On 5/9/13 12:23 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 09 May 2013 12:09:07 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

As for Maryland, I've been told by law enforcement officials and an
assistant prosecutor that if someone forces their way into the house at
night and I shoot the perp, they are unlikely to prosecute.

That may not be all that comforting


I'm not concerned.

On 5/9/13 12:24 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 09 May 2013 12:04:59 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 5/9/13 12:02 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 09 May 2013 11:51:34 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 5/9/13 11:39 AM, wrote:
On Thu, 09 May 2013 07:44:55 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

You're willing to risk getting yourself shot to protect inanimate
objects? I'm not. We had a burglar visit us when we lived in Florida. I
caught him in the act. He came after me with a pry bar. I whacked him
with my truck, but not because he stole our stuff, but because he was
threatening me physically.

That is what got Martin shot

Oh, in what criminal act was Martin engaging?

Assault and battery


Prove it.

That is not how it works. The state has to prove Zimmerman was not
attacked.


Oh. You can claim Martin was engaged in criminal acts and deny that
Zimmerman started the fight. I get it.

On 5/9/2013 12:29 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 5/9/13 12:24 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 09 May 2013 12:04:59 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 5/9/13 12:02 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 09 May 2013 11:51:34 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 5/9/13 11:39 AM, wrote:
On Thu, 09 May 2013 07:44:55 -0400, "F.O.A.D."
wrote:

You're willing to risk getting yourself shot to protect inanimate
objects? I'm not. We had a burglar visit us when we lived in
Florida. I
caught him in the act. He came after me with a pry bar. I whacked
him
with my truck, but not because he stole our stuff, but because he
was
threatening me physically.

That is what got Martin shot

Oh, in what criminal act was Martin engaging?

Assault and battery


Prove it.

That is not how it works. The state has to prove Zimmerman was not
attacked.


Oh. You can claim Martin was engaged in criminal acts and deny that
Zimmerman started the fight. I get it.

AHHHH The light comes on. What took so lomg?

On 5/9/2013 12:24 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 09 May 2013 12:04:59 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 5/9/13 12:02 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 09 May 2013 11:51:34 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 5/9/13 11:39 AM, wrote:
On Thu, 09 May 2013 07:44:55 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

You're willing to risk getting yourself shot to protect inanimate
objects? I'm not. We had a burglar visit us when we lived in Florida. I
caught him in the act. He came after me with a pry bar. I whacked him
with my truck, but not because he stole our stuff, but because he was
threatening me physically.

That is what got Martin shot

Oh, in what criminal act was Martin engaging?

Assault and battery


Prove it.

That is not how it works. The state has to prove Zimmerman was not
attacked.


redundant....

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 09 May 2013 12:09:07 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

As for Maryland, I've been told by law enforcement officials and an
assistant prosecutor that if someone forces their way into the house at
night and I shoot the perp, they are unlikely to prosecute.

That may not be all that comforting

You bet! For one thing, I don't like leaving things like that up to
someone's discretion, you either broke the law or you didn't!

On 5/9/2013 12:36 PM, Hank© wrote:
On 5/9/2013 12:29 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 5/9/13 12:24 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 09 May 2013 12:04:59 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 5/9/13 12:02 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 09 May 2013 11:51:34 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 5/9/13 11:39 AM, wrote:
On Thu, 09 May 2013 07:44:55 -0400, "F.O.A.D."
wrote:

You're willing to risk getting yourself shot to protect inanimate
objects? I'm not. We had a burglar visit us when we lived in
Florida. I
caught him in the act. He came after me with a pry bar. I whacked
him
with my truck, but not because he stole our stuff, but because he
was
threatening me physically.

That is what got Martin shot

Oh, in what criminal act was Martin engaging?

Assault and battery


Prove it.

That is not how it works. The state has to prove Zimmerman was not
attacked.


Oh. You can claim Martin was engaged in criminal acts and deny that
Zimmerman started the fight. I get it.

AHHHH The light comes on. What took so lomg?

Just wondering... how many times are you guys going to answer the same
five ridiculous inferences, from the same three idiots?

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 09 May 2013 12:04:59 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 5/9/13 12:02 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 09 May 2013 11:51:34 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 5/9/13 11:39 AM, wrote:
On Thu, 09 May 2013 07:44:55 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

You're willing to risk getting yourself shot to protect inanimate
objects? I'm not. We had a burglar visit us when we lived in Florida. I
caught him in the act. He came after me with a pry bar. I whacked him
with my truck, but not because he stole our stuff, but because he was
threatening me physically.

That is what got Martin shot

Oh, in what criminal act was Martin engaging?

Assault and battery


Prove it.

That is not how it works. The state has to prove Zimmerman was not
attacked.

Where did you get that wild idea?

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 9 May 2013 12:20:57 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 9 May 2013 08:42:45 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,

If a man comes chases me because I'm walking at night and accosts me, he
certainly would be in for a fight!

So is the girlfriend lying?

She says Martin confronted Zimmerman

No she didn't. That's a lie.


OK what do you think she said

When Martin was cornered by a gun wielding assailant he asked him "Why
are you following me"? I'd have asked the same thing. She never, ever
said that Martin confronted Zimmerman. It's the other way around.

Martin did not know Zimmerman was armed. Prove otherwise.

Where did you get THAT wild idea?

On Thu, 9 May 2013 13:13:54 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

you either broke the law or you didn't!

===

If you think the law is all black and white like that, you've never
seen a good defense attorney in action.

In article ,
says...

On 5/9/2013 12:36 PM, Hank© wrote:
On 5/9/2013 12:29 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 5/9/13 12:24 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 09 May 2013 12:04:59 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 5/9/13 12:02 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 09 May 2013 11:51:34 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 5/9/13 11:39 AM, wrote:
On Thu, 09 May 2013 07:44:55 -0400, "F.O.A.D."
wrote:

You're willing to risk getting yourself shot to protect inanimate
objects? I'm not. We had a burglar visit us when we lived in
Florida. I
caught him in the act. He came after me with a pry bar. I whacked
him
with my truck, but not because he stole our stuff, but because he
was
threatening me physically.

That is what got Martin shot

Oh, in what criminal act was Martin engaging?

Assault and battery


Prove it.

That is not how it works. The state has to prove Zimmerman was not
attacked.


Oh. You can claim Martin was engaged in criminal acts and deny that
Zimmerman started the fight. I get it.

AHHHH The light comes on. What took so lomg?

Just wondering... how many times are you guys going to answer the same
five ridiculous inferences, from the same three idiots?

The only "idiot" here is you.