...and fifty years later...
 

.... we have a president who was elected because of "The color of his
skin", not "the content of his character"...

...and fifty years later...
 

On 8/24/2013 9:25 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
.... we have a president who was elected because of "The color of his
skin", not "the content of his character"...

Obviously.

...and fifty years later...
 

....and yet the best you repugnants could offer couldn't beat him.
That says something about your party.

...and fifty years later...
 

On 8/24/2013 9:53 AM, True North wrote:
...and yet the best you repugnants could offer couldn't beat him.
That says something about your party.


LOL, we did beat him... Just because the dems spent 4 years setting up
Ohio and Penn, doesn't change that.

...and fifty years later...
 

On 8/24/13 9:25 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
... we have a president who was elected because of "The color of his
skin", not "the content of his character"...


Bull****, but, what is far more interesting is that your party, the GOP,
the party of hate, ignorance, and racism, was unable to elect a war hero
or a captain of corporationism. If race was a factor, and I don't think
it was, it was because the majority of voters, both times, wasn't buying
into the hate, ignorance, and racism your party was selling and
continues to sell.

Looks like 2016 is going to turn out the same for you boys, because the
hate-mongering tea party types who control your party are going to
nominate yet another asshole, probably Rand Paul or Ted Cruz. If Hills
is the nominee, she will slaughter your boys.

...and fifty years later...
 

On 8/24/13 10:12 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 8/24/2013 9:53 AM, True North wrote:
...and yet the best you repugnants could offer couldn't beat him.
That says something about your party.


LOL, we did beat him... Just because the dems spent 4 years setting up
Ohio and Penn, doesn't change that.


So, in your years of social promotion in high school, you skipped math
entirely, eh?

...and fifty years later...
 

In article ,
says...

... we have a president who was elected because of "The color of his
skin", not "the content of his character"...

You are just plain insane. Get help. Please.

...and fifty years later...
 

In article ,
says...

On 8/24/2013 9:53 AM, True North wrote:
...and yet the best you repugnants could offer couldn't beat him.
That says something about your party.


LOL, we did beat him... Just because the dems spent 4 years setting up
Ohio and Penn, doesn't change that.

You stupid idiot!!! Do you realize how many levels of ignorant that
statement is?