|
Where is Bill Ayres?
Explosions at the Boston Marathon.. Wonder where Bill Ayres is today?
|
Where is Bill Ayres?
On Mon, 15 Apr 2013 15:28:29 -0400, JustWaitAFrekinMinute
wrote: Explosions at the Boston Marathon.. Wonder where Bill Ayres is today? Up your butt? |
Where is Bill Ayres?
On 4/15/13 3:28 PM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
Explosions at the Boston Marathon.. Wonder where Bill Ayres is today? Where were you? Are you going to show up on the video cams at the Boston event, a greasy little guy with a porkpie hat, a ponytail, and a 'stache, running away from the scene? |
Where is Bill Ayres?
More likely putt putting away on a smelly mini bike.
|
Where is Bill Ayres?
|
Where is Bill Ayres?
On 4/15/2013 5:59 PM, True North wrote:
More likely putt putting away on a smelly mini bike. Harry sure has a strange little buddy. |
Where is Bill Ayres?
On Monday, 15 April 2013 20:14:56 UTC-3, Hank© wrote:
On 4/15/2013 5:59 PM, True North wrote: More likely putt putting away on a smelly mini bike. Harry sure has a strange little buddy. I wouldn't call Snottie his buddy...... |
Where is Bill Ayres?
On Mon, 15 Apr 2013 15:28:29 -0400, JustWaitAFrekinMinute
wrote: Explosions at the Boston Marathon.. Wonder where Bill Ayres is today? Paling around with Tim McVeigh? |
Where is Bill Ayres?
|
Where is Bill Ayres?
|
Where is Bill Ayres?
On Wednesday, April 17, 2013 3:33:03 PM UTC-4, F.O.A.D. wrote:
Ayers was not even prosecuted for any criminal activities. He was, obviously, deeply involved in efforts to force an end to our war against the people of Vietnam. He was charged with a number of crimes and was pursued by the FBI. He remained a fugitive for a period of time. Because of some illegal activities by the FBI while investigating, the charges were dropped. Ayers was a domestic terrorist and has admitted it. He got off on a technicality. That doesn't change the facts. |
Where is Bill Ayres?
|
Where is Bill Ayres?
Urin Asshole wrote:
On Wed, 17 Apr 2013 12:44:09 -0700 (PDT), wrote: On Wednesday, April 17, 2013 3:33:03 PM UTC-4, F.O.A.D. wrote: Ayers was not even prosecuted for any criminal activities. He was, obviously, deeply involved in efforts to force an end to our war against the people of Vietnam. He was charged with a number of crimes and was pursued by the FBI. He remained a fugitive for a period of time. Because of some illegal activities by the FBI while investigating, the charges were dropped. Ayers was a domestic terrorist and has admitted it. He got off on a technicality. That doesn't change the facts. So, you don't believe in the rule of law. The FBI has a long history of ****ing up investigations and acting illegally. Cheney and Rumsfeld were serious terrorists and they weren't prosecuted either. |
Where is Bill Ayres?
On Wed, 17 Apr 2013 19:05:05 -0400, BAR wrote:
In article , says... On Wed, 17 Apr 2013 12:44:09 -0700 (PDT), wrote: On Wednesday, April 17, 2013 3:33:03 PM UTC-4, F.O.A.D. wrote: Ayers was not even prosecuted for any criminal activities. He was, obviously, deeply involved in efforts to force an end to our war against the people of Vietnam. He was charged with a number of crimes and was pursued by the FBI. He remained a fugitive for a period of time. Because of some illegal activities by the FBI while investigating, the charges were dropped. Ayers was a domestic terrorist and has admitted it. He got off on a technicality. That doesn't change the facts. So, you don't believe in the rule of law. The FBI has a long history of ****ing up investigations and acting illegally Just because he wasn't prosecuted due to a technicality doesn't mean he didn't do the crime. So do you or don't you believe in the rule of law? It's a simple question. And, AGAIN, this has nothing to do with the Boston Marathon. NOTHING. |
Where is Bill Ayres?
On 17 Apr 2013 23:32:02 GMT, F.O.A.D. wrote:
Urin Asshole wrote: On Wed, 17 Apr 2013 12:44:09 -0700 (PDT), wrote: On Wednesday, April 17, 2013 3:33:03 PM UTC-4, F.O.A.D. wrote: Ayers was not even prosecuted for any criminal activities. He was, obviously, deeply involved in efforts to force an end to our war against the people of Vietnam. He was charged with a number of crimes and was pursued by the FBI. He remained a fugitive for a period of time. Because of some illegal activities by the FBI while investigating, the charges were dropped. Ayers was a domestic terrorist and has admitted it. He got off on a technicality. That doesn't change the facts. So, you don't believe in the rule of law. The FBI has a long history of ****ing up investigations and acting illegally. Cheney and Rumsfeld were serious terrorists and they weren't prosecuted either. That's right. A recent report showed that we did torture after 9/11 and nothing at all was accomplished as far as intel goes. Cheney should have been prosecuted. It's too bad that won't happen. |
Where is Bill Ayres?
In article ,
says... In article , says... On Wed, 17 Apr 2013 12:44:09 -0700 (PDT), wrote: On Wednesday, April 17, 2013 3:33:03 PM UTC-4, F.O.A.D. wrote: Ayers was not even prosecuted for any criminal activities. He was, obviously, deeply involved in efforts to force an end to our war against the people of Vietnam. He was charged with a number of crimes and was pursued by the FBI. He remained a fugitive for a period of time. Because of some illegal activities by the FBI while investigating, the charges were dropped. Ayers was a domestic terrorist and has admitted it. He got off on a technicality. That doesn't change the facts. So, you don't believe in the rule of law. The FBI has a long history of ****ing up investigations and acting illegally Just because he wasn't prosecuted due to a technicality doesn't mean he didn't do the crime. That's the hard core right for you, screw the rule of law if it gets in your way. |
Where is Bill Ayres?
On 4/18/13 8:39 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says... In article , says... On Wed, 17 Apr 2013 12:44:09 -0700 (PDT), wrote: On Wednesday, April 17, 2013 3:33:03 PM UTC-4, F.O.A.D. wrote: Ayers was not even prosecuted for any criminal activities. He was, obviously, deeply involved in efforts to force an end to our war against the people of Vietnam. He was charged with a number of crimes and was pursued by the FBI. He remained a fugitive for a period of time. Because of some illegal activities by the FBI while investigating, the charges were dropped. Ayers was a domestic terrorist and has admitted it. He got off on a technicality. That doesn't change the facts. So, you don't believe in the rule of law. The FBI has a long history of ****ing up investigations and acting illegally Just because he wasn't prosecuted due to a technicality doesn't mean he didn't do the crime. That's the hard core right for you, screw the rule of law if it gets in your way. Cheney wasn't prosecuted, either, and there's no question he did the crime(s). |
Where is Bill Ayres?
On 4/18/2013 8:40 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
The shooting at Ft. Hood was classified as workplace violence, which is what it was. Terrorism usually is reserved for large-scale acts of violence that target non-combatant civilians. You are a ****ing idiot... to call you retarded would be an insult to the mentally challenged. It targeted civilians as well as soldiers, and the asshole ran around screaming his Islamic rants while he was shooting... He was a terrorist, he should be at Gitmo, period... |
Where is Bill Ayres?
On 4/18/2013 8:41 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
Cheney wasn't prosecuted, either, and there's no question he did the crime(s). For you maybe, but you are not a "reasonable person"... |
Where is Bill Ayres?
|
Where is Bill Ayres?
|
Where is Bill Ayres?
On 4/18/13 8:49 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 4/18/2013 8:40 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote: The shooting at Ft. Hood was classified as workplace violence, which is what it was. Terrorism usually is reserved for large-scale acts of violence that target non-combatant civilians. You are a ****ing idiot... to call you retarded would be an insult to the mentally challenged. It targeted civilians as well as soldiers, and the asshole ran around screaming his Islamic rants while he was shooting... He was a terrorist, he should be at Gitmo, period... The military and federal government have classified the Ft. Hood murders as workplace violence. |
Where is Bill Ayres?
On 4/18/2013 8:41 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 4/18/13 8:39 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... In article , says... On Wed, 17 Apr 2013 12:44:09 -0700 (PDT), wrote: On Wednesday, April 17, 2013 3:33:03 PM UTC-4, F.O.A.D. wrote: Ayers was not even prosecuted for any criminal activities. He was, obviously, deeply involved in efforts to force an end to our war against the people of Vietnam. He was charged with a number of crimes and was pursued by the FBI. He remained a fugitive for a period of time. Because of some illegal activities by the FBI while investigating, the charges were dropped. Ayers was a domestic terrorist and has admitted it. He got off on a technicality. That doesn't change the facts. So, you don't believe in the rule of law. The FBI has a long history of ****ing up investigations and acting illegally Just because he wasn't prosecuted due to a technicality doesn't mean he didn't do the crime. That's the hard core right for you, screw the rule of law if it gets in your way. Cheney wasn't prosecuted, either, and there's no question he did the crime(s). Then you should bring this oversight to Holder. |
Where is Bill Ayres?
In article , says...
In article , says... In article , says... On Wed, 17 Apr 2013 12:44:09 -0700 (PDT), wrote: On Wednesday, April 17, 2013 3:33:03 PM UTC-4, F.O.A.D. wrote: Ayers was not even prosecuted for any criminal activities. He was, obviously, deeply involved in efforts to force an end to our war against the people of Vietnam. He was charged with a number of crimes and was pursued by the FBI. He remained a fugitive for a period of time. Because of some illegal activities by the FBI while investigating, the charges were dropped. Ayers was a domestic terrorist and has admitted it. He got off on a technicality. That doesn't change the facts. So, you don't believe in the rule of law. The FBI has a long history of ****ing up investigations and acting illegally Just because he wasn't prosecuted due to a technicality doesn't mean he didn't do the crime. That's the hard core right for you, screw the rule of law if it gets in your way. If he didn't commit the crime he couldn't get off on a technicality. Being found guilty in a court of law just allows us to physically punish the criminal. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:26 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com