|
Just when you thought...
....the stupidity level on Fox News had bottomed out... Laura Ingraham bore even deeper into the depths of stupidity of unimaginable proportion. Ingraham called Puerto Ricans immigrants. On her radio show, Ingraham said Associate Supreme Court Justice Sotomayor’s “allegiance obviously goes to her [Puerto Rican] immigrant family background and not to the Constitution of the United States. Puerto Ricans are United States Citizens and are NOT immigrants. -- There’s no point crying over spilled 4-Methylcyclohexanemethanol. |
Just when you thought...
On 2/9/2014 4:28 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
...the stupidity level on Fox News had bottomed out... Laura Ingraham bore even deeper into the depths of stupidity of unimaginable proportion. Ingraham called Puerto Ricans immigrants. On her radio show, Ingraham said Associate Supreme Court Justice Sotomayor’s “allegiance obviously goes to her [Puerto Rican] immigrant family background and not to the Constitution of the United States. Puerto Ricans are United States Citizens and are NOT immigrants. Didn't O"Bama refer to Puerto Rico as the 57th state. |
Just when you thought...
On Sun, 09 Feb 2014 16:39:25 -0500, HanK wrote:
On 2/9/2014 4:28 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote: ...the stupidity level on Fox News had bottomed out... Laura Ingraham bore even deeper into the depths of stupidity of unimaginable proportion. Ingraham called Puerto Ricans immigrants. On her radio show, Ingraham said Associate Supreme Court Justice Sotomayor’s “allegiance obviously goes to her [Puerto Rican] immigrant family background and not to the Constitution of the United States. Puerto Ricans are United States Citizens and are NOT immigrants. Didn't O"Bama refer to Puerto Rico as the 57th state. No. |
Just when you thought...
On 2/9/2014 10:21 PM, Gene Kearns wrote:
On Sun, 09 Feb 2014 16:39:25 -0500, HanK wrote: On 2/9/2014 4:28 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote: ...the stupidity level on Fox News had bottomed out... Laura Ingraham bore even deeper into the depths of stupidity of unimaginable proportion. Ingraham called Puerto Ricans immigrants. On her radio show, Ingraham said Associate Supreme Court Justice Sotomayor’s “allegiance obviously goes to her [Puerto Rican] immigrant family background and not to the Constitution of the United States. Puerto Ricans are United States Citizens and are NOT immigrants. Didn't O"Bama refer to Puerto Rico as the 57th state. No. You're right. He didn't. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EpGH02DtIws |
Just when you thought...
|
Just when you thought...
On Sun, 09 Feb 2014 22:32:38 -0500, HanK wrote:
On 2/9/2014 10:21 PM, Gene Kearns wrote: On Sun, 09 Feb 2014 16:39:25 -0500, HanK wrote: On 2/9/2014 4:28 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote: ...the stupidity level on Fox News had bottomed out... Laura Ingraham bore even deeper into the depths of stupidity of unimaginable proportion. Ingraham called Puerto Ricans immigrants. On her radio show, Ingraham said Associate Supreme Court Justice Sotomayor’s “allegiance obviously goes to her [Puerto Rican] immigrant family background and not to the Constitution of the United States. Puerto Ricans are United States Citizens and are NOT immigrants. Didn't O"Bama refer to Puerto Rico as the 57th state. No. You're right. He didn't. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EpGH02DtIws Maybe Puerto Rico was the 'one left to go', which would make it the 58th. |
Just when you thought...
On Mon, 10 Feb 2014 05:03:26 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote:
On 2/10/14, 12:30 AM, wrote: On Sun, 09 Feb 2014 16:28:14 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote: ...the stupidity level on Fox News had bottomed out... Laura Ingraham bore even deeper into the depths of stupidity of unimaginable proportion. Ingraham called Puerto Ricans immigrants. On her radio show, Ingraham said Associate Supreme Court Justice Sotomayor’s “allegiance obviously goes to her [Puerto Rican] immigrant family background and not to the Constitution of the United States. Puerto Ricans are United States Citizens and are NOT immigrants. Immigration is defined as "To enter and settle in a country or region to which one is not native." It says nothing about citizenship. New Yorkers are immigrating to Texas. (and are just about as welcome) Whoosh. Diarrhea? Greg just showed Laura was correct. That went over your head? I don't think so. |
Just when you thought...
On 2/10/2014 5:03 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 2/10/14, 12:30 AM, wrote: On Sun, 09 Feb 2014 16:28:14 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote: ...the stupidity level on Fox News had bottomed out... Laura Ingraham bore even deeper into the depths of stupidity of unimaginable proportion. Ingraham called Puerto Ricans immigrants. On her radio show, Ingraham said Associate Supreme Court Justice Sotomayor’s “allegiance obviously goes to her [Puerto Rican] immigrant family background and not to the Constitution of the United States. Puerto Ricans are United States Citizens and are NOT immigrants. Immigration is defined as "To enter and settle in a country or region to which one is not native." It says nothing about citizenship. New Yorkers are immigrating to Texas. (and are just about as welcome) Whoosh. The sound made by Greg's enlightening post as it passes by your ear. "Whoosh" |
Just when you thought...
On 2/10/2014 6:55 AM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Sun, 09 Feb 2014 22:32:38 -0500, HanK wrote: On 2/9/2014 10:21 PM, Gene Kearns wrote: On Sun, 09 Feb 2014 16:39:25 -0500, HanK wrote: On 2/9/2014 4:28 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote: ...the stupidity level on Fox News had bottomed out... Laura Ingraham bore even deeper into the depths of stupidity of unimaginable proportion. Ingraham called Puerto Ricans immigrants. On her radio show, Ingraham said Associate Supreme Court Justice Sotomayor’s “allegiance obviously goes to her [Puerto Rican] immigrant family background and not to the Constitution of the United States. Puerto Ricans are United States Citizens and are NOT immigrants. Didn't O"Bama refer to Puerto Rico as the 57th state. No. You're right. He didn't. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EpGH02DtIws Maybe Puerto Rico was the 'one left to go', which would make it the 58th. Laura would never be dumb enough to make that mistake. |
Just when you thought...
On 2/10/2014 6:57 AM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Mon, 10 Feb 2014 05:03:26 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 2/10/14, 12:30 AM, wrote: On Sun, 09 Feb 2014 16:28:14 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote: ...the stupidity level on Fox News had bottomed out... Laura Ingraham bore even deeper into the depths of stupidity of unimaginable proportion. Ingraham called Puerto Ricans immigrants. On her radio show, Ingraham said Associate Supreme Court Justice Sotomayor’s “allegiance obviously goes to her [Puerto Rican] immigrant family background and not to the Constitution of the United States. Puerto Ricans are United States Citizens and are NOT immigrants. Immigration is defined as "To enter and settle in a country or region to which one is not native." It says nothing about citizenship. New Yorkers are immigrating to Texas. (and are just about as welcome) Whoosh. Diarrhea? Greg just showed Laura was correct. That went over your head? I don't think so. The thing is, property and home owners have rights too. They also have responsibilities that go along with those rights. In many cases a location is selected to rent or purchase a home based upon the school system, and general quality of life in which to raise a family. Having to tip-toe around homeless people living in cardboard boxes is not what they are paying taxes for. The homeless have to accept some level of responsibility to get help to improve their lot in life. Help is available in many areas and provided by tax funded federal and state government programs, private organizations and church based shelters that offer a warm place to stay with employment, health and training assistance. One of the problems that exists is that a large percentage of homeless individuals *do not* want to take advantage of these facilities or to even get help. Drug addicts and alcoholics make up a higher proportion of the homeless than do the mentally ill or other subgroups and many homeless are in that position *because* of drug addiction or alcoholism. Like a drug addict or alcoholic, they must first *want* to get help. |
Just when you thought...
On Mon, 10 Feb 2014 07:30:43 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote:
On 2/10/2014 6:57 AM, Poco Loco wrote: On Mon, 10 Feb 2014 05:03:26 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 2/10/14, 12:30 AM, wrote: On Sun, 09 Feb 2014 16:28:14 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote: ...the stupidity level on Fox News had bottomed out... Laura Ingraham bore even deeper into the depths of stupidity of unimaginable proportion. Ingraham called Puerto Ricans immigrants. On her radio show, Ingraham said Associate Supreme Court Justice Sotomayor’s “allegiance obviously goes to her [Puerto Rican] immigrant family background and not to the Constitution of the United States. Puerto Ricans are United States Citizens and are NOT immigrants. Immigration is defined as "To enter and settle in a country or region to which one is not native." It says nothing about citizenship. New Yorkers are immigrating to Texas. (and are just about as welcome) Whoosh. Diarrhea? Greg just showed Laura was correct. That went over your head? I don't think so. The thing is, property and home owners have rights too. They also have responsibilities that go along with those rights. In many cases a location is selected to rent or purchase a home based upon the school system, and general quality of life in which to raise a family. Having to tip-toe around homeless people living in cardboard boxes is not what they are paying taxes for. The homeless have to accept some level of responsibility to get help to improve their lot in life. Help is available in many areas and provided by tax funded federal and state government programs, private organizations and church based shelters that offer a warm place to stay with employment, health and training assistance. One of the problems that exists is that a large percentage of homeless individuals *do not* want to take advantage of these facilities or to even get help. Drug addicts and alcoholics make up a higher proportion of the homeless than do the mentally ill or other subgroups and many homeless are in that position *because* of drug addiction or alcoholism. Like a drug addict or alcoholic, they must first *want* to get help. Amen. |
Just when you thought...
On 2/10/14, 6:57 AM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Mon, 10 Feb 2014 05:03:26 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 2/10/14, 12:30 AM, wrote: On Sun, 09 Feb 2014 16:28:14 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote: ...the stupidity level on Fox News had bottomed out... Laura Ingraham bore even deeper into the depths of stupidity of unimaginable proportion. Ingraham called Puerto Ricans immigrants. On her radio show, Ingraham said Associate Supreme Court Justice Sotomayor’s “allegiance obviously goes to her [Puerto Rican] immigrant family background and not to the Constitution of the United States. Puerto Ricans are United States Citizens and are NOT immigrants. Immigration is defined as "To enter and settle in a country or region to which one is not native." It says nothing about citizenship. New Yorkers are immigrating to Texas. (and are just about as welcome) Whoosh. Diarrhea? Greg just showed Laura was correct. That went over your head? I don't think so. Greg is misusing the term. In most common usage, an immigrant is someone who comes into your country from another country. That's how Ingraham was using the term...it was obvious from her hate-filled comment that she thinks Puerto Rico is "another country," and not part of the United States territories, and that Puerto Ricans are American citizens, and not foreigners. And if memory serves, Greg didn't even know the difference between immigrant and emigrant. -- There’s no point crying over spilled 4-Methylcyclohexanemethanol. |
Just when you thought...
On Mon, 10 Feb 2014 07:38:55 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote:
On 2/10/14, 6:57 AM, Poco Loco wrote: On Mon, 10 Feb 2014 05:03:26 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 2/10/14, 12:30 AM, wrote: On Sun, 09 Feb 2014 16:28:14 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote: ...the stupidity level on Fox News had bottomed out... Laura Ingraham bore even deeper into the depths of stupidity of unimaginable proportion. Ingraham called Puerto Ricans immigrants. On her radio show, Ingraham said Associate Supreme Court Justice Sotomayor’s “allegiance obviously goes to her [Puerto Rican] immigrant family background and not to the Constitution of the United States. Puerto Ricans are United States Citizens and are NOT immigrants. Immigration is defined as "To enter and settle in a country or region to which one is not native." It says nothing about citizenship. New Yorkers are immigrating to Texas. (and are just about as welcome) Whoosh. Diarrhea? Greg just showed Laura was correct. That went over your head? I don't think so. Greg is misusing the term. In most common usage, an immigrant is someone who comes into your country from another country. That's how Ingraham was using the term...it was obvious from her hate-filled comment that she thinks Puerto Rico is "another country," and not part of the United States territories, and that Puerto Ricans are American citizens, and not foreigners. And if memory serves, Greg didn't even know the difference between immigrant and emigrant. Uh-huh. How the hell do you know what Laura Ingraham was thinking? Hate filled? Another adjective? So you should have said, "...the depths of hatefilled stupidity of unimaginable proportion..." Greg had it right, even though it may not agree with your 'common usage'. And, I expect Greg knows full well the difference between immigrant and emigrant, and he used the correct word. Maybe you should do a little dictionary work? Eh? |
Just when you thought...
On 2/10/14, 7:30 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 2/10/2014 6:57 AM, Poco Loco wrote: On Mon, 10 Feb 2014 05:03:26 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 2/10/14, 12:30 AM, wrote: On Sun, 09 Feb 2014 16:28:14 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote: ...the stupidity level on Fox News had bottomed out... Laura Ingraham bore even deeper into the depths of stupidity of unimaginable proportion. Ingraham called Puerto Ricans immigrants. On her radio show, Ingraham said Associate Supreme Court Justice Sotomayor’s “allegiance obviously goes to her [Puerto Rican] immigrant family background and not to the Constitution of the United States. Puerto Ricans are United States Citizens and are NOT immigrants. Immigration is defined as "To enter and settle in a country or region to which one is not native." It says nothing about citizenship. New Yorkers are immigrating to Texas. (and are just about as welcome) Whoosh. Diarrhea? Greg just showed Laura was correct. That went over your head? I don't think so. The thing is, property and home owners have rights too. They also have responsibilities that go along with those rights. In many cases a location is selected to rent or purchase a home based upon the school system, and general quality of life in which to raise a family. Having to tip-toe around homeless people living in cardboard boxes is not what they are paying taxes for. The homeless have to accept some level of responsibility to get help to improve their lot in life. Help is available in many areas and provided by tax funded federal and state government programs, private organizations and church based shelters that offer a warm place to stay with employment, health and training assistance. One of the problems that exists is that a large percentage of homeless individuals *do not* want to take advantage of these facilities or to even get help. Drug addicts and alcoholics make up a higher proportion of the homeless than do the mentally ill or other subgroups and many homeless are in that position *because* of drug addiction or alcoholism. Like a drug addict or alcoholic, they must first *want* to get help. You replied to the wrong thread, but, what the hell, this is wrecked.bloats, so... I don't dispute what you are saying. The problem of the homeless is a difficult one. But taking blankets away from the homeless on a cold night is not part of the solution, or shouldn't be. Some other modern countries seem to be doing a better job with their homeless, and taking a more pro-active approach to humanely housing the homeless. -- There’s no point crying over spilled 4-Methylcyclohexanemethanol. |
Just when you thought...
On Mon, 10 Feb 2014 08:02:59 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote:
snip I don't dispute what you are saying. The problem of the homeless is a difficult one. But taking blankets away from the homeless on a cold night is not part of the solution, or shouldn't be. Sure it is, if there are adequate shelters and the goal is to get the homeless off the streets and into the shelters where it is warm. Some other modern countries seem to be doing a better job with their homeless, and taking a more pro-active approach to humanely housing the homeless. Do those 'modern countries' have more shelters per indigent than Pensacola? Or is this just another one of your 'USA putdowns'? |
Just when you thought...
On 2/10/14, 8:14 AM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Mon, 10 Feb 2014 08:02:59 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote: snip I don't dispute what you are saying. The problem of the homeless is a difficult one. But taking blankets away from the homeless on a cold night is not part of the solution, or shouldn't be. Sure it is, if there are adequate shelters and the goal is to get the homeless off the streets and into the shelters where it is warm. Ahh, so you have current knowledge, verified, of course, of the shelter situation in Pensacola and the status of the homeless there. Good for you. Go get those blankets! -- Sarah Palin is watching the Sochi Olympic Games from the front porch of her house. |
Just when you thought...
On 2/10/2014 8:02 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 2/10/14, 7:30 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 2/10/2014 6:57 AM, Poco Loco wrote: On Mon, 10 Feb 2014 05:03:26 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 2/10/14, 12:30 AM, wrote: On Sun, 09 Feb 2014 16:28:14 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote: ...the stupidity level on Fox News had bottomed out... Laura Ingraham bore even deeper into the depths of stupidity of unimaginable proportion. Ingraham called Puerto Ricans immigrants. On her radio show, Ingraham said Associate Supreme Court Justice Sotomayor’s “allegiance obviously goes to her [Puerto Rican] immigrant family background and not to the Constitution of the United States. Puerto Ricans are United States Citizens and are NOT immigrants. Immigration is defined as "To enter and settle in a country or region to which one is not native." It says nothing about citizenship. New Yorkers are immigrating to Texas. (and are just about as welcome) Whoosh. Diarrhea? Greg just showed Laura was correct. That went over your head? I don't think so. The thing is, property and home owners have rights too. They also have responsibilities that go along with those rights. In many cases a location is selected to rent or purchase a home based upon the school system, and general quality of life in which to raise a family. Having to tip-toe around homeless people living in cardboard boxes is not what they are paying taxes for. The homeless have to accept some level of responsibility to get help to improve their lot in life. Help is available in many areas and provided by tax funded federal and state government programs, private organizations and church based shelters that offer a warm place to stay with employment, health and training assistance. One of the problems that exists is that a large percentage of homeless individuals *do not* want to take advantage of these facilities or to even get help. Drug addicts and alcoholics make up a higher proportion of the homeless than do the mentally ill or other subgroups and many homeless are in that position *because* of drug addiction or alcoholism. Like a drug addict or alcoholic, they must first *want* to get help. You replied to the wrong thread, but, what the hell, this is wrecked.bloats, so... I don't dispute what you are saying. The problem of the homeless is a difficult one. But taking blankets away from the homeless on a cold night is not part of the solution, or shouldn't be. Some other modern countries seem to be doing a better job with their homeless, and taking a more pro-active approach to humanely housing the homeless. Yeah, I realized it was the wrong thread after I hit the "send" key. I was reading about Puerto Rico (having lived there for two years) but was still thinking about the homeless issue. |
Just when you thought...
On Mon, 10 Feb 2014 08:22:23 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote:
On 2/10/14, 8:14 AM, Poco Loco wrote: On Mon, 10 Feb 2014 08:02:59 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote: snip I don't dispute what you are saying. The problem of the homeless is a difficult one. But taking blankets away from the homeless on a cold night is not part of the solution, or shouldn't be. Sure it is, if there are adequate shelters and the goal is to get the homeless off the streets and into the shelters where it is warm. Ahh, so you have current knowledge, verified, of course, of the shelter situation in Pensacola and the status of the homeless there. Good for you. Go get those blankets! Did you miss the word 'if', Harry? My, my. I've already posted a link to the homeless shelters available in Pensacola. Bunches of them. |
Just when you thought...
On 2/10/14, 10:24 AM, wrote:
On Mon, 10 Feb 2014 05:03:26 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 2/10/14, 12:30 AM, wrote: On Sun, 09 Feb 2014 16:28:14 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote: ...the stupidity level on Fox News had bottomed out... Laura Ingraham bore even deeper into the depths of stupidity of unimaginable proportion. Ingraham called Puerto Ricans immigrants. On her radio show, Ingraham said Associate Supreme Court Justice Sotomayor’s “allegiance obviously goes to her [Puerto Rican] immigrant family background and not to the Constitution of the United States. Puerto Ricans are United States Citizens and are NOT immigrants. Immigration is defined as "To enter and settle in a country or region to which one is not native." It says nothing about citizenship. New Yorkers are immigrating to Texas. (and are just about as welcome) Whoosh. You hate it when you are wrong don't you mr liberal arts graduate. No, I'm not. And New Yorkers may be emigrating to Texas or immigrating into Texas, but they are not immigrating *to* Texas, Mr. Non College Graduate. -- Sarah Palin is watching the Sochi Olympic Games from the front porch of her house. |
Just when you thought...
On 2/10/14, 10:30 AM, wrote:
On Mon, 10 Feb 2014 07:38:55 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote: Greg is misusing the term. In most common usage, an immigrant is someone who comes into your country from another country. That's how Ingraham was using the term...it was obvious from her hate-filled comment that she thinks Puerto Rico is "another country," and not part of the United States territories, and that Puerto Ricans are American citizens, and not foreigners. And if memory serves, Greg didn't even know the difference between immigrant and emigrant. I pasted the definition straight from the dictionary. I can't help it if you have been misusing the term. Then you compound the error when you bring up Emigrant. http://www.wisegeek.org/what-is-the-....htm#slideshow Your cite explains what emigration and immigration are. Try reading for content. -- Sarah Palin is watching the Sochi Olympic Games from the front porch of her house. |
Just when you thought...
|
Just when you thought...
On Mon, 10 Feb 2014 10:37:49 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote:
On 2/10/14, 10:34 AM, wrote: On Mon, 10 Feb 2014 08:22:23 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 2/10/14, 8:14 AM, Poco Loco wrote: On Mon, 10 Feb 2014 08:02:59 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote: snip I don't dispute what you are saying. The problem of the homeless is a difficult one. But taking blankets away from the homeless on a cold night is not part of the solution, or shouldn't be. Sure it is, if there are adequate shelters and the goal is to get the homeless off the streets and into the shelters where it is warm. Ahh, so you have current knowledge, verified, of course, of the shelter situation in Pensacola and the status of the homeless there. Good for you. Go get those blankets! It is clear this was just thread leak. BTW Nevada has the best plan and maybe Florida should adopt it. They simply pay the homeless people to move to California. Why is that the best plan? It gets them out of Nevada and sends them to a state well known for taking care of the unemployed. |
Just when you thought...
On 2/10/2014 7:35 AM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Mon, 10 Feb 2014 07:30:43 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: On 2/10/2014 6:57 AM, Poco Loco wrote: On Mon, 10 Feb 2014 05:03:26 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 2/10/14, 12:30 AM, wrote: On Sun, 09 Feb 2014 16:28:14 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote: ...the stupidity level on Fox News had bottomed out... Laura Ingraham bore even deeper into the depths of stupidity of unimaginable proportion. Ingraham called Puerto Ricans immigrants. On her radio show, Ingraham said Associate Supreme Court Justice Sotomayor’s “allegiance obviously goes to her [Puerto Rican] immigrant family background and not to the Constitution of the United States. Puerto Ricans are United States Citizens and are NOT immigrants. Immigration is defined as "To enter and settle in a country or region to which one is not native." It says nothing about citizenship. New Yorkers are immigrating to Texas. (and are just about as welcome) Whoosh. Diarrhea? Greg just showed Laura was correct. That went over your head? I don't think so. The thing is, property and home owners have rights too. They also have responsibilities that go along with those rights. In many cases a location is selected to rent or purchase a home based upon the school system, and general quality of life in which to raise a family. Having to tip-toe around homeless people living in cardboard boxes is not what they are paying taxes for. The homeless have to accept some level of responsibility to get help to improve their lot in life. Help is available in many areas and provided by tax funded federal and state government programs, private organizations and church based shelters that offer a warm place to stay with employment, health and training assistance. One of the problems that exists is that a large percentage of homeless individuals *do not* want to take advantage of these facilities or to even get help. Drug addicts and alcoholics make up a higher proportion of the homeless than do the mentally ill or other subgroups and many homeless are in that position *because* of drug addiction or alcoholism. Like a drug addict or alcoholic, they must first *want* to get help. Amen. Harry should round up a hundred or so of them and set up a tent city on his lawn. He could feed them and hand out blankets while his bride counsels them. Southern Maryland is beginning to have a homeless problem of epic proportions. Harry could help deal with it if he wanted to. |
Just when you thought...
In article ,
says... On Mon, 10 Feb 2014 10:37:49 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote: BTW Nevada has the best plan and maybe Florida should adopt it. They simply pay the homeless people to move to California. Why is that the best plan? Because the bleeding hearts in California get to bleed some of their own blood instead of bleeding other people. Those people in Pensacola should give the bums bus tickets to Breezy Point and enough meal/wine money to be sure they can make it there safely. Then you can decide if that blanket ordinance still seems so silly. Why California? Send them the the Florida Keys. http://www.miamiherald.com/2013/08/2...an-stabbed-to- death.html Damn, they must iron skin. The flies and no-seeums in the mangroves will eat you up. |
Just when you thought...
On Monday, February 10, 2014 6:12:58 PM UTC-6, wrote:
Damn, they must iron skin. The flies and no-seeums in the mangroves will eat you up. Sterno is an insect repellant. Lit? or applied directly to the skin.... then lit? |
Just when you thought...
|
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:12 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com