Shoes of . . .
 

.. . .the Fisherman, retired.

http://tinyurl.com/kvpwwbt

Found these gems in the back of my closet. Provenance indicates they
were worn 2000 years ago by a fellow fishing next to the Sea of Galilee,
but that provenance may be a hoax.

Thinking of selling them on eBay for about $100,000. They're broken in,
they've been in several oceans, they're holy, and they have an original,
never-duplicated aroma.




--

Shoes of . . .
 

"F.O.A.D." wrote:
. . .the Fisherman, retired.

http://tinyurl.com/kvpwwbt

Found these gems in the back of my closet. Provenance indicates they were
worn 2000 years ago by a fellow fishing next to the Sea of Galilee, but
that provenance may be a hoax.

Thinking of selling them on eBay for about $100,000. They're broken in,
they've been in several oceans, they're holy, and they have an original,
never-duplicated aroma.




--

I sea you did not berth your obnoxious behavior in Africa.

Shoes of . . .
 

On Fri, 10 Jan 2014 17:26:08 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

. . .the Fisherman, retired.

http://tinyurl.com/kvpwwbt

Found these gems in the back of my closet. Provenance indicates they
were worn 2000 years ago by a fellow fishing next to the Sea of Galilee,
but that provenance may be a hoax.

Thinking of selling them on eBay for about $100,000. They're broken in,
they've been in several oceans, they're holy, and they have an original,
never-duplicated aroma.

Why start the ****, Harry?
--

Hope you're day is spectacular!

Shoes of . . .
 

Did you really "sea" that Billy?
Just be glad that Harry is back to liven up this near dead newsgroup.

Shoes of . . .
 

On 1/10/14, 6:00 PM, Califbill wrote:
"F.O.A.D." wrote:
. . .the Fisherman, retired.

http://tinyurl.com/kvpwwbt

Found these gems in the back of my closet. Provenance indicates they were
worn 2000 years ago by a fellow fishing next to the Sea of Galilee, but
that provenance may be a hoax.

Thinking of selling them on eBay for about $100,000. They're broken in,
they've been in several oceans, they're holy, and they have an original,
never-duplicated aroma.




--

I sea you did not berth your obnoxious behavior in Africa.



What is obnoxious about the post? I know the shoes smell, but certainly
their aroma hasn't reached you way out there in California.

Shoes of . . .
 

On 1/10/14, 6:03 PM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Fri, 10 Jan 2014 17:26:08 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

. . .the Fisherman, retired.

http://tinyurl.com/kvpwwbt

Found these gems in the back of my closet. Provenance indicates they
were worn 2000 years ago by a fellow fishing next to the Sea of Galilee,
but that provenance may be a hoax.

Thinking of selling them on eBay for about $100,000. They're broken in,
they've been in several oceans, they're holy, and they have an original,
never-duplicated aroma.

Why start the ****, Harry?
--

Hope you're day is spectacular!





What ****?

These are my shoes. I wore them when I went fishing. I have retired from
fishing. Ergo, they are the Shoes of the Fisherman, Retired.

Not only have I worn these shoes while fishing in the Atlantic, Pacific
and Carib, I also wore them while on a trip to northern Israel about six
years ago and, guess what, I likely had them on my feet while we were at
the Sea of Galilee. On the other hand, I didn't fish there.

Earlier today, I noticed that your boy Wayne made a nasty reference to a
poster here, the first I saw upon my return to U.S.A., and, of course,
rec.boats. I must have missed you asking him to "not start the ****."

I haven't made one negative comment so far this year about any other
poster here. I haven't looked through the posts I missed while I was
away, but I wonder, can you make the same claim?

Shoes of . . .
 

True North wrote:
Just be glad that Harry is back to liven up this near dead newsgroup.
It was peaceful and on-topic. Even you were mostly well-behaved. Now
you are happy for it to return to a cesspool of politics and name-calling?

Shoes of . . .
 

On 1/10/14, 6:05 PM, True North wrote:
Did you really "sea" that Billy?
Just be glad that Harry is back to liven up this near dead newsgroup.



Oh, I think I'll leave that task to the usual suspects on the right who
I notice are already engaging in that game here this year.

Shoes of . . .
 

On Fri, 10 Jan 2014 18:17:42 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

Earlier today, I noticed that your boy Wayne made a nasty reference to a
poster here, the first I saw upon my return to U.S.A., and, of course,
rec.boats.

===

Not just any "poster", most specifically directed at you. Your kill
file must be leaking again. So how are the Feds doing with that
Fraudulent Conveyance investigation? Those guys can be really tough
once they get on the trail. Hope your wife doesn't get dragged into
it as an accessory or co-conspirator.

If I were you, and carrying around all of that baggage, I'd keep a
much lower profile.

Shoes of . . .
 

On 1/10/14, 9:25 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Fri, 10 Jan 2014 18:17:42 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

Earlier today, I noticed that your boy Wayne made a nasty reference to a
poster here, the first I saw upon my return to U.S.A., and, of course,
rec.boats.

===

Not just any "poster", most specifically directed at you. Your kill
file must be leaking again. So how are the Feds doing with that
Fraudulent Conveyance investigation? Those guys can be really tough
once they get on the trail. Hope your wife doesn't get dragged into
it as an accessory or co-conspirator.

If I were you, and carrying around all of that baggage, I'd keep a
much lower profile.



There are no leaks in the septic tank; earlier today I stated here I
took the cover off for most, but not all, of the right-wing posters. I
also stated that for the moment I wasn't going to engage in the
right-wing games here. Obviously, you are one of those who can't seem to
get along without exhibiting your personal nastiness, and I'm sure that
some of your buds here can't get along with it, either.

Have a nice day.

Shoes of . . .
 

Poco Loco wrote:
"F.O.A.D." wrote:

. . .the Fisherman, retired.

http://tinyurl.com/kvpwwbt

Found these gems in the back of my closet. Provenance indicates they
were worn 2000 years ago by a fellow fishing next to the Sea of Galilee,
but that provenance may be a hoax.

Thinking of selling them on eBay for about $100,000. They're broken in,
they've been in several oceans, they're holy, and they have an original,
never-duplicated aroma.

Why start the ****, Harry?

Wow, talk about sensitive...

Why go out of your way to look for trouble?

Shoes of . . .
 

"F.O.A.D." wrote:
On 1/10/14, 6:03 PM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Fri, 10 Jan 2014 17:26:08 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

. . .the Fisherman, retired.

http://tinyurl.com/kvpwwbt

Found these gems in the back of my closet. Provenance indicates they
were worn 2000 years ago by a fellow fishing next to the Sea of Galilee,
but that provenance may be a hoax.

Thinking of selling them on eBay for about $100,000. They're broken in,
they've been in several oceans, they're holy, and they have an original,
never-duplicated aroma.

Why start the ****, Harry?
--

Hope you're day is spectacular!





What ****?

These are my shoes. I wore them when I went fishing. I have retired from
fishing. Ergo, they are the Shoes of the Fisherman, Retired.

Not only have I worn these shoes while fishing in the Atlantic, Pacific
and Carib, I also wore them while on a trip to northern Israel about six
years ago and, guess what, I likely had them on my feet while we were at
the Sea of Galilee. On the other hand, I didn't fish there.

Earlier today, I noticed that your boy Wayne made a nasty reference to a
poster here, the first I saw upon my return to U.S.A., and, of course,
rec.boats. I must have missed you asking him to "not start the ****."

I haven't made one negative comment so far this year about any other
poster here. I haven't looked through the posts I missed while I was
away, but I wonder, can you make the same claim?

2000 years ago? Not just the shoes stink.

Shoes of . . .
 

True North wrote:
Did you really "sea" that Billy?
Just be glad that Harry is back to liven up this near dead newsgroup.

You should have paid attention in school. Wanted somewhat boat centric.

Shoes of . . .
 

On 1/11/14, 12:38 AM, Califbill wrote:
"F.O.A.D." wrote:
On 1/10/14, 6:03 PM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Fri, 10 Jan 2014 17:26:08 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

. . .the Fisherman, retired.

http://tinyurl.com/kvpwwbt

Found these gems in the back of my closet. Provenance indicates they
were worn 2000 years ago by a fellow fishing next to the Sea of Galilee,
but that provenance may be a hoax.

Thinking of selling them on eBay for about $100,000. They're broken in,
they've been in several oceans, they're holy, and they have an original,
never-duplicated aroma.

Why start the ****, Harry?
--

Hope you're day is spectacular!





What ****?

These are my shoes. I wore them when I went fishing. I have retired from
fishing. Ergo, they are the Shoes of the Fisherman, Retired.

Not only have I worn these shoes while fishing in the Atlantic, Pacific
and Carib, I also wore them while on a trip to northern Israel about six
years ago and, guess what, I likely had them on my feet while we were at
the Sea of Galilee. On the other hand, I didn't fish there.

Earlier today, I noticed that your boy Wayne made a nasty reference to a
poster here, the first I saw upon my return to U.S.A., and, of course,
rec.boats. I must have missed you asking him to "not start the ****."

I haven't made one negative comment so far this year about any other
poster here. I haven't looked through the posts I missed while I was
away, but I wonder, can you make the same claim?

2000 years ago? Not just the shoes stink.


I'm sorry for you.

http://www.youtube.com/results?searc...r+old+man&sm=1

--
I’ll be delighted to stop my war on religion when the Republicans stop
their war on women, workers, unions, teachers, textbooks, gays, voting
rights, minorities, science, the environment, the separation of church
and state, the poor, the unemployed, the middle class, common decency
and common sense.

Shoes of . . .
 

On Fri, 10 Jan 2014 19:37:01 -0800, thumper wrote:

Poco Loco wrote:
"F.O.A.D." wrote:

. . .the Fisherman, retired.

http://tinyurl.com/kvpwwbt

Found these gems in the back of my closet. Provenance indicates they
were worn 2000 years ago by a fellow fishing next to the Sea of Galilee,
but that provenance may be a hoax.

Thinking of selling them on eBay for about $100,000. They're broken in,
they've been in several oceans, they're holy, and they have an original,
never-duplicated aroma.

Why start the ****, Harry?

Wow, talk about sensitive...

Why go out of your way to look for trouble?

Keep reading, Thumper. I suppose Harry's thinly disguised religious sarcasm, part of his 'war on
religion' (in his own words), went over your head.
--

Hope you're day is spectacular!

Shoes of . . .
 

On 1/11/14, 8:49 AM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Fri, 10 Jan 2014 19:37:01 -0800, thumper wrote:

Poco Loco wrote:
"F.O.A.D." wrote:

. . .the Fisherman, retired.

http://tinyurl.com/kvpwwbt

Found these gems in the back of my closet. Provenance indicates they
were worn 2000 years ago by a fellow fishing next to the Sea of Galilee,
but that provenance may be a hoax.

Thinking of selling them on eBay for about $100,000. They're broken in,
they've been in several oceans, they're holy, and they have an original,
never-duplicated aroma.

Why start the ****, Harry?

Wow, talk about sensitive...

Why go out of your way to look for trouble?

Keep reading, Thumper. I suppose Harry's thinly disguised religious sarcasm, part of his 'war on
religion' (in his own words), went over your head.
--

Hope you're day is spectacular!


I've got those shoes up for sale in a post on FB, and so far, I've
received six bids, with the highest, as of last night, at a quarter.

It is possible, but not likely, they were worn by a 2000-year-old man.

http://www.youtube.com/results?searc...r+old+man&sm=1

Shoes of . . .
 

On 1/11/2014 8:12 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
I’ll be delighted to stop my war on religion when the Republicans stop
their war on women, workers, unions, teachers, textbooks, gays, voting
rights, minorities, science, the environment, the separation of church
and state, the poor, the unemployed, the middle class, common decency
and common sense.

pompous asshole!

Shoes of . . .
 

On 1/11/2014 5:49 AM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Fri, 10 Jan 2014 19:37:01 -0800, thumper wrote:
Poco Loco wrote:

Why start the ****, Harry?

Wow, talk about sensitive...

Why go out of your way to look for trouble?

Keep reading, Thumper. I suppose Harry's thinly disguised religious sarcasm, part of his 'war on
religion' (in his own words), went over your head.

More evident is your hyper-sensitivity, how about giving it a break.

Shoes of . . .
 

On 1/11/14, 1:23 PM, thumper wrote:
On 1/11/2014 5:49 AM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Fri, 10 Jan 2014 19:37:01 -0800, thumper wrote:
Poco Loco wrote:

Why start the ****, Harry?

Wow, talk about sensitive...

Why go out of your way to look for trouble?

Keep reading, Thumper. I suppose Harry's thinly disguised religious
sarcasm, part of his 'war on
religion' (in his own words), went over your head.

More evident is your hyper-sensitivity, how about giving it a break.


I don't think it is snarky to point out that it apparently is "ok" with
some of the "hypersensitive," as you call them, if their buddies behave
badly in here and "go after" other posters. As far as I can tell, so far
this year, it is only the posters on the rightwing side of the political
spectrum who are exhibiting that sort of behavior. What is ironic is
that when some of those same posters complain about the behavior of
others here, they tend not to include their own examples of what they
consider bad behavior, or those of their fellow rightwingers.

Benghazi, Benghazi, Benghazi, as the saying goes. :)

Shoes of . . .
 

On Sat, 11 Jan 2014 14:55:21 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 1/11/14, 1:23 PM, thumper wrote:
On 1/11/2014 5:49 AM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Fri, 10 Jan 2014 19:37:01 -0800, thumper wrote:
Poco Loco wrote:

Why start the ****, Harry?

Wow, talk about sensitive...

Why go out of your way to look for trouble?

Keep reading, Thumper. I suppose Harry's thinly disguised religious
sarcasm, part of his 'war on
religion' (in his own words), went over your head.

More evident is your hyper-sensitivity, how about giving it a break.


I don't think it is snarky to point out that it apparently is "ok" with
some of the "hypersensitive," as you call them, if their buddies behave
badly in here and "go after" other posters. As far as I can tell, so far
this year, it is only the posters on the rightwing side of the political
spectrum who are exhibiting that sort of behavior. What is ironic is
that when some of those same posters complain about the behavior of
others here, they tend not to include their own examples of what they
consider bad behavior, or those of their fellow rightwingers.

Benghazi, Benghazi, Benghazi, as the saying goes. :)

You should really spend some more time reading the posts.

If one were to be 'snarky', one might consider you're little anti-religious sarcasm to be somewhat
inappropriate, no?
--

Hope you're having a spectacular day!

Shoes of . . .
 

On Sat, 11 Jan 2014 15:35:59 -0500, Poco Loco wrote:

On Sat, 11 Jan 2014 14:55:21 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 1/11/14, 1:23 PM, thumper wrote:
On 1/11/2014 5:49 AM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Fri, 10 Jan 2014 19:37:01 -0800, thumper wrote:
Poco Loco wrote:

Why start the ****, Harry?

Wow, talk about sensitive...

Why go out of your way to look for trouble?

Keep reading, Thumper. I suppose Harry's thinly disguised religious
sarcasm, part of his 'war on
religion' (in his own words), went over your head.

More evident is your hyper-sensitivity, how about giving it a break.


I don't think it is snarky to point out that it apparently is "ok" with
some of the "hypersensitive," as you call them, if their buddies behave
badly in here and "go after" other posters. As far as I can tell, so far
this year, it is only the posters on the rightwing side of the political
spectrum who are exhibiting that sort of behavior. What is ironic is
that when some of those same posters complain about the behavior of
others here, they tend not to include their own examples of what they
consider bad behavior, or those of their fellow rightwingers.

Benghazi, Benghazi, Benghazi, as the saying goes. :)

You should really spend some more time reading the posts.

If one were to be 'snarky', one might consider you're little anti-religious sarcasm to be somewhat
inappropriate, no?

'your'
--

Hope you're having a spectacular day!

Shoes of . . .
 

On 1/11/14, 3:55 PM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Sat, 11 Jan 2014 15:35:59 -0500, Poco Loco wrote:

On Sat, 11 Jan 2014 14:55:21 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 1/11/14, 1:23 PM, thumper wrote:
On 1/11/2014 5:49 AM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Fri, 10 Jan 2014 19:37:01 -0800, thumper wrote:
Poco Loco wrote:

Why start the ****, Harry?

Wow, talk about sensitive...

Why go out of your way to look for trouble?

Keep reading, Thumper. I suppose Harry's thinly disguised religious
sarcasm, part of his 'war on
religion' (in his own words), went over your head.

More evident is your hyper-sensitivity, how about giving it a break.


I don't think it is snarky to point out that it apparently is "ok" with
some of the "hypersensitive," as you call them, if their buddies behave
badly in here and "go after" other posters. As far as I can tell, so far
this year, it is only the posters on the rightwing side of the political
spectrum who are exhibiting that sort of behavior. What is ironic is
that when some of those same posters complain about the behavior of
others here, they tend not to include their own examples of what they
consider bad behavior, or those of their fellow rightwingers.

Benghazi, Benghazi, Benghazi, as the saying goes. :)

You should really spend some more time reading the posts.

If one were to be 'snarky', one might consider you're little anti-religious sarcasm to be somewhat
inappropriate, no?

'your'
--

Hope you're having a spectacular day!

:)

Shoes of . . .
 

"F.O.A.D." wrote:
On 1/11/14, 12:38 AM, Califbill wrote:
"F.O.A.D." wrote:
On 1/10/14, 6:03 PM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Fri, 10 Jan 2014 17:26:08 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

. . .the Fisherman, retired.

http://tinyurl.com/kvpwwbt

Found these gems in the back of my closet. Provenance indicates they
were worn 2000 years ago by a fellow fishing next to the Sea of Galilee,
but that provenance may be a hoax.

Thinking of selling them on eBay for about $100,000. They're broken in,
they've been in several oceans, they're holy, and they have an original,
never-duplicated aroma.

Why start the ****, Harry?
--

Hope you're day is spectacular!





What ****?

These are my shoes. I wore them when I went fishing. I have retired from
fishing. Ergo, they are the Shoes of the Fisherman, Retired.

Not only have I worn these shoes while fishing in the Atlantic, Pacific
and Carib, I also wore them while on a trip to northern Israel about six
years ago and, guess what, I likely had them on my feet while we were at
the Sea of Galilee. On the other hand, I didn't fish there.

Earlier today, I noticed that your boy Wayne made a nasty reference to a
poster here, the first I saw upon my return to U.S.A., and, of course,
rec.boats. I must have missed you asking him to "not start the ****."

I haven't made one negative comment so far this year about any other
poster here. I haven't looked through the posts I missed while I was
away, but I wonder, can you make the same claim?

2000 years ago? Not just the shoes stink.


I'm sorry for you.

http://www.youtube.com/results?searc...r+old+man&sm=1


Oh bull****. Mel Brooks movie and your reference of a 2000 year old
fisherman have zero in reference relationships regards your post!

Shoes of . . .
 

On 1/11/14, 10:03 PM, Califbill wrote:
"F.O.A.D." wrote:
On 1/11/14, 12:38 AM, Califbill wrote:
"F.O.A.D." wrote:
On 1/10/14, 6:03 PM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Fri, 10 Jan 2014 17:26:08 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

. . .the Fisherman, retired.

http://tinyurl.com/kvpwwbt

Found these gems in the back of my closet. Provenance indicates they
were worn 2000 years ago by a fellow fishing next to the Sea of Galilee,
but that provenance may be a hoax.

Thinking of selling them on eBay for about $100,000. They're broken in,
they've been in several oceans, they're holy, and they have an original,
never-duplicated aroma.

Why start the ****, Harry?
--

Hope you're day is spectacular!





What ****?

These are my shoes. I wore them when I went fishing. I have retired from
fishing. Ergo, they are the Shoes of the Fisherman, Retired.

Not only have I worn these shoes while fishing in the Atlantic, Pacific
and Carib, I also wore them while on a trip to northern Israel about six
years ago and, guess what, I likely had them on my feet while we were at
the Sea of Galilee. On the other hand, I didn't fish there.

Earlier today, I noticed that your boy Wayne made a nasty reference to a
poster here, the first I saw upon my return to U.S.A., and, of course,
rec.boats. I must have missed you asking him to "not start the ****."

I haven't made one negative comment so far this year about any other
poster here. I haven't looked through the posts I missed while I was
away, but I wonder, can you make the same claim?

2000 years ago? Not just the shoes stink.


I'm sorry for you.

http://www.youtube.com/results?searc...r+old+man&sm=1


Oh bull****. Mel Brooks movie and your reference of a 2000 year old
fisherman have zero in reference relationships regards your post!


Bill, the clip I posted of Mel and Carl's gag routine in the
2000-year-old man wasn't from a movie. To whom do you think I was
referring?

Shoes of . . .
 

"F.O.A.D." wrote:
On 1/11/14, 10:03 PM, Califbill wrote:
"F.O.A.D." wrote:
On 1/11/14, 12:38 AM, Califbill wrote:
"F.O.A.D." wrote:
On 1/10/14, 6:03 PM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Fri, 10 Jan 2014 17:26:08 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

. . .the Fisherman, retired.

http://tinyurl.com/kvpwwbt

Found these gems in the back of my closet. Provenance indicates they
were worn 2000 years ago by a fellow fishing next to the Sea of Galilee,
but that provenance may be a hoax.

Thinking of selling them on eBay for about $100,000. They're broken in,
they've been in several oceans, they're holy, and they have an original,
never-duplicated aroma.

Why start the ****, Harry?
--

Hope you're day is spectacular!





What ****?

These are my shoes. I wore them when I went fishing. I have retired from
fishing. Ergo, they are the Shoes of the Fisherman, Retired.

Not only have I worn these shoes while fishing in the Atlantic, Pacific
and Carib, I also wore them while on a trip to northern Israel about six
years ago and, guess what, I likely had them on my feet while we were at
the Sea of Galilee. On the other hand, I didn't fish there.

Earlier today, I noticed that your boy Wayne made a nasty reference to a
poster here, the first I saw upon my return to U.S.A., and, of course,
rec.boats. I must have missed you asking him to "not start the ****."

I haven't made one negative comment so far this year about any other
poster here. I haven't looked through the posts I missed while I was
away, but I wonder, can you make the same claim?

2000 years ago? Not just the shoes stink.


I'm sorry for you.

http://www.youtube.com/results?searc...r+old+man&sm=1


Oh bull****. Mel Brooks movie and your reference of a 2000 year old
fisherman have zero in reference relationships regards your post!


Bill, the clip I posted of Mel and Carl's gag routine in the
2000-year-old man wasn't from a movie. To whom do you think I was referring?

Did not watch your clip. But I think it was Mel who did a movie on a 2000
yo man