....is what dress, jewelry and hair-do Johnny Weir will be sporting for the LGBTQZ crowd.

Poco Loco wrote:
...is what dress, jewelry and hair-do Johnny Weir will be sporting for the LGBTQZ crowd.

Does not matter. Personal choice. As long as you do not have to pay for
his lifestyle, why concern yourself?

In article 1534629128413669095.270969bmckeenospam-
, says...

Poco Loco wrote:
...is what dress, jewelry and hair-do Johnny Weir will be sporting for the LGBTQZ crowd.

Does not matter. Personal choice. As long as you do not have to pay for
his lifestyle, why concern yourself?

Don't know where that came from. Weird.

On 2/9/14, 1:49 PM, Poco Loco wrote:
...is what dress, jewelry and hair-do Johnny Weir will be sporting for the LGBTQZ crowd.



You sure seem to be interested in what you refer to as the LGBTQZ
crowd...the personalities, the lifestyles, the clothes, et cetera. You
bring it up here a lot. Is your interest a precursor to coming out of
the closet and joining in their fun?



--
There’s no point crying over spilled 4-Methylcyclohexanemethanol.

On Sun, 09 Feb 2014 16:17:20 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 2/9/14, 1:49 PM, Poco Loco wrote:
...is what dress, jewelry and hair-do Johnny Weir will be sporting for the LGBTQZ crowd.



You sure seem to be interested in what you refer to as the LGBTQZ
crowd...the personalities, the lifestyles, the clothes, et cetera. You
bring it up here a lot. Is your interest a precursor to coming out of
the closet and joining in their fun?

I think Weir is cute. Shame he's a man...but then, who knows? Maybe he's one of the 'T' persons.

And what if it *was* a precursor to me coming out of the closet. Would that bother you, Harry dear?
I find it humorous that you folks are so 'pro gay' yet make 'insulting' remarks to others here. You
ever wonder about that? All your comments about 'time in the barrel', Don's comments about condoms
in the 'officer's (sic) shower', would seem to indicate a negative attitude towards gaydom.

But maybe it's just my imagination.

On 2/9/14, 5:17 PM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Sun, 09 Feb 2014 16:17:20 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 2/9/14, 1:49 PM, Poco Loco wrote:
...is what dress, jewelry and hair-do Johnny Weir will be sporting for the LGBTQZ crowd.



You sure seem to be interested in what you refer to as the LGBTQZ
crowd...the personalities, the lifestyles, the clothes, et cetera. You
bring it up here a lot. Is your interest a precursor to coming out of
the closet and joining in their fun?

I think Weir is cute. Shame he's a man...but then, who knows? Maybe he's one of the 'T' persons.

And what if it *was* a precursor to me coming out of the closet. Would that bother you, Harry dear?
I find it humorous that you folks are so 'pro gay' yet make 'insulting' remarks to others here. You
ever wonder about that? All your comments about 'time in the barrel', Don's comments about condoms
in the 'officer's (sic) shower', would seem to indicate a negative attitude towards gaydom.

But maybe it's just my imagination.


All my comments about "time in the barrel"? Say what?

I bring up the subject of gays once in the while when their rights are
extended, or when a loudmouthed anti-gay rightie is outed. You bring up
gays to ridicule them.

Oh, and I am guessing here, but I would think Don's comments about the
"officers' showers" is more a reflection of the disdain he has for you,
rather than any dislike for gays. In any event, Don's snarky comments
are a lot milder than the bile some of you righties cough up here and
spit in the direction of posters you don't like.

--
There’s no point crying over spilled 4-Methylcyclohexanemethanol.

On Sun, 09 Feb 2014 17:29:41 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 2/9/14, 5:17 PM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Sun, 09 Feb 2014 16:17:20 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 2/9/14, 1:49 PM, Poco Loco wrote:
...is what dress, jewelry and hair-do Johnny Weir will be sporting for the LGBTQZ crowd.



You sure seem to be interested in what you refer to as the LGBTQZ
crowd...the personalities, the lifestyles, the clothes, et cetera. You
bring it up here a lot. Is your interest a precursor to coming out of
the closet and joining in their fun?

I think Weir is cute. Shame he's a man...but then, who knows? Maybe he's one of the 'T' persons.

And what if it *was* a precursor to me coming out of the closet. Would that bother you, Harry dear?
I find it humorous that you folks are so 'pro gay' yet make 'insulting' remarks to others here. You
ever wonder about that? All your comments about 'time in the barrel', Don's comments about condoms
in the 'officer's (sic) shower', would seem to indicate a negative attitude towards gaydom.

But maybe it's just my imagination.


All my comments about "time in the barrel"? Say what?

I bring up the subject of gays once in the while when their rights are
extended, or when a loudmouthed anti-gay rightie is outed. You bring up
gays to ridicule them.

Oh, and I am guessing here, but I would think Don's comments about the
"officers' showers" is more a reflection of the disdain he has for you,
rather than any dislike for gays. In any event, Don's snarky comments
are a lot milder than the bile some of you righties cough up here and
spit in the direction of posters you don't like.

Tapety, tapety, tap.

Uh-huh!

On 2/9/2014 6:21 PM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Sun, 09 Feb 2014 17:29:41 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 2/9/14, 5:17 PM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Sun, 09 Feb 2014 16:17:20 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 2/9/14, 1:49 PM, Poco Loco wrote:
...is what dress, jewelry and hair-do Johnny Weir will be sporting for the LGBTQZ crowd.



You sure seem to be interested in what you refer to as the LGBTQZ
crowd...the personalities, the lifestyles, the clothes, et cetera. You
bring it up here a lot. Is your interest a precursor to coming out of
the closet and joining in their fun?

I think Weir is cute. Shame he's a man...but then, who knows? Maybe he's one of the 'T' persons.

And what if it *was* a precursor to me coming out of the closet. Would that bother you, Harry dear?
I find it humorous that you folks are so 'pro gay' yet make 'insulting' remarks to others here. You
ever wonder about that? All your comments about 'time in the barrel', Don's comments about condoms
in the 'officer's (sic) shower', would seem to indicate a negative attitude towards gaydom.

But maybe it's just my imagination.


All my comments about "time in the barrel"? Say what?

I bring up the subject of gays once in the while when their rights are
extended, or when a loudmouthed anti-gay rightie is outed. You bring up
gays to ridicule them.

Oh, and I am guessing here, but I would think Don's comments about the
"officers' showers" is more a reflection of the disdain he has for you,
rather than any dislike for gays. In any event, Don's snarky comments
are a lot milder than the bile some of you righties cough up here and
spit in the direction of posters you don't like.

Tapety, tapety, tap.

Uh-huh!

Harry and his relativity judgements. Snerk

On Sun, 09 Feb 2014 22:29:16 -0500, HanK wrote:

On 2/9/2014 6:21 PM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Sun, 09 Feb 2014 17:29:41 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 2/9/14, 5:17 PM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Sun, 09 Feb 2014 16:17:20 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 2/9/14, 1:49 PM, Poco Loco wrote:
...is what dress, jewelry and hair-do Johnny Weir will be sporting for the LGBTQZ crowd.



You sure seem to be interested in what you refer to as the LGBTQZ
crowd...the personalities, the lifestyles, the clothes, et cetera. You
bring it up here a lot. Is your interest a precursor to coming out of
the closet and joining in their fun?

I think Weir is cute. Shame he's a man...but then, who knows? Maybe he's one of the 'T' persons.

And what if it *was* a precursor to me coming out of the closet. Would that bother you, Harry dear?
I find it humorous that you folks are so 'pro gay' yet make 'insulting' remarks to others here. You
ever wonder about that? All your comments about 'time in the barrel', Don's comments about condoms
in the 'officer's (sic) shower', would seem to indicate a negative attitude towards gaydom.

But maybe it's just my imagination.


All my comments about "time in the barrel"? Say what?

I bring up the subject of gays once in the while when their rights are
extended, or when a loudmouthed anti-gay rightie is outed. You bring up
gays to ridicule them.

Oh, and I am guessing here, but I would think Don's comments about the
"officers' showers" is more a reflection of the disdain he has for you,
rather than any dislike for gays. In any event, Don's snarky comments
are a lot milder than the bile some of you righties cough up here and
spit in the direction of posters you don't like.

Tapety, tapety, tap.

Uh-huh!

Harry and his relativity judgements. Snerk

It's funny. Intimating that folks here are gay is a big put-down tool for them, yet they're all for
the rights of gaydom.

On 2/10/14, 6:59 AM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Sun, 09 Feb 2014 22:29:16 -0500, HanK wrote:

On 2/9/2014 6:21 PM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Sun, 09 Feb 2014 17:29:41 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 2/9/14, 5:17 PM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Sun, 09 Feb 2014 16:17:20 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 2/9/14, 1:49 PM, Poco Loco wrote:
...is what dress, jewelry and hair-do Johnny Weir will be sporting for the LGBTQZ crowd.



You sure seem to be interested in what you refer to as the LGBTQZ
crowd...the personalities, the lifestyles, the clothes, et cetera. You
bring it up here a lot. Is your interest a precursor to coming out of
the closet and joining in their fun?

I think Weir is cute. Shame he's a man...but then, who knows? Maybe he's one of the 'T' persons.

And what if it *was* a precursor to me coming out of the closet. Would that bother you, Harry dear?
I find it humorous that you folks are so 'pro gay' yet make 'insulting' remarks to others here. You
ever wonder about that? All your comments about 'time in the barrel', Don's comments about condoms
in the 'officer's (sic) shower', would seem to indicate a negative attitude towards gaydom.

But maybe it's just my imagination.


All my comments about "time in the barrel"? Say what?

I bring up the subject of gays once in the while when their rights are
extended, or when a loudmouthed anti-gay rightie is outed. You bring up
gays to ridicule them.

Oh, and I am guessing here, but I would think Don's comments about the
"officers' showers" is more a reflection of the disdain he has for you,
rather than any dislike for gays. In any event, Don's snarky comments
are a lot milder than the bile some of you righties cough up here and
spit in the direction of posters you don't like.

Tapety, tapety, tap.

Uh-huh!

Harry and his relativity judgements. Snerk

It's funny. Intimating that folks here are gay is a big put-down tool for them, yet they're all for
the rights of gaydom.


What's funny is how much dancing on the head of a pin many righties go
through after someone calls them out on their direct or subtle racism,
homophobia, sexism, et cetera.

It's obvious from your years of comments here that you don't like gays,
blacks, Latinos, or, in fact, pretty much any other group that isn't
white and male. You may have or may claim to have "friends" in these
groups, and maybe you do, but your hatred for these groups shows
through, and your fellow righties here who come to your defense on these
matters only prove it more.

--
There’s no point crying over spilled 4-Methylcyclohexanemethanol.