|
What a great country, eh?
|
What a great country, eh?
On 2/3/14, 11:24 AM, wrote:
On Mon, 03 Feb 2014 05:21:38 -0500, KC wrote: On 2/2/2014 10:39 PM, wrote: I am saying you can and they do not have to include church dogma. I have no problem with religious organizations denying these services in their hospitals and as employers but I don't want them imposing it on everyone else through legislation. Now you are starting to sound like harry.... I don't see the little nuns trying to push their agenda on anybody else, they just don't want to be covered or charged for abortions.... Isn't that what I just said? Be nice. :) -- There’s no point crying over spilled 4-Methylcyclohexanemethanol. |
What a great country, eh?
On 2/3/14, 11:35 AM, wrote:
On Mon, 03 Feb 2014 08:26:54 -0500, Poco Loco wrote: On Sun, 02 Feb 2014 23:01:06 -0500, wrote: On Sun, 02 Feb 2014 13:25:40 -0500, Hank wrote: The women who take advantage of birth control, whether self paid or from some government giveaway, aren't the breeding factories that train their offspring to game the system and generally keep an undesireable element growing and multiplying. That is a bit harsher than what I said because these girls usually did not plan on being pregnant (breeding factories) but once they are they are doomed to a life of poverty and public assistance about 99,99% of the time, particularly if the baby daddy is in the wind, as is usually the case. You all know I am a cheap ******* Getting this girl "un****ed" and back in school is the cheapest thing we can do. It is also best for her, the baby she didn't have and the rest of society. Once she gets in a stable place, with a hubby and job skills she can put the dice back in the cup and throw the family dice again Free morning after pills. OK but free Norplant would be more effective. I would make it a recommendation if not a requirement for anyone on public assistance or drug treatment. And tea party types and ultra conservatives. -- There’s no point crying over spilled 4-Methylcyclohexanemethanol. |
What a great country, eh?
On 2/3/2014 11:24 AM, wrote:
On Mon, 03 Feb 2014 05:21:38 -0500, KC wrote: On 2/2/2014 10:39 PM, wrote: I am saying you can and they do not have to include church dogma. I have no problem with religious organizations denying these services in their hospitals and as employers but I don't want them imposing it on everyone else through legislation. Now you are starting to sound like harry.... I don't see the little nuns trying to push their agenda on anybody else, they just don't want to be covered or charged for abortions.... Isn't that what I just said? I was talking about the "imposing" part.. Imposing what, and the same question we don't bother asking him, show me? |
What a great country, eh?
On 2/3/14, 11:47 AM, KC wrote:
On 2/3/2014 11:24 AM, wrote: On Mon, 03 Feb 2014 05:21:38 -0500, KC wrote: On 2/2/2014 10:39 PM, wrote: I am saying you can and they do not have to include church dogma. I have no problem with religious organizations denying these services in their hospitals and as employers but I don't want them imposing it on everyone else through legislation. Now you are starting to sound like harry.... I don't see the little nuns trying to push their agenda on anybody else, they just don't want to be covered or charged for abortions.... Isn't that what I just said? I was talking about the "imposing" part.. Imposing what, and the same question we don't bother asking him, show me? No one is "imposing" abortions. If you don't want one, don't get one. -- There’s no point crying over spilled 4-Methylcyclohexanemethanol. |
What a great country, eh?
On 2/3/2014 11:30 AM, wrote:
On Mon, 03 Feb 2014 05:23:58 -0500, KC wrote: On 2/2/2014 10:53 PM, wrote: On Sun, 02 Feb 2014 13:11:27 -0500, KC wrote: Some of us just see a viable human being and want to have a discussion as to when it's ok to kill that person... You have no problem when they are 15 and just shot a cop. I am just nipping it in the bud. Wth does that have to do with anything? If you look at who is in prisons, the majority came from families that had an unmarried teenaged mom who was in the welfare system her whole life. If they aborted that first baby and got the girl back in school, there is a far better chance she could have a productive life and not as many criminal kids. So, you think it's ok to premurder someone.. Sounds like a Tom Cruise movie.... No problem, you have the right to think that as crazy as it sounds to me. Either way, back to the point you keep avoiding.. how does me being against killing viable humans for financial reasons, make me only against abortion based on "religious" issues...? |
What a great country, eh?
On 2/3/14, 11:57 AM, wrote:
On Mon, 03 Feb 2014 11:45:26 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 2/3/14, 11:35 AM, wrote: Free morning after pills. OK but free Norplant would be more effective. I would make it a recommendation if not a requirement for anyone on public assistance or drug treatment. And tea party types and ultra conservatives. I don't think they are a big part of the unwed welfare mother problem. Really? From what I have seen of tea party types at DC assemblies, I doubt they would know how to put on a condom. And most welfare recipients are white. -- There’s no point crying over spilled 4-Methylcyclohexanemethanol. |
What a great country, eh?
On 2/3/14, 11:59 AM, wrote:
On Mon, 03 Feb 2014 11:47:27 -0500, KC wrote: On 2/3/2014 11:24 AM, wrote: On Mon, 03 Feb 2014 05:21:38 -0500, KC wrote: On 2/2/2014 10:39 PM, wrote: I am saying you can and they do not have to include church dogma. I have no problem with religious organizations denying these services in their hospitals and as employers but I don't want them imposing it on everyone else through legislation. Now you are starting to sound like harry.... I don't see the little nuns trying to push their agenda on anybody else, they just don't want to be covered or charged for abortions.... Isn't that what I just said? I was talking about the "imposing" part.. Imposing what, and the same question we don't bother asking him, show me? When these groups push legislation that makes everyone follow their pro life policies it "imposing". They are not pro life, they are pro fetus. Once there is a birth, the pro lifers disappear. -- There’s no point crying over spilled 4-Methylcyclohexanemethanol. |
What a great country, eh?
On 2/3/14, 12:02 PM, KC wrote:
On 2/3/2014 11:30 AM, wrote: On Mon, 03 Feb 2014 05:23:58 -0500, KC wrote: On 2/2/2014 10:53 PM, wrote: On Sun, 02 Feb 2014 13:11:27 -0500, KC wrote: Some of us just see a viable human being and want to have a discussion as to when it's ok to kill that person... You have no problem when they are 15 and just shot a cop. I am just nipping it in the bud. Wth does that have to do with anything? If you look at who is in prisons, the majority came from families that had an unmarried teenaged mom who was in the welfare system her whole life. If they aborted that first baby and got the girl back in school, there is a far better chance she could have a productive life and not as many criminal kids. So, you think it's ok to premurder someone.. Sounds like a Tom Cruise movie.... No problem, you have the right to think that as crazy as it sounds to me. Either way, back to the point you keep avoiding.. how does me being against killing viable humans for financial reasons, make me only against abortion based on "religious" issues...? "Pre-murder" !!! Now there is an interesting term. -- There’s no point crying over spilled 4-Methylcyclohexanemethanol. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:06 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com