about a $70 million website than a $24 billion shutdown, you just may be
a Republican....

iBoaterer wrote:
about a $70 million website than a $24 billion shutdown, you just may be
a Republican....

Actually a $350 million website, leading to a $ trillion spending function.

In article 301484919404854896.658239bmckeenospam-
, says...

iBoaterer wrote:
about a $70 million website than a $24 billion shutdown, you just may be
a Republican....

Actually a $350 million website, leading to a $ trillion spending function.

Cite?

iBoaterer wrote:
In article 301484919404854896.658239bmckeenospam-
, says...

iBoaterer wrote:
about a $70 million website than a $24 billion shutdown, you just may be
a Republican....

Actually a $350 million website, leading to a $ trillion spending function.

Cite?

Cite my ass. Get off your lazy ass, you are not doing any work anyway. It
is already admitted they spent over $300 million on the software that does
not work. You think they will require it be made good for no more
payments? It's the government. And how much do you think this ACA is
going to add to the debt?

In article 1525710591404866495.437275bmckeenospam-
, says...

iBoaterer wrote:
In article 301484919404854896.658239bmckeenospam-
, says...

iBoaterer wrote:
about a $70 million website than a $24 billion shutdown, you just may be
a Republican....

Actually a $350 million website, leading to a $ trillion spending function.

Cite?

Cite my ass. Get off your lazy ass, you are not doing any work anyway. It
is already admitted they spent over $300 million on the software that does
not work. You think they will require it be made good for no more
payments? It's the government. And how much do you think this ACA is
going to add to the debt?

As expected, nothing but bull**** from you.

iBoaterer wrote:
In article 1525710591404866495.437275bmckeenospam-
, says...

iBoaterer wrote:
In article 301484919404854896.658239bmckeenospam-
, says...

iBoaterer wrote:
about a $70 million website than a $24 billion shutdown, you just may be
a Republican....

Actually a $350 million website, leading to a $ trillion spending function.

Cite?

Cite my ass. Get off your lazy ass, you are not doing any work anyway. It
is already admitted they spent over $300 million on the software that does
not work. You think they will require it be made good for no more
payments? It's the government. And how much do you think this ACA is
going to add to the debt?

As expected, nothing but bull**** from you.

As expected, you can provide no substance for you posits.

On 10/30/13, 7:56 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 30 Oct 2013 16:07:17 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article 301484919404854896.658239bmckeenospam-
, says...

iBoaterer wrote:
about a $70 million website than a $24 billion shutdown, you just may be
a Republican....

Actually a $350 million website, leading to a $ trillion spending function.

Cite?

Do you have a TV? It has been covered extensively for a couple weeks



A pittance. Hell, an F-18 jet runs about $60 million each, and a nuclear
submarine is $2 billion. It's too bad the states with Republican
governors opted out and, basically, ****ed their citizens, eh?

--
Religion: together we can find the cure.

wrote:
On Wed, 30 Oct 2013 20:05:10 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 10/30/13, 7:56 PM, wrote:

A pittance. Hell, an F-18 jet runs about $60 million each, and a nuclear
submarine is $2 billion. It's too bad the states with Republican
governors opted out and, basically, ****ed their citizens, eh?

Airplanes are a jobs program for US aerospace employees
The prime contractor for Healthcare.Com was a Canadian company.

There is more to the opt out than simply rejecting "free money" from
the government. It brings on an unfunded mandate in 3 years when the
federal money stops.
It is similar to those high speed rail deals where the feds get the
project started and then walk away leaving the state on the hook to
not only finish the project but run a money losing train for decades.

The Republican governors turned it down because they are Republicans.

On 10/30/2013 8:41 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
wrote:
On Wed, 30 Oct 2013 20:05:10 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 10/30/13, 7:56 PM, wrote:

A pittance. Hell, an F-18 jet runs about $60 million each, and a nuclear
submarine is $2 billion. It's too bad the states with Republican
governors opted out and, basically, ****ed their citizens, eh?

Airplanes are a jobs program for US aerospace employees
The prime contractor for Healthcare.Com was a Canadian company.

There is more to the opt out than simply rejecting "free money" from
the government. It brings on an unfunded mandate in 3 years when the
federal money stops.
It is similar to those high speed rail deals where the feds get the
project started and then walk away leaving the state on the hook to
not only finish the project but run a money losing train for decades.

The Republican governors turned it down because they are Republicans.

Simply said by a simpleton.

In article , says...

wrote:
On Wed, 30 Oct 2013 20:05:10 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 10/30/13, 7:56 PM, wrote:

A pittance. Hell, an F-18 jet runs about $60 million each, and a nuclear
submarine is $2 billion. It's too bad the states with Republican
governors opted out and, basically, ****ed their citizens, eh?

Airplanes are a jobs program for US aerospace employees
The prime contractor for Healthcare.Com was a Canadian company.

There is more to the opt out than simply rejecting "free money" from
the government. It brings on an unfunded mandate in 3 years when the
federal money stops.
It is similar to those high speed rail deals where the feds get the
project started and then walk away leaving the state on the hook to
not only finish the project but run a money losing train for decades.

The Republican governors turned it down because they are Republicans.

Do you remember Bill Clinton's effort to get more cops on the street? He paid for them for
the first year and then the local jurisdiction needed to pick up the tab for the continued
employment of the cops. Most were terminated when the federal money ran out.