"Hank©" wrote in message
eb.com...


I was able to distinguish Luddite's post from your reply without no
Steeenkin "separator". Who did what to make that happen?


I left his whole signature line in my reply. I usually cut them
because some people here like to make big political statements over
and over again using their signature line as the vehicle.

On 10/10/2013 8:51 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:


"Hank©" wrote in message
eb.com...


I was able to distinguish Luddite's post from your reply without no
Steeenkin "separator". Who did what to make that happen?


I left his whole signature line in my reply. I usually cut them
because some people here like to make big political statements over and
over again using their signature line as the vehicle.

I didn't notice whether or not his sig got stripped. Your news reader
should be able to automatically strip sigs. Maybe there's a setting you
need to set to make that happen.

On 10/10/2013 9:02 AM, Hank© wrote:
On 10/10/2013 8:51 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:


"Hank©" wrote in message
eb.com...


I was able to distinguish Luddite's post from your reply without no
Steeenkin "separator". Who did what to make that happen?


I left his whole signature line in my reply. I usually cut them
because some people here like to make big political statements over and
over again using their signature line as the vehicle.

I didn't notice whether or not his sig got stripped. Your news reader
should be able to automatically strip sigs. Maybe there's a setting you
need to set to make that happen.

I see no rhyme or reason.... Dicks posts have been in and out of the sig
file area of my reader for a long time.. Never really figured out why..

On Thu, 10 Oct 2013 08:51:05 -0400, "Mr. Luddite" nowayalso.jose.com wrote:



"Hank©" wrote in message
web.com...


I was able to distinguish Luddite's post from your reply without no
Steeenkin "separator". Who did what to make that happen?


I left his whole signature line in my reply. I usually cut them
because some people here like to make big political statements over
and over again using their signature line as the vehicle.

I honestly, cross my heart, pinky promise that "Hope you're having a great day!" is not meant to be
political. I suppose Kevin or someone could (and would) argue that, but that's my story and I'm
stickin' with it.
--

John H.

Hope you're having a great day!

On Thursday, 10 October 2013 11:43:15 UTC-3, John H wrote:
On Thu, 10 Oct 2013 08:51:05 -0400, "Mr. Luddite" nowayalso.jose.com wrote:







"Hank©" wrote in message

web.com...





I was able to distinguish Luddite's post from your reply without no

Steeenkin "separator". Who did what to make that happen?





I left his whole signature line in my reply. I usually cut them

because some people here like to make big political statements over

and over again using their signature line as the vehicle.



I honestly, cross my heart, pinky promise that "Hope you're having a great day!" is not meant to be

political. I suppose Kevin or someone could (and would) argue that, but that's my story and I'm

stickin' with it.

--


John H.


Really, Johnny.. in light of your unsociable behavior day after day, many would doubt your sincerity.

On Thursday, October 10, 2013 10:56:52 AM UTC-4, True North wrote:

Really, Johnny.. in light of your unsociable behavior day after day, many would doubt your sincerity.

Just like you, you hypocrite coward ****.

True North wrote:
On Thursday, 10 October 2013 11:43:15 UTC-3, John H wrote:
On Thu, 10 Oct 2013 08:51:05 -0400, "Mr. Luddite" nowayalso.jose.com wrote:







"Hank©" wrote in message

eb.com...





I was able to distinguish Luddite's post from your reply without no

Steeenkin "separator". Who did what to make that happen?





I left his whole signature line in my reply. I usually cut them

because some people here like to make big political statements over

and over again using their signature line as the vehicle.



I honestly, cross my heart, pinky promise that "Hope you're having a
great day!" is not meant to be

political. I suppose Kevin or someone could (and would) argue that, but
that's my story and I'm

stickin' with it.

--


John H.


Really, Johnny.. in light of your unsociable behavior day after day, many
would doubt your sincerity.

Talk about unsociable behavior.

"John H" wrote in message
...

On Thu, 10 Oct 2013 08:51:05 -0400, "Mr. Luddite" nowayalso.jose.com
wrote:



"Hank©" wrote in message
web.com...


I was able to distinguish Luddite's post from your reply without no
Steeenkin "separator". Who did what to make that happen?


I left his whole signature line in my reply. I usually cut them
because some people here like to make big political statements over
and over again using their signature line as the vehicle.

I honestly, cross my heart, pinky promise that "Hope you're having a
great day!" is not meant to be
political. I suppose Kevin or someone could (and would) argue that,
but that's my story and I'm
stickin' with it.
--

John H.

Hope you're having a great day!

(have no clue what to do here)

John, I wasn't referring to your signature line obviously. I
usually strip them in replies as a matter of habit.
Signature lines are nice and everything but if a thread gets long with
many replies that quote everything previously said, it gets old having
to scroll down through all the quotes and repeated signature lines
(especially the political agenda ones) just to see that somebody
added, "Cite".

I try, not always successfully, to cut previous quotes that are not
germane to a reply or comment I intend to add. Keeps it cleaner for
me and minimizes erroneous attributes which seem to happen quite often
here.

On 10/10/13 11:21 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:


"John H" wrote in message
...

On Thu, 10 Oct 2013 08:51:05 -0400, "Mr. Luddite" nowayalso.jose.com
wrote:



"Hank©" wrote in message
eb.com...


I was able to distinguish Luddite's post from your reply without no
Steeenkin "separator". Who did what to make that happen?


I left his whole signature line in my reply. I usually cut them
because some people here like to make big political statements over
and over again using their signature line as the vehicle.

I honestly, cross my heart, pinky promise that "Hope you're having a
great day!" is not meant to be
political. I suppose Kevin or someone could (and would) argue that, but
that's my story and I'm
stickin' with it.

My newsreader, Thunderbird, deletes properly formated sig lines when
putting up a post that incorporates previous posts.

On 10/10/2013 11:21 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:


"John H" wrote in message
...

On Thu, 10 Oct 2013 08:51:05 -0400, "Mr. Luddite" nowayalso.jose.com
wrote:



"Hank©" wrote in message
eb.com...


I was able to distinguish Luddite's post from your reply without no
Steeenkin "separator". Who did what to make that happen?


I left his whole signature line in my reply. I usually cut them
because some people here like to make big political statements over
and over again using their signature line as the vehicle.

I honestly, cross my heart, pinky promise that "Hope you're having a
great day!" is not meant to be
political. I suppose Kevin or someone could (and would) argue that, but
that's my story and I'm
stickin' with it.

This time your reply appended John's sig line and, of course, my
newsreader stripped it automatically when I made this reply to you