Good News for Infants!
 

http://tinyurl.com/kfwnoz8

Now, if they'd add free morning after pills to the mix, maybe everyone would be happier.

Good News for Infants!
 

On Mon, 03 Feb 2014 10:25:05 -0500, Poco Loco
wrote:

http://tinyurl.com/kfwnoz8

Now, if they'd add free morning after pills to the mix, maybe everyone would be happier.

===

I'm happy to see you advocating reasonable solutions like that. I
wish there were more like you.

Good News for Infants!
 

On 2/3/2014 1:20 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Mon, 03 Feb 2014 10:25:05 -0500, Poco Loco
wrote:

http://tinyurl.com/kfwnoz8

Now, if they'd add free morning after pills to the mix, maybe everyone would be happier.

===

I'm happy to see you advocating reasonable solutions like that. I
wish there were more like you.


Where are you looking.. There are lots of us. Problem is, there are too
many who feel that if you are not for abortion up till two weeks after
birth, are considered, right wing nuts....

Good News for Infants!
 

On Monday, February 3, 2014 12:26:03 PM UTC-6, KC wrote:
On 2/3/2014 1:20 PM, Wayne.B wrote:

On Mon, 03 Feb 2014 10:25:05 -0500, Poco Loco

wrote:



http://tinyurl.com/kfwnoz8



Now, if they'd add free morning after pills to the mix, maybe everyone would be happier.



===



I'm happy to see you advocating reasonable solutions like that. I

wish there were more like you.





Where are you looking.. There are lots of us. Problem is, there are too

many who feel that if you are not for abortion up till two weeks after

birth, are considered, right wing nuts....

AND you're involved in some kind of an imaginary 'war on women'

?;^)

Good News for Infants!
 

On Mon, 3 Feb 2014 14:38:31 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote:

On Monday, February 3, 2014 12:26:03 PM UTC-6, KC wrote:
On 2/3/2014 1:20 PM, Wayne.B wrote:

On Mon, 03 Feb 2014 10:25:05 -0500, Poco Loco

wrote:



http://tinyurl.com/kfwnoz8



Now, if they'd add free morning after pills to the mix, maybe everyone would be happier.



===



I'm happy to see you advocating reasonable solutions like that. I

wish there were more like you.





Where are you looking.. There are lots of us. Problem is, there are too

many who feel that if you are not for abortion up till two weeks after

birth, are considered, right wing nuts....

AND you're involved in some kind of an imaginary 'war on women'

?;^)

'War on women' is another buzz phrase the left is throwing out for the consumption of fools who
believe whatever they hear. The problem is that 90% of the liberals fall into that mold.

It's no wonder the left wants to keep the population uneducated as much as possible.

Good News for Infants!
 

On 2/4/14, 8:33 AM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Mon, 3 Feb 2014 14:38:31 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote:

On Monday, February 3, 2014 12:26:03 PM UTC-6, KC wrote:
On 2/3/2014 1:20 PM, Wayne.B wrote:

On Mon, 03 Feb 2014 10:25:05 -0500, Poco Loco

wrote:



http://tinyurl.com/kfwnoz8



Now, if they'd add free morning after pills to the mix, maybe everyone would be happier.



===



I'm happy to see you advocating reasonable solutions like that. I

wish there were more like you.





Where are you looking.. There are lots of us. Problem is, there are too

many who feel that if you are not for abortion up till two weeks after

birth, are considered, right wing nuts....

AND you're involved in some kind of an imaginary 'war on women'

?;^)

'War on women' is another buzz phrase the left is throwing out for the consumption of fools who
believe whatever they hear. The problem is that 90% of the liberals fall into that mold.

It's no wonder the left wants to keep the population uneducated as much as possible.



Snerk. The GOPers claim there is no GOP war on women. That is hilarious
b.s.

--
There’s no point crying over spilled 4-Methylcyclohexanemethanol.

Good News for Infants!
 

On 2/4/2014 8:39 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 2/4/14, 8:33 AM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Mon, 3 Feb 2014 14:38:31 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote:

On Monday, February 3, 2014 12:26:03 PM UTC-6, KC wrote:
On 2/3/2014 1:20 PM, Wayne.B wrote:

On Mon, 03 Feb 2014 10:25:05 -0500, Poco Loco

wrote:



http://tinyurl.com/kfwnoz8



Now, if they'd add free morning after pills to the mix, maybe
everyone would be happier.



===



I'm happy to see you advocating reasonable solutions like that. I

wish there were more like you.





Where are you looking.. There are lots of us. Problem is, there are too

many who feel that if you are not for abortion up till two weeks after

birth, are considered, right wing nuts....

AND you're involved in some kind of an imaginary 'war on women'

?;^)

'War on women' is another buzz phrase the left is throwing out for the
consumption of fools who
believe whatever they hear. The problem is that 90% of the liberals
fall into that mold.

It's no wonder the left wants to keep the population uneducated as
much as possible.



Snerk. The GOPers claim there is no GOP war on women. That is hilarious
b.s.



It's nothing more than a phrase coined by the left to further the
progressive agenda or to counter the opposing points of view of the
right. Intellectual dishonesty at it's height.

Good News for Infants!
 

On 2/4/14, 9:00 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 2/4/2014 8:39 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 2/4/14, 8:33 AM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Mon, 3 Feb 2014 14:38:31 -0800 (PST), Tim
wrote:

On Monday, February 3, 2014 12:26:03 PM UTC-6, KC wrote:
On 2/3/2014 1:20 PM, Wayne.B wrote:

On Mon, 03 Feb 2014 10:25:05 -0500, Poco Loco

wrote:



http://tinyurl.com/kfwnoz8



Now, if they'd add free morning after pills to the mix, maybe
everyone would be happier.



===



I'm happy to see you advocating reasonable solutions like that. I

wish there were more like you.





Where are you looking.. There are lots of us. Problem is, there are
too

many who feel that if you are not for abortion up till two weeks after

birth, are considered, right wing nuts....

AND you're involved in some kind of an imaginary 'war on women'

?;^)

'War on women' is another buzz phrase the left is throwing out for the
consumption of fools who
believe whatever they hear. The problem is that 90% of the liberals
fall into that mold.

It's no wonder the left wants to keep the population uneducated as
much as possible.



Snerk. The GOPers claim there is no GOP war on women. That is hilarious
b.s.



It's nothing more than a phrase coined by the left to further the
progressive agenda or to counter the opposing points of view of the
right. Intellectual dishonesty at it's height.



When you force or try to force women into unnecessary procedures, when
you make it impossible or very difficult to obtain abortions, when you
try to restric access to birth control, when you refuse to endorse equal
pay for equal work, you are waging a war on women. Period.

--
There’s no point crying over spilled 4-Methylcyclohexanemethanol.

Good News for Infants!
 

On 2/4/2014 9:00 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 2/4/2014 8:39 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 2/4/14, 8:33 AM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Mon, 3 Feb 2014 14:38:31 -0800 (PST), Tim
wrote:

On Monday, February 3, 2014 12:26:03 PM UTC-6, KC wrote:
On 2/3/2014 1:20 PM, Wayne.B wrote:

On Mon, 03 Feb 2014 10:25:05 -0500, Poco Loco

wrote:



http://tinyurl.com/kfwnoz8



Now, if they'd add free morning after pills to the mix, maybe
everyone would be happier.



===



I'm happy to see you advocating reasonable solutions like that. I

wish there were more like you.





Where are you looking.. There are lots of us. Problem is, there are
too

many who feel that if you are not for abortion up till two weeks after

birth, are considered, right wing nuts....

AND you're involved in some kind of an imaginary 'war on women'

?;^)

'War on women' is another buzz phrase the left is throwing out for the
consumption of fools who
believe whatever they hear. The problem is that 90% of the liberals
fall into that mold.

It's no wonder the left wants to keep the population uneducated as
much as possible.



Snerk. The GOPers claim there is no GOP war on women. That is hilarious
b.s.



It's nothing more than a phrase coined by the left to further the
progressive agenda or to counter the opposing points of view of the
right. Intellectual dishonesty at it's height.



Why is it then that so many dems, across the board, are ok with
perpetrating the lie? Do they just across the board, have no moral core
or decency?

Good News for Infants!
 

On 2/4/2014 9:11 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 2/4/14, 9:00 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 2/4/2014 8:39 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 2/4/14, 8:33 AM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Mon, 3 Feb 2014 14:38:31 -0800 (PST), Tim
wrote:

On Monday, February 3, 2014 12:26:03 PM UTC-6, KC wrote:
On 2/3/2014 1:20 PM, Wayne.B wrote:

On Mon, 03 Feb 2014 10:25:05 -0500, Poco Loco

wrote:



http://tinyurl.com/kfwnoz8



Now, if they'd add free morning after pills to the mix, maybe
everyone would be happier.



===



I'm happy to see you advocating reasonable solutions like that. I

wish there were more like you.





Where are you looking.. There are lots of us. Problem is, there are
too

many who feel that if you are not for abortion up till two weeks
after

birth, are considered, right wing nuts....

AND you're involved in some kind of an imaginary 'war on women'

?;^)

'War on women' is another buzz phrase the left is throwing out for the
consumption of fools who
believe whatever they hear. The problem is that 90% of the liberals
fall into that mold.

It's no wonder the left wants to keep the population uneducated as
much as possible.



Snerk. The GOPers claim there is no GOP war on women. That is hilarious
b.s.



It's nothing more than a phrase coined by the left to further the
progressive agenda or to counter the opposing points of view of the
right. Intellectual dishonesty at it's height.



When you force or try to force women into unnecessary procedures, when
you make it impossible or very difficult to obtain abortions, when you
try to restric access to birth control, when you refuse to endorse equal
pay for equal work, you are waging a war on women. Period.


Right. Or Left. Or whatever. Any political party or person trying to
get elected or retain their seats are going to "wage a war" on women who
represent over 50 percent of the voters. Makes sense. Not.