![]() |
|
Treatment of Females - Does this meet your approval, Krause?
On 11/30/13, 8:37 AM, Tim wrote:
On Saturday, November 30, 2013 6:38:52 AM UTC-6, F.O.A.D. wrote: It's just a book, Tim. Then why do you hate it so? What is it with you righties and the "hate" word? You guys use that word a lot. I don't "hate" the bible, Tim. I even like the King James version because of its beautiful use of the English language. I will say, though, that I'm not a fan of how some in this country "use" the bible to "hate" people in groups they don't like. -- Religion: together we can find the cure. |
Treatment of Females - Does this meet your approval, Krause?
On 11/30/13, 8:45 AM, Tim wrote:
On Saturday, November 30, 2013 6:38:52 AM UTC-6, This country has no state religion. Well, that's been established for over 235 years. Did you think it would be overturned next week? I know for a fact that there are many right-wing bible thumpers in this country who are working hard to push their religious beliefs onto those who believe differently. A good number of those thumpers are politicians. -- Religion: together we can find the cure. |
Treatment of Females - Does this meet your approval, Krause?
On 11/30/13, 9:12 AM, KC wrote:
On 11/30/2013 7:47 AM, John H. wrote: On Fri, 29 Nov 2013 17:08:39 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote: On Friday, November 29, 2013 6:41:42 PM UTC-6, No, I am not a theologian, but I did have as a college roommate for an academic year a fellow who got his master's at Union Theological Seminary, and was ordained an Episcopal priest. He got me to go to Sunday Episcopal services on campus because, he claimed, they served the best Sunday student breakfast and had the best-looking coeds at their services. He was right on both counts. Of course there would be an alternate motive for going. He and I argued some on issues religious. We're still close friends. I have an M.A. in English, and my concentration was in etymology. As for your interpretations, you're just proving my point, that biblical interpretation is in the mind of the beholder. There's nothing wrong or intellectually dishonest about that, as long as one admits it. I'm glad you told me. THANKS! But, you don't believe in the book anyhow. so why make a big deal out of it? I mean, why are you trying to interpret something something you don't believe in anyhow? That's my question for atheists. Why fight so hard against something that you firmly believe is non-existent? Why not fight against flying pigs? John H. -- Hope you're having a great day! It's hate.. and they need someone to blame for their failures... Speaking of failures, here we have PsychoScotty, the ultimate failure. -- Religion: together we can find the cure. |
Treatment of Females - Does this meet your approval, Krause?
On Sat, 30 Nov 2013 09:38:36 -0500, John H wrote:
On Sat, 30 Nov 2013 07:47:11 -0500, John H. wrote: On Fri, 29 Nov 2013 17:08:39 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote: On Friday, November 29, 2013 6:41:42 PM UTC-6, No, I am not a theologian, but I did have as a college roommate for an academic year a fellow who got his master's at Union Theological Seminary, and was ordained an Episcopal priest. He got me to go to Sunday Episcopal services on campus because, he claimed, they served the best Sunday student breakfast and had the best-looking coeds at their services. He was right on both counts. Of course there would be an alternate motive for going. He and I argued some on issues religious. We're still close friends. I have an M.A. in English, and my concentration was in etymology. As for your interpretations, you're just proving my point, that biblical interpretation is in the mind of the beholder. There's nothing wrong or intellectually dishonest about that, as long as one admits it. I'm glad you told me. THANKS! But, you don't believe in the book anyhow. so why make a big deal out of it? I mean, why are you trying to interpret something something you don't believe in anyhow? That's my question for atheists. Why fight so hard against something that you firmly believe is non-existent? Why not fight against flying pigs? It isn't about the flying pigs, it is about those who worship flying pigs. Most people believe there are no flying pigs, so they don't create thousands of flying pig denominations so that they can force and or coerce their particular flying pig beliefs on others. Odd how one makes perfect sense to you, while the other seems totally ridiculous. . John Spoofer There are laws which prohibit the use of force to cram religion down your throat. What difference should it make to you or any other stupid liberal what folks wish to worship? Some folks worship rocks. Where are all the anti-rock people? Sounds like you've got your spoofer head buried with the lil' Squirts head. Must be getting tight in there. John H. -- Hope you're having a great day! |
Treatment of Females - Does this meet your approval, Krause?
On Sat, 30 Nov 2013 09:47:43 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote:
On 11/30/13, 8:34 AM, Tim wrote: On Saturday, November 30, 2013 6:38:52 AM UTC-6, F.O.A.D. wrote: It's just a book, Tim. There's not a shred of proof that it was written by other than men, or that there was a divine hand in its writing. to you it is, Harry, Some of us live it. No one is stopping you from "living it," whatever that means, so long as you don't force others to believe as you do. When was the last time you were 'forced' to do anything religious. Muslims are the ones doing the 'forcing' these days, and you seem to think they're God's gift to mankind. John H. -- Hope you're having a great day! |
Treatment of Females - Does this meet your approval, Krause?
On Sat, 30 Nov 2013 09:51:08 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote:
On 11/30/13, 8:45 AM, Tim wrote: On Saturday, November 30, 2013 6:38:52 AM UTC-6, This country has no state religion. Well, that's been established for over 235 years. Did you think it would be overturned next week? I know for a fact that there are many right-wing bible thumpers in this country who are working hard to push their religious beliefs onto those who believe differently. A good number of those thumpers are politicians. Working hard and 'forcing' are two different things. There's nothing wrong with peacefully attempting to persuade another to believe as one does. You do that several hundred times a week, quite stupidly I might add. Some Muslims (your darling children), on the other hand, tend to cut off heads and shoot folks who don't wish to follow the 'rules'. John H. -- Hope you're having a great day! |
Treatment of Females - Does this meet your approval, Krause?
On Saturday, November 30, 2013 8:47:43 AM UTC-6, F.O.A.D. wrote:
to you it is, Harry, Some of us live it. No one is stopping you from "living it," whatever that means, so long as you don't force others to believe as you do. And who is forcing who to do what? |
Treatment of Females - Does this meet your approval, Krause?
On Saturday, November 30, 2013 8:50:14 AM UTC-6, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 11/30/13, 8:37 AM, Tim wrote: On Saturday, November 30, 2013 6:38:52 AM UTC-6, F.O.A.D. wrote: It's just a book, Tim. Then why do you hate it so? What is it with you righties and the "hate" word? You guys use that word a lot. I don't "hate" the bible, Tim. I even like the King James version because of its beautiful use of the English language. I will say, though, that I'm not a fan of how some in this country "use" the bible to "hate" people in groups they don't like. There are plenty of people and groups who don't use a Bible to "hate" others as well. |
Treatment of Females - Does this meet your approval, Krause?
On Saturday, November 30, 2013 8:51:08 AM UTC-6, F.O.A.D. wrote:
Well, that's been established for over 235 years. Did you think it would be overturned next week? I know for a fact that there are many right-wing bible thumpers in this country who are working hard to push their religious beliefs onto those who believe differently. A good number of those thumpers are politicians. Why do you listen to them?: I don't. |
Treatment of Females - Does this meet your approval, Krause?
"F.O.A.D." wrote:
On 11/30/13, 8:45 AM, Tim wrote: On Saturday, November 30, 2013 6:38:52 AM UTC-6, This country has no state religion. Well, that's been established for over 235 years. Did you think it would be overturned next week? I know for a fact that there are many right-wing bible thumpers in this country who are working hard to push their religious beliefs onto those who believe differently. A good number of those thumpers are politicians. A lot less are pushing their religious belief on others than the group that is forcing their political belief on others. You and your leftists are that group! |
Treatment of Females - Does this meet your approval, Krause?
On 11/30/13, 1:55 PM, Tim wrote:
On Saturday, November 30, 2013 8:47:43 AM UTC-6, F.O.A.D. wrote: to you it is, Harry, Some of us live it. No one is stopping you from "living it," whatever that means, so long as you don't force others to believe as you do. And who is forcing who to do what? Are you kidding? All over this country, "religious" politicians are waging war on womens' health, on gays, on immigrants. You haven't noticed, or you don't care...which is it? -- Religion: together we can find the cure. |
Treatment of Females - Does this meet your approval, Krause?
On 11/30/13, 1:57 PM, Tim wrote:
On Saturday, November 30, 2013 8:50:14 AM UTC-6, F.O.A.D. wrote: On 11/30/13, 8:37 AM, Tim wrote: On Saturday, November 30, 2013 6:38:52 AM UTC-6, F.O.A.D. wrote: It's just a book, Tim. Then why do you hate it so? What is it with you righties and the "hate" word? You guys use that word a lot. I don't "hate" the bible, Tim. I even like the King James version because of its beautiful use of the English language. I will say, though, that I'm not a fan of how some in this country "use" the bible to "hate" people in groups they don't like. There are plenty of people and groups who don't use a Bible to "hate" others as well. The issue on the table is the treatment of females by the religious. -- Religion: together we can find the cure. |
Treatment of Females - Does this meet your approval, Krause?
On 11/30/13, 1:58 PM, Tim wrote:
On Saturday, November 30, 2013 8:51:08 AM UTC-6, F.O.A.D. wrote: Well, that's been established for over 235 years. Did you think it would be overturned next week? I know for a fact that there are many right-wing bible thumpers in this country who are working hard to push their religious beliefs onto those who believe differently. A good number of those thumpers are politicians. Why do you listen to them?: I don't. They impact the lives of people I care about with their religion, their hate, their need to control. -- Religion: together we can find the cure. |
Treatment of Females - Does this meet your approval, Krause?
On 11/30/13, 2:13 PM, Califbill wrote:
"F.O.A.D." wrote: On 11/30/13, 8:45 AM, Tim wrote: On Saturday, November 30, 2013 6:38:52 AM UTC-6, This country has no state religion. Well, that's been established for over 235 years. Did you think it would be overturned next week? I know for a fact that there are many right-wing bible thumpers in this country who are working hard to push their religious beliefs onto those who believe differently. A good number of those thumpers are politicians. A lot less are pushing their religious belief on others than the group that is forcing their political belief on others. You and your leftists are that group! You should start a thread to discuss your feelings about groups that force their political beliefs on others. Let us know when one of those groups forces you to have an abortion. -- Religion: together we can find the cure. |
Treatment of Females - Does this meet your approval, Krause?
On Sat, 30 Nov 2013 15:44:21 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote:
On 11/30/13, 2:13 PM, Califbill wrote: "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 11/30/13, 8:45 AM, Tim wrote: On Saturday, November 30, 2013 6:38:52 AM UTC-6, This country has no state religion. Well, that's been established for over 235 years. Did you think it would be overturned next week? I know for a fact that there are many right-wing bible thumpers in this country who are working hard to push their religious beliefs onto those who believe differently. A good number of those thumpers are politicians. A lot less are pushing their religious belief on others than the group that is forcing their political belief on others. You and your leftists are that group! You should start a thread to discuss your feelings about groups that force their political beliefs on others. Let us know when one of those groups forces you to have an abortion. Ask that same question, but put yourself in the baby's place. John H. -- Hope you're having a great day! |
Treatment of Females - Does this meet your approval, Krause?
On 11/30/2013 2:55 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 11/30/13, 1:57 PM, Tim wrote: On Saturday, November 30, 2013 8:50:14 AM UTC-6, F.O.A.D. wrote: On 11/30/13, 8:37 AM, Tim wrote: On Saturday, November 30, 2013 6:38:52 AM UTC-6, F.O.A.D. wrote: It's just a book, Tim. Then why do you hate it so? What is it with you righties and the "hate" word? You guys use that word a lot. I don't "hate" the bible, Tim. I even like the King James version because of its beautiful use of the English language. I will say, though, that I'm not a fan of how some in this country "use" the bible to "hate" people in groups they don't like. There are plenty of people and groups who don't use a Bible to "hate" others as well. The issue on the table is the treatment of females by the religious. Well take it off the table and shut the **** up already. -- Americans deserve better. |
Treatment of Females - Does this meet your approval, Krause?
On 11/30/2013 2:56 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 11/30/13, 1:58 PM, Tim wrote: On Saturday, November 30, 2013 8:51:08 AM UTC-6, F.O.A.D. wrote: Well, that's been established for over 235 years. Did you think it would be overturned next week? I know for a fact that there are many right-wing bible thumpers in this country who are working hard to push their religious beliefs onto those who believe differently. A good number of those thumpers are politicians. Why do you listen to them?: I don't. They impact the lives of people I care about with their religion, their hate, their need to control. Ahhh. Now we're getting somewhere. The impressionable religious southern belle is rubbing you the wrong way with her religiousity. Tough, live with it or starve Krowsie baby. -- Americans deserve better. |
Treatment of Females - Does this meet your approval, Krause?
On 11/30/2013 3:44 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 11/30/13, 2:13 PM, Califbill wrote: "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 11/30/13, 8:45 AM, Tim wrote: On Saturday, November 30, 2013 6:38:52 AM UTC-6, This country has no state religion. Well, that's been established for over 235 years. Did you think it would be overturned next week? I know for a fact that there are many right-wing bible thumpers in this country who are working hard to push their religious beliefs onto those who believe differently. A good number of those thumpers are politicians. A lot less are pushing their religious belief on others than the group that is forcing their political belief on others. You and your leftists are that group! You should start a thread to discuss your feelings about groups that force their political beliefs on others. Let us know when one of those groups forces you to have an abortion. Crackpot! -- Americans deserve better. |
Treatment of Females - Does this meet your approval, Krause?
"F.O.A.D." wrote:
On 11/30/13, 2:13 PM, Califbill wrote: "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 11/30/13, 8:45 AM, Tim wrote: On Saturday, November 30, 2013 6:38:52 AM UTC-6, This country has no state religion. Well, that's been established for over 235 years. Did you think it would be overturned next week? I know for a fact that there are many right-wing bible thumpers in this country who are working hard to push their religious beliefs onto those who believe differently. A good number of those thumpers are politicians. A lot less are pushing their religious belief on others than the group that is forcing their political belief on others. You and your leftists are that group! You should start a thread to discuss your feelings about groups that force their political beliefs on others. Let us know when one of those groups forces you to have an abortion. Those political groups are forcing people who are against abortion, or even those who are against late term abortion to pay for those same abortions. I am not against first term abortion, just late term abortion. But if you can afford to get knocked up, you and the sperm donor can pay for the abortion or morning after pill. |
Treatment of Females - Does this meet your approval, Krause?
On 11/30/13, 5:27 PM, Califbill wrote:
"F.O.A.D." wrote: On 11/30/13, 2:13 PM, Califbill wrote: "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 11/30/13, 8:45 AM, Tim wrote: On Saturday, November 30, 2013 6:38:52 AM UTC-6, This country has no state religion. Well, that's been established for over 235 years. Did you think it would be overturned next week? I know for a fact that there are many right-wing bible thumpers in this country who are working hard to push their religious beliefs onto those who believe differently. A good number of those thumpers are politicians. A lot less are pushing their religious belief on others than the group that is forcing their political belief on others. You and your leftists are that group! You should start a thread to discuss your feelings about groups that force their political beliefs on others. Let us know when one of those groups forces you to have an abortion. Those political groups are forcing people who are against abortion, or even those who are against late term abortion to pay for those same abortions. I am not against first term abortion, just late term abortion. But if you can afford to get knocked up, you and the sperm donor can pay for the abortion or morning after pill. If you can afford a pack of cigarettes, you should pay for your cancer treatment. If you are hit by a car, you should pay for your own treatment...or burial. And so on, ad nauseum. -- Religion: together we can find the cure. |
Treatment of Females - Does this meet your approval, Krause?
On 11/30/2013 5:29 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 11/30/13, 5:27 PM, Califbill wrote: "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 11/30/13, 2:13 PM, Califbill wrote: "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 11/30/13, 8:45 AM, Tim wrote: On Saturday, November 30, 2013 6:38:52 AM UTC-6, This country has no state religion. Well, that's been established for over 235 years. Did you think it would be overturned next week? I know for a fact that there are many right-wing bible thumpers in this country who are working hard to push their religious beliefs onto those who believe differently. A good number of those thumpers are politicians. A lot less are pushing their religious belief on others than the group that is forcing their political belief on others. You and your leftists are that group! You should start a thread to discuss your feelings about groups that force their political beliefs on others. Let us know when one of those groups forces you to have an abortion. Those political groups are forcing people who are against abortion, or even those who are against late term abortion to pay for those same abortions. I am not against first term abortion, just late term abortion. But if you can afford to get knocked up, you and the sperm donor can pay for the abortion or morning after pill. If you can afford a pack of cigarettes, you should pay for your cancer treatment. If you are hit by a car, you should pay for your own treatment...or burial. And so on, ad nauseum. Your logic is quite flawed there buddy boy. -- Americans deserve better. |
Treatment of Females - Does this meet your approval, Krause?
On 11/30/2013 5:14 PM, Hank© wrote:
On 11/30/2013 3:44 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote: On 11/30/13, 2:13 PM, Califbill wrote: "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 11/30/13, 8:45 AM, Tim wrote: On Saturday, November 30, 2013 6:38:52 AM UTC-6, This country has no state religion. Well, that's been established for over 235 years. Did you think it would be overturned next week? I know for a fact that there are many right-wing bible thumpers in this country who are working hard to push their religious beliefs onto those who believe differently. A good number of those thumpers are politicians. A lot less are pushing their religious belief on others than the group that is forcing their political belief on others. You and your leftists are that group! You should start a thread to discuss your feelings about groups that force their political beliefs on others. Let us know when one of those groups forces you to have an abortion. How about I just let you know when I need the abortion coverage "your" group is forcing on me. snerk Crackpot! |
Treatment of Females - Does this meet your approval, Krause?
KC wrote:
On 11/30/2013 5:14 PM, Hank© wrote: On 11/30/2013 3:44 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote: On 11/30/13, 2:13 PM, Califbill wrote: "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 11/30/13, 8:45 AM, Tim wrote: On Saturday, November 30, 2013 6:38:52 AM UTC-6, This country has no state religion. Well, that's been established for over 235 years. Did you think it would be overturned next week? I know for a fact that there are many right-wing bible thumpers in this country who are working hard to push their religious beliefs onto those who believe differently. A good number of those thumpers are politicians. A lot less are pushing their religious belief on others than the group that is forcing their political belief on others. You and your leftists are that group! You should start a thread to discuss your feelings about groups that force their political beliefs on others. Let us know when one of those groups forces you to have an abortion. How about I just let you know when I need the abortion coverage "your" group is forcing on me. snerk Crackpot! What do you care? You're not paying the freight for health care insurance. Oh, any smokers in your family? Anyone engaged in risky sports? Anyone got a heart condition or cancer? |
Treatment of Females - Does this meet your approval, Krause?
On 11/30/2013 7:11 PM, John H wrote:
On Sat, 30 Nov 2013 16:54:03 -0500, John H. wrote: On Sat, 30 Nov 2013 15:44:21 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 11/30/13, 2:13 PM, Califbill wrote: "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 11/30/13, 8:45 AM, Tim wrote: On Saturday, November 30, 2013 6:38:52 AM UTC-6, This country has no state religion. Well, that's been established for over 235 years. Did you think it would be overturned next week? I know for a fact that there are many right-wing bible thumpers in this country who are working hard to push their religious beliefs onto those who believe differently. A good number of those thumpers are politicians. A lot less are pushing their religious belief on others than the group that is forcing their political belief on others. You and your leftists are that group! You should start a thread to discuss your feelings about groups that force their political beliefs on others. Let us know when one of those groups forces you to have an abortion. Ask that same question, but put yourself in the baby's place. I have absolutely no problem forcing women to act in any way I deem necessary if it fits my religion..... . John H. -- Hope you're having a great day! Kevin, the new WAFA! |
Treatment of Females - Does this meet your approval, Krause?
"F.O.A.D." wrote:
On 11/30/13, 5:27 PM, Califbill wrote: "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 11/30/13, 2:13 PM, Califbill wrote: "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 11/30/13, 8:45 AM, Tim wrote: On Saturday, November 30, 2013 6:38:52 AM UTC-6, This country has no state religion. Well, that's been established for over 235 years. Did you think it would be overturned next week? I know for a fact that there are many right-wing bible thumpers in this country who are working hard to push their religious beliefs onto those who believe differently. A good number of those thumpers are politicians. A lot less are pushing their religious belief on others than the group that is forcing their political belief on others. You and your leftists are that group! You should start a thread to discuss your feelings about groups that force their political beliefs on others. Let us know when one of those groups forces you to have an abortion. Those political groups are forcing people who are against abortion, or even those who are against late term abortion to pay for those same abortions. I am not against first term abortion, just late term abortion. But if you can afford to get knocked up, you and the sperm donor can pay for the abortion or morning after pill. If you can afford a pack of cigarettes, you should pay for your cancer treatment. If you are hit by a car, you should pay for your own treatment...or burial. And so on, ad nauseum. Those smokers are paying for their cancer treatment. Huge taxes on tobacco. NYC is like $13 a pack, mostly taxes. Getting knocked up is not really an accident. Car crashes are. With the amount of different birth control available, besides an aspirin held between the knees, there should be an extremely small rate of accidental knocking up! Smokers are a smaller draw on societies money than most groups. They die earlier, do not collect Social Security or not for long, and pay huge amount of taxes for the habit. |
Treatment of Females - Does this meet your approval, Krause?
On Saturday, November 30, 2013 1:55:03 PM UTC-6, F. O. A. D. wrote:
And who is forcing who to do what? Are you kidding? All over this country, "religious" politicians are waging war on womens' health, on gays, on immigrants. You haven't noticed, or you don't care...which is it? "waging war?" I think you're putting too many lines into the script. |
Treatment of Females - Does this meet your approval, Krause?
On Saturday, November 30, 2013 1:56:26 PM UTC-6, F. O. A. D. wrote:
On 11/30/13, 1:58 PM, Tim wrote: On Saturday, November 30, 2013 8:51:08 AM UTC-6, F.O.A.D. wrote: Well, that's been established for over 235 years. Did you think it would be overturned next week? I know for a fact that there are many right-wing bible thumpers in this country who are working hard to push their religious beliefs onto those who believe differently. A good number of those thumpers are politicians. Why do you listen to them?: I don't. They impact the lives of people I care about with their religion, their hate, their need to control. The Harry, you need to talk to the people you care about. It's not the guy on the soap box, but the people listening.... |
Treatment of Females - Does this meet your approval, Krause?
On Sat, 30 Nov 2013 19:11:01 -0500, John H wrote:
On Sat, 30 Nov 2013 16:54:03 -0500, John H. wrote: On Sat, 30 Nov 2013 15:44:21 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 11/30/13, 2:13 PM, Califbill wrote: "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 11/30/13, 8:45 AM, Tim wrote: On Saturday, November 30, 2013 6:38:52 AM UTC-6, This country has no state religion. Well, that's been established for over 235 years. Did you think it would be overturned next week? I know for a fact that there are many right-wing bible thumpers in this country who are working hard to push their religious beliefs onto those who believe differently. A good number of those thumpers are politicians. A lot less are pushing their religious belief on others than the group that is forcing their political belief on others. You and your leftists are that group! You should start a thread to discuss your feelings about groups that force their political beliefs on others. Let us know when one of those groups forces you to have an abortion. Ask that same question, but put yourself in the baby's place. I have absolutely no problem forcing women to act in any way I deem necessary if it fits my religion..... . John spoof Yes, we know. Liberals do a lot of talking about how badly conservatives /Christians treat women. But the statement you made says a lot. Being an atheist gives you all the latitude in the world for how you treat women, doesn't it? Nothing you force on them would be contrary to your 'religion'. But then, perhaps you're a Muslim, which would explain your statement. John H. -- Hope you're having a great day! |
Treatment of Females - Does this meet your approval, Krause?
On 12/1/13, 1:04 AM, Tim wrote:
On Saturday, November 30, 2013 1:56:26 PM UTC-6, F. O. A. D. wrote: On 11/30/13, 1:58 PM, Tim wrote: On Saturday, November 30, 2013 8:51:08 AM UTC-6, F.O.A.D. wrote: Well, that's been established for over 235 years. Did you think it would be overturned next week? I know for a fact that there are many right-wing bible thumpers in this country who are working hard to push their religious beliefs onto those who believe differently. A good number of those thumpers are politicians. Why do you listen to them?: I don't. They impact the lives of people I care about with their religion, their hate, their need to control. The Harry, you need to talk to the people you care about. It's not the guy on the soap box, but the people listening.... It's the self-proclaimed christian politician/leader on the soap box passing "christian" legislation that discriminates against women, children, gays, minorities, et cetera, that bothers me. Hey, if you want to bury your head in the sand and pretend as if your hate-filled co-religionists aren't hurting society, go right ahead. After all, you're not the daddy who has to explain to a small child why the draconian christian republican cuts in the SNAP program mean less food on the table and in his or her belly, and that such cuts demonstrate how "pro-life" these christian republican legislators are. -- Religion: together we can find the cure. |
Treatment of Females - Does this meet your approval, Krause?
On 12/1/2013 7:55 AM, John H. wrote:
On Sat, 30 Nov 2013 19:11:01 -0500, John H wrote: On Sat, 30 Nov 2013 16:54:03 -0500, John H. wrote: On Sat, 30 Nov 2013 15:44:21 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 11/30/13, 2:13 PM, Califbill wrote: "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 11/30/13, 8:45 AM, Tim wrote: On Saturday, November 30, 2013 6:38:52 AM UTC-6, This country has no state religion. Well, that's been established for over 235 years. Did you think it would be overturned next week? I know for a fact that there are many right-wing bible thumpers in this country who are working hard to push their religious beliefs onto those who believe differently. A good number of those thumpers are politicians. A lot less are pushing their religious belief on others than the group that is forcing their political belief on others. You and your leftists are that group! You should start a thread to discuss your feelings about groups that force their political beliefs on others. Let us know when one of those groups forces you to have an abortion. Ask that same question, but put yourself in the baby's place. I have absolutely no problem forcing women to act in any way I deem necessary if it fits my religion..... . John spoof Yes, we know. Liberals do a lot of talking about how badly conservatives /Christians treat women. But the statement you made says a lot. Being an atheist gives you all the latitude in the world for how you treat women, doesn't it? Nothing you force on them would be contrary to your 'religion'. But then, perhaps you're a Muslim, which would explain your statement. John H. -- Hope you're having a great day! It seems that your carbon copy has been thrown off Eternal September. Notice his new news server. By the way, Harry has revealed that the source of his religious hatred stems from his wife's religiosity interfering with his tranquility. Now that we know what his real problem is, I'd like to help him resolve it. I thought of suggesting that he bring it out in the open with her or at least a shrink. But that would probably cause him to be evicted from his basement apartment. I would hate to think of him being holed up at an internet cafe or homeless mission; especially over the holidays. As a good Christian, I'm sure you'd like to offer him some help as well. ?-aka Hank -- Hope you're having a great day as well! -- Americans deserve better. |
Treatment of Females - Does this meet your approval, Krause?
On 12/1/2013 8:16 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 12/1/13, 1:04 AM, Tim wrote: On Saturday, November 30, 2013 1:56:26 PM UTC-6, F. O. A. D. wrote: On 11/30/13, 1:58 PM, Tim wrote: On Saturday, November 30, 2013 8:51:08 AM UTC-6, F.O.A.D. wrote: Well, that's been established for over 235 years. Did you think it would be overturned next week? I know for a fact that there are many right-wing bible thumpers in this country who are working hard to push their religious beliefs onto those who believe differently. A good number of those thumpers are politicians. Why do you listen to them?: I don't. They impact the lives of people I care about with their religion, their hate, their need to control. The Harry, you need to talk to the people you care about. It's not the guy on the soap box, but the people listening.... It's the self-proclaimed christian politician/leader on the soap box passing "christian" legislation that discriminates against women, children, gays, minorities, et cetera, that bothers me. Hey, if you want to bury your head in the sand and pretend as if your hate-filled co-religionists aren't hurting society, go right ahead. After all, you're not the daddy who has to explain to a small child why the draconian christian republican cuts in the SNAP program mean less food on the table and in his or her belly, and that such cuts demonstrate how "pro-life" these christian republican legislators are. Usually in these sorts of scenarios, *Daddy is no where to be found* -- Americans deserve better. |
Treatment of Females - Does this meet your approval, Krause?
On Sun, 01 Dec 2013 08:29:59 -0500, John H. wrote:
On Sun, 01 Dec 2013 07:55:38 -0500, John H. wrote: On Sat, 30 Nov 2013 19:11:01 -0500, John H wrote: On Sat, 30 Nov 2013 16:54:03 -0500, John H. wrote: On Sat, 30 Nov 2013 15:44:21 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 11/30/13, 2:13 PM, Califbill wrote: "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 11/30/13, 8:45 AM, Tim wrote: On Saturday, November 30, 2013 6:38:52 AM UTC-6, This country has no state religion. Well, that's been established for over 235 years. Did you think it would be overturned next week? I know for a fact that there are many right-wing bible thumpers in this country who are working hard to push their religious beliefs onto those who believe differently. A good number of those thumpers are politicians. A lot less are pushing their religious belief on others than the group that is forcing their political belief on others. You and your leftists are that group! You should start a thread to discuss your feelings about groups that force their political beliefs on others. Let us know when one of those groups forces you to have an abortion. Ask that same question, but put yourself in the baby's place. I have absolutely no problem forcing women to act in any way I deem necessary if it fits my religion..... . John spoof Yes, we know. Liberals do a lot of talking about how badly conservatives /Christians treat women. But the statement you made says a lot. Being an atheist gives you all the latitude in the world for how you treat women, doesn't it? Nothing you force on them would be contrary to your 'religion'. But then, perhaps you're a Muslim, which would explain your statement. John H. -- Hope you're having a great day! Spoof. John H. -- Hope you're having a great day! Public Usenet Newsgroup Access? Who's doing the spoofing? Your buried head gives you away. I see you, like the lil' squirt, don't have the gonads to address the post...let alone use your own name. John H. -- Hope you're having a great day! |
Treatment of Females - Does this meet your approval, Krause?
Hank© wrote:
On 12/1/2013 8:16 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote: On 12/1/13, 1:04 AM, Tim wrote: On Saturday, November 30, 2013 1:56:26 PM UTC-6, F. O. A. D. wrote: On 11/30/13, 1:58 PM, Tim wrote: On Saturday, November 30, 2013 8:51:08 AM UTC-6, F.O.A.D. wrote: Well, that's been established for over 235 years. Did you think it would be overturned next week? I know for a fact that there are many right-wing bible thumpers in this country who are working hard to push their religious beliefs onto those who believe differently. A good number of those thumpers are politicians. Why do you listen to them?: I don't. They impact the lives of people I care about with their religion, their hate, their need to control. The Harry, you need to talk to the people you care about. It's not the guy on the soap box, but the people listening.... It's the self-proclaimed christian politician/leader on the soap box passing "christian" legislation that discriminates against women, children, gays, minorities, et cetera, that bothers me. Hey, if you want to bury your head in the sand and pretend as if your hate-filled co-religionists aren't hurting society, go right ahead. After all, you're not the daddy who has to explain to a small child why the draconian christian republican cuts in the SNAP program mean less food on the table and in his or her belly, and that such cuts demonstrate how "pro-life" these christian republican legislators are. Usually in these sorts of scenarios, *Daddy is no where to be found* Or daddy is feeding the kids baloney sandwich and drinking IW Harper, while dressing well. |
Treatment of Females - Does this meet your approval, Krause?
On 12/1/13, 11:55 AM, Califbill wrote:
Hank© wrote: On 12/1/2013 8:16 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote: On 12/1/13, 1:04 AM, Tim wrote: On Saturday, November 30, 2013 1:56:26 PM UTC-6, F. O. A. D. wrote: On 11/30/13, 1:58 PM, Tim wrote: On Saturday, November 30, 2013 8:51:08 AM UTC-6, F.O.A.D. wrote: Well, that's been established for over 235 years. Did you think it would be overturned next week? I know for a fact that there are many right-wing bible thumpers in this country who are working hard to push their religious beliefs onto those who believe differently. A good number of those thumpers are politicians. Why do you listen to them?: I don't. They impact the lives of people I care about with their religion, their hate, their need to control. The Harry, you need to talk to the people you care about. It's not the guy on the soap box, but the people listening.... It's the self-proclaimed christian politician/leader on the soap box passing "christian" legislation that discriminates against women, children, gays, minorities, et cetera, that bothers me. Hey, if you want to bury your head in the sand and pretend as if your hate-filled co-religionists aren't hurting society, go right ahead. After all, you're not the daddy who has to explain to a small child why the draconian christian republican cuts in the SNAP program mean less food on the table and in his or her belly, and that such cuts demonstrate how "pro-life" these christian republican legislators are. Usually in these sorts of scenarios, *Daddy is no where to be found* Or daddy is feeding the kids baloney sandwich and drinking IW Harper, while dressing well. It's a sad giggle when you realize that righties don't really believe in right to life for those already alive. But a fetus? Hey, that's the way to control women, eh? -- Religion: together we can find the cure. |
Treatment of Females - Does this meet your approval, Krause?
On 12/1/2013 12:18 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 12/1/13, 11:55 AM, Califbill wrote: Hank© wrote: On 12/1/2013 8:16 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote: On 12/1/13, 1:04 AM, Tim wrote: On Saturday, November 30, 2013 1:56:26 PM UTC-6, F. O. A. D. wrote: On 11/30/13, 1:58 PM, Tim wrote: On Saturday, November 30, 2013 8:51:08 AM UTC-6, F.O.A.D. wrote: Well, that's been established for over 235 years. Did you think it would be overturned next week? I know for a fact that there are many right-wing bible thumpers in this country who are working hard to push their religious beliefs onto those who believe differently. A good number of those thumpers are politicians. Why do you listen to them?: I don't. They impact the lives of people I care about with their religion, their hate, their need to control. The Harry, you need to talk to the people you care about. It's not the guy on the soap box, but the people listening.... It's the self-proclaimed christian politician/leader on the soap box passing "christian" legislation that discriminates against women, children, gays, minorities, et cetera, that bothers me. Hey, if you want to bury your head in the sand and pretend as if your hate-filled co-religionists aren't hurting society, go right ahead. After all, you're not the daddy who has to explain to a small child why the draconian christian republican cuts in the SNAP program mean less food on the table and in his or her belly, and that such cuts demonstrate how "pro-life" these christian republican legislators are. Usually in these sorts of scenarios, *Daddy is no where to be found* Or daddy is feeding the kids baloney sandwich and drinking IW Harper, while dressing well. It's a sad giggle when you realize that righties don't really believe in right to life for those already alive. But a fetus? Hey, that's the way to control women, eh? There are lots of head cases like you who giggle for no good reason. What moves you to say the things you do is incomprehensible. -- Americans deserve better. |
Treatment of Females - Does this meet your approval, Krause?
"F.O.A.D." wrote:
On 12/1/13, 11:55 AM, Califbill wrote: Hank© wrote: On 12/1/2013 8:16 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote: On 12/1/13, 1:04 AM, Tim wrote: On Saturday, November 30, 2013 1:56:26 PM UTC-6, F. O. A. D. wrote: On 11/30/13, 1:58 PM, Tim wrote: On Saturday, November 30, 2013 8:51:08 AM UTC-6, F.O.A.D. wrote: Well, that's been established for over 235 years. Did you think it would be overturned next week? I know for a fact that there are many right-wing bible thumpers in this country who are working hard to push their religious beliefs onto those who believe differently. A good number of those thumpers are politicians. Why do you listen to them?: I don't. They impact the lives of people I care about with their religion, their hate, their need to control. The Harry, you need to talk to the people you care about. It's not the guy on the soap box, but the people listening.... It's the self-proclaimed christian politician/leader on the soap box passing "christian" legislation that discriminates against women, children, gays, minorities, et cetera, that bothers me. Hey, if you want to bury your head in the sand and pretend as if your hate-filled co-religionists aren't hurting society, go right ahead. After all, you're not the daddy who has to explain to a small child why the draconian christian republican cuts in the SNAP program mean less food on the table and in his or her belly, and that such cuts demonstrate how "pro-life" these christian republican legislators are. Usually in these sorts of scenarios, *Daddy is no where to be found* Or daddy is feeding the kids baloney sandwich and drinking IW Harper, while dressing well. It's a sad giggle when you realize that righties don't really believe in right to life for those already alive. But a fetus? Hey, that's the way to control women, eh? I see you showing your stupidity again. Changing the subject because you are too stupid to stay on subject. |
Treatment of Females - Does this meet your approval, Krause?
On 12/1/2013 12:53 PM, Califbill wrote:
"F.O.A.D." wrote: On 12/1/13, 11:55 AM, Califbill wrote: Hank© wrote: On 12/1/2013 8:16 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote: On 12/1/13, 1:04 AM, Tim wrote: On Saturday, November 30, 2013 1:56:26 PM UTC-6, F. O. A. D. wrote: On 11/30/13, 1:58 PM, Tim wrote: On Saturday, November 30, 2013 8:51:08 AM UTC-6, F.O.A.D. wrote: Well, that's been established for over 235 years. Did you think it would be overturned next week? I know for a fact that there are many right-wing bible thumpers in this country who are working hard to push their religious beliefs onto those who believe differently. A good number of those thumpers are politicians. Why do you listen to them?: I don't. They impact the lives of people I care about with their religion, their hate, their need to control. The Harry, you need to talk to the people you care about. It's not the guy on the soap box, but the people listening.... It's the self-proclaimed christian politician/leader on the soap box passing "christian" legislation that discriminates against women, children, gays, minorities, et cetera, that bothers me. Hey, if you want to bury your head in the sand and pretend as if your hate-filled co-religionists aren't hurting society, go right ahead. After all, you're not the daddy who has to explain to a small child why the draconian christian republican cuts in the SNAP program mean less food on the table and in his or her belly, and that such cuts demonstrate how "pro-life" these christian republican legislators are. Usually in these sorts of scenarios, *Daddy is no where to be found* Or daddy is feeding the kids baloney sandwich and drinking IW Harper, while dressing well. It's a sad giggle when you realize that righties don't really believe in right to life for those already alive. But a fetus? Hey, that's the way to control women, eh? I see you showing your stupidity again. Changing the subject because you are too stupid to stay on subject. He's stupid in so many ways. That's just one of them. -- Americans deserve better. |
Treatment of Females - Does this meet your approval, Krause?
On Saturday, November 30, 2013 5:29:27 PM UTC-5, F.O.A.D. wrote:
If you are hit by a car, you should pay for your own treatment...or burial. Then hurry up and die, ****FACE..... |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:26 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com