|
More info.. not looking good...
On 6/24/2013 4:46 AM, Eisboch wrote:
"F.O.A.D." wrote in message ... Wayne.B wrote: On Sun, 23 Jun 2013 16:51:30 -0400, Hank© wrote: You're pretty goode at taking the wind out of his sails. There's no wonder why he calls you all sorts of silly names. ;-) ==== Harry's name calling stems from his insecurity and self esteem issues. It's an attempt to boost himself up by putting everyone else down. Unlike you, I don't need a really big old boat to compensate for a really small old dick. ----------------------------------------- Nonesense. Wayne has a big old boat because he lives on it for 5 months at a time and uses it to travel to places that most of us would only dream of navigating to. Everyone has their type of boating and interests. Few do what Wayne does. Harry can't afford to do what Wayne does. Too bad he can't mask his jealousy. |
More info.. not looking good...
|
More info.. not looking good...
|
More info.. not looking good...
On Mon, 24 Jun 2013 07:17:06 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:
"John H" wrote in message .. . On Mon, 24 Jun 2013 04:52:24 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote: Good grief. So, criminals, rapists and serial murderers have a *Right* to Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness? You make no sense. Again, I'll repeat, having to obtain a gun permit and submit to a background check to ensure you are not one of the above is *not* a violation of your Constitutional rights. Why is this so hard to understand? Criminals, rapists and serial murderers won't be abiding by the law in any case. John (Gun Nut) H. --------------------------------- I agree. So, how do they get their guns? Go to downtown Detroit and wave a couple hundred dollar bills. John (Gun Nut) H. -- Hope you're having a great day! |
More info.. not looking good...
"F.O.A.D." wrote in message m... On 6/24/13 7:07 AM, Eisboch wrote: "F.O.A.D." wrote in message ... On 6/24/13 4:46 AM, Eisboch wrote: "F.O.A.D." wrote in message ... Wayne.B wrote: On Sun, 23 Jun 2013 16:51:30 -0400, Hank© wrote: You're pretty goode at taking the wind out of his sails. There's no wonder why he calls you all sorts of silly names. ;-) ==== Harry's name calling stems from his insecurity and self esteem issues. It's an attempt to boost himself up by putting everyone else down. Unlike you, I don't need a really big old boat to compensate for a really small old dick. ----------------------------------------- Nonesense. Wayne has a big old boat because he lives on it for 5 months at a time and uses it to travel to places that most of us would only dream of navigating to. Everyone has their type of boating and interests. Few do what Wayne does. To each his own. What Wayne does for "five months at a time," indeed for the whole year, seems vacuous to me. To me, the idea of being *that* retired with nothing really to do but putter around in a boat for half the year seems mindless and completely self-indulgent. ------------------------------------------ You sound a little envious to me. I know I am. I had to go look up "vacuous" BTW. So what are your "retirement" hobbies or interests, besides spreading your political, social and anti-business philosophies on a obscure internet newsgroup? Why would I be envious of a lifestyle I'd find boring? I'm not retired. For fun and relaxation, I do some boating, some bike riding, some traveling, some reading, some target shooting, some getting together with old friends. I have friends and colleagues in their 80's who are still actively involved in their work. If I make it that far, I hope to be doing the same. -------------------------------------------- So why the negativity on what other people enjoy? Some would find your "hobbies" boring. As for continuing to work, go for it. But isn't that being a bit self-indulgent as well? You seem to have made your mark and apparently don't need the money. |
More info.. not looking good...
On 6/24/2013 7:17 AM, Eisboch wrote:
"John H" wrote in message ... On Mon, 24 Jun 2013 04:52:24 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote: Good grief. So, criminals, rapists and serial murderers have a *Right* to Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness? You make no sense. Again, I'll repeat, having to obtain a gun permit and submit to a background check to ensure you are not one of the above is *not* a violation of your Constitutional rights. Why is this so hard to understand? Criminals, rapists and serial murderers won't be abiding by the law in any case. John (Gun Nut) H. --------------------------------- I agree. So, how do they get their guns? By unlawful means. There are laws already on the books that deal with criminals. We have too many law makers and not enough law enforcers. |
More info.. not looking good...
"Hank©" wrote in message b.com... On 6/23/2013 11:13 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote: Wayne.B wrote: On Sun, 23 Jun 2013 16:51:30 -0400, Hank© wrote: You're pretty goode at taking the wind out of his sails. There's no wonder why he calls you all sorts of silly names. ;-) ==== Harry's name calling stems from his insecurity and self esteem issues. It's an attempt to boost himself up by putting everyone else down. Unlike you, I don't need a really big old boat to compensate for a really small old dick. And of course your assumption I stated the shirt manufacturer was making a $4.50 net profit on a $9.00 shirt. Banisters...no wonder this country is ****ed. Have nice day. So you compensate for your small old dick with your big mouth. Got it. That explains everything. ----------------------------- Gotta admit. That made me laugh! |
More info.. not looking good...
On Mon, 24 Jun 2013 07:32:58 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:
"John H" wrote in message .. . On Mon, 24 Jun 2013 05:08:28 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote: The requirements to simply "own" a firearm and the requirements to own and carry in public (concealed or open) are different. A permit is required for concealed or open carry in most states. It's also why some (like MA) is a "may" and "shall" state as far as the issuance of permits go. Neither violate anyone's right to own a firearm. The only reason a permit will not be issued is if you have a felony record and are legally not eligible to own one. *That* is the purpose of a cursory background check. That's all. It's not to "take away" your rights unless you deserve to have them taken. Geeze. Why is this so hard for people to understand? It is not hard for 'us people' to understand that you would like background checks for *every* transfer of a firearm, a la the Senate bill. Many of 'us people' disagree. Some of us don't see the need for the bureaucracy, the taxes, etc, when the checks would not have prevented the atrocities that have prompted all the demands for them. Furthermore, I don't think it's anyone's damn business if I decide to give my brother or grandson a gun. John (Gun Nut) H. --------------------------------------------------- I'll try again and then drop the subject. I don't advocate a background check for *every* transfer of a firearm as you stated. Not necessary. What I am advocating, much to the chagrin of some, is that a permit be required to own a firearm, much like a license is required to drive a car on public roads. The permit is *required* to be issued unless an initial cursory background check reveals that you are a convicted felon or person who is not legally permitted to own a firearm. There's no violation of anyone's 2nd Amendment Rights. If you are not legally prohibited, you will receive a permit. Once acquired, the only "check" made is when you purchase a gun, either through a dealer or private party, be it a sale or gift. The check isn't a background check. The check is simply to ensure that your permit is valid and you are who you say you are. Very simple. Won't solve all the problems associated with criminals acquiring guns, nor will it prevent a nut case from going on a rampage and going on a killing spree. But it *will* help reducing the number of guns in the hands of people who are prohibited from having them without stepping on the toes of anyone's "Rights" under the Constitution. Personally, I'd also advocate that a safety course also be required to obtain a permit but I realize that's asking too much for our Constitutional experts to accept. Here's a way to garner support for the 'permit' idea. Pass a law stating that a voter identification card can be used as a permit to buy a gun. Then do the background check to ensure the individual is qualified to vote. I'd go along with that in a heartbeat, and I'll bet a lot of Republicans would do likewise. Hell, a law like that should make everyone happy. Probably put the NRA out of business. John (Gun Nut) H. -- Hope you're having a great day! |
More info.. not looking good...
On 6/24/2013 7:23 AM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Sat, 22 Jun 2013 12:00:21 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: I'm hoping my ashes will be airdropped on the naked California gals who sunbathe near Paradise Beach near Santa Monica. ===== You should study French in the hope that your ashes could be dropped on the naked European gals who sunbathe on the beaches at St Martins and St Barths - overall a cut or two above the Californians and you don't have all of that annoying "valley girl" talk. That would be a nice visual if they would shave their pits and legs. ;-) |
More info.. not looking good...
On 6/24/13 7:57 AM, Eisboch wrote:
"Wayne.B" wrote in message ... On Sat, 22 Jun 2013 12:00:21 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: I'm hoping my ashes will be airdropped on the naked California gals who sunbathe near Paradise Beach near Santa Monica. ===== You should study French in the hope that your ashes could be dropped on the naked European gals who sunbathe on the beaches at St Martins and St Barths - overall a cut or two above the Californians and you don't have all of that annoying "valley girl" talk. ------------------------------------ Hopefully not dropped from a plane landing at the airport: http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature...IJ0F62og4&NR=1 We've been to many destinations in the Caribbean, including both parts of Saint Martin, and we've been to Saint Barthélemy, too, in fact, on the same trip. For many reasons, we prefer the Med and the Greek isles, though I would enjoy a trip to Cuba. Love Cuban food, music, and hopefully, once the Castro brothers are dead, the country can get with it. |
More info.. not looking good...
|
More info.. not looking good...
In article ,
says... On 6/23/2013 5:51 PM, John H wrote: On Sun, 23 Jun 2013 08:30:15 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 6/23/13 8:22 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... They all missed my point. The point is like gun control... if we let them give citizenship, without *first* securing the border, the border won't get secured. There will be financing delays, lawsuits, and just "rules" made by administration officials that delay or sink the security end of the bill asap.... It's just the way things go in Washington, the Dems make promises "if" the repubs will just cave and of course like in 84 and the fence in '06... All we will end up with in millions of new dem voters.... Scotty O'reilly speaks!! It really doesn't matter whether a fence is erected along the U.S.-Mexico border, because such devices don't work. The Great Wall of China didn't work, and the Berlin Wall didn't work...both were breached many, many times. But calling for the building of such a wall gets the righties what they want...a delay in a real immigration plan "until" the wall is built. It's just more conservative cynicism. Got to get serious about those who climb the fence. John (Gun Nut) H. Can't even take folks seriously who think a wall would do less than we are doing more. It defies logic... sure, hire all the new govt workers but give them "all" the tools to do the job... That's all I am saying. A decent wall and a few drones would do a lot but they really don't want to stop all those voters from coming in until they destroy the two party system... Then like so many monopolies in the past, they will shut the borders hard, both ways... Speaking of taking someone "seriously", tell us more about that wall you were talking about, you know, the Iron Curtain!!!!!!!!! |
More info.. not looking good...
|
More info.. not looking good...
In article ,
says... In article , says... Geeze. Why is this so hard for people to understand? Tell me about it. Recently this thread turned to building the Great Wall of Amerca, to keep out illegals. A wall that can be seen from outer space probably. I explicitly said that almost half of the illegals in this country flew in to airports with legal visas. The answer? Build a wall. I don't expect ANYBODY to agree with anything I say. But unless I'm here to call dumb asses dumb asses, there's just no fun in it. Scotty wants to build a 40,000 foot wall..... |
More info.. not looking good...
|
More info.. not looking good...
|
More info.. not looking good...
On 6/24/2013 8:08 AM, Eisboch wrote:
"F.O.A.D." wrote in message m... On 6/24/13 7:07 AM, Eisboch wrote: "F.O.A.D." wrote in message ... On 6/24/13 4:46 AM, Eisboch wrote: "F.O.A.D." wrote in message ... Wayne.B wrote: On Sun, 23 Jun 2013 16:51:30 -0400, Hank© wrote: You're pretty goode at taking the wind out of his sails. There's no wonder why he calls you all sorts of silly names. ;-) ==== Harry's name calling stems from his insecurity and self esteem issues. It's an attempt to boost himself up by putting everyone else down. Unlike you, I don't need a really big old boat to compensate for a really small old dick. ----------------------------------------- Nonesense. Wayne has a big old boat because he lives on it for 5 months at a time and uses it to travel to places that most of us would only dream of navigating to. Everyone has their type of boating and interests. Few do what Wayne does. To each his own. What Wayne does for "five months at a time," indeed for the whole year, seems vacuous to me. To me, the idea of being *that* retired with nothing really to do but putter around in a boat for half the year seems mindless and completely self-indulgent. ------------------------------------------ You sound a little envious to me. I know I am. I had to go look up "vacuous" BTW. So what are your "retirement" hobbies or interests, besides spreading your political, social and anti-business philosophies on a obscure internet newsgroup? Why would I be envious of a lifestyle I'd find boring? I'm not retired. For fun and relaxation, I do some boating, some bike riding, some traveling, some reading, some target shooting, some getting together with old friends. I have friends and colleagues in their 80's who are still actively involved in their work. If I make it that far, I hope to be doing the same. -------------------------------------------- So why the negativity on what other people enjoy? Some would find your "hobbies" boring. As for continuing to work, go for it. But isn't that being a bit self-indulgent as well? You seem to have made your mark and apparently don't need the money. His wife threatened to put him in the home if he stopped working. |
More info.. not looking good...
|
More info.. not looking good...
On 6/24/2013 6:23 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 6/24/13 4:46 AM, Eisboch wrote: "F.O.A.D." wrote in message ... Wayne.B wrote: On Sun, 23 Jun 2013 16:51:30 -0400, Hank© wrote: You're pretty goode at taking the wind out of his sails. There's no wonder why he calls you all sorts of silly names. ;-) ==== Harry's name calling stems from his insecurity and self esteem issues. It's an attempt to boost himself up by putting everyone else down. Unlike you, I don't need a really big old boat to compensate for a really small old dick. ----------------------------------------- Nonesense. Wayne has a big old boat because he lives on it for 5 months at a time and uses it to travel to places that most of us would only dream of navigating to. Everyone has their type of boating and interests. Few do what Wayne does. To each his own. What Wayne does for "five months at a time," indeed for the whole year, seems vacuous to me. To me, the idea of being *that* retired with nothing really to do but putter around in a boat for half the year seems mindless and completely self-indulgent. You obviously march to a different drummer. That's OK, but don't expect *anyone* to follow you. |
More info.. not looking good...
|
More info.. not looking good...
"F.O.A.D." wrote in message m... We've been to many destinations in the Caribbean, including both parts of Saint Martin, and we've been to Saint Barthélemy, too, in fact, on the same trip. For many reasons, we prefer the Med and the Greek isles, though I would enjoy a trip to Cuba. Love Cuban food, music, and hopefully, once the Castro brothers are dead, the country can get with it. ----------------------------------------- We are not exactly world travellers but have spent extensive time living outside the US. I had one brief excursion to southeast Asia in 1969 that only lasted 6 weeks, and spent a little over a week in China (PRC) in 1986 but we lived in Italy for over two years and in Puerto Rico for about the same. Loved Italy. Puerto Rico? Not so much. Had an interesting series of emails last December with a guy in Italy. I was Christmas shopping on eBay and came across some custom made, very beautiful pens that were made in a factory in Italy, not far from where we had lived. Thought it would make a good gift for Mrs.E, so I ordered one. I was surprised to receive a personal email from the factory owner thanking me for the order. One email exchange led to another and I told him about our living not far from him, how our daughter was born there and how much we had enjoyed his country back in the early 70's. He responded with an invitation to visit again and he would make arrangements for us to stay at a villa he owned, free of charge. He was also very honest and talked about how much Italy has changed since the 70's and how we probably wouldn't enjoy it like we did back then. It was tempting, but I hate air travel and I'd rather retain the good memories that we have. |
More info.. not looking good...
On 6/24/13 9:41 AM, Eisboch wrote:
"F.O.A.D." wrote in message m... We've been to many destinations in the Caribbean, including both parts of Saint Martin, and we've been to Saint Barthélemy, too, in fact, on the same trip. For many reasons, we prefer the Med and the Greek isles, though I would enjoy a trip to Cuba. Love Cuban food, music, and hopefully, once the Castro brothers are dead, the country can get with it. ----------------------------------------- We are not exactly world travellers but have spent extensive time living outside the US. I had one brief excursion to southeast Asia in 1969 that only lasted 6 weeks, and spent a little over a week in China (PRC) in 1986 but we lived in Italy for over two years and in Puerto Rico for about the same. Loved Italy. Puerto Rico? Not so much. Had an interesting series of emails last December with a guy in Italy. I was Christmas shopping on eBay and came across some custom made, very beautiful pens that were made in a factory in Italy, not far from where we had lived. Thought it would make a good gift for Mrs.E, so I ordered one. I was surprised to receive a personal email from the factory owner thanking me for the order. One email exchange led to another and I told him about our living not far from him, how our daughter was born there and how much we had enjoyed his country back in the early 70's. He responded with an invitation to visit again and he would make arrangements for us to stay at a villa he owned, free of charge. He was also very honest and talked about how much Italy has changed since the 70's and how we probably wouldn't enjoy it like we did back then. It was tempting, but I hate air travel and I'd rather retain the good memories that we have. I don't like air travel very much, either. We've been to Italy but only for a few weeks. I'd love to live there for a while. There's so much art, history and historical buildings and music that interest us. When I was growing up in New Haven, we had a family friend who worked for Sikorsky in Stratford. He was an engineer. Sikorsky got a huge contract from the Italian government for copters. He went over there to help set up their maintenance facilities, and spent three years in Italy. He banked his salary in the states and lived off of a generous per diem Sikorsky provided, and the Italian government provided him with a villa and just about everything else his family needed. My wife and I want to spend a month in Ireland sometime soon, she to meet up with relatives, and me to spend some time with an old author friend of mine who lives on Lough Owel and who keeps tempting me with photos and stories about trout fishing. |
More info.. not looking good...
In article ,
says... In article , says... "John H" wrote in message ... On Mon, 24 Jun 2013 05:08:28 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote: The requirements to simply "own" a firearm and the requirements to own and carry in public (concealed or open) are different. A permit is required for concealed or open carry in most states. It's also why some (like MA) is a "may" and "shall" state as far as the issuance of permits go. Neither violate anyone's right to own a firearm. The only reason a permit will not be issued is if you have a felony record and are legally not eligible to own one. *That* is the purpose of a cursory background check. That's all. It's not to "take away" your rights unless you deserve to have them taken. Geeze. Why is this so hard for people to understand? It is not hard for 'us people' to understand that you would like background checks for *every* transfer of a firearm, a la the Senate bill. Many of 'us people' disagree. Some of us don't see the need for the bureaucracy, the taxes, etc, when the checks would not have prevented the atrocities that have prompted all the demands for them. Furthermore, I don't think it's anyone's damn business if I decide to give my brother or grandson a gun. John (Gun Nut) H. --------------------------------------------------- I'll try again and then drop the subject. I don't advocate a background check for *every* transfer of a firearm as you stated. Not necessary. What I am advocating, much to the chagrin of some, is that a permit be required to own a firearm, much like a license is required to drive a car on public roads. The permit is *required* to be issued unless an initial cursory background check reveals that you are a convicted felon or person who is not legally permitted to own a firearm. There's no violation of anyone's 2nd Amendment Rights. If you are not legally prohibited, you will receive a permit. Once acquired, the only "check" made is when you purchase a gun, either through a dealer or private party, be it a sale or gift. The check isn't a background check. The check is simply to ensure that your permit is valid and you are who you say you are. Very simple. Won't solve all the problems associated with criminals acquiring guns, nor will it prevent a nut case from going on a rampage and going on a killing spree. But it *will* help reducing the number of guns in the hands of people who are prohibited from having them without stepping on the toes of anyone's "Rights" under the Constitution. Personally, I'd also advocate that a safety course also be required to obtain a permit but I realize that's asking too much for our Constitutional experts to accept. Again, why must I obtain a permit also known as approval in order to exercise my civil rights. I have committed no crime. The courts have told Maryland that they cannot require people to provide a good substantial reason as to why they want to exercise their rights to keep and bear arms. Well, then, why have any laws at all? |
More info.. not looking good...
|
More info.. not looking good...
On Mon, 24 Jun 2013 07:18:39 -0500, Boating All Out wrote:
In article , says... --------------------------------------------------- I'll try again and then drop the subject. I don't advocate a background check for *every* transfer of a firearm as you stated. Not necessary. What I am advocating, much to the chagrin of some, is that a permit be required to own a firearm, much like a license is required to drive a car on public roads. The permit is *required* to be issued unless an initial cursory background check reveals that you are a convicted felon or person who is not legally permitted to own a firearm. There's no violation of anyone's 2nd Amendment Rights. If you are not legally prohibited, you will receive a permit. Once acquired, the only "check" made is when you purchase a gun, either through a dealer or private party, be it a sale or gift. The check isn't a background check. The check is simply to ensure that your permit is valid and you are who you say you are. Very simple. Won't solve all the problems associated with criminals acquiring guns, nor will it prevent a nut case from going on a rampage and going on a killing spree. But it *will* help reducing the number of guns in the hands of people who are prohibited from having them without stepping on the toes of anyone's "Rights" under the Constitution. Personally, I'd also advocate that a safety course also be required to obtain a permit but I realize that's asking too much for our Constitutional experts to accept. Might as well drop it now. You can't reason with dumb- asses. Just use a 2x4 or axe handle. As I've said before, registration doesn't bother me, or most folks probably. The non-paranoids anyway. And the supremes will find it constitutional. Some states already require registration, and I don't see the supremes overturning those laws. But the scared dumb asses will go wild. What else could you expect from people who think it's a good idea to build a high enough wall to keep international air traffic from entering American airspace and landing at U.S. airports. What, they never even heard of surface to air missiles? Federal gun registration will happen when enough of the old scared dumb asses die off. And we'll all be better off for it. Especially the old scared dumb asses dying off part. I can wait. Or die first. Doesn't matter, I'll die knowing it's gonna happen. Here. Problem solved. Now find a new excuse for name-calling. About the only thing you've said that makes sense is, "Doesn't matter, I'll die..." That's true. John (Gun Nut) H. -- Hope you're having a great day! |
More info.. not looking good...
|
More info.. not looking good...
|
More info.. not looking good...
In article , says...
"BAR" wrote in message . .. In article , says... "F.O.A.D." wrote in message m... On 6/24/13 7:07 AM, Eisboch wrote: "F.O.A.D." wrote in message ... On 6/24/13 4:46 AM, Eisboch wrote: "F.O.A.D." wrote in message ... Wayne.B wrote: On Sun, 23 Jun 2013 16:51:30 -0400, Hank© wrote: You're pretty goode at taking the wind out of his sails. There's no wonder why he calls you all sorts of silly names. ;-) ==== Harry's name calling stems from his insecurity and self esteem issues. It's an attempt to boost himself up by putting everyone else down. Unlike you, I don't need a really big old boat to compensate for a really small old dick. ----------------------------------------- Nonesense. Wayne has a big old boat because he lives on it for 5 months at a time and uses it to travel to places that most of us would only dream of navigating to. Everyone has their type of boating and interests. Few do what Wayne does. To each his own. What Wayne does for "five months at a time," indeed for the whole year, seems vacuous to me. To me, the idea of being *that* retired with nothing really to do but putter around in a boat for half the year seems mindless and completely self-indulgent. ------------------------------------------ You sound a little envious to me. I know I am. I had to go look up "vacuous" BTW. So what are your "retirement" hobbies or interests, besides spreading your political, social and anti-business philosophies on a obscure internet newsgroup? Why would I be envious of a lifestyle I'd find boring? I'm not retired. For fun and relaxation, I do some boating, some bike riding, some traveling, some reading, some target shooting, some getting together with old friends. I have friends and colleagues in their 80's who are still actively involved in their work. If I make it that far, I hope to be doing the same. -------------------------------------------- So why the negativity on what other people enjoy? Some would find your "hobbies" boring. As for continuing to work, go for it. But isn't that being a bit self-indulgent as well? You seem to have made your mark and apparently don't need the money. Harry is still quite a bit light in satisfying his financial obligations to his creditors. We would appreciate it if Harry would make us whole again by paying all of his back taxes in full. ---------------------------------- That subject keeps bring brought up here by some. Personally, I have no first hand knowledge of it and it's none of my business anyway. I conduct any conversations with Harry with the same degree of respect he affords me. Or try to anyway. Can't say the same for some others. I have seen the informaiton in the various Florida County's criminal and civil court information systems. Harry is a deadbeat, you would serve yourself well if you did a credit check on him prior to engaging in any transations of any value. I am really amazed at the polarization in our society now-a-days. Every person is unique but few people act or behave uniquely. Those who offer opinions or viewpoints on a controversial subject of a current event status all seem to repeat the same talking points, depending on their point of view. I don't hate people who hold views, beliefs and opinions differnt from mine. I don't tell them that their views, beliefs and opinions are wrogn. I do try and tell them about what I believe are faults in their reasoning or background information. An example of this would be your desire to stick your head in the sand like the proverbial Ostrich with regard to Harry's financial responsibility problems. When someone, like Harry, is so damned adamanet about funding social programs that his side of the political fence desires with tax money from everyone else, it becomes a joke when it is found that Harry doesn't pay his taxes nor honor his financial obligations. Harry is the epitome of do as I say and not as I do. The discussion I've been having regarding guns and permits is a good example. It may surprise Bar, John H and a few others that I can see their point of view ... and I am not suggesting they are wrong. My opinion is just that ... an opinion ... but when something is broken I try to find a fix if possible. But all you seem to get in response is the same, tired arguments that no fix is necessary. I am glad that you are able to see others points of view. What we can't understand is why you believe that government approval is required to exercise your rights. |
More info.. not looking good...
|
More info.. not looking good...
|
More info.. not looking good...
On Mon, 24 Jun 2013 08:21:48 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:
I was just returning to Wayne some of the crap he was dishing out to me. ==== You should have some Cheerios and milk with those sour grapes of yours - very tasty breakfast for one with a such a sour disposition. How are you doing with those unpaid taxes and bankruptcy judgements? |
More info.. not looking good...
On 6/24/13 9:08 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Mon, 24 Jun 2013 08:21:48 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: I was just returning to Wayne some of the crap he was dishing out to me. ==== You should have some Cheerios and milk with those sour grapes of yours - very tasty breakfast for one with a such a sour disposition. How are you doing with those unpaid taxes and bankruptcy judgements? Another example of W'hine not behaving here as he often exhorts other to do. Sorry, W'hine, but there is nothing in your life that would give me a case of sour grapes. |
More info.. not looking good...
|
More info.. not looking good...
On Mon, 24 Jun 2013 07:57:08 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:
"Wayne.B" wrote in message .. . On Sat, 22 Jun 2013 12:00:21 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: I'm hoping my ashes will be airdropped on the naked California gals who sunbathe near Paradise Beach near Santa Monica. ===== You should study French in the hope that your ashes could be dropped on the naked European gals who sunbathe on the beaches at St Martins and St Barths - overall a cut or two above the Californians and you don't have all of that annoying "valley girl" talk. ------------------------------------ Hopefully not dropped from a plane landing at the airport: http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature...IJ0F62og4&NR=1 === I woukd not want to land *anything* at that airport let alone a 747. It is one scary looking runway located at the bottom of a hill. There are several roads and a traffic circle at the top of the hill, and off to the side there is a large cross marking the location of one major crash. From our anchorage at Shell Beach we could see the planes on final approach as they would just clear the roadway and go into a steep dive down the hill to the runway. http://www.google.com/imgres?start=295&hl=en&biw=1006&bih=579&tbm=isch&t bnid=0c-_r6FEIGDuRM:&imgrefurl=http://voyagelusting.com/2013/05/13/voyage-lusting-treats/st-barth-summer/&docid=7Dc7zR8qomJrsM&imgurl=http://voyagelusting.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/MG_8248-2.jpg&w=600&h=400&ei=EPHIUevZApL49gSnm4DoBg&zoom=1 &ved=1t:3588,r:99,s:200,i:301&iact=rc&page=25&tbnh =178&tbnw=275&ndsp=13&tx=131&ty=94 https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&site=imghp&tbm=isch&source=hp&biw=100 6&bih=579&q=shell+beach+st+barths&oq=shell+beach+s t+barths&gs_l=img.12...0.0.1.252299.0.0.0.0.0.0.0. 0..0.0...0.0...1ac..17.img.6GPh3zz1lhg |
More info.. not looking good...
On 6/24/13 9:23 PM, Boating All Out wrote:
In article , says... On Mon, 24 Jun 2013 08:21:48 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: I was just returning to Wayne some of the crap he was dishing out to me. ==== You should have some Cheerios and milk with those sour grapes of yours - very tasty breakfast for one with a such a sour disposition. How are you doing with those unpaid taxes and bankruptcy judgements? I don't get it. Don't you purport to be a "gentleman?" Whether your accusations are true of not can only make a difference in defining you as rude, or a scoundrel. Neither is acceptable in a forum of gentlemen. Oh, wait..... W'hine often exhorts others to behave as he doesn't, and he's been doing it for a long time. The reality is, he's just another of the many snarky right-wingers in here. W'hine's retired from his job as a bankster facilitator for Citibank. |
More info.. not looking good...
On Mon, 24 Jun 2013 09:11:43 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:
Harry is still quite a bit light in satisfying his financial obligations to his creditors. We would appreciate it if Harry would make us whole again by paying all of his back taxes in full. ---------------------------------- That subject keeps bring brought up here by some. Personally, I have no first hand knowledge of it and it's none of my business anyway. === It's true. I've seen the documents which are all a matter of public record. |
More info.. not looking good...
On 6/24/2013 9:29 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Mon, 24 Jun 2013 07:57:08 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote: "Wayne.B" wrote in message ... On Sat, 22 Jun 2013 12:00:21 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: I'm hoping my ashes will be airdropped on the naked California gals who sunbathe near Paradise Beach near Santa Monica. ===== You should study French in the hope that your ashes could be dropped on the naked European gals who sunbathe on the beaches at St Martins and St Barths - overall a cut or two above the Californians and you don't have all of that annoying "valley girl" talk. ------------------------------------ Hopefully not dropped from a plane landing at the airport: http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature...IJ0F62og4&NR=1 === I woukd not want to land *anything* at that airport let alone a 747. It is one scary looking runway located at the bottom of a hill. There are several roads and a traffic circle at the top of the hill, and off to the side there is a large cross marking the location of one major crash. From our anchorage at Shell Beach we could see the planes on final approach as they would just clear the roadway and go into a steep dive down the hill to the runway. http://www.google.com/imgres?start=295&hl=en&biw=1006&bih=579&tbm=isch&t bnid=0c-_r6FEIGDuRM:&imgrefurl=http://voyagelusting.com/2013/05/13/voyage-lusting-treats/st-barth-summer/&docid=7Dc7zR8qomJrsM&imgurl=http://voyagelusting.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/MG_8248-2.jpg&w=600&h=400&ei=EPHIUevZApL49gSnm4DoBg&zoom=1 &ved=1t:3588,r:99,s:200,i:301&iact=rc&page=25&tbnh =178&tbnw=275&ndsp=13&tx=131&ty=94 https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&site=imghp&tbm=isch&source=hp&biw=100 6&bih=579&q=shell+beach+st+barths&oq=shell+beach+s t+barths&gs_l=img.12...0.0.1.252299.0.0.0.0.0.0.0. 0..0.0...0.0...1ac..17.img.6GPh3zz1lhg It's in there...: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GOTuo1vdDkk |
More info.. not looking good...
|
More info.. not looking good...
On Mon, 24 Jun 2013 20:23:12 -0500, Boating All Out
wrote: In article , says... On Mon, 24 Jun 2013 08:21:48 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: I was just returning to Wayne some of the crap he was dishing out to me. ==== You should have some Cheerios and milk with those sour grapes of yours - very tasty breakfast for one with a such a sour disposition. How are you doing with those unpaid taxes and bankruptcy judgements? I don't get it. Don't you purport to be a "gentleman?" Whether your accusations are true of not can only make a difference in defining you as rude, or a scoundrel. === Point taken, however: 1. They are not accusations - well documented facts if you know where to look. 2. If you have followed Harry's "act" here for any length of time you must realize that he is no stranger to rudeness and invariably throws the first stone. 3. He's very good at dishing it out but puts on his best wounded face when it starts coming back at him. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:16 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com