By the way...
 

If you live in a RED STATE and your governor has rejected the Affordable
Care Act, you will not be able to get the same assistance that those in
states that have accepted the ACA. Blame your governor, not the
President or the ACA.

Tough titty, Floridians. :)

By the way...
 

On 10/27/13, 10:41 AM, wrote:
On Sun, 27 Oct 2013 10:09:41 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

If you live in a RED STATE and your governor has rejected the Affordable
Care Act, you will not be able to get the same assistance that those in
states that have accepted the ACA. Blame your governor, not the
President or the ACA.

Tough titty, Floridians. :)

OTOH if you notice your Medicare Advantage plan is not quite as good
as it was last year you can blame that on the $70 billion ACA sucked
out of the program.
Tough titties grandma.


I didn't have a Medicare Advantage program last year and in fact I still
am not on Medicare.

By the way...
 

"F.O.A.D." wrote:
If you live in a RED STATE and your governor has rejected the Affordable
Care Act, you will not be able to get the same assistance that those in
states that have accepted the ACA. Blame your governor, not the President or the ACA.

Tough titty, Floridians. :)

Prime example of a badly written law. Maybe if they had not rammed through
an unread law at the last minute, the law might actually work.
http://www.latimes.com/nation/la-na-...#axzz2iwfjGewk

By the way...
 

On 10/27/13, 2:05 PM, Califbill wrote:
"F.O.A.D." wrote:
If you live in a RED STATE and your governor has rejected the Affordable
Care Act, you will not be able to get the same assistance that those in
states that have accepted the ACA. Blame your governor, not the President or the ACA.

Tough titty, Floridians. :)

Prime example of a badly written law. Maybe if they had not rammed through
an unread law at the last minute, the law might actually work.
http://www.latimes.com/nation/la-na-...#axzz2iwfjGewk



And it only took two or three years to straighten out Medicare problems
when it was introduced...

By the way...
 

wrote:
On Sun, 27 Oct 2013 14:10:33 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 10/27/13, 2:05 PM, Califbill wrote:
"F.O.A.D." wrote:
If you live in a RED STATE and your governor has rejected the Affordable
Care Act, you will not be able to get the same assistance that those in
states that have accepted the ACA. Blame your governor, not the President or the ACA.

Tough titty, Floridians. :)

Prime example of a badly written law. Maybe if they had not rammed through
an unread law at the last minute, the law might actually work.
http://www.latimes.com/nation/la-na-...#axzz2iwfjGewk



And it only took two or three years to straighten out Medicare problems
when it was introduced...

They have been screwing with Medicare since it started, trying to get
the kinks out but the big problem now is how we pay for it. The same
will be true of ACA, just much sooner.

Good. It'll help us transition to national health care like all the big
countries

By the way...
 

On Sunday, October 27, 2013 10:09:41 AM UTC-4, F.O.A.D. wrote:


Flagged for the **** it is.

By the way...
 

F.O.A.D. wrote:
wrote:
On Sun, 27 Oct 2013 14:10:33 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 10/27/13, 2:05 PM, Califbill wrote:
"F.O.A.D." wrote:
If you live in a RED STATE and your governor has rejected the Affordable
Care Act, you will not be able to get the same assistance that those in
states that have accepted the ACA. Blame your governor, not the President or the ACA.

Tough titty, Floridians. :)

Prime example of a badly written law. Maybe if they had not rammed through
an unread law at the last minute, the law might actually work.
http://www.latimes.com/nation/la-na-...#axzz2iwfjGewk



And it only took two or three years to straighten out Medicare problems
when it was introduced...

They have been screwing with Medicare since it started, trying to get
the kinks out but the big problem now is how we pay for it. The same
will be true of ACA, just much sooner.

Good. It'll help us transition to national health care like all the big
countries

Be prepared for very regressive taxes when that happens. How do you think
those countries in Europe pay for that healthcare? One way is large
consumer taxes. Over a buck a gallon on gasoline 10 years ago. Not income
tax, but that old regressive tax that goes across all the populace. Canada
has an 18% VAT tax. Everybody who spends money, pays. Actually I think
that is very good. Gets rid of a lot of freeloading.

By the way...
 

"F.O.A.D." wrote:
On 10/27/13, 2:05 PM, Califbill wrote:
"F.O.A.D." wrote:
If you live in a RED STATE and your governor has rejected the Affordable
Care Act, you will not be able to get the same assistance that those in
states that have accepted the ACA. Blame your governor, not the President or the ACA.

Tough titty, Floridians. :)

Prime example of a badly written law. Maybe if they had not rammed through
an unread law at the last minute, the law might actually work.
http://www.latimes.com/nation/la-na-...#axzz2iwfjGewk



And it only took two or three years to straighten out Medicare problems
when it was introduced...

Medicare still has lots of problems. Mostly cost. Was only going to cost
$500 million when they brought it out. You actually pointed out a major
problem in one of the other theads. You are going to MediCare as it is
much cheaper and does not burdon your present insurance company. Someone
has to pay, and that is the taxpayers, and since we are borrowing 40% of
the money we spend! that means.my grand kids and their kids will pay the
bills, maybe. Too many last minute, rushed through the pipe laws have
created major problems in the last 20 years, and probably before that.
California rushed through a energy deregulation law a few years ago. We
are still paying more for energy because of that. Allowed Enron and
Calpine and others to buy PG&E and SDGE generating facilities that the
state said the utilities had to sell at bargain basement prices. Then the
utility companies had to pay whatever the wholesaler wanted as only the
retail price was controlled, not the wholesale price. PGE went bankrupt at
the time.

By the way...
 

15 percent here. Varies in the different provinces as it's a combination of the Federal GST and provincial PST.
They 'harmonized it guite a while ago here and call it HST.
Originally they wanted to call it the 'blended sales tax' but locals decided that the BST stood for 'bull**** tax' so the gov't changed the name.

By the way...
 

True North wrote:
15 percent here. Varies in the different provinces as it's a combination
of the Federal GST and provincial PST.
They 'harmonized it guite a while ago here and call it HST.
Originally they wanted to call it the 'blended sales tax' but locals
decided that the BST stood for 'bull**** tax' so the gov't changed the name.

Ok. Free medical?

By the way...
 

F.O.A.D. wrote:

As I have stated several times, I am planning to discontinue coverage
with my local union, since I am at the age where I may start incurring
serious health care charges, and I don't want to burden my local's
plan with that. My buying coverage from my local has worked out well
for both parties, since my annual health plan charges have been small
relative to the premiums I pay. So I shall be signing up for and
paying for Medicare B, and will subscribe to some supplemental plan,
but which one of those I don't know.
What a load of crap. Even if you weren't a documented tax-dodger this
would still be unbelievable!

By the way...
 

F.O.A.D. wrote:
If you live in a RED STATE and your governor has rejected the
Affordable Care Act, you will not be able to get the same assistance
that those in states that have accepted the ACA. Blame your governor,
not the President or the ACA.

Tough titty, Floridians. :)
And 35 other states. 72% have opted out.

By the way...
 

Stop it Johnny.
I would never enter into an agreement with an unhonourable poster...so no, I didn't back out of any agreement.

By the way...
 

On Tue, 29 Oct 2013 05:12:16 -0700 (PDT), True North wrote:

Stop it Johnny.
I would never enter into an agreement with an unhonourable poster...so no, I didn't back out of any agreement.

Well, you've answered, falsely, one question. Now how about the others? Even iboaterr had the balls
to answer, and he's not the one tossing out the comments!

Would you be happy with a Sharia government in Canada? Would you like a government like that of
Mexico in Canada? Just wondering what your thoughts are on the subject.

Have you not yet learned to spell the name of our country? It's' America'.

John H. -- Hope you're having a great day!

By the way...
 

I sometimes spell it like a lot if y'all pronounce it.

By the way...
 

Make that 'of'...

By the way...
 

On Tue, 29 Oct 2013 05:36:30 -0700 (PDT), True North wrote:

I sometimes spell it like a lot if y'all pronounce it.

Show some respect. The reason you're not speaking Chinese is because of 'America'.

Now you've answered two questions...here are the rest.

I cannot understand either the fear or the embarrassment that makes you unable to answer the
questions. I cannot think of a question I would be afraid to answer as long as it was about me and
not family, etc.

Again:

Would you be happy with a Sharia government in Canada? Would you like a government like that of
Mexico in Canada? Just wondering what your thoughts are on the subject.


John H. -- Hope you're having a great day!

By the way...
 

On 10/29/2013 8:36 AM, True North wrote:
I sometimes spell it like a lot if y'all pronounce it.


You are watching too much tv, get outside once in a while..

By the way...
 

On 10/29/2013 8:37 AM, True North wrote:
Make that 'of'...


Of what?

By the way...
 

John H wrote:
On Tue, 29 Oct 2013 05:36:30 -0700 (PDT), True North wrote:

I sometimes spell it like a lot if y'all pronounce it.
Show some respect. The reason you're not speaking Chinese is because of 'America'.

Now you've answered two questions...here are the rest.

I cannot understand either the fear or the embarrassment that makes you unable to answer the
questions. I cannot think of a question I would be afraid to answer as long as it was about me and
not family, etc.

Again:

Would you be happy with a Sharia government in Canada? Would you like a government like that of
Mexico in Canada? Just wondering what your thoughts are on the subject.


John H. -- Hope you're having a great day!


"Sharia" doesn't compute on his EOL Playbook so he is forced to ignore you.

By the way...
 

On 10/29/2013 8:31 PM, Earl wrote:
John H wrote:
On Tue, 29 Oct 2013 05:36:30 -0700 (PDT), True North
wrote:

I sometimes spell it like a lot if y'all pronounce it.
Show some respect. The reason you're not speaking Chinese is because
of 'America'.

Now you've answered two questions...here are the rest.

I cannot understand either the fear or the embarrassment that makes
you unable to answer the
questions. I cannot think of a question I would be afraid to answer as
long as it was about me and
not family, etc.

Again:

Would you be happy with a Sharia government in Canada? Would you like
a government like that of
Mexico in Canada? Just wondering what your thoughts are on the subject.


John H. -- Hope you're having a great day!


"Sharia" doesn't compute on his EOL Playbook so he is forced to ignore you.

It's "baby of the family" syndrome.. They are used to running their
mouths with mommy protecting them from the big brothers and sisters,
then in school, the same protecting them from themselves... These
"babies" are difficult to find accountable for running their mouth...

By the way...
 

In article , says...

On 10/29/2013 8:31 PM, Earl wrote:
John H wrote:
On Tue, 29 Oct 2013 05:36:30 -0700 (PDT), True North
wrote:

I sometimes spell it like a lot if y'all pronounce it.
Show some respect. The reason you're not speaking Chinese is because
of 'America'.

Now you've answered two questions...here are the rest.

I cannot understand either the fear or the embarrassment that makes
you unable to answer the
questions. I cannot think of a question I would be afraid to answer as
long as it was about me and
not family, etc.

Again:

Would you be happy with a Sharia government in Canada? Would you like
a government like that of
Mexico in Canada? Just wondering what your thoughts are on the subject.


John H. -- Hope you're having a great day!


"Sharia" doesn't compute on his EOL Playbook so he is forced to ignore you.

It's "baby of the family" syndrome.. They are used to running their
mouths with mommy protecting them from the big brothers and sisters,
then in school, the same protecting them from themselves... These
"babies" are difficult to find accountable for running their mouth...

That rates right up there with some of the dumbest crap to ever come
from your jawbone.

By the way...
 

On 10/30/13, 7:56 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says...

On 10/29/2013 8:31 PM, Earl wrote:
John H wrote:
On Tue, 29 Oct 2013 05:36:30 -0700 (PDT), True North
wrote:

I sometimes spell it like a lot if y'all pronounce it.
Show some respect. The reason you're not speaking Chinese is because
of 'America'.

Now you've answered two questions...here are the rest.

I cannot understand either the fear or the embarrassment that makes
you unable to answer the
questions. I cannot think of a question I would be afraid to answer as
long as it was about me and
not family, etc.

Again:

Would you be happy with a Sharia government in Canada? Would you like
a government like that of
Mexico in Canada? Just wondering what your thoughts are on the subject.


John H. -- Hope you're having a great day!


"Sharia" doesn't compute on his EOL Playbook so he is forced to ignore you.

It's "baby of the family" syndrome.. They are used to running their
mouths with mommy protecting them from the big brothers and sisters,
then in school, the same protecting them from themselves... These
"babies" are difficult to find accountable for running their mouth...

That rates right up there with some of the dumbest crap to ever come
from your jawbone.


There's no reason to take seriously anything a true psychotic like Scott
Ingersoll says.

--
Religion: together we can find the cure.

By the way...
 

On 10/30/2013 8:04 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
There's no reason to take seriously anything a true psychotic like Scott
Ingersoll says.

--
Religion: together we can find the cure.

Who's the psychotic one?

By the way...
 

On 10/30/2013 8:04 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
There's no reason to take seriously anything a true psychotic like Scott
Ingersoll says.

--
Religion: together we can find the cure.

How bout you? Are you to be taken seriously?

By the way...
 

In article , says...

On 10/27/13, 2:05 PM, Califbill wrote:
"F.O.A.D." wrote:
If you live in a RED STATE and your governor has rejected the Affordable
Care Act, you will not be able to get the same assistance that those in
states that have accepted the ACA. Blame your governor, not the President or the ACA.

Tough titty, Floridians. :)

Prime example of a badly written law. Maybe if they had not rammed through
an unread law at the last minute, the law might actually work.
http://www.latimes.com/nation/la-na-...#axzz2iwfjGewk



And it only took two or three years to straighten out Medicare problems
when it was introduced...

I suppose you believe that Medicare is running a surplus.