|
No Guns Allowed at Terrorist NRA Confab
On Tue, 24 Sep 2013 13:21:20 -0400, John H
wrote: On Tue, 24 Sep 2013 09:53:01 -0700, jps wrote: But what could be safer than having everybody armed? Isn't that what the NRA preaches? Won't they be sitting ducks for anyone targeting a "gun free zone?" This just shows what absolute hypocrites the NRA are and how little they believe in their own message. It's about selling more guns to an ever smaller part of the population. Just for you jps: It was around 10:30 p.m. when Matt Fugate heard a commotion from inside his home. When Fugate ran to investigate, he found two men assaulting his brother, John Fugate. One of the suspects was reportedly brandishing what turned out to be a pellet gun. When Fugate saw his brother in danger, he did not hesitate to take action, "I raced for the gun vault and had my gun in my hand in five seconds, …" he explained. Fugate ordered the intruders not to move and to keep their hands up. While Fugate held the intruders at gun-point, his brother was able to call the police. There were no serious injuries reported. Matt Fugate later commented on the ordeal, "I was scared and angry … I'm relieved that nothing bad came of it … that it ended the way it did, peacefully." (TheBlaze.com, Evansville, IN, 4/27/13) http://tinyurl.com/cvhm3l5 Thank goodness for guns, huh? In that rare instance, yes. Most incidents with guns involve family members who lose their minds and kill either themselves or someone close to them. But you can ignore all that, John. Just like the "Christians" in congress ignore the 95% of food stamp recipients who need food and instead focus on the 5% that game the system. Forest/trees. |
No Guns Allowed at Terrorist NRA Confab
On Tue, 24 Sep 2013 10:50:57 -0700, jps wrote:
On Tue, 24 Sep 2013 13:21:20 -0400, John H wrote: On Tue, 24 Sep 2013 09:53:01 -0700, jps wrote: But what could be safer than having everybody armed? Isn't that what the NRA preaches? Won't they be sitting ducks for anyone targeting a "gun free zone?" This just shows what absolute hypocrites the NRA are and how little they believe in their own message. It's about selling more guns to an ever smaller part of the population. Just for you jps: It was around 10:30 p.m. when Matt Fugate heard a commotion from inside his home. When Fugate ran to investigate, he found two men assaulting his brother, John Fugate. One of the suspects was reportedly brandishing what turned out to be a pellet gun. When Fugate saw his brother in danger, he did not hesitate to take action, "I raced for the gun vault and had my gun in my hand in five seconds, …" he explained. Fugate ordered the intruders not to move and to keep their hands up. While Fugate held the intruders at gun-point, his brother was able to call the police. There were no serious injuries reported. Matt Fugate later commented on the ordeal, "I was scared and angry … I'm relieved that nothing bad came of it … that it ended the way it did, peacefully." (TheBlaze.com, Evansville, IN, 4/27/13) http://tinyurl.com/cvhm3l5 Thank goodness for guns, huh? In that rare instance, yes. Most incidents with guns involve family members who lose their minds and kill either themselves or someone close to them. But you can ignore all that, John. Just like the "Christians" in congress ignore the 95% of food stamp recipients who need food and instead focus on the 5% that game the system. Forest/trees. Pferde apfel. -- John H. Hope you're having a great day! |
No Guns Allowed at Terrorist NRA Confab
On 9/24/2013 1:47 PM, jps wrote:
On Tue, 24 Sep 2013 10:20:46 -0700 (PDT), wrote: On Tuesday, September 24, 2013 12:53:01 PM UTC-4, jps wrote: On Mon, 23 Sep 2013 20:52:02 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: The National Rifle Association's annual meeting is this weekend and it's a galaxy of pro-gun stars! Sarah Palin! Glenn Beck! Newt Gringrich! Ollie North! Oh, and no guns. Yes, in this celebration of all things that go bang, each of these NRA-sanctioned speakers will be offering their address before a crowd of disarmed gun enthusiasts. On its website, the NRA warns: North Carolina State law prohibits the carrying of firearms in the Charlotte Convention Center, and the Time Warner Cable Arena. In addition, the Rules and Regulations of the Charlotte Convention Center prohibit the carrying of firearms in the Center. Pursuant to Time Warner Cable Arena policy, all individuals entering the Arena will be subject to a magnetometer security check. To think that you'd have to suffer the indignity of going through a metal detector to hear someone proselytize about your right to carry your gun anywhere you want is easy irony. READ MO http://www.huffingtonpost.com/josh-s..._b_576680.html 63 - - - snerk But what could be safer than having everybody armed? Isn't that what the NRA preaches? Won't they be sitting ducks for anyone targeting a "gun free zone?" This just shows what absolute hypocrites the NRA are and how little they believe in their own message. It's about selling more guns to an ever smaller part of the population. You obviously missed: "North Carolina State law prohibits the carrying of firearms in the Charlotte Convention Center..." Your knee must really be tired. Why in God's name would the NRA choose a venue that didn't allow guns? "Gun Free Zones" are anathema to the NRA. The reason is that leadership are a bunch of ****ing liars and probably afraid of being killed by their own members. No, it's illegal to carry there, but this won't stop you from your lies and hypocritical rants... |
No Guns Allowed at Terrorist NRA Confab
On Tue, 24 Sep 2013 10:50:57 -0700, jps wrote:
On Tue, 24 Sep 2013 13:21:20 -0400, John H wrote: On Tue, 24 Sep 2013 09:53:01 -0700, jps wrote: But what could be safer than having everybody armed? Isn't that what the NRA preaches? Won't they be sitting ducks for anyone targeting a "gun free zone?" This just shows what absolute hypocrites the NRA are and how little they believe in their own message. It's about selling more guns to an ever smaller part of the population. Just for you jps: It was around 10:30 p.m. when Matt Fugate heard a commotion from inside his home. When Fugate ran to investigate, he found two men assaulting his brother, John Fugate. One of the suspects was reportedly brandishing what turned out to be a pellet gun. When Fugate saw his brother in danger, he did not hesitate to take action, "I raced for the gun vault and had my gun in my hand in five seconds, …" he explained. Fugate ordered the intruders not to move and to keep their hands up. While Fugate held the intruders at gun-point, his brother was able to call the police. There were no serious injuries reported. Matt Fugate later commented on the ordeal, "I was scared and angry … I'm relieved that nothing bad came of it … that it ended the way it did, peacefully." (TheBlaze.com, Evansville, IN, 4/27/13) http://tinyurl.com/cvhm3l5 Thank goodness for guns, huh? In that rare instance, yes. Most incidents with guns involve family members who lose their minds and kill either themselves or someone close to them. But you can ignore all that, John. Just like the "Christians" in congress ignore the 95% of food stamp recipients who need food and instead focus on the 5% that game the system. Forest/trees. Here jps. Food for thought. http://www.ijreview.com/2013/09/8085...c-shootings/6/ -- John H. Hope you're having a great day! |
No Guns Allowed at Terrorist NRA Confab
On Tue, 24 Sep 2013 10:47:34 -0700, jps wrote:
On Tue, 24 Sep 2013 10:20:46 -0700 (PDT), wrote: Why in God's name would the NRA choose a venue that didn't allow guns? Why not? "Gun Free Zones" are anathema to the NRA. Bull****. The reason is that leadership are a bunch of ****ing liars and probably afraid of being killed by their own members. More bull****. Here, just for you. Food for thought. http://www.ijreview.com/2013/09/8085...-shootings/12/ -- John H. Hope you're having a great day! |
No Guns Allowed at Terrorist NRA Confab
On 9/24/13 2:18 PM, skin a cat wrote:
On 9/24/2013 1:47 PM, jps wrote: On Tue, 24 Sep 2013 10:20:46 -0700 (PDT), wrote: On Tuesday, September 24, 2013 12:53:01 PM UTC-4, jps wrote: On Mon, 23 Sep 2013 20:52:02 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: The National Rifle Association's annual meeting is this weekend and it's a galaxy of pro-gun stars! Sarah Palin! Glenn Beck! Newt Gringrich! Ollie North! Oh, and no guns. Yes, in this celebration of all things that go bang, each of these NRA-sanctioned speakers will be offering their address before a crowd of disarmed gun enthusiasts. On its website, the NRA warns: North Carolina State law prohibits the carrying of firearms in the Charlotte Convention Center, and the Time Warner Cable Arena. In addition, the Rules and Regulations of the Charlotte Convention Center prohibit the carrying of firearms in the Center. Pursuant to Time Warner Cable Arena policy, all individuals entering the Arena will be subject to a magnetometer security check. To think that you'd have to suffer the indignity of going through a metal detector to hear someone proselytize about your right to carry your gun anywhere you want is easy irony. READ MO http://www.huffingtonpost.com/josh-s..._b_576680.html 63 - - - snerk But what could be safer than having everybody armed? Isn't that what the NRA preaches? Won't they be sitting ducks for anyone targeting a "gun free zone?" This just shows what absolute hypocrites the NRA are and how little they believe in their own message. It's about selling more guns to an ever smaller part of the population. You obviously missed: "North Carolina State law prohibits the carrying of firearms in the Charlotte Convention Center..." Your knee must really be tired. Why in God's name would the NRA choose a venue that didn't allow guns? "Gun Free Zones" are anathema to the NRA. The reason is that leadership are a bunch of ****ing liars and probably afraid of being killed by their own members. No, it's illegal to carry there, but this won't stop you from your lies and hypocritical rants... Funny stuff. The NRA, which advocates "guns for everyone and carry them everywhere," will have an unarmed convention, well, except for the NRA'ers who try to sneak in with their personal firearms. |
No Guns Allowed at Terrorist NRA Confab
On Tue, 24 Sep 2013 14:30:09 -0400, John H
wrote: On Tue, 24 Sep 2013 10:47:34 -0700, jps wrote: On Tue, 24 Sep 2013 10:20:46 -0700 (PDT), wrote: Why in God's name would the NRA choose a venue that didn't allow guns? Why not? Because in every case of mass murder, the NRA has supported the idea that more guns would have made the situation safer. "Gun Free Zones" are anathema to the NRA. Bull****. You must be daft. The NRA has been arguing against gun free zones and citing them as the reason that shooters are attracted to them. This argument was used in response to Sandyhook and elsewhere. The reason is that leadership are a bunch of ****ing liars and probably afraid of being killed by their own members. More bull****. Why would they book their event in an arena where guns were prohibited? The leadership is very vocal about guns making our citzenry safer. What's bull**** is any of your arguments, because you don't field anything that a brain would recognize as an argument. Here, just for you. Food for thought. http://www.ijreview.com/2013/09/8085...-shootings/12/ Deflection. Your best argument is to turn your head away and post bull**** that supports your point of view. You can't argue the points because there's no good argument. I can't believe you were a teacher. You'd think that math required critical thinking skills but your arguments contain none. |
No Guns Allowed at Terrorist NRA Confab
On Tue, 24 Sep 2013 14:16:31 -0400, skin a cat
wrote: On 9/24/2013 1:20 PM, wrote: On Tuesday, September 24, 2013 12:53:01 PM UTC-4, jps wrote: On Mon, 23 Sep 2013 20:52:02 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: The National Rifle Association's annual meeting is this weekend and it's a galaxy of pro-gun stars! Sarah Palin! Glenn Beck! Newt Gringrich! Ollie North! Oh, and no guns. Yes, in this celebration of all things that go bang, each of these NRA-sanctioned speakers will be offering their address before a crowd of disarmed gun enthusiasts. On its website, the NRA warns: North Carolina State law prohibits the carrying of firearms in the Charlotte Convention Center, and the Time Warner Cable Arena. In addition, the Rules and Regulations of the Charlotte Convention Center prohibit the carrying of firearms in the Center. Pursuant to Time Warner Cable Arena policy, all individuals entering the Arena will be subject to a magnetometer security check. To think that you'd have to suffer the indignity of going through a metal detector to hear someone proselytize about your right to carry your gun anywhere you want is easy irony. READ MO http://www.huffingtonpost.com/josh-s..._b_576680.html 63 - - - snerk But what could be safer than having everybody armed? Isn't that what the NRA preaches? Won't they be sitting ducks for anyone targeting a "gun free zone?" This just shows what absolute hypocrites the NRA are and how little they believe in their own message. It's about selling more guns to an ever smaller part of the population. You obviously missed: "North Carolina State law prohibits the carrying of firearms in the Charlotte Convention Center..." Your knee must really be tired. They have no shame... as long as they get theirs folks like JPS are happy to tell us all how much to sacrifice for them... You need your head examined. The inside, dummy. |
No Guns Allowed at Terrorist NRA Confab
On 9/24/13 3:00 PM, jps wrote:
On Tue, 24 Sep 2013 14:30:09 -0400, John H wrote: On Tue, 24 Sep 2013 10:47:34 -0700, jps wrote: On Tue, 24 Sep 2013 10:20:46 -0700 (PDT), wrote: Why in God's name would the NRA choose a venue that didn't allow guns? Why not? Because in every case of mass murder, the NRA has supported the idea that more guns would have made the situation safer. "Gun Free Zones" are anathema to the NRA. Bull****. You must be daft. The NRA has been arguing against gun free zones and citing them as the reason that shooters are attracted to them. This argument was used in response to Sandyhook and elsewhere. The reason is that leadership are a bunch of ****ing liars and probably afraid of being killed by their own members. More bull****. Why would they book their event in an arena where guns were prohibited? The leadership is very vocal about guns making our citzenry safer. What's bull**** is any of your arguments, because you don't field anything that a brain would recognize as an argument. Here, just for you. Food for thought. http://www.ijreview.com/2013/09/8085...-shootings/12/ Deflection. Your best argument is to turn your head away and post bull**** that supports your point of view. You can't argue the points because there's no good argument. I can't believe you were a teacher. You'd think that math required critical thinking skills but your arguments contain none. I can't believe Herring was a teacher, either. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:20 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com