|
How stupid do you...
....have to be to believe that the rape kits hospitals use to determine
if a woman has been sexually attacked end a pregnancy? About as stupid as this Texas female legislator... Jodie Laubenberg says Texas rape kit is like dilation and curettage procedure The lead House sponsor of legislation pitched by advocates as improving the safety of abortion clinics and restricting certain late-term abortions described kits used after sexual assaults as akin to a procedure that scrapes out tissue lining the uterus. In floor debate that would extend hours past midnight June 23, 2013, Rep. Jodie Laubenberg, R-Parker, mentioned "rape kits" after Rep. Senfronia Thompson, D-Houston, presented an amendment to Senate Bill 5 to exempt victims of rape and incest from limits on abortions after the 20th week of pregnancy. A day later, the GOP-majority House advanced the measure to the Senate for possible action before a 30-day special session was to end June 25. Laubenberg, responding to questions from Democratic Reps. Joseph Moody of El Paso and Dawnna Dukes of Austin, framed her refusal to accept Thompson’s amendment by implying that rape kits used in hospitals can prevent unwanted pregnancy. Laubenberg said that currently, in "the emergency rooms they have what’s called rape kits, that the woman can get cleaned out, basically like a D and C" -- dilation and curettage surgery, often performed after miscarriages. The reality is a sexual assault evidence collection kit includes legal and medical forms, oral swabs, hair combs and containers for clothes, hair, fingernails, blood and saliva. Welcome to ayatollahville. |
How stupid do you...
On Mon, 24 Jun 2013 21:28:49 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:
...have to be to believe that the rape kits hospitals use to determine if a woman has been sexually attacked end a pregnancy? About as stupid as this Texas female legislator... Jodie Laubenberg says Texas rape kit is like dilation and curettage procedure The lead House sponsor of legislation pitched by advocates as improving the safety of abortion clinics and restricting certain late-term abortions described kits used after sexual assaults as akin to a procedure that scrapes out tissue lining the uterus. In floor debate that would extend hours past midnight June 23, 2013, Rep. Jodie Laubenberg, R-Parker, mentioned "rape kits" after Rep. Senfronia Thompson, D-Houston, presented an amendment to Senate Bill 5 to exempt victims of rape and incest from limits on abortions after the 20th week of pregnancy. A day later, the GOP-majority House advanced the measure to the Senate for possible action before a 30-day special session was to end June 25. Laubenberg, responding to questions from Democratic Reps. Joseph Moody of El Paso and Dawnna Dukes of Austin, framed her refusal to accept Thompson’s amendment by implying that rape kits used in hospitals can prevent unwanted pregnancy. Laubenberg said that currently, in "the emergency rooms they have what’s called rape kits, that the woman can get cleaned out, basically like a D and C" -- dilation and curettage surgery, often performed after miscarriages. The reality is a sexual assault evidence collection kit includes legal and medical forms, oral swabs, hair combs and containers for clothes, hair, fingernails, blood and saliva. Welcome to ayatollahville. How stupid do you have to be to not realize your pregnancy is due to rape or incest before 20 weeks have expired? The morning after pill should have solved that problem 19 6/7ths weeks earlier. John (Gun Nut) H. -- Hope you're having a great day! |
How stupid do you...
|
How stupid do you...
|
How stupid do you...
In article ,
says... On Tuesday, June 25, 2013 10:19:37 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Mon, 24 Jun 2013 21:28:49 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: ...have to be to believe that the rape kits hospitals use to determine if a woman has been sexually attacked end a pregnancy? About as stupid as this Texas female legislator... Jodie Laubenberg says Texas rape kit is like dilation and curettage procedure The lead House sponsor of legislation pitched by advocates as improving the safety of abortion clinics and restricting certain late-term abortions described kits used after sexual assaults as akin to a procedure that scrapes out tissue lining the uterus. In floor debate that would extend hours past midnight June 23, 2013, Rep. Jodie Laubenberg, R-Parker, mentioned "rape kits" after Rep. Senfronia Thompson, D-Houston, presented an amendment to Senate Bill 5 to exempt victims of rape and incest from limits on abortions after the 20th week of pregnancy. A day later, the GOP-majority House advanced the measure to the Senate for possible action before a 30-day special session was to end June 25. Laubenberg, responding to questions from Democratic Reps. Joseph Moody of El Paso and Dawnna Dukes of Austin, framed her refusal to accept Thompson?s amendment by implying that rape kits used in hospitals can prevent unwanted pregnancy. Laubenberg said that currently, in "the emergency rooms they have what?s called rape kits, that the woman can get cleaned out, basically like a D and C" -- dilation and curettage surgery, often performed after miscarriages. The reality is a sexual assault evidence collection kit includes legal and medical forms, oral swabs, hair combs and containers for clothes, hair, fingernails, blood and saliva. Welcome to ayatollahville. How stupid do you have to be to not realize your pregnancy is due to rape or incest before 20 weeks have expired? How stupid do YOU have to be to think that is the only scenario. Did you EVER stop to think that maybe the person is having a hard time deciding whether to keep the fetus anyway or to give it up for adoption or have an abortion, etc.? The morning after pill should have solved that problem 19 6/7ths weeks earlier. John (Gun Nut) H. Idiot. Cite? There should be plenty of examples where a woman needs more than 20 weeks to make a kill or keep decision. I'm sure there are, but do you think that these women who are struggling with a decision like that makes sure that she documents it thoroughly on the web? Do you have any "cite" that says otherwise? |
How stupid do you...
On 6/25/13 11:27 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says... On Tuesday, June 25, 2013 10:19:37 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Mon, 24 Jun 2013 21:28:49 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: ...have to be to believe that the rape kits hospitals use to determine if a woman has been sexually attacked end a pregnancy? About as stupid as this Texas female legislator... Jodie Laubenberg says Texas rape kit is like dilation and curettage procedure The lead House sponsor of legislation pitched by advocates as improving the safety of abortion clinics and restricting certain late-term abortions described kits used after sexual assaults as akin to a procedure that scrapes out tissue lining the uterus. In floor debate that would extend hours past midnight June 23, 2013, Rep. Jodie Laubenberg, R-Parker, mentioned "rape kits" after Rep. Senfronia Thompson, D-Houston, presented an amendment to Senate Bill 5 to exempt victims of rape and incest from limits on abortions after the 20th week of pregnancy. A day later, the GOP-majority House advanced the measure to the Senate for possible action before a 30-day special session was to end June 25. Laubenberg, responding to questions from Democratic Reps. Joseph Moody of El Paso and Dawnna Dukes of Austin, framed her refusal to accept Thompson?s amendment by implying that rape kits used in hospitals can prevent unwanted pregnancy. Laubenberg said that currently, in "the emergency rooms they have what?s called rape kits, that the woman can get cleaned out, basically like a D and C" -- dilation and curettage surgery, often performed after miscarriages. The reality is a sexual assault evidence collection kit includes legal and medical forms, oral swabs, hair combs and containers for clothes, hair, fingernails, blood and saliva. Welcome to ayatollahville. How stupid do you have to be to not realize your pregnancy is due to rape or incest before 20 weeks have expired? How stupid do YOU have to be to think that is the only scenario. Did you EVER stop to think that maybe the person is having a hard time deciding whether to keep the fetus anyway or to give it up for adoption or have an abortion, etc.? The morning after pill should have solved that problem 19 6/7ths weeks earlier. John (Gun Nut) H. Idiot. Cite? There should be plenty of examples where a woman needs more than 20 weeks to make a kill or keep decision. I'm sure there are, but do you think that these women who are struggling with a decision like that makes sure that she documents it thoroughly on the web? Do you have any "cite" that says otherwise? Reproductive issues are black or white for some, especially where women, who they consider second-class citizens, are concerned. |
How stupid do you...
On Tuesday, June 25, 2013 11:27:42 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says... On Tuesday, June 25, 2013 10:19:37 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Mon, 24 Jun 2013 21:28:49 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: ...have to be to believe that the rape kits hospitals use to determine if a woman has been sexually attacked end a pregnancy? About as stupid as this Texas female legislator... Jodie Laubenberg says Texas rape kit is like dilation and curettage procedure The lead House sponsor of legislation pitched by advocates as improving the safety of abortion clinics and restricting certain late-term abortions described kits used after sexual assaults as akin to a procedure that scrapes out tissue lining the uterus. In floor debate that would extend hours past midnight June 23, 2013, Rep. Jodie Laubenberg, R-Parker, mentioned "rape kits" after Rep. Senfronia Thompson, D-Houston, presented an amendment to Senate Bill 5 to exempt victims of rape and incest from limits on abortions after the 20th week of pregnancy. A day later, the GOP-majority House advanced the measure to the Senate for possible action before a 30-day special session was to end June 25. Laubenberg, responding to questions from Democratic Reps. Joseph Moody of El Paso and Dawnna Dukes of Austin, framed her refusal to accept Thompson?s amendment by implying that rape kits used in hospitals can prevent unwanted pregnancy. Laubenberg said that currently, in "the emergency rooms they have what?s called rape kits, that the woman can get cleaned out, basically like a D and C" -- dilation and curettage surgery, often performed after miscarriages. The reality is a sexual assault evidence collection kit includes legal and medical forms, oral swabs, hair combs and containers for clothes, hair, fingernails, blood and saliva. Welcome to ayatollahville. How stupid do you have to be to not realize your pregnancy is due to rape or incest before 20 weeks have expired? How stupid do YOU have to be to think that is the only scenario. Did you EVER stop to think that maybe the person is having a hard time deciding whether to keep the fetus anyway or to give it up for adoption or have an abortion, etc.? The morning after pill should have solved that problem 19 6/7ths weeks earlier. John (Gun Nut) H. Idiot. Cite? There should be plenty of examples where a woman needs more than 20 weeks to make a kill or keep decision. I'm sure there are, but do you think that these women who are struggling with a decision like that makes sure that she documents it thoroughly on the web? Do you have any "cite" that says otherwise? I asked first. Obviously you're blowing smoke again. Goodbye. |
How stupid do you...
In article ,
says... On Tuesday, June 25, 2013 11:27:42 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Tuesday, June 25, 2013 10:19:37 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Mon, 24 Jun 2013 21:28:49 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: ...have to be to believe that the rape kits hospitals use to determine if a woman has been sexually attacked end a pregnancy? About as stupid as this Texas female legislator... Jodie Laubenberg says Texas rape kit is like dilation and curettage procedure The lead House sponsor of legislation pitched by advocates as improving the safety of abortion clinics and restricting certain late-term abortions described kits used after sexual assaults as akin to a procedure that scrapes out tissue lining the uterus. In floor debate that would extend hours past midnight June 23, 2013, Rep. Jodie Laubenberg, R-Parker, mentioned "rape kits" after Rep. Senfronia Thompson, D-Houston, presented an amendment to Senate Bill 5 to exempt victims of rape and incest from limits on abortions after the 20th week of pregnancy. A day later, the GOP-majority House advanced the measure to the Senate for possible action before a 30-day special session was to end June 25. Laubenberg, responding to questions from Democratic Reps. Joseph Moody of El Paso and Dawnna Dukes of Austin, framed her refusal to accept Thompson?s amendment by implying that rape kits used in hospitals can prevent unwanted pregnancy. Laubenberg said that currently, in "the emergency rooms they have what?s called rape kits, that the woman can get cleaned out, basically like a D and C" -- dilation and curettage surgery, often performed after miscarriages. The reality is a sexual assault evidence collection kit includes legal and medical forms, oral swabs, hair combs and containers for clothes, hair, fingernails, blood and saliva. Welcome to ayatollahville. How stupid do you have to be to not realize your pregnancy is due to rape or incest before 20 weeks have expired? How stupid do YOU have to be to think that is the only scenario. Did you EVER stop to think that maybe the person is having a hard time deciding whether to keep the fetus anyway or to give it up for adoption or have an abortion, etc.? The morning after pill should have solved that problem 19 6/7ths weeks earlier. John (Gun Nut) H. Idiot. Cite? There should be plenty of examples where a woman needs more than 20 weeks to make a kill or keep decision. I'm sure there are, but do you think that these women who are struggling with a decision like that makes sure that she documents it thoroughly on the web? Do you have any "cite" that says otherwise? I asked first. Obviously you're blowing smoke again. Goodbye. Blowing smoke? You fool!!! What would make you think that a woman should make and would make an instant decision like that? |
How stupid do you...
On Tuesday, June 25, 2013 12:19:17 PM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says... How stupid do you have to be to not realize your pregnancy is due to rape or incest before 20 weeks have expired? The morning after pill should have solved that problem 19 6/7ths weeks earlier. Blowing smoke? You fool!!! What would make you think that a woman should make and would make an instant decision like that? Rape or incest, which is what John specifically referenced. If after those specific scenarios the victim is thinking about keeping it, it would almost certainly be because she is against abortion to begin with. |
How stupid do you...
In article ,
says... On Tuesday, June 25, 2013 12:19:17 PM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... How stupid do you have to be to not realize your pregnancy is due to rape or incest before 20 weeks have expired? The morning after pill should have solved that problem 19 6/7ths weeks earlier. Blowing smoke? You fool!!! What would make you think that a woman should make and would make an instant decision like that? Rape or incest, which is what John specifically referenced. If after those specific scenarios the victim is thinking about keeping it, it would almost certainly be because she is against abortion to begin with. I'll ask again. Because it's due to rape or incest, the woman must choose instantly? |
How stupid do you...
On Tue, 25 Jun 2013 10:49:43 -0700 (PDT), wrote:
On Tuesday, June 25, 2013 12:19:17 PM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... How stupid do you have to be to not realize your pregnancy is due to rape or incest before 20 weeks have expired? The morning after pill should have solved that problem 19 6/7ths weeks earlier. Blowing smoke? You fool!!! What would make you think that a woman should make and would make an instant decision like that? Rape or incest, which is what John specifically referenced. If after those specific scenarios the victim is thinking about keeping it, it would almost certainly be because she is against abortion to begin with. And, I wouldn't consider 20 weeks an 'instant decision'. John (Gun Nut) H. -- Hope you're having a great day! |
How stupid do you...
In article ,
says... On Tue, 25 Jun 2013 10:49:43 -0700 (PDT), wrote: On Tuesday, June 25, 2013 12:19:17 PM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... How stupid do you have to be to not realize your pregnancy is due to rape or incest before 20 weeks have expired? The morning after pill should have solved that problem 19 6/7ths weeks earlier. Blowing smoke? You fool!!! What would make you think that a woman should make and would make an instant decision like that? Rape or incest, which is what John specifically referenced. If after those specific scenarios the victim is thinking about keeping it, it would almost certainly be because she is against abortion to begin with. And, I wouldn't consider 20 weeks an 'instant decision'. John (Gun Nut) H. So you don't think a woman should take time to think about her decision whether or not to abort a fetus? |
How stupid do you...
On Tuesday, June 25, 2013 2:28:49 PM UTC-4, John H wrote:
On Tue, 25 Jun 2013 10:49:43 -0700 (PDT), wrote: On Tuesday, June 25, 2013 12:19:17 PM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... How stupid do you have to be to not realize your pregnancy is due to rape or incest before 20 weeks have expired? The morning after pill should have solved that problem 19 6/7ths weeks earlier. Blowing smoke? You fool!!! What would make you think that a woman should make and would make an instant decision like that? Rape or incest, which is what John specifically referenced. If after those specific scenarios the victim is thinking about keeping it, it would almost certainly be because she is against abortion to begin with. And, I wouldn't consider 20 weeks an 'instant decision'. Bingo! |
How stupid do you...
On 6/25/13 3:12 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says... On Tue, 25 Jun 2013 10:49:43 -0700 (PDT), wrote: On Tuesday, June 25, 2013 12:19:17 PM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... How stupid do you have to be to not realize your pregnancy is due to rape or incest before 20 weeks have expired? The morning after pill should have solved that problem 19 6/7ths weeks earlier. Blowing smoke? You fool!!! What would make you think that a woman should make and would make an instant decision like that? Rape or incest, which is what John specifically referenced. If after those specific scenarios the victim is thinking about keeping it, it would almost certainly be because she is against abortion to begin with. And, I wouldn't consider 20 weeks an 'instant decision'. John (Gun Nut) H. So you don't think a woman should take time to think about her decision whether or not to abort a fetus? As we have seen recently, most doctrinaire righties don't give a damn about women, womens' rights, or even children, and the only reason they give a damn about fetuses is because pregnancy and and full term births are ways to try to control women. |
How stupid do you...
On 6/25/2013 4:48 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 6/25/13 3:12 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Tue, 25 Jun 2013 10:49:43 -0700 (PDT), wrote: On Tuesday, June 25, 2013 12:19:17 PM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... How stupid do you have to be to not realize your pregnancy is due to rape or incest before 20 weeks have expired? The morning after pill should have solved that problem 19 6/7ths weeks earlier. Blowing smoke? You fool!!! What would make you think that a woman should make and would make an instant decision like that? Rape or incest, which is what John specifically referenced. If after those specific scenarios the victim is thinking about keeping it, it would almost certainly be because she is against abortion to begin with. And, I wouldn't consider 20 weeks an 'instant decision'. John (Gun Nut) H. So you don't think a woman should take time to think about her decision whether or not to abort a fetus? As we have seen recently, most doctrinaire righties don't give a damn about women, womens' rights, or even children, and the only reason they give a damn about fetuses is because pregnancy and and full term births are ways to try to control women. You are delusional... |
How stupid do you...
On 6/25/13 5:27 PM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 6/25/2013 4:48 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote: On 6/25/13 3:12 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Tue, 25 Jun 2013 10:49:43 -0700 (PDT), wrote: On Tuesday, June 25, 2013 12:19:17 PM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... How stupid do you have to be to not realize your pregnancy is due to rape or incest before 20 weeks have expired? The morning after pill should have solved that problem 19 6/7ths weeks earlier. Blowing smoke? You fool!!! What would make you think that a woman should make and would make an instant decision like that? Rape or incest, which is what John specifically referenced. If after those specific scenarios the victim is thinking about keeping it, it would almost certainly be because she is against abortion to begin with. And, I wouldn't consider 20 weeks an 'instant decision'. John (Gun Nut) H. So you don't think a woman should take time to think about her decision whether or not to abort a fetus? As we have seen recently, most doctrinaire righties don't give a damn about women, womens' rights, or even children, and the only reason they give a damn about fetuses is because pregnancy and and full term births are ways to try to control women. You are delusional... Sorry, but I've been watching the GOP federal legislators, governors, and state legislators for years on this issue, and what they are doing is what their extremist base is telling them to do. The extremist base, the doctrinaire righties, controls the Republican party. There's certainly no morality behind these beliefs, because if there were, they'd be acting differently towards women and children. |
How stupid do you...
"F.O.A.D." wrote in message m... As we have seen recently, most doctrinaire righties don't give a damn about women, womens' rights, or even children, and the only reason they give a damn about fetuses is because pregnancy and and full term births are ways to try to control women. ----------------------------------------------- I don't buy that argument for a minute. Anyone who consumes oxygen on this planet in this day and age knows there's no such thing as "controlling women". I think is more related to traditional values and faith beliefs, right or wrong. I've cashed out on this issue. I remain pro-life but pro-choice. I know what I would do. What others do is their business. |
How stupid do you...
On 6/25/2013 5:36 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 6/25/13 5:27 PM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote: On 6/25/2013 4:48 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote: On 6/25/13 3:12 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Tue, 25 Jun 2013 10:49:43 -0700 (PDT), wrote: On Tuesday, June 25, 2013 12:19:17 PM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... How stupid do you have to be to not realize your pregnancy is due to rape or incest before 20 weeks have expired? The morning after pill should have solved that problem 19 6/7ths weeks earlier. Blowing smoke? You fool!!! What would make you think that a woman should make and would make an instant decision like that? Rape or incest, which is what John specifically referenced. If after those specific scenarios the victim is thinking about keeping it, it would almost certainly be because she is against abortion to begin with. And, I wouldn't consider 20 weeks an 'instant decision'. John (Gun Nut) H. So you don't think a woman should take time to think about her decision whether or not to abort a fetus? As we have seen recently, most doctrinaire righties don't give a damn about women, womens' rights, or even children, and the only reason they give a damn about fetuses is because pregnancy and and full term births are ways to try to control women. You are delusional... Sorry, but I've been watching the GOP federal legislators, governors, and state legislators for years on this issue, and what they are doing is what their extremist base is telling them to do. The extremist base, the doctrinaire righties, controls the Republican party. There's certainly no morality behind these beliefs, because if there were, they'd be acting differently towards women and children. Just because you don't see it, doesn't mean it isn't there. That is the problem with the left, so intolerant and dismissive across the board... |
How stupid do you...
On 6/25/13 5:37 PM, Eisboch wrote:
"F.O.A.D." wrote in message m... As we have seen recently, most doctrinaire righties don't give a damn about women, womens' rights, or even children, and the only reason they give a damn about fetuses is because pregnancy and and full term births are ways to try to control women. ----------------------------------------------- I don't buy that argument for a minute. Anyone who consumes oxygen on this planet in this day and age knows there's no such thing as "controlling women". I think is more related to traditional values and faith beliefs, right or wrong. I've cashed out on this issue. I remain pro-life but pro-choice. I know what I would do. What others do is their business. The right-wing religious bozos talk all the time about the need to control women and keep women subservient. It does work, not in your household or mine, but it does work. Women are very much controlled in many of these conservative superreligious families. Love the GOP state lawmaker in Texas who recently said use of a rape kit would prevent pregnancy. D'oh. |
How stupid do you...
On 6/25/2013 5:36 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 6/25/13 5:27 PM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote: On 6/25/2013 4:48 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote: On 6/25/13 3:12 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Tue, 25 Jun 2013 10:49:43 -0700 (PDT), wrote: On Tuesday, June 25, 2013 12:19:17 PM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... How stupid do you have to be to not realize your pregnancy is due to rape or incest before 20 weeks have expired? The morning after pill should have solved that problem 19 6/7ths weeks earlier. Blowing smoke? You fool!!! What would make you think that a woman should make and would make an instant decision like that? Rape or incest, which is what John specifically referenced. If after those specific scenarios the victim is thinking about keeping it, it would almost certainly be because she is against abortion to begin with. And, I wouldn't consider 20 weeks an 'instant decision'. John (Gun Nut) H. So you don't think a woman should take time to think about her decision whether or not to abort a fetus? As we have seen recently, most doctrinaire righties don't give a damn about women, womens' rights, or even children, and the only reason they give a damn about fetuses is because pregnancy and and full term births are ways to try to control women. You are delusional... Sorry, but I've been watching the GOP federal legislators, governors, and state legislators for years on this issue, and what they are doing is what their extremist base is telling them to do. The extremist base, the doctrinaire righties, controls the Republican party. There's certainly no morality behind these beliefs, because if there were, they'd be acting differently towards women and children. Just think of all the women and children who could have benefited if only you had paid your taxes. |
How stupid do you...
On 6/25/2013 5:37 PM, Eisboch wrote:
I don't buy that argument for a minute. Anyone who consumes oxygen on this planet in this day and age knows there's no such thing as "controlling women". Harry's wife, Nancy Pelosi, Monika Lewinsky, to name a few. ;-) |
How stupid do you...
In article ,
says... On 6/25/2013 5:36 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote: On 6/25/13 5:27 PM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote: On 6/25/2013 4:48 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote: On 6/25/13 3:12 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Tue, 25 Jun 2013 10:49:43 -0700 (PDT), wrote: On Tuesday, June 25, 2013 12:19:17 PM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... How stupid do you have to be to not realize your pregnancy is due to rape or incest before 20 weeks have expired? The morning after pill should have solved that problem 19 6/7ths weeks earlier. Blowing smoke? You fool!!! What would make you think that a woman should make and would make an instant decision like that? Rape or incest, which is what John specifically referenced. If after those specific scenarios the victim is thinking about keeping it, it would almost certainly be because she is against abortion to begin with. And, I wouldn't consider 20 weeks an 'instant decision'. John (Gun Nut) H. So you don't think a woman should take time to think about her decision whether or not to abort a fetus? As we have seen recently, most doctrinaire righties don't give a damn about women, womens' rights, or even children, and the only reason they give a damn about fetuses is because pregnancy and and full term births are ways to try to control women. You are delusional... Sorry, but I've been watching the GOP federal legislators, governors, and state legislators for years on this issue, and what they are doing is what their extremist base is telling them to do. The extremist base, the doctrinaire righties, controls the Republican party. There's certainly no morality behind these beliefs, because if there were, they'd be acting differently towards women and children. Just because you don't see it, doesn't mean it isn't there. That is the problem with the left, so intolerant and dismissive across the board... Well, then, if you can't see it, how do YOU know it's there? |
How stupid do you...
On Tue, 25 Jun 2013 17:37:16 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:
"F.O.A.D." wrote in message om... As we have seen recently, most doctrinaire righties don't give a damn about women, womens' rights, or even children, and the only reason they give a damn about fetuses is because pregnancy and and full term births are ways to try to control women. ----------------------------------------------- I don't buy that argument for a minute. Anyone who consumes oxygen on this planet in this day and age knows there's no such thing as "controlling women". I think is more related to traditional values and faith beliefs, right or wrong. I've cashed out on this issue. I remain pro-life but pro-choice. I know what I would do. What others do is their business. Harry often confuses Muslims and normal folks. John (Gun Nut) H. -- Hope you're having a great day! |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:48 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com