|
Which...
On 8/4/2013 3:24 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 8/4/13 3:20 PM, wrote: On Sun, 04 Aug 2013 14:09:37 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 8/4/13 2:02 PM, wrote: On Sun, 04 Aug 2013 12:37:47 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: A sleaze, and hero to the right wing. Figures. ... and Martin is a hero to the left. A drug dealing gun running, brawling burglar who was going into the gutter while Zimmerman was trying to improve himself. Do you think those union school teachers were wrong suspending him 3 times in one term? It is clear he was going to pass that year (he had already missed too many days to be promoted) and very likely to simply drop out. Your hero! I'm on the left, and I am not aware of any lefties I know who consider Martin "a hero." Huh? Can I talk to Harry, Is Harry there? Again, none of the lefties I know consider Martin anything more than a victim, and certainly not a "hero." A victim of what? The evidence and the jury say Martin was the aggressor. |
Which...
In article ,
says... "iBoaterer" wrote in message ... In article , says... Do you think those union school teachers were wrong suspending him 3 times in one term? It is clear he was going to pass that year (he had already missed too many days to be promoted) and very likely to simply drop out. Your hero! Please show the evidence that he was a drug dealer, a gun runner or a burglar. Please show arrests. --------------------------- The reports have about the same veracity as those of Zimmerman molesting 12 year olds. You believe them. Why don't you believe the stories about Martin? Who said I believed them? As a matter of fact, I stated that the cousin CLAIMED...... As for the arrest records, they are what they are. |
Which...
In article ,
says... On Sun, 4 Aug 2013 15:01:49 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Sun, 4 Aug 2013 14:15:31 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Sun, 4 Aug 2013 12:36:34 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Sun, 4 Aug 2013 09:25:06 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: Boy, you sure are blind then, Jawbone Scotty! Zimmerman battered a police officer, lied to the cops, beat his wife but he's not a loser????? Cite No problem! http://tinyurl.com/o9a4jzc "In July 2005, he was arrested for ?resisting officer with violence.? The neighborhood watch volunteer who wanted to be a cop got into a scuffle with cops who were questioning a friend for alleged underage drinking. The charges were reduced and then waived after he entered an alcohol education program." "Then in August 2005, Zimmerman?s former fiance sought a restraining order against him because of domestic violence. Zimmerman sought a restraining order against her in return. Both were granted." And the lies to police: http://tinyurl.com/lmcl2vr Oh, according to his cousin, he molested her when she was young. That sounds like "opinion" from a place with "Partisan" in it's name. "The woman said Zimmerman would fondle her and penetrated her vagina with his fingers. She also revealed that Zimmerman molested other young girls. She spoke with a woman who was molested by Zimmerman as a youth, but the woman wanted to maintain her privacy. When she was 12 years old, Zimmerman made her rub his penis. Other times, he would take her to vacant rooms and kiss and fondle her." That you would stick up for a piece of **** that would do that is awful and I thought more of you than that. Was that Zimmerman, or your bud Krause? Harry's said such behavior is quite appropriate, or words to that effect. John (Gun Nut) H. Cite? Right here! http://tinyurl.com/o42at Learn to read! John (Gun Nut) H. READ WHAT, idiot? Heresay? I'd guess in your narrow mind that heresay about Martin is damning, but actual arrest records of Zimmerman are bull****, right? |
Which...
On Mon, 5 Aug 2013 08:11:57 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says... On Sun, 4 Aug 2013 15:01:49 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Sun, 4 Aug 2013 14:15:31 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Sun, 4 Aug 2013 12:36:34 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Sun, 4 Aug 2013 09:25:06 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: Boy, you sure are blind then, Jawbone Scotty! Zimmerman battered a police officer, lied to the cops, beat his wife but he's not a loser????? Cite No problem! http://tinyurl.com/o9a4jzc "In July 2005, he was arrested for ?resisting officer with violence.? The neighborhood watch volunteer who wanted to be a cop got into a scuffle with cops who were questioning a friend for alleged underage drinking. The charges were reduced and then waived after he entered an alcohol education program." "Then in August 2005, Zimmerman?s former fiance sought a restraining order against him because of domestic violence. Zimmerman sought a restraining order against her in return. Both were granted." And the lies to police: http://tinyurl.com/lmcl2vr Oh, according to his cousin, he molested her when she was young. That sounds like "opinion" from a place with "Partisan" in it's name. "The woman said Zimmerman would fondle her and penetrated her vagina with his fingers. She also revealed that Zimmerman molested other young girls. She spoke with a woman who was molested by Zimmerman as a youth, but the woman wanted to maintain her privacy. When she was 12 years old, Zimmerman made her rub his penis. Other times, he would take her to vacant rooms and kiss and fondle her." That you would stick up for a piece of **** that would do that is awful and I thought more of you than that. Was that Zimmerman, or your bud Krause? Harry's said such behavior is quite appropriate, or words to that effect. John (Gun Nut) H. Cite? Right here! http://tinyurl.com/o42at Learn to read! John (Gun Nut) H. READ WHAT, idiot? Heresay? I'd guess in your narrow mind that heresay about Martin is damning, but actual arrest records of Zimmerman are bull****, right? Well, if arrests make one a 'bad' person, then you should ask your newfound buddy about this: 8/8/01 Au contraire...having worked as a mid and upper level troublemaker* for both the NEA and the AFT, I can testify first-hand that there are no organizations more democratic. They will talk every single subject to death, until everyone's opinion is heard at least three times. *My professional resume include a mention of the time I was cited for *criminal* contempt of court, jailed briefly and fined 50 Large in New York State for activities aimed at prolonging a teachers' strike a judge wanted ended. The charges later were dropped. I enjoyed every minute of it. -- Harry Krause ------------ John (Gun Nut) H. -- Hope you're having a great day! |
Which...
On 8/5/2013 8:34 AM, John H wrote:
On Mon, 5 Aug 2013 08:11:57 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Sun, 4 Aug 2013 15:01:49 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Sun, 4 Aug 2013 14:15:31 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Sun, 4 Aug 2013 12:36:34 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Sun, 4 Aug 2013 09:25:06 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: Boy, you sure are blind then, Jawbone Scotty! Zimmerman battered a police officer, lied to the cops, beat his wife but he's not a loser????? Cite No problem! http://tinyurl.com/o9a4jzc "In July 2005, he was arrested for ?resisting officer with violence.? The neighborhood watch volunteer who wanted to be a cop got into a scuffle with cops who were questioning a friend for alleged underage drinking. The charges were reduced and then waived after he entered an alcohol education program." "Then in August 2005, Zimmerman?s former fiance sought a restraining order against him because of domestic violence. Zimmerman sought a restraining order against her in return. Both were granted." And the lies to police: http://tinyurl.com/lmcl2vr Oh, according to his cousin, he molested her when she was young. That sounds like "opinion" from a place with "Partisan" in it's name. "The woman said Zimmerman would fondle her and penetrated her vagina with his fingers. She also revealed that Zimmerman molested other young girls. She spoke with a woman who was molested by Zimmerman as a youth, but the woman wanted to maintain her privacy. When she was 12 years old, Zimmerman made her rub his penis. Other times, he would take her to vacant rooms and kiss and fondle her." That you would stick up for a piece of **** that would do that is awful and I thought more of you than that. Was that Zimmerman, or your bud Krause? Harry's said such behavior is quite appropriate, or words to that effect. John (Gun Nut) H. Cite? Right here! http://tinyurl.com/o42at Learn to read! John (Gun Nut) H. READ WHAT, idiot? Heresay? I'd guess in your narrow mind that heresay about Martin is damning, but actual arrest records of Zimmerman are bull****, right? Well, if arrests make one a 'bad' person, then you should ask your newfound buddy about this: 8/8/01 Au contraire...having worked as a mid and upper level troublemaker* for both the NEA and the AFT, I can testify first-hand that there are no organizations more democratic. They will talk every single subject to death, until everyone's opinion is heard at least three times. *My professional resume include a mention of the time I was cited for *criminal* contempt of court, jailed briefly and fined 50 Large in New York State for activities aimed at prolonging a teachers' strike a judge wanted ended. The charges later were dropped. I enjoyed every minute of it. Typical union thug. Bad to the bone. Useless and worthless. No wonder the good doctor won't associate herself with the name Krause. |
Which...
|
Which...
|
Which...
|
Which...
|
Which...
|
Which...
|
Which...
On Monday, August 5, 2013 7:34:43 AM UTC-5, John H wrote:
On Mon, 5 Aug 2013 08:11:57 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Sun, 4 Aug 2013 15:01:49 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Sun, 4 Aug 2013 14:15:31 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Sun, 4 Aug 2013 12:36:34 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Sun, 4 Aug 2013 09:25:06 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: Boy, you sure are blind then, Jawbone Scotty! Zimmerman battered a police officer, lied to the cops, beat his wife but he's not a loser????? Cite No problem! http://tinyurl.com/o9a4jzc "In July 2005, he was arrested for ?resisting officer with violence.? The neighborhood watch volunteer who wanted to be a cop got into a scuffle with cops who were questioning a friend for alleged underage drinking. The charges were reduced and then waived after he entered an alcohol education program." "Then in August 2005, Zimmerman?s former fiance sought a restraining order against him because of domestic violence. Zimmerman sought a restraining order against her in return. Both were granted." And the lies to police: http://tinyurl.com/lmcl2vr Oh, according to his cousin, he molested her when she was young. That sounds like "opinion" from a place with "Partisan" in it's name. "The woman said Zimmerman would fondle her and penetrated her vagina with his fingers. She also revealed that Zimmerman molested other young girls. She spoke with a woman who was molested by Zimmerman as a youth, but the woman wanted to maintain her privacy. When she was 12 years old, Zimmerman made her rub his penis. Other times, he would take her to vacant rooms and kiss and fondle her." That you would stick up for a piece of **** that would do that is awful and I thought more of you than that. Was that Zimmerman, or your bud Krause? Harry's said such behavior is quite appropriate, or words to that effect. John (Gun Nut) H. Cite? Right here! http://tinyurl.com/o42at Learn to read! John (Gun Nut) H. READ WHAT, idiot? Heresay? I'd guess in your narrow mind that heresay about Martin is damning, but actual arrest records of Zimmerman are bull****, right? Well, if arrests make one a 'bad' person, then you should ask your newfound buddy about this: 8/8/01 Au contraire...having worked as a mid and upper level troublemaker* for both the NEA and the AFT, I can testify first-hand that there are no organizations more democratic. They will talk every single subject to death, until everyone's opinion is heard at least three times. *My professional resume include a mention of the time I was cited for *criminal* contempt of court, jailed briefly and fined 50 Large in New York State for activities aimed at prolonging a teachers' strike a judge wanted ended. The charges later were dropped. I enjoyed every minute of it. -- Harry Krause ------------ John (Gun Nut) H. -- Hope you're having a great day! Oh man. |
Which...
On 8/5/13 9:47 PM, Tim wrote:
On Monday, August 5, 2013 7:34:43 AM UTC-5, John H wrote: Was that Zimmerman, or your bud Krause? Harry's said such behavior is quite appropriate, or words to that effect. John (Gun Nut) H. Cite? Right here! http://tinyurl.com/o42at Learn to read! John (Gun Nut) H. READ WHAT, idiot? Heresay? I'd guess in your narrow mind that heresay about Martin is damning, but actual arrest records of Zimmerman are bull****, right? Well, if arrests make one a 'bad' person, then you should ask your newfound buddy about this: 8/8/01 Au contraire...having worked as a mid and upper level troublemaker* for both the NEA and the AFT, I can testify first-hand that there are no organizations more democratic. They will talk every single subject to death, until everyone's opinion is heard at least three times. *My professional resume include a mention of the time I was cited for *criminal* contempt of court, jailed briefly and fined 50 Large in New York State for activities aimed at prolonging a teachers' strike a judge wanted ended. The charges later were dropped. I enjoyed every minute of it. -- Harry Krause ------------ John (Gun Nut) H. -- Hope you're having a great day! Oh man. Hey, it wasn't as if I lied my country into a war against Iraq or Afghanistan, and there was no criminal penalty for public employee strikes in the state at that time. The judge ordered striking teachers back to work, but the only penalty for them was to lose two days pay for every day the strike lasted, and the issue was such that the teachers were willing to stay out a while longer. The strike was not over pay. So the judge ordered each teacher to line up in front of the courthouse so he or she could be individually served with his back to work order. I had the teachers that showed up for that "show of force" come out the back door of the courthouse so they could plop those orders into a steel trash bin in which I had a fire burning. All was forgiven by the end of the day, the strike lasted another few days, and the board of education agreed to go back to the bargaining table and negotiate, which was what the strike was all about, because the public employee statutes required the board to negotiate "in good faith," and the strike came about because it refused to do so. Unfortunately at the time there were no civil penalties to force the board back to the bargaining table. Oh, there were no weapons involved, and no one got shoved. Peaceful civil disobedience, as it were. |
Which...
On Tue, 06 Aug 2013 06:51:31 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:
On 8/5/13 9:47 PM, Tim wrote: On Monday, August 5, 2013 7:34:43 AM UTC-5, John H wrote: Was that Zimmerman, or your bud Krause? Harry's said such behavior is quite appropriate, or words to that effect. John (Gun Nut) H. Cite? Right here! http://tinyurl.com/o42at Learn to read! John (Gun Nut) H. READ WHAT, idiot? Heresay? I'd guess in your narrow mind that heresay about Martin is damning, but actual arrest records of Zimmerman are bull****, right? Well, if arrests make one a 'bad' person, then you should ask your newfound buddy about this: 8/8/01 Au contraire...having worked as a mid and upper level troublemaker* for both the NEA and the AFT, I can testify first-hand that there are no organizations more democratic. They will talk every single subject to death, until everyone's opinion is heard at least three times. *My professional resume include a mention of the time I was cited for *criminal* contempt of court, jailed briefly and fined 50 Large in New York State for activities aimed at prolonging a teachers' strike a judge wanted ended. The charges later were dropped. I enjoyed every minute of it. -- Harry Krause ------------ John (Gun Nut) H. -- Hope you're having a great day! Oh man. Hey, it wasn't as if I lied my country into a war against Iraq or Afghanistan, and there was no criminal penalty for public employee strikes in the state at that time. The judge ordered striking teachers back to work, but the only penalty for them was to lose two days pay for every day the strike lasted, and the issue was such that the teachers were willing to stay out a while longer. The strike was not over pay. So the judge ordered each teacher to line up in front of the courthouse so he or she could be individually served with his back to work order. I had the teachers that showed up for that "show of force" come out the back door of the courthouse so they could plop those orders into a steel trash bin in which I had a fire burning. All was forgiven by the end of the day, the strike lasted another few days, and the board of education agreed to go back to the bargaining table and negotiate, which was what the strike was all about, because the public employee statutes required the board to negotiate "in good faith," and the strike came about because it refused to do so. Unfortunately at the time there were no civil penalties to force the board back to the bargaining table. Oh, there were no weapons involved, and no one got shoved. Peaceful civil disobedience, as it were. Gosh, Zimmerman all over again. John (Gun Nut) H. -- Hope you're having a great day! |
Which...
On 8/6/2013 11:07 AM, John H wrote:
On Tue, 06 Aug 2013 06:51:31 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 8/5/13 9:47 PM, Tim wrote: On Monday, August 5, 2013 7:34:43 AM UTC-5, John H wrote: Was that Zimmerman, or your bud Krause? Harry's said such behavior is quite appropriate, or words to that effect. John (Gun Nut) H. Cite? Right here! http://tinyurl.com/o42at Learn to read! John (Gun Nut) H. READ WHAT, idiot? Heresay? I'd guess in your narrow mind that heresay about Martin is damning, but actual arrest records of Zimmerman are bull****, right? Well, if arrests make one a 'bad' person, then you should ask your newfound buddy about this: 8/8/01 Au contraire...having worked as a mid and upper level troublemaker* for both the NEA and the AFT, I can testify first-hand that there are no organizations more democratic. They will talk every single subject to death, until everyone's opinion is heard at least three times. *My professional resume include a mention of the time I was cited for *criminal* contempt of court, jailed briefly and fined 50 Large in New York State for activities aimed at prolonging a teachers' strike a judge wanted ended. The charges later were dropped. I enjoyed every minute of it. -- Harry Krause ------------ John (Gun Nut) H. -- Hope you're having a great day! Oh man. Hey, it wasn't as if I lied my country into a war against Iraq or Afghanistan, and there was no criminal penalty for public employee strikes in the state at that time. The judge ordered striking teachers back to work, but the only penalty for them was to lose two days pay for every day the strike lasted, and the issue was such that the teachers were willing to stay out a while longer. The strike was not over pay. So the judge ordered each teacher to line up in front of the courthouse so he or she could be individually served with his back to work order. I had the teachers that showed up for that "show of force" come out the back door of the courthouse so they could plop those orders into a steel trash bin in which I had a fire burning. All was forgiven by the end of the day, the strike lasted another few days, and the board of education agreed to go back to the bargaining table and negotiate, which was what the strike was all about, because the public employee statutes required the board to negotiate "in good faith," and the strike came about because it refused to do so. Unfortunately at the time there were no civil penalties to force the board back to the bargaining table. Oh, there were no weapons involved, and no one got shoved. Peaceful civil disobedience, as it were. Gosh, Zimmerman all over again. John (Gun Nut) H. Add firebug to his list of attributes. |
Which...
|
Which...
|
Which...
In article ,
says... On Mon, 05 Aug 2013 14:38:14 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 8/5/13 2:30 PM, wrote: On Sun, 04 Aug 2013 15:24:41 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: Again, none of the lefties I know consider Martin anything more than a victim, and certainly not a "hero." Explain the million hoodie march. Oh, was the march to proclaim heroism? It certainly elevated small time thuggery to an unprecedented level. What "thuggery" did marching "elevate"? |
Which...
In article ,
says... On 8/5/2013 2:30 PM, wrote: On Sun, 04 Aug 2013 15:24:41 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: Again, none of the lefties I know consider Martin anything more than a victim, and certainly not a "hero." Explain the million hoodie march. Sharpton and Jackson doing their jobs, earning their 2000 dollar suits.. That's old Jawbone Scotty, jealous of anybody that is industrious enough to earn a decent living for their family. |
Which...
On 8/6/13 2:22 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says... On Mon, 05 Aug 2013 14:38:14 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 8/5/13 2:30 PM, wrote: On Sun, 04 Aug 2013 15:24:41 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: Again, none of the lefties I know consider Martin anything more than a victim, and certainly not a "hero." Explain the million hoodie march. Oh, was the march to proclaim heroism? It certainly elevated small time thuggery to an unprecedented level. What "thuggery" did marching "elevate"? If you want to see thuggery, just attend a teabagger rally and listen to the speakers. |
Which...
In article ,
says... On Tue, 06 Aug 2013 06:51:31 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 8/5/13 9:47 PM, Tim wrote: On Monday, August 5, 2013 7:34:43 AM UTC-5, John H wrote: Was that Zimmerman, or your bud Krause? Harry's said such behavior is quite appropriate, or words to that effect. John (Gun Nut) H. Cite? Right here! http://tinyurl.com/o42at Learn to read! John (Gun Nut) H. READ WHAT, idiot? Heresay? I'd guess in your narrow mind that heresay about Martin is damning, but actual arrest records of Zimmerman are bull****, right? Well, if arrests make one a 'bad' person, then you should ask your newfound buddy about this: 8/8/01 Au contraire...having worked as a mid and upper level troublemaker* for both the NEA and the AFT, I can testify first-hand that there are no organizations more democratic. They will talk every single subject to death, until everyone's opinion is heard at least three times. *My professional resume include a mention of the time I was cited for *criminal* contempt of court, jailed briefly and fined 50 Large in New York State for activities aimed at prolonging a teachers' strike a judge wanted ended. The charges later were dropped. I enjoyed every minute of it. -- Harry Krause ------------ John (Gun Nut) H. -- Hope you're having a great day! Oh man. Hey, it wasn't as if I lied my country into a war against Iraq or Afghanistan, and there was no criminal penalty for public employee strikes in the state at that time. The judge ordered striking teachers back to work, but the only penalty for them was to lose two days pay for every day the strike lasted, and the issue was such that the teachers were willing to stay out a while longer. The strike was not over pay. So the judge ordered each teacher to line up in front of the courthouse so he or she could be individually served with his back to work order. I had the teachers that showed up for that "show of force" come out the back door of the courthouse so they could plop those orders into a steel trash bin in which I had a fire burning. All was forgiven by the end of the day, the strike lasted another few days, and the board of education agreed to go back to the bargaining table and negotiate, which was what the strike was all about, because the public employee statutes required the board to negotiate "in good faith," and the strike came about because it refused to do so. Unfortunately at the time there were no civil penalties to force the board back to the bargaining table. Oh, there were no weapons involved, and no one got shoved. Peaceful civil disobedience, as it were. Gosh, Zimmerman all over again. John (Gun Nut) H. Damn you ARE senile or stupid. Did you not notice that Zimmerman had a gun and shot a kid? |
Which...
|
Which...
|
Which...
|
Which...
On Tue, 6 Aug 2013 14:21:32 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says... On Mon, 5 Aug 2013 15:00:38 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Sun, 4 Aug 2013 15:40:24 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: Which of these was he arrested for? I find it sickly hilarious that you defend Zimmerman who WAS arrested and Martin who was NEVER arrested.... What was Zimmerman ever CHARGED with. That was your original contention. 1. Resisting officer with violence. (this happened while he was drinking, by the way) 2. Restraining order issued against him for domestic violence. Now, what was Martin ever charged with again?? Neither ever resulted in a CHARGE. Cops don't charge people, They simply arrest them. The DA or states attorney decides whether there are grounds for an actual charge. Nope, only for felonies in Florida, where Zimmerman lives. Zimmerman was never charged with anything, even after he shot Martin, until politicians up to and including the intruder in chief demanded it. (for political reasons, not facts) In retrospect the first opinion of the states attorney the night of the shooting was the right one., There was no case there. Our local DA was on TV here saying the same thing the day after the verdict and he explained why. Zimmerman, like it or not was within his rights to use deadly force to stop a physical attack that did not seem to be stopping. Now, what was Martin arrested for again? Oh, nothing....... ....'cause he attacked someone and got his ass shot. John (Gun Nut) H. -- Hope you're having a great day! |
Which...
On Tue, 6 Aug 2013 15:51:35 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says... On Tue, 6 Aug 2013 14:26:06 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: Damn you ARE senile or stupid. Did you not notice that Zimmerman had a gun and shot a kid? ... who had attacked him and was beating the **** out of him. Zimmerman had his day in court and he was exonerated. Get over it. So that makes what John said correct???? Absolutely. Here's the cite: http://tinyurl.com/o42at John (Gun Nut) H. -- Hope you're having a great day! |
Which...
In article ,
says... On Tue, 6 Aug 2013 15:51:35 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Tue, 6 Aug 2013 14:26:06 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: Damn you ARE senile or stupid. Did you not notice that Zimmerman had a gun and shot a kid? ... who had attacked him and was beating the **** out of him. Zimmerman had his day in court and he was exonerated. Get over it. So that makes what John said correct???? Absolutely. Here's the cite: http://tinyurl.com/o42at John (Gun Nut) H. Again, you sure love showing everyone just how stupid you are, don't you? |
Which...
On 8/6/2013 2:25 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 8/6/13 2:22 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Mon, 05 Aug 2013 14:38:14 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 8/5/13 2:30 PM, wrote: On Sun, 04 Aug 2013 15:24:41 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: Again, none of the lefties I know consider Martin anything more than a victim, and certainly not a "hero." Explain the million hoodie march. Oh, was the march to proclaim heroism? It certainly elevated small time thuggery to an unprecedented level. What "thuggery" did marching "elevate"? If you want to see thuggery, just attend a teabagger rally and listen to the speakers. Or a union home recruitment visit. I hear they can get mighty rough. |
Which...
On 8/6/2013 6:56 PM, Hank© wrote:
On 8/6/2013 2:25 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote: On 8/6/13 2:22 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Mon, 05 Aug 2013 14:38:14 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 8/5/13 2:30 PM, wrote: On Sun, 04 Aug 2013 15:24:41 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: Again, none of the lefties I know consider Martin anything more than a victim, and certainly not a "hero." Explain the million hoodie march. Oh, was the march to proclaim heroism? It certainly elevated small time thuggery to an unprecedented level. What "thuggery" did marching "elevate"? If you want to see thuggery, just attend a teabagger rally and listen to the speakers. Or a union home recruitment visit. I hear they can get mighty rough. Problem is, if you do what harry says, you will see that he is full of ****... |
Which...
On 8/6/2013 4:12 PM, John H wrote:
On Tue, 6 Aug 2013 14:21:32 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Mon, 5 Aug 2013 15:00:38 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Sun, 4 Aug 2013 15:40:24 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: Which of these was he arrested for? I find it sickly hilarious that you defend Zimmerman who WAS arrested and Martin who was NEVER arrested.... What was Zimmerman ever CHARGED with. That was your original contention. 1. Resisting officer with violence. (this happened while he was drinking, by the way) 2. Restraining order issued against him for domestic violence. Now, what was Martin ever charged with again?? Neither ever resulted in a CHARGE. Cops don't charge people, They simply arrest them. The DA or states attorney decides whether there are grounds for an actual charge. Nope, only for felonies in Florida, where Zimmerman lives. Zimmerman was never charged with anything, even after he shot Martin, until politicians up to and including the intruder in chief demanded it. (for political reasons, not facts) In retrospect the first opinion of the states attorney the night of the shooting was the right one., There was no case there. Our local DA was on TV here saying the same thing the day after the verdict and he explained why. Zimmerman, like it or not was within his rights to use deadly force to stop a physical attack that did not seem to be stopping. Now, what was Martin arrested for again? Oh, nothing....... Who ****ing cares.. All that matters really is the state didn't have to spend a bunch of money locking him up... ...'cause he attacked someone and got his ass shot. John (Gun Nut) H. W |
Which...
On 8/6/2013 8:03 PM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 8/6/2013 6:56 PM, Hank© wrote: On 8/6/2013 2:25 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote: On 8/6/13 2:22 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Mon, 05 Aug 2013 14:38:14 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 8/5/13 2:30 PM, wrote: On Sun, 04 Aug 2013 15:24:41 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: Again, none of the lefties I know consider Martin anything more than a victim, and certainly not a "hero." Explain the million hoodie march. Oh, was the march to proclaim heroism? It certainly elevated small time thuggery to an unprecedented level. What "thuggery" did marching "elevate"? If you want to see thuggery, just attend a teabagger rally and listen to the speakers. Or a union home recruitment visit. I hear they can get mighty rough. Problem is, if you do what harry says, you will see that he is full of ****... What's that? |
Which...
On 8/6/13 8:03 PM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 8/6/2013 6:56 PM, Hank© wrote: On 8/6/2013 2:25 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote: On 8/6/13 2:22 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Mon, 05 Aug 2013 14:38:14 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 8/5/13 2:30 PM, wrote: On Sun, 04 Aug 2013 15:24:41 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: Again, none of the lefties I know consider Martin anything more than a victim, and certainly not a "hero." Explain the million hoodie march. Oh, was the march to proclaim heroism? It certainly elevated small time thuggery to an unprecedented level. What "thuggery" did marching "elevate"? If you want to see thuggery, just attend a teabagger rally and listen to the speakers. Or a union home recruitment visit. I hear they can get mighty rough. Problem is, if you do what harry says, you will see that he is full of ****... There are plenty of legitimate videos of tea bagger rallies and meetings and such, and of the horrific thug behavior of the speakers and participants, the people who appeal to psychotics...like you. |
Which...
iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says... On Mon, 5 Aug 2013 15:02:11 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Mon, 5 Aug 2013 08:11:57 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: READ WHAT, idiot? Heresay? I'd guess in your narrow mind that heresay about Martin is damning, but actual arrest records of Zimmerman are bull****, right? He had one arrest and no charges. Martin had none. But Martin was committing a "forcible felony" (aggravated assault) when he was shot. A bystander could have legally shot him, in the back. 776.012 Use of force in defense of person.?A person is justified in using force, except deadly force, against another when and to the extent that the person reasonably believes that such conduct is necessary to defend himself or herself or another against the other?s imminent use of unlawful force. However, a person is justified in the use of deadly force and does not have a duty to retreat if: (1) He or she reasonably believes that such force is necessary to prevent imminent death or great bodily harm to himself or herself or another or to prevent the imminent commission of a forcible felony What was Martin arrested for again? Even if he was arrested, the records would most likely be sealed as he was a minor. |
Which...
In article ,
says... iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Mon, 5 Aug 2013 15:02:11 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Mon, 5 Aug 2013 08:11:57 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: READ WHAT, idiot? Heresay? I'd guess in your narrow mind that heresay about Martin is damning, but actual arrest records of Zimmerman are bull****, right? He had one arrest and no charges. Martin had none. But Martin was committing a "forcible felony" (aggravated assault) when he was shot. A bystander could have legally shot him, in the back. 776.012 Use of force in defense of person.?A person is justified in using force, except deadly force, against another when and to the extent that the person reasonably believes that such conduct is necessary to defend himself or herself or another against the other?s imminent use of unlawful force. However, a person is justified in the use of deadly force and does not have a duty to retreat if: (1) He or she reasonably believes that such force is necessary to prevent imminent death or great bodily harm to himself or herself or another or to prevent the imminent commission of a forcible felony What was Martin arrested for again? Even if he was arrested, the records would most likely be sealed as he was a minor. Booger is setting the bar for malfesence very high. No actual arrest then nothing bad happened. |
Which...
In article ,
says... On 8/6/2013 4:12 PM, John H wrote: On Tue, 6 Aug 2013 14:21:32 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Mon, 5 Aug 2013 15:00:38 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Sun, 4 Aug 2013 15:40:24 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: Which of these was he arrested for? I find it sickly hilarious that you defend Zimmerman who WAS arrested and Martin who was NEVER arrested.... What was Zimmerman ever CHARGED with. That was your original contention. 1. Resisting officer with violence. (this happened while he was drinking, by the way) 2. Restraining order issued against him for domestic violence. Now, what was Martin ever charged with again?? Neither ever resulted in a CHARGE. Cops don't charge people, They simply arrest them. The DA or states attorney decides whether there are grounds for an actual charge. Nope, only for felonies in Florida, where Zimmerman lives. Zimmerman was never charged with anything, even after he shot Martin, until politicians up to and including the intruder in chief demanded it. (for political reasons, not facts) In retrospect the first opinion of the states attorney the night of the shooting was the right one., There was no case there. Our local DA was on TV here saying the same thing the day after the verdict and he explained why. Zimmerman, like it or not was within his rights to use deadly force to stop a physical attack that did not seem to be stopping. Now, what was Martin arrested for again? Oh, nothing....... Who ****ing cares.. All that matters really is the state didn't have to spend a bunch of money locking him up... Low life Jawbone Scotty at it again. |
Which...
|
Which...
On 8/7/13 7:50 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says... On 8/6/2013 4:12 PM, John H wrote: On Tue, 6 Aug 2013 14:21:32 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Mon, 5 Aug 2013 15:00:38 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Sun, 4 Aug 2013 15:40:24 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: Which of these was he arrested for? I find it sickly hilarious that you defend Zimmerman who WAS arrested and Martin who was NEVER arrested.... What was Zimmerman ever CHARGED with. That was your original contention. 1. Resisting officer with violence. (this happened while he was drinking, by the way) 2. Restraining order issued against him for domestic violence. Now, what was Martin ever charged with again?? Neither ever resulted in a CHARGE. Cops don't charge people, They simply arrest them. The DA or states attorney decides whether there are grounds for an actual charge. Nope, only for felonies in Florida, where Zimmerman lives. Zimmerman was never charged with anything, even after he shot Martin, until politicians up to and including the intruder in chief demanded it. (for political reasons, not facts) In retrospect the first opinion of the states attorney the night of the shooting was the right one., There was no case there. Our local DA was on TV here saying the same thing the day after the verdict and he explained why. Zimmerman, like it or not was within his rights to use deadly force to stop a physical attack that did not seem to be stopping. Now, what was Martin arrested for again? Oh, nothing....... Who ****ing cares.. All that matters really is the state didn't have to spend a bunch of money locking him up... Low life Jawbone Scotty at it again. I am looking forward to the next cable channel reality show starring Psychoscotty and family, something like "Swamp Rats," or "Landfill Slackers," complete with firearms, crank, tattoos, ATVs, ER visits, police drive-bys and, of course, for the patriarch, "Pint Sized Punching Pop." |
Which...
In article ,
says... In article , says... iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Mon, 5 Aug 2013 15:02:11 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Mon, 5 Aug 2013 08:11:57 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: READ WHAT, idiot? Heresay? I'd guess in your narrow mind that heresay about Martin is damning, but actual arrest records of Zimmerman are bull****, right? He had one arrest and no charges. Martin had none. But Martin was committing a "forcible felony" (aggravated assault) when he was shot. A bystander could have legally shot him, in the back. 776.012 Use of force in defense of person.?A person is justified in using force, except deadly force, against another when and to the extent that the person reasonably believes that such conduct is necessary to defend himself or herself or another against the other?s imminent use of unlawful force. However, a person is justified in the use of deadly force and does not have a duty to retreat if: (1) He or she reasonably believes that such force is necessary to prevent imminent death or great bodily harm to himself or herself or another or to prevent the imminent commission of a forcible felony What was Martin arrested for again? Even if he was arrested, the records would most likely be sealed as he was a minor. Booger is setting the bar for malfesence very high. No actual arrest then nothing bad happened. So, following your logic, one can be found guilty of heinous crimes without being arrested, and going to court? |
Which...
In article ,
says... On 8/7/13 7:50 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 8/6/2013 4:12 PM, John H wrote: On Tue, 6 Aug 2013 14:21:32 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Mon, 5 Aug 2013 15:00:38 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Sun, 4 Aug 2013 15:40:24 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: Which of these was he arrested for? I find it sickly hilarious that you defend Zimmerman who WAS arrested and Martin who was NEVER arrested.... What was Zimmerman ever CHARGED with. That was your original contention. 1. Resisting officer with violence. (this happened while he was drinking, by the way) 2. Restraining order issued against him for domestic violence. Now, what was Martin ever charged with again?? Neither ever resulted in a CHARGE. Cops don't charge people, They simply arrest them. The DA or states attorney decides whether there are grounds for an actual charge. Nope, only for felonies in Florida, where Zimmerman lives. Zimmerman was never charged with anything, even after he shot Martin, until politicians up to and including the intruder in chief demanded it. (for political reasons, not facts) In retrospect the first opinion of the states attorney the night of the shooting was the right one., There was no case there. Our local DA was on TV here saying the same thing the day after the verdict and he explained why. Zimmerman, like it or not was within his rights to use deadly force to stop a physical attack that did not seem to be stopping. Now, what was Martin arrested for again? Oh, nothing....... Who ****ing cares.. All that matters really is the state didn't have to spend a bunch of money locking him up... Low life Jawbone Scotty at it again. I am looking forward to the next cable channel reality show starring Psychoscotty and family, something like "Swamp Rats," or "Landfill Slackers," complete with firearms, crank, tattoos, ATVs, ER visits, police drive-bys and, of course, for the patriarch, "Pint Sized Punching Pop." The trailer will be Scotty holding his jawbone and screaming nasty vulgar things about people's wives and children...... |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:14 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com