006
Posts: 19,107
Default Well, of course...

On Monday, February 17, 2014 6:55:47 PM UTC-6, F*O*A*D wrote:
On 2/17/14, 7:25 PM, Tim wrote:

On Monday, February 17, 2014 5:50:19 PM UTC-6, F*O*A*D wrote:






Your attempts to deny the outright superstition that underpins religious




beliefs are laughable. How many millions of self-described Christians




believe in creationism and believe the earth is less than 10,000 years old?




Harry, you come on here to make some boastful statement about the views of a select few then you want to put me on trial for my thoughts?




Wow!






BTW-Ever hear of this guy? I figured a link would be sufficient.




http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aristarchus_of_Samos








By select few, are you referring to the several Greeks I mentioned,

considered for thousands of years the greatest thinkers of their era?



Tell me you are not.


No, I am not. If I may make myself clear, you posted an article about people who believe the sun travels around the earth.I added the flat-earthers and the island-flipers. Those are the 'select few' I was regarding.



I don't want to put you on trial for anything. We were talking about

superstitions that underpin religion. Well, believing in creationism and

believing the earth is less than 10,000 years old is believing in

superstition.


To you it is. To many it's truth. I believe in science. But science is only limited to mans knowledge and understanding. Consider the flat-earther's plight. It was considered the truthful science of the day until Columbus (actually before him) proved that science different with newer science.Same with the earth-orbiters. The standard is held until adequately evidence has been found to prove the old school though as defective.

Pliney the Elder was a great philsophic naturalist and scholar- and he even believed in a singular "Universal Creator" . Science hasn't proven him wrong to this day. Now when Science does prove differently, I'll believe that science. Believe it or not, I am an objectionable person, but until science proves different, I'll hold to what I believe is true.


Thank goodness for Edwards v. Aguillard.


Thank goodness for the 1st. Amendment!



  #83   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Feb 2014
Posts: 3,524
Default Well, of course...

On 2/17/14, 8:39 PM, Tim wrote:
On Monday, February 17, 2014 6:55:47 PM UTC-6, F*O*A*D wrote:
On 2/17/14, 7:25 PM, Tim wrote:

On Monday, February 17, 2014 5:50:19 PM UTC-6, F*O*A*D wrote:






Your attempts to deny the outright superstition that underpins religious




beliefs are laughable. How many millions of self-described Christians




believe in creationism and believe the earth is less than 10,000 years old?




Harry, you come on here to make some boastful statement about the views of a select few then you want to put me on trial for my thoughts?




Wow!






BTW-Ever hear of this guy? I figured a link would be sufficient.




http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aristarchus_of_Samos








By select few, are you referring to the several Greeks I mentioned,

considered for thousands of years the greatest thinkers of their era?



Tell me you are not.


No, I am not. If I may make myself clear, you posted an article about people who believe the sun travels around the earth.I added the flat-earthers and the island-flipers. Those are the 'select few' I was regarding.



I don't want to put you on trial for anything. We were talking about

superstitions that underpin religion. Well, believing in creationism and

believing the earth is less than 10,000 years old is believing in

superstition.


To you it is. To many it's truth. I believe in science. But science is only limited to mans knowledge and understanding. Consider the flat-earther's plight. It was considered the truthful science of the day until Columbus (actually before him) proved that science different with newer science.Same with the earth-orbiters. The standard is held until adequately evidence has been found to prove the old school though as defective.

Pliney the Elder was a great philsophic naturalist and scholar- and he even believed in a singular "Universal Creator" . Science hasn't proven him wrong to this day. Now when Science does prove differently, I'll believe that science. Believe it or not, I am an objectionable person, but until science proves different, I'll hold to what I believe is true.


Thank goodness for Edwards v. Aguillard.


Thank goodness for the 1st. Amendment!




That the earth is more than 10,000 years old is scientifically provable,
and evolution is science, too. You are asking science to prove
superstition in the existence of a creator. ;
  #86   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 10,492
Default Hey John???

On Mon, 17 Feb 2014 15:32:39 -0500, KC wrote:

It doesn't take a PhD in Psychiatry or Psychotherapy to recognized that

...Dick has little man disease... Gotta' be the boss, gotta' mock and
rub it in when someone makes a mistake, has to be the first to answer,
has to be right... Has to go back and pat himself on the back for months
when he gets a little internet victory... Like beating a dead horse....
sick dude. Look at yourself first Dick, ask youself why you have to
"win" in an internet forum, why you have to go back over and over it
again and agan?....


===

Scott, with all due respect, you are totally out of line. Back off,
take a few deep breaths and put your keyboard down for awhile.
  #87   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
Tim Tim is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Nov 2006
Posts: 19,107
Default Well, of course...

On Monday, February 17, 2014 8:13:29 PM UTC-6, F*O*A*D wrote:
On 2/17/14, 8:39 PM, Tim wrote:

On Monday, February 17, 2014 6:55:47 PM UTC-6, F*O*A*D wrote:


On 2/17/14, 7:25 PM, Tim wrote:




On Monday, February 17, 2014 5:50:19 PM UTC-6, F*O*A*D wrote:












Your attempts to deny the outright superstition that underpins religious








beliefs are laughable. How many millions of self-described Christians








believe in creationism and believe the earth is less than 10,000 years old?








Harry, you come on here to make some boastful statement about the views of a select few then you want to put me on trial for my thoughts?








Wow!












BTW-Ever hear of this guy? I figured a link would be sufficient.








http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aristarchus_of_Samos
















By select few, are you referring to the several Greeks I mentioned,




considered for thousands of years the greatest thinkers of their era?








Tell me you are not.




No, I am not. If I may make myself clear, you posted an article about people who believe the sun travels around the earth.I added the flat-earthers and the island-flipers. Those are the 'select few' I was regarding.








I don't want to put you on trial for anything. We were talking about




superstitions that underpin religion. Well, believing in creationism and




believing the earth is less than 10,000 years old is believing in




superstition.




To you it is. To many it's truth. I believe in science. But science is only limited to mans knowledge and understanding. Consider the flat-earther's plight. It was considered the truthful science of the day until Columbus (actually before him) proved that science different with newer science.Same with the earth-orbiters. The standard is held until adequately evidence has been found to prove the old school though as defective.




Pliney the Elder was a great philsophic naturalist and scholar- and he even believed in a singular "Universal Creator" . Science hasn't proven him wrong to this day. Now when Science does prove differently, I'll believe that science. Believe it or not, I am an objectionable person, but until science proves different, I'll hold to what I believe is true.






Thank goodness for Edwards v. Aguillard.




Thank goodness for the 1st. Amendment!










That the earth is more than 10,000 years old is scientifically provable,

and evolution is science, too.


Oh, I know the earth is much older than that. But is mankind? Carbon 14 *IS* the accepted science for research, but its not infallible...

http://www.nytimes.com/1990/05/31/us...on-dating.html

And I admire Albert Einstein's genius when he developed his theory of relativity. Amazing that a hundred years ago, being armed with a brain, an imagination and a chalk board he was dead on! But in the last few years, though his theory is still a standard, his calculations are being scrutinized due to modern scientific techniques.

http://gajitz.com/was-einstein-wrong...t-be-constant/

Another thing. His theory is light travels 186000 mi. per second. why not 186,243.94 MPS? Why is accuracy only limited to 'thousands?" When you consider 'millions' of years at stake, at least Albert was more accurate with relativity theories than carbon 14 dating can be.

You are asking science to prove

superstition in the existence of a creator. ;



Why not? You are stating that because science *cannot* provide evidence of a 'creator' then a creator doesn't exist. When science *CAN* prove there *IS NOT* a Divine Creator- I'll believe that science. Until then I'm absolutely satisfied in my beliefs.

Pretty simple really....
  #88   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Mar 2011
Posts: 541
Default Well, of course...

On 2/17/2014 8:17 AM, KC wrote:

Well, the the 20 mph part might make things easier to compare I must
admit.. Tell him to also ask his teacher about using weight shift
instead of the bars to make the same maneuvers...


I missed your reply on whether you throw your torso side to side to
avoid a slight handlebar nudge or if you ride a custom bike without
those needless handlebars?


  #89   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Mar 2011
Posts: 541
Default Hey John???

On 2/17/2014 1:06 PM, KC wrote:

Dick took a shot based on a conversation about ammo we had last year.
But I am sure you all will run with that anyway... Listen John. Here's
the way I see it.. You know about some stuff, pretty good guy, but not
really mechanical, harry, here cause he has a nasty inferior complex and
needs to feel like he's beating folks up, dick the same, but doesn't
have to lie cause he has plenty to flash around... the rest I am not
getting into but the fact is, there is just nothing here for me anymore
and even though I tried for 4 months to not be "that guy" anymore, it's
obvious "that guy" is all you poor suckers are here for... Later....


Just because we have differing opinions doesn't mean it's personal. I
might think you're half bat-**** delusional but it's based on what
you've written, not what others say about you. That said we'd probably
get along fine as neighbors. Don't sweat the small stuff.

  #90   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Aug 2013
Posts: 6,972
Default Well, of course...

On 2/17/2014 11:07 PM, Tim wrote:
On Monday, February 17, 2014 8:13:29 PM UTC-6, F*O*A*D wrote:
On 2/17/14, 8:39 PM, Tim wrote:

On Monday, February 17, 2014 6:55:47 PM UTC-6, F*O*A*D wrote:


On 2/17/14, 7:25 PM, Tim wrote:




On Monday, February 17, 2014 5:50:19 PM UTC-6, F*O*A*D wrote:












Your attempts to deny the outright superstition that underpins religious








beliefs are laughable. How many millions of self-described Christians








believe in creationism and believe the earth is less than 10,000 years old?








Harry, you come on here to make some boastful statement about the views of a select few then you want to put me on trial for my thoughts?








Wow!












BTW-Ever hear of this guy? I figured a link would be sufficient.








http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aristarchus_of_Samos
















By select few, are you referring to the several Greeks I mentioned,




considered for thousands of years the greatest thinkers of their era?








Tell me you are not.




No, I am not. If I may make myself clear, you posted an article about people who believe the sun travels around the earth.I added the flat-earthers and the island-flipers. Those are the 'select few' I was regarding.








I don't want to put you on trial for anything. We were talking about




superstitions that underpin religion. Well, believing in creationism and




believing the earth is less than 10,000 years old is believing in




superstition.




To you it is. To many it's truth. I believe in science. But science is only limited to mans knowledge and understanding. Consider the flat-earther's plight. It was considered the truthful science of the day until Columbus (actually before him) proved that science different with newer science.Same with the earth-orbiters. The standard is held until adequately evidence has been found to prove the old school though as defective.




Pliney the Elder was a great philsophic naturalist and scholar- and he even believed in a singular "Universal Creator" . Science hasn't proven him wrong to this day. Now when Science does prove differently, I'll believe that science. Believe it or not, I am an objectionable person, but until science proves different, I'll hold to what I believe is true.






Thank goodness for Edwards v. Aguillard.




Thank goodness for the 1st. Amendment!










That the earth is more than 10,000 years old is scientifically provable,

and evolution is science, too.


Oh, I know the earth is much older than that. But is mankind? Carbon 14 *IS* the accepted science for research, but its not infallible...

http://www.nytimes.com/1990/05/31/us...on-dating.html

And I admire Albert Einstein's genius when he developed his theory of relativity. Amazing that a hundred years ago, being armed with a brain, an imagination and a chalk board he was dead on! But in the last few years, though his theory is still a standard, his calculations are being scrutinized due to modern scientific techniques.

http://gajitz.com/was-einstein-wrong...t-be-constant/

Another thing. His theory is light travels 186000 mi. per second. why not 186,243.94 MPS? Why is accuracy only limited to 'thousands?" When you consider 'millions' of years at stake, at least Albert was more accurate with relativity theories than carbon 14 dating can be.

You are asking science to prove

superstition in the existence of a creator. ;



Why not? You are stating that because science *cannot* provide evidence of a 'creator' then a creator doesn't exist. When science *CAN* prove there *IS NOT* a Divine Creator- I'll believe that science. Until then I'm absolutely satisfied in my beliefs.

Pretty simple really....



Science often unearths more questions than it answers.
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:42 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017