Call it what it is, eh?
 

On 4/27/13 11:36 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

In article , says...

In article m, hank57
@socialworker.net says...

On 4/26/2013 4:43 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
We can?t continue to allow people to pretend that they support life, on
the basis that they oppose abortion. We have to be willing to say, ?No,
that?s not what you are, and I?m not going to let you lie about your
position in order to make it sound more appealing. You are not pro-life.
If you were, you would be fundraising for orphanages instead of
protesting at abortion clinics.?

The flip side of your nonsense is that you can't be against the death
penalty if you condone killing unborn babies.

Where did Harry say he condoned killing babies?

He, Harry, is a proponent of free and available abortions in order to fix problems he induces
in young women.

So? That doesn't mean he condones "killing babies".



I suspect "Bertie" is projecting. I wasn't and am not Catholic, and
always practiced "safe sex" when I was single.

Call it what it is, eh?
 

In article , says...

In article ,
says...

In article , says...

In article m, hank57
@socialworker.net says...

On 4/26/2013 4:43 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
We can?t continue to allow people to pretend that they support life, on
the basis that they oppose abortion. We have to be willing to say, ?No,
that?s not what you are, and I?m not going to let you lie about your
position in order to make it sound more appealing. You are not pro-life.
If you were, you would be fundraising for orphanages instead of
protesting at abortion clinics.?

The flip side of your nonsense is that you can't be against the death
penalty if you condone killing unborn babies.

Where did Harry say he condoned killing babies?

He, Harry, is a proponent of free and available abortions in order to fix problems he induces
in young women.

So? That doesn't mean he condones "killing babies".

Harry sees killing babies as a solution to an unintended pregnancy.

Call it what it is, eh?
 

In article ,
says...

In article , says...

In article ,
says...

In article , says...

In article m, hank57
@socialworker.net says...

On 4/26/2013 4:43 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
We can?t continue to allow people to pretend that they support life, on
the basis that they oppose abortion. We have to be willing to say, ?No,
that?s not what you are, and I?m not going to let you lie about your
position in order to make it sound more appealing. You are not pro-life.
If you were, you would be fundraising for orphanages instead of
protesting at abortion clinics.?

The flip side of your nonsense is that you can't be against the death
penalty if you condone killing unborn babies.

Where did Harry say he condoned killing babies?

He, Harry, is a proponent of free and available abortions in order to fix problems he induces
in young women.

So? That doesn't mean he condones "killing babies".

Harry sees killing babies as a solution to an unintended pregnancy.

Cite?

Call it what it is, eh?
 

On 4/27/2013 11:23 AM, BAR wrote:
In article , says...

In article m, hank57
@socialworker.net says...

On 4/26/2013 4:43 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
We can?t continue to allow people to pretend that they support life, on
the basis that they oppose abortion. We have to be willing to say, ?No,
that?s not what you are, and I?m not going to let you lie about your
position in order to make it sound more appealing. You are not pro-life.
If you were, you would be fundraising for orphanages instead of
protesting at abortion clinics.?

The flip side of your nonsense is that you can't be against the death
penalty if you condone killing unborn babies.

Where did Harry say he condoned killing babies?

He, Harry, is a proponent of free and available abortions in order to fix problems he induces
in young women.

Mu guess is that he hasn't had the ability to induce problems in thirty
or more years.

Call it what it is, eh?
 

On Saturday, 27 April 2013 00:53:55 UTC-3, *e#c wrote:


Too bad you and Gumby weren't terminated before birth.

Shut up, jackass.
Go back to alt guitar.bass.....
wait a minute... no one over there wants you either.

Call it what it is, eh?
 

On 4/27/2013 2:14 PM, True North wrote:
On Saturday, 27 April 2013 00:53:55 UTC-3, *e#c wrote:


Too bad you and Gumby weren't terminated before birth.

Shut up, jackass.
Go back to alt guitar.bass.....
wait a minute... no one over there wants you either.


Yeah, this group is only for harry and the "circle jerks"!!

Call it what it is, eh?
 

Yet you spend every day in here.
So...are you Harry.. or are you one of the "circle jerks"?

Call it what it is, eh?
 

On 4/27/2013 5:54 PM, True North wrote:
Yet you spend every day in here.
So...are you Harry.. or are you one of the "circle jerks"?


My posting history suggest otherwise... but hey, the circle jerks should
be here soon to discuss spell checking with you:) After they are all
done with the ethanol discussion.....................again:)

Call it what it is, eh?
 

Since you claim to have been a mechanic in the far distant past, a person would think you'd have more than a passing interest in that fuel debate.
We're lucky up here...our people haven't jumped on the E10 bandwagon yet.

Call it what it is, eh?
 

In article ,
says...

On 4/27/2013 2:14 PM, True North wrote:
On Saturday, 27 April 2013 00:53:55 UTC-3, *e#c wrote:


Too bad you and Gumby weren't terminated before birth.

Shut up, jackass.
Go back to alt guitar.bass.....
wait a minute... no one over there wants you either.


Yeah, this group is only for harry and the "circle jerks"!!

There he is, Day 2, the vulgar, low class talk day, followed by the
vulgar nasty, low class phase where he says nasty things about poster's
families and children!