The Dick is back.
 

In article ,
says...

On 5/16/13 1:53 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 16 May 2013 12:18:48 -0400, iBoaterer
wrote:

In article ,
says...



Anheuser-Busch gave him six figures, Colgate-Palmolive shelled out
$50,000 and Macy's and Pfizer have contributed thousands to the Rev.
Al Sharpton's charity.

Almost 50 companies - including PepsiCo, General Motors, Wal-Mart,
FedEx, Continental Airlines, Johnson & Johnson and Chase - and some
labor unions sponsored Sharpton's National Action Network annual
conference in April.

Terrified of negative publicity, fearful of a consumer boycott or
eager to make nice with the civil-rights activist, CEOs write checks,
critics say, to NAN and Sharpton - who brandishes the buying power of
African-American consumers. In some cases, they hire him as a
consultant.

The cash flows even as the US Attorney's Office in Brooklyn has been
conducting a grand-jury investigation of NAN's finances.

There are corporations upon corporations donating to causes much more
than Sharptons. Are they all crooks? Red Cross? United Way? Muscular
Dystrophy? Alzheimer's Foundation?

As usual, you miss the point. The donors are not crooks but they are
blackmailed into donating so as not to be declared racist by a guy who
used those unfounded claims to make a living for 3 decades.



Blackmail? Is PsychoSnotty involved?

Scotty's the victim, as always!

The Dick is back.
 

wrote in message
...

On Thursday, May 16, 2013 9:48:09 AM UTC-4, F.O.A.D. wrote:
wrote in message

...



On Thursday, May 16, 2013 12:01:59 AM UTC-4, F.O.A.D. wrote:



It also allows me (if so

motivated) to declare a tax-free status for many activities I
might

engage in...



Ah, so that explains the Duval County records. It didn't work out
so

well, eh?



----------------------------------------------------



Harry didn't say that. I did, and I've never declared a tax-free

activity.

Not sure who *you* are, since google shows you both to be foad/eisboch
interchangeably. The statement, obviously, was about him.

------------------------------------------------

We both happen to share the same fake email reply address, that's all.
He can buy me out if he wants. :-)

The Dick is back.
 

In article ,
says...

wrote in message
...

On Thursday, May 16, 2013 9:48:09 AM UTC-4, F.O.A.D. wrote:
wrote in message

...



On Thursday, May 16, 2013 12:01:59 AM UTC-4, F.O.A.D. wrote:



It also allows me (if so

motivated) to declare a tax-free status for many activities I
might

engage in...



Ah, so that explains the Duval County records. It didn't work out
so

well, eh?



----------------------------------------------------



Harry didn't say that. I did, and I've never declared a tax-free

activity.

Not sure who *you* are, since google shows you both to be foad/eisboch
interchangeably. The statement, obviously, was about him.

------------------------------------------------

We both happen to share the same fake email reply address, that's all.
He can buy me out if he wants. :-)

His fishing skills seem to be about as good as Scotty's!

The Dick is back.
 

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 16 May 2013 15:42:23 -0400, iBoaterer
wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 16 May 2013 12:18:48 -0400, iBoaterer
wrote:

In article ,
says...



Anheuser-Busch gave him six figures, Colgate-Palmolive shelled out
$50,000 and Macy's and Pfizer have contributed thousands to the Rev.
Al Sharpton's charity.

Almost 50 companies - including PepsiCo, General Motors, Wal-Mart,
FedEx, Continental Airlines, Johnson & Johnson and Chase - and some
labor unions sponsored Sharpton's National Action Network annual
conference in April.

Terrified of negative publicity, fearful of a consumer boycott or
eager to make nice with the civil-rights activist, CEOs write checks,
critics say, to NAN and Sharpton - who brandishes the buying power of
African-American consumers. In some cases, they hire him as a
consultant.

The cash flows even as the US Attorney's Office in Brooklyn has been
conducting a grand-jury investigation of NAN's finances.

There are corporations upon corporations donating to causes much more
than Sharptons. Are they all crooks? Red Cross? United Way? Muscular
Dystrophy? Alzheimer's Foundation?

As usual, you miss the point. The donors are not crooks but they are
blackmailed into donating so as not to be declared racist by a guy who
used those unfounded claims to make a living for 3 decades.

Horse****. No one's been "blackmailed". Insane Scotty thinks everyone is
blackmailed too!

The racism claims go away as soon as they send a big check to Al. It
sounds like blackmail or at least a "protection" racket to me.
Are you denying the tax fraud too?

Nope, and never did. As a matter of fact, I stated that I think he's a
scumbag. So, are companies that send a check to Red Cross doing so to
avoid claims of being incompassionate towards hurricane victims?

The Dick is back.
 

On Thu, 16 May 2013 17:10:28 -0400, iBoaterer
wrote:

So, are companies that send a check to Red Cross doing so to
avoid claims of being incompassionate towards hurricane victims?

===

Of course not but it is well understood that Sharpton operates a bit
differently than the Red Cross.

The Dick is back.
 

On Thursday, May 16, 2013 6:06:02 PM UTC-4, wrote:
On Thu, 16 May 2013 17:10:28 -0400, iBoaterer

wrote:



In article ,

says...



Horse****. No one's been "blackmailed". Insane Scotty thinks everyone is

blackmailed too!



The racism claims go away as soon as they send a big check to Al. It

sounds like blackmail or at least a "protection" racket to me.

Are you denying the tax fraud too?



Nope, and never did. As a matter of fact, I stated that I think he's a

scumbag. So, are companies that send a check to Red Cross doing so to

avoid claims of being incompassionate towards hurricane victims?



The Red Cross does not organize boycotts and protests if you don't

send them a check.

Give it up. iIdiot's reasoning and logic skills are no better than a toad's.

The Dick is back.
 

On Thursday, May 16, 2013 4:41:30 PM UTC-4, Eisboch wrote:
wrote in message

...



On Thursday, May 16, 2013 9:48:09 AM UTC-4, F.O.A.D. wrote:

wrote in message



...







On Thursday, May 16, 2013 12:01:59 AM UTC-4, F.O.A.D. wrote:







It also allows me (if so



motivated) to declare a tax-free status for many activities I

might



engage in...







Ah, so that explains the Duval County records. It didn't work out

so



well, eh?







----------------------------------------------------







Harry didn't say that. I did, and I've never declared a tax-free



activity.



Not sure who *you* are, since google shows you both to be foad/eisboch

interchangeably. The statement, obviously, was about him.



------------------------------------------------



We both happen to share the same fake email reply address, that's all.

He can buy me out if he wants. :-)

If that ever happened, you'll wind up in court to get your money and he'll claim bankruptcy. :-

The Dick is back.
 

On 5/17/13 8:27 AM, Gogarty wrote:
In article ,
says...


On 5/16/13 9:48 AM, Eisboch wrote:

(Snip)


Founding a church might be a fun gag. "Harry's Church of People Who
Don't Believe in Stuporstitious Nonsense."

That's almost as good as my Church of Cosmic Energy.



Perhaps we can merge the two and form "The Church of Universal
Stuporstitious Cosmic Religious Nonsense."

The Dick is back.
 

"Gogarty" wrote in message
...

In article ,
says...


On 5/16/13 9:48 AM, Eisboch wrote:

(Snip)


Founding a church might be a fun gag. "Harry's Church of People Who
Don't Believe in Stuporstitious Nonsense."

That's almost as good as my Church of Cosmic Energy.

---------------------------------

Funny. BTW, I don't use Googlenews and don't have a clue how it
works but again, the above quote in incorrectly attributed.
I didn't say that. Harry did.

The Dick is back.
 

On 5/17/13 8:42 AM, Eisboch wrote:


"Gogarty" wrote in message
...

In article ,
says...


On 5/16/13 9:48 AM, Eisboch wrote:

(Snip)


Founding a church might be a fun gag. "Harry's Church of People Who
Don't Believe in Stuporstitious Nonsense."

That's almost as good as my Church of Cosmic Energy.

---------------------------------

Funny. BTW, I don't use Googlenews and don't have a clue how it works
but again, the above quote in incorrectly attributed.
I didn't say that. Harry did.




That's right. *I* said it. :) C'est moi. Ich bin der Schuldige!

The Dick is back.
 

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 16 May 2013 17:10:28 -0400, iBoaterer
wrote:

In article ,
says...

Horse****. No one's been "blackmailed". Insane Scotty thinks everyone is
blackmailed too!

The racism claims go away as soon as they send a big check to Al. It
sounds like blackmail or at least a "protection" racket to me.
Are you denying the tax fraud too?

Nope, and never did. As a matter of fact, I stated that I think he's a
scumbag. So, are companies that send a check to Red Cross doing so to
avoid claims of being incompassionate towards hurricane victims?

The Red Cross does not organize boycotts and protests if you don't
send them a check.

Please show where Sharpton "organized protests and boycotts" because
someone "didn't send them a check".

The Dick is back.
 

In article ,
says...

On Fri, 17 May 2013 09:49:13 -0400, iBoaterer
wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 16 May 2013 17:10:28 -0400, iBoaterer
wrote:

In article ,
says...

Horse****. No one's been "blackmailed". Insane Scotty thinks everyone is
blackmailed too!

The racism claims go away as soon as they send a big check to Al. It
sounds like blackmail or at least a "protection" racket to me.
Are you denying the tax fraud too?

Nope, and never did. As a matter of fact, I stated that I think he's a
scumbag. So, are companies that send a check to Red Cross doing so to
avoid claims of being incompassionate towards hurricane victims?

The Red Cross does not organize boycotts and protests if you don't
send them a check.

Please show where Sharpton "organized protests and boycotts" because
someone "didn't send them a check".

Read the second article I linked

I did, and I sure didn't see THAT!

The Dick is back.
 

In article , says...

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 16 May 2013 17:10:28 -0400, iBoaterer
wrote:

In article ,
says...

Horse****. No one's been "blackmailed". Insane Scotty thinks everyone is
blackmailed too!

The racism claims go away as soon as they send a big check to Al. It
sounds like blackmail or at least a "protection" racket to me.
Are you denying the tax fraud too?

Nope, and never did. As a matter of fact, I stated that I think he's a
scumbag. So, are companies that send a check to Red Cross doing so to
avoid claims of being incompassionate towards hurricane victims?

The Red Cross does not organize boycotts and protests if you don't
send them a check.

Please show where Sharpton "organized protests and boycotts" because
someone "didn't send them a check".

Sharpton threatend many businesses with protests and boycotts in order to get a check, just
like the Rev. Jessie Jackson.

The Dick is back.
 

In article ,
says...

In article , says...

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 16 May 2013 17:10:28 -0400, iBoaterer
wrote:

In article ,
says...

Horse****. No one's been "blackmailed". Insane Scotty thinks everyone is
blackmailed too!

The racism claims go away as soon as they send a big check to Al. It
sounds like blackmail or at least a "protection" racket to me.
Are you denying the tax fraud too?

Nope, and never did. As a matter of fact, I stated that I think he's a
scumbag. So, are companies that send a check to Red Cross doing so to
avoid claims of being incompassionate towards hurricane victims?

The Red Cross does not organize boycotts and protests if you don't
send them a check.

Please show where Sharpton "organized protests and boycotts" because
someone "didn't send them a check".

Sharpton threatend many businesses with protests and boycotts in order to get a check, just
like the Rev. Jessie Jackson.

Cite?

The Dick is back.
 

In article , says...

In article ,
says...

In article , says...

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 16 May 2013 17:10:28 -0400, iBoaterer
wrote:

In article ,
says...

Horse****. No one's been "blackmailed". Insane Scotty thinks everyone is
blackmailed too!

The racism claims go away as soon as they send a big check to Al. It
sounds like blackmail or at least a "protection" racket to me.
Are you denying the tax fraud too?

Nope, and never did. As a matter of fact, I stated that I think he's a
scumbag. So, are companies that send a check to Red Cross doing so to
avoid claims of being incompassionate towards hurricane victims?

The Red Cross does not organize boycotts and protests if you don't
send them a check.

Please show where Sharpton "organized protests and boycotts" because
someone "didn't send them a check".

Sharpton threatend many businesses with protests and boycotts in order to get a check, just
like the Rev. Jessie Jackson.

Cite?

http://staugustine.com/stories/09110...0911.018.shtml

http://askville.amazon.com/Sharpton-...swerViewer.do?
requestId=4839951

http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/i...asp?indid=1527

http://www.soulciti.com/african_amer...=1&pollid=6 3

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/0...for-a-boycott-
of-Sanford-businesses

The Dick is back.
 

In article ,
says...

In article , says...

In article ,
says...

In article , says...

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 16 May 2013 17:10:28 -0400, iBoaterer
wrote:

In article ,
says...

Horse****. No one's been "blackmailed". Insane Scotty thinks everyone is
blackmailed too!

The racism claims go away as soon as they send a big check to Al. It
sounds like blackmail or at least a "protection" racket to me.
Are you denying the tax fraud too?

Nope, and never did. As a matter of fact, I stated that I think he's a
scumbag. So, are companies that send a check to Red Cross doing so to
avoid claims of being incompassionate towards hurricane victims?

The Red Cross does not organize boycotts and protests if you don't
send them a check.

Please show where Sharpton "organized protests and boycotts" because
someone "didn't send them a check".

Sharpton threatend many businesses with protests and boycotts in order to get a check, just
like the Rev. Jessie Jackson.

Cite?

http://staugustine.com/stories/09110...0911.018.shtml

Absolutely NOTHING to do with Sharpton "getting a check".

http://askville.amazon.com/Sharpton-...swerViewer.do?
requestId=4839951

Absolutely NOTHING to do with Sharpton "getting a check".

http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/i...asp?indid=1527

Absolutely NOTHING to do with Sharpton "getting a check".

http://www.soulciti.com/african_amer...=1&pollid=6 3

Absolutely NOTHING to do with Sharpton "getting a check".

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/0...for-a-boycott-
of-Sanford-businesses

Absolutely NOTHING to do with Sharpton "getting a check".

Wrong on ALL counts.

The Dick is back.
 

In article , says...

In article ,
says...

In article , says...

In article ,
says...

In article , says...

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 16 May 2013 17:10:28 -0400, iBoaterer
wrote:

In article ,
says...

Horse****. No one's been "blackmailed". Insane Scotty thinks everyone is
blackmailed too!

The racism claims go away as soon as they send a big check to Al. It
sounds like blackmail or at least a "protection" racket to me.
Are you denying the tax fraud too?

Nope, and never did. As a matter of fact, I stated that I think he's a
scumbag. So, are companies that send a check to Red Cross doing so to
avoid claims of being incompassionate towards hurricane victims?

The Red Cross does not organize boycotts and protests if you don't
send them a check.

Please show where Sharpton "organized protests and boycotts" because
someone "didn't send them a check".

Sharpton threatend many businesses with protests and boycotts in order to get a check, just
like the Rev. Jessie Jackson.

Cite?

http://staugustine.com/stories/09110...0911.018.shtml

Absolutely NOTHING to do with Sharpton "getting a check".

http://askville.amazon.com/Sharpton-...swerViewer.do?
requestId=4839951

Absolutely NOTHING to do with Sharpton "getting a check".

http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/i...asp?indid=1527

Absolutely NOTHING to do with Sharpton "getting a check".

http://www.soulciti.com/african_amer...=1&pollid=6 3

Absolutely NOTHING to do with Sharpton "getting a check".

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/0...for-a-boycott-
of-Sanford-businesses

Absolutely NOTHING to do with Sharpton "getting a check".

Wrong on ALL counts.

You don't know Shartpon didn't get a check. Maybe the IRS should audit him.

The Dick is back.
 

In article ,
says...

In article , says...

In article ,
says...

In article , says...

In article ,
says...

In article , says...

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 16 May 2013 17:10:28 -0400, iBoaterer
wrote:

In article ,
says...

Horse****. No one's been "blackmailed". Insane Scotty thinks everyone is
blackmailed too!

The racism claims go away as soon as they send a big check to Al. It
sounds like blackmail or at least a "protection" racket to me.
Are you denying the tax fraud too?

Nope, and never did. As a matter of fact, I stated that I think he's a
scumbag. So, are companies that send a check to Red Cross doing so to
avoid claims of being incompassionate towards hurricane victims?

The Red Cross does not organize boycotts and protests if you don't
send them a check.

Please show where Sharpton "organized protests and boycotts" because
someone "didn't send them a check".

Sharpton threatend many businesses with protests and boycotts in order to get a check, just
like the Rev. Jessie Jackson.

Cite?

http://staugustine.com/stories/09110...0911.018.shtml

Absolutely NOTHING to do with Sharpton "getting a check".

http://askville.amazon.com/Sharpton-...swerViewer.do?
requestId=4839951

Absolutely NOTHING to do with Sharpton "getting a check".

http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/i...asp?indid=1527

Absolutely NOTHING to do with Sharpton "getting a check".

http://www.soulciti.com/african_amer...=1&pollid=6 3

Absolutely NOTHING to do with Sharpton "getting a check".

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/0...for-a-boycott-
of-Sanford-businesses

Absolutely NOTHING to do with Sharpton "getting a check".

Wrong on ALL counts.

You don't know Shartpon didn't get a check. Maybe the IRS should audit him.

YOU said he got a check from them. Prove it, liar.

The Dick is back.
 

On 5/20/2013 10:15 AM, BAR wrote:
In article , says...

In article ,
says...

In article , says...

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 16 May 2013 17:10:28 -0400, iBoaterer
wrote:

In article ,
says...

Horse****. No one's been "blackmailed". Insane Scotty thinks everyone is
blackmailed too!

The racism claims go away as soon as they send a big check to Al. It
sounds like blackmail or at least a "protection" racket to me.
Are you denying the tax fraud too?

Nope, and never did. As a matter of fact, I stated that I think he's a
scumbag. So, are companies that send a check to Red Cross doing so to
avoid claims of being incompassionate towards hurricane victims?

The Red Cross does not organize boycotts and protests if you don't
send them a check.

Please show where Sharpton "organized protests and boycotts" because
someone "didn't send them a check".

Sharpton threatend many businesses with protests and boycotts in order to get a check, just
like the Rev. Jessie Jackson.

Cite?

http://staugustine.com/stories/09110...0911.018.shtml

http://askville.amazon.com/Sharpton-...swerViewer.do?
requestId=4839951

http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/i...asp?indid=1527

http://www.soulciti.com/african_amer...=1&pollid=6 3

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/0...for-a-boycott-
of-Sanford-businesses


It's hard to imagine that Loogie is in such a fog that he's never seen
the rev. Al at work collecting money.

The Dick is back.
 

In article m, hank57
@socialworker.net says...

On 5/20/2013 10:15 AM, BAR wrote:
In article , says...

In article ,
says...

In article , says...

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 16 May 2013 17:10:28 -0400, iBoaterer
wrote:

In article ,
says...

Horse****. No one's been "blackmailed". Insane Scotty thinks everyone is
blackmailed too!

The racism claims go away as soon as they send a big check to Al. It
sounds like blackmail or at least a "protection" racket to me.
Are you denying the tax fraud too?

Nope, and never did. As a matter of fact, I stated that I think he's a
scumbag. So, are companies that send a check to Red Cross doing so to
avoid claims of being incompassionate towards hurricane victims?

The Red Cross does not organize boycotts and protests if you don't
send them a check.

Please show where Sharpton "organized protests and boycotts" because
someone "didn't send them a check".

Sharpton threatend many businesses with protests and boycotts in order to get a check, just
like the Rev. Jessie Jackson.

Cite?

http://staugustine.com/stories/09110...0911.018.shtml

http://askville.amazon.com/Sharpton-...swerViewer.do?
requestId=4839951

http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/i...asp?indid=1527

http://www.soulciti.com/african_amer...=1&pollid=6 3

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/0...for-a-boycott-
of-Sanford-businesses


It's hard to imagine that Loogie is in such a fog that he's never seen
the rev. Al at work collecting money.

Please show me in each and every single one of those cites, or ANY of
those cites where there is ANY evidence that Sharpton collected monies
from them....... Come on, balls in your court.

The Dick is back.
 

In article ,
says...

On Mon, 20 May 2013 16:48:00 -0400, iBoaterer
wrote:



Please show me in each and every single one of those cites, or ANY of
those cites where there is ANY evidence that Sharpton collected monies
from them....... Come on, balls in your court.

I gave you a cite with several examples and you just ignored it

You NEVER gave me a cite that stated that Sharpton demanded money from
anyone.

The Dick is back.
 

In article ,
says...

On Tue, 21 May 2013 09:01:24 -0400, iBoaterer
wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Mon, 20 May 2013 16:48:00 -0400, iBoaterer
wrote:



Please show me in each and every single one of those cites, or ANY of
those cites where there is ANY evidence that Sharpton collected monies
from them....... Come on, balls in your court.

I gave you a cite with several examples and you just ignored it

You NEVER gave me a cite that stated that Sharpton demanded money from
anyone.

Bull****

You gave me cites that showed nothing of the sort.

The Dick is back.
 

On May 15, 11:22*am, True North wrote:
On Wednesday, 15 May 2013 11:40:14 UTC-3, *e#c *wrote:

Why you keep replying to the **** is the real mystery here......DICK !!

Maybe because he wants to, jackass.
It's supposed to be 'a free country' down there.

You want to suck on Dicks Herpes-infected dick as well, huh COCKHOLE?

That figures. Now, you , Harry, and Dick can have a 3 some.....with
you as the " bitch".....LMAO

The Dick is back.
 

On May 16, 4:41*pm, "Eisboch" wrote:
wrote in ...





On Thursday, May 16, 2013 9:48:09 AM UTC-4, F.O.A.D. wrote:
wrote in message

...

On Thursday, May 16, 2013 12:01:59 AM UTC-4, F.O.A.D. wrote:

It also allows me (if so

motivated) *to declare a tax-free status for many activities I
might

engage in...

Ah, so that explains the Duval County records. *It didn't work out
so

well, eh?

----------------------------------------------------

Harry didn't say that. * I did, and I've never declared a tax-free

activity.

Not sure who *you* are, since google shows you both to be foad/eisboch
interchangeably. *The statement, obviously, was about him.

------------------------------------------------

We both happen to share the same fake email reply address, that's all.
He can buy me out if he wants. * :-)

Cowards do that........

The Dick is back.
 

On May 17, 8:47*am, "F.O.A.D." wrote:
On 5/17/13 8:42 AM, Eisboch wrote:







"Gogarty" *wrote in message
...

In article ,
says...

On 5/16/13 9:48 AM, Eisboch wrote:

(Snip)

Founding a church might be a fun gag. "Harry's Church of People Who
Don't Believe in Stuporstitious Nonsense."

That's almost as good as my Church of Cosmic Energy.

---------------------------------

Funny. * BTW, *I don't use Googlenews and don't have a clue how it works
but again, the above quote in incorrectly attributed.
I didn't say that. * Harry did.

That's right. *I* said it. * :) *C'est moi. Ich bin der Schuldige!

Grosse arschloch !!!

The Dick is back.
 

On May 20, 2:04*pm, Hank© wrote:
On 5/20/2013 10:15 AM, BAR wrote:





In article , says...

In article ,
says...

In article , says...

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 16 May 2013 17:10:28 -0400, iBoaterer
wrote:

In article ,
says...

Horse****. No one's been "blackmailed". Insane Scotty thinks everyone is
blackmailed too!

The racism claims go away as soon as they send a big check to Al. It
sounds like blackmail or at least a "protection" racket to me.
Are you denying the tax fraud too?

Nope, and never did. As a matter of fact, I stated that I think he's a
scumbag. So, are companies that send a check to Red Cross doing so to
avoid claims of being incompassionate towards hurricane victims?

The Red Cross does not organize boycotts and protests if you don't
send them a check.

Please show where Sharpton "organized protests and boycotts" because
someone "didn't send them a check".

Sharpton threatend many businesses with protests and boycotts in order to get a check, just
like the Rev. Jessie Jackson.

Cite?

http://staugustine.com/stories/09110...0911.018.shtml

http://askville.amazon.com/Sharpton-...ycott-warrante...
requestId=4839951

http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/i...asp?indid=1527

http://www.soulciti.com/african_amer...php?view=1&pol....

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/0...arpton-is-wron...
of-Sanford-businesses

It's hard to imagine that Loogie is in such a fog that he's never seen
the rev. Al at work collecting money.

Its the Steroids he eats....... They're burning out his already addled
brain.

The Dick is back.
 

In article ,
says...

On Tue, 21 May 2013 12:51:22 -0400, iBoaterer
wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Tue, 21 May 2013 09:01:24 -0400, iBoaterer
wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Mon, 20 May 2013 16:48:00 -0400, iBoaterer
wrote:



Please show me in each and every single one of those cites, or ANY of
those cites where there is ANY evidence that Sharpton collected monies
from them....... Come on, balls in your court.

I gave you a cite with several examples and you just ignored it

You NEVER gave me a cite that stated that Sharpton demanded money from
anyone.

Bull****

You gave me cites that showed nothing of the sort.


What part of this confuses you

Terrified of negative publicity, fearful of a consumer boycott or
eager to make nice with the civil-rights activist, CEOs write checks,
critics say, to NAN and Sharpton - who brandishes the buying power of
African-American consumers. In some cases, they hire him as a
consultant.

The cash flows even as the US Attorney's Office in Brooklyn has been
conducting a grand-jury investigation of NAN's finances.

That is speculation and someone's view ONLY. That is not PROOF of
anything, and you know it.

The Dick is back.
 

In article ,
says...

On Wed, 22 May 2013 08:58:24 -0400, iBoaterer
wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Tue, 21 May 2013 12:51:22 -0400, iBoaterer
wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Tue, 21 May 2013 09:01:24 -0400, iBoaterer
wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Mon, 20 May 2013 16:48:00 -0400, iBoaterer
wrote:



Please show me in each and every single one of those cites, or ANY of
those cites where there is ANY evidence that Sharpton collected monies
from them....... Come on, balls in your court.

I gave you a cite with several examples and you just ignored it

You NEVER gave me a cite that stated that Sharpton demanded money from
anyone.

Bull****

You gave me cites that showed nothing of the sort.


What part of this confuses you

Terrified of negative publicity, fearful of a consumer boycott or
eager to make nice with the civil-rights activist, CEOs write checks,
critics say, to NAN and Sharpton - who brandishes the buying power of
African-American consumers. In some cases, they hire him as a
consultant.

The cash flows even as the US Attorney's Office in Brooklyn has been
conducting a grand-jury investigation of NAN's finances.

That is speculation and someone's view ONLY. That is not PROOF of
anything, and you know it.

That same article goes on with a half dozen other examples but if you
love Sharpton there will be no proof good enough to convince you.

Again, there is NO proof. One person's view is not proof.

The Dick is back.
 

In article ,
says...

On Wed, 22 May 2013 13:10:19 -0400, iBoaterer
wrote:

In article ,
says...


That is speculation and someone's view ONLY. That is not PROOF of
anything, and you know it.

That same article goes on with a half dozen other examples but if you
love Sharpton there will be no proof good enough to convince you.

Again, there is NO proof. One person's view is not proof.

If I found 10 more articles you would reject them too. I am out.

If you think Sharpton is a valuable contributor to society, go for it.

Send him a check

I never said he was anything. I don't like him, BUT the fact remains
that you have nothing but opinion, not fact.

The Dick is back.
 

On Wednesday, May 22, 2013 3:14:59 PM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,

says...



On Wed, 22 May 2013 13:10:19 -0400, iBoaterer

wrote:



In article ,

says...





That is speculation and someone's view ONLY. That is not PROOF of

anything, and you know it.



That same article goes on with a half dozen other examples but if you

love Sharpton there will be no proof good enough to convince you.



Again, there is NO proof. One person's view is not proof.



If I found 10 more articles you would reject them too. I am out.



If you think Sharpton is a valuable contributor to society, go for it.



Send him a check



I never said he was anything. I don't like him, BUT the fact remains

that you have nothing but opinion, not fact.

~snerk~ This from the guy that linked a vision statement as proof of something.

The Dick is back.
 

In article ,
says...

On Wed, 22 May 2013 15:14:59 -0400, iBoaterer
wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Wed, 22 May 2013 13:10:19 -0400, iBoaterer
wrote:

In article ,
says...


That is speculation and someone's view ONLY. That is not PROOF of
anything, and you know it.

That same article goes on with a half dozen other examples but if you
love Sharpton there will be no proof good enough to convince you.

Again, there is NO proof. One person's view is not proof.

If I found 10 more articles you would reject them too. I am out.

If you think Sharpton is a valuable contributor to society, go for it.

Send him a check

I never said he was anything. I don't like him, BUT the fact remains
that you have nothing but opinion, not fact.

So all of those CEOs are lying?

No CEO's stated ANYTHING of the like and you know it.