In article ,
says...

On Thu, 19 Sep 2013 19:09:15 -0400, John H
wrote:

On Thu, 19 Sep 2013 17:34:12 -0400, wrote:

On Thu, 19 Sep 2013 09:09:57 -0400, John H
wrote:

This article, posted first by Mr. Luddite, says a great deal.

http://www.angelfire.com/emo2/republican/Manual.htm

There are many things to note, but the first lines in the conclusion offers some great advice:

"Do not get angry, ever"
"Remain calm, cool, collected, and relaxed"

Most of the liberal ideology posted doesn't deserve a loss of serenity. The name-calling especially!

Perhaps, one day, you will see that most right wing-nuts don't have
any rebuttal to ANY position remotely left of theirs, other than
flaming invective, hate, and anger. It is rather a way to attack the
messenger, rather than the message, but in a righteous sort of way.

Somebody else's take:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5WT1Vwlfyms

Gosh, you have to start name-calling in the first sentence! No sense in going any further.

You have me at a disadvantage! Whose name did I call?

You have to remember, John has always thought he was above everyone
else, and if you don't think exactly like he does, then you are wrong.
Period. The trouble is, he's a dolt and doesn't realize it.

On Fri, 20 Sep 2013 11:21:51 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 19 Sep 2013 19:09:15 -0400, John H
wrote:

On Thu, 19 Sep 2013 17:34:12 -0400, wrote:

On Thu, 19 Sep 2013 09:09:57 -0400, John H
wrote:

This article, posted first by Mr. Luddite, says a great deal.

http://www.angelfire.com/emo2/republican/Manual.htm

There are many things to note, but the first lines in the conclusion offers some great advice:

"Do not get angry, ever"
"Remain calm, cool, collected, and relaxed"

Most of the liberal ideology posted doesn't deserve a loss of serenity. The name-calling especially!

Perhaps, one day, you will see that most right wing-nuts don't have
any rebuttal to ANY position remotely left of theirs, other than
flaming invective, hate, and anger. It is rather a way to attack the
messenger, rather than the message, but in a righteous sort of way.

Somebody else's take:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5WT1Vwlfyms

Gosh, you have to start name-calling in the first sentence! No sense in going any further.

You have me at a disadvantage! Whose name did I call?

You have to remember, John has always thought he was above everyone
else, and if you don't think exactly like he does, then you are wrong.
Period. The trouble is, he's a dolt and doesn't realize it.

Name-calling - the last of the liberal recourses.
--

John H.

Hope you're having a great day!

In article ,
says...

On Fri, 20 Sep 2013 11:21:51 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 19 Sep 2013 19:09:15 -0400, John H
wrote:

On Thu, 19 Sep 2013 17:34:12 -0400, wrote:

On Thu, 19 Sep 2013 09:09:57 -0400, John H
wrote:

This article, posted first by Mr. Luddite, says a great deal.

http://www.angelfire.com/emo2/republican/Manual.htm

There are many things to note, but the first lines in the conclusion offers some great advice:

"Do not get angry, ever"
"Remain calm, cool, collected, and relaxed"

Most of the liberal ideology posted doesn't deserve a loss of serenity. The name-calling especially!

Perhaps, one day, you will see that most right wing-nuts don't have
any rebuttal to ANY position remotely left of theirs, other than
flaming invective, hate, and anger. It is rather a way to attack the
messenger, rather than the message, but in a righteous sort of way.

Somebody else's take:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5WT1Vwlfyms

Gosh, you have to start name-calling in the first sentence! No sense in going any further.

You have me at a disadvantage! Whose name did I call?

You have to remember, John has always thought he was above everyone
else, and if you don't think exactly like he does, then you are wrong.
Period. The trouble is, he's a dolt and doesn't realize it.

Name-calling - the last of the liberal recourses.

Name calling and facts are two very different things. The FACT is, you
are a dolt.