|
Yet Another U.S. Navy Screw Up...Boating Related
On Fri, 29 Mar 2013 01:23:55 -0400, wrote:
On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 21:39:05 -0700, Urin Asshole wrote: On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 21:18:09 -0400, wrote: Who do you think runs it now? A better question is who do you think should continue to run it? It appears that it will be the highest bidder. Unless people like Elizabeth Warren can do something. She looks good on MSNBC but she has been pretty ineffective in actually accomplishing much. That is the main reason she went to the senate. Every other post she was given was reduced to being meaningless pretty much immediately. Let's see what big money does to her in the Senate. I fear that when the reality of fund raising raises it's ugly head she will just be another bought and paid for tool of the rich ... or she will be gone. Huh? She was just elected. She's holding their feet to the fire. What would you like her to do in the couple of months she's been there? You fear... precisely. |
Yet Another U.S. Navy Screw Up...Boating Related
On Fri, 29 Mar 2013 06:24:08 -0400, JustWaitAFrekinMinute
wrote: On 3/29/2013 1:23 AM, wrote: On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 21:39:05 -0700, Urin Asshole wrote: On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 21:18:09 -0400, wrote: Who do you think runs it now? A better question is who do you think should continue to run it? It appears that it will be the highest bidder. Unless people like Elizabeth Warren can do something. She looks good on MSNBC but she has been pretty ineffective in actually accomplishing much. That is the main reason she went to the senate. Every other post she was given was reduced to being meaningless pretty much immediately. Let's see what big money does to her in the Senate. I fear that when the reality of fund raising raises it's ugly head she will just be another bought and paid for tool of the rich ... or she will be gone. Warren, she already is bought and paid for.. Not to mention, like so many others she cheated her way in... Not to mention, you're completely a ****ing ignoramous. |
Yet Another U.S. Navy Screw Up...Boating Related
On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 17:23:32 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:
...besides "Meyer the Hank" Ships Costing U.S. $37 Billion Lack Firepower, Navy Told By David Lerman - Mar 28, 2013 Sounds a lot more like union shipbuilders screwed up. In any case, why would we need a more potent ship. The liberal philosophy denies the existence of a threat. Salmonbait -- 'Name-calling'...the liberals' last resort. |
Yet Another U.S. Navy Screw Up...Boating Related
|
Yet Another U.S. Navy Screw Up...Boating Related
In article , says...
In article , says... "BAR" wrote in message . .. In article , says... "Hank©" wrote in message eb.com... On 3/28/2013 5:23 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote: Ships Costing U.S. $37 Billion Lack Firepower, Navy Told By David Lerman - Mar 28, 2013 It's our money being wasted. Why are you gloating? ---------------------------------------- I read an article about the cost overruns on these ships a month or so ago. It bothered me that the two versions are being built by companies owned (in one case) by a foreign country (Italy) and the other as a joint venture or something with a company in Australia. Why aren't American warships built by Americans? We may not have the capacity to build the ships. -------------------------------------- That's damn scary. Not really. At the beginning of WW II we didn't have the "capacity" either until factories and facilities that were making other things re- tooled to help in the effort (and make a lot of money in the process). Just before WWII we had the capacity, we didn't have the demand. |
Yet Another U.S. Navy Screw Up...Boating Related
In article , says...
On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 21:39:05 -0700, Urin Asshole wrote: On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 21:18:09 -0400, wrote: Who do you think runs it now? A better question is who do you think should continue to run it? It appears that it will be the highest bidder. Unless people like Elizabeth Warren can do something. She looks good on MSNBC but she has been pretty ineffective in actually accomplishing much. That is the main reason she went to the senate. Every other post she was given was reduced to being meaningless pretty much immediately. Let's see what big money does to her in the Senate. I fear that when the reality of fund raising raises it's ugly head she will just be another bought and paid for tool of the rich ... or she will be gone. Warren's longevity will depend upon how much the credit industry wants to put with. |
Yet Another U.S. Navy Screw Up...Boating Related
In article ,
says... On Sat, 30 Mar 2013 09:24:42 -0700, Urin Asshole wrote: On Sat, 30 Mar 2013 02:02:46 -0400, wrote: His own advisory panel says they have people who are too dangerous to release, they can't try and they can't deport. What would you do with them? Supermax. Nobody has ever escaped. As soon as the hit US soil, a first year law student would be filing a habeas corpus writ and we would have to turn them loose. Because you said so I guess. Because that DoJ study says so. Cite? That is why we just kill them now, no prisoners to have to deal with. We should have killed those guys in Gitmo You're not much of a human being if you are serious about this. Poor phrasing, I meant the guys in Gitmo should have been killed before they left Afghanistan, like we are doing now. He went back on the public campaign promise No he didn't. Yes he did but just like ending the wars, it was a naive statement by a guy who did not have a clue what he was promising could never actually happen. It did give him a nice campaign sound bite tho.. And he's been trying. So you can fault him for believing that those on the right wouldn't continue to this day to obstruct just about everything he's tried to do. He had both houses of congress for 2 years. Who was stopping him then? Never heard of the fillibuster? Guess not, because you're ignorant. Was closing Gitmo filibustered? Cite it. |
Yet Another U.S. Navy Screw Up...Boating Related
On Sat, 30 Mar 2013 20:06:31 -0400, BAR wrote:
In article , says... On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 21:39:05 -0700, Urin Asshole wrote: On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 21:18:09 -0400, wrote: Who do you think runs it now? A better question is who do you think should continue to run it? It appears that it will be the highest bidder. Unless people like Elizabeth Warren can do something. She looks good on MSNBC but she has been pretty ineffective in actually accomplishing much. That is the main reason she went to the senate. Every other post she was given was reduced to being meaningless pretty much immediately. Let's see what big money does to her in the Senate. I fear that when the reality of fund raising raises it's ugly head she will just be another bought and paid for tool of the rich ... or she will be gone. Warren's longevity will depend upon how much the credit industry wants to put with. So, I can almost agree, except what that says is that she's on the right track. Unless you think the credit industry should control Congress? |
Yet Another U.S. Navy Screw Up...Boating Related
|
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:03 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com