Wonder how the narrow minded faction of the right wing likesthis
 

On 3/28/2013 3:11 AM, Eisboch wrote:


"Urin Asshole" wrote in message
...

On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 00:57:48 -0400, wrote:

On Wed, 27 Mar 2013 10:20:41 -0700, Urin Asshole
wrote:

Well you come across as a ****ing stupid ****, but I try not to bring
it up. I own four. No, I'm not going to list them. One's a handgun,
one's a 20 gauge. Figure it out from there.

Hmmm, I seem to remember Plume bragging about a 20 ga.
Are you thinking about buying a sail boat too?

Who the **** is Plume? A fantasy woman of yours?

-------------------------------------

Hmmmmmm. How did you know "Plume" is a woman?

20 guage, flying with his kids, old ford tractor... It's Kevin Noble
guys, come on...

Wonder how the narrow minded faction of the right wing likesthis
 

On 3/27/2013 11:44 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 27 Mar 2013 13:44:29 -0400, iBoaterer
wrote:

Sometimes they hit every number in the phone book, other times they
start with a prefix and hit all 10,000 numbers.

Did you READ the article?

Yes, it said nothing about the scope of the robocall campaign only
that people in Newtown got called. It didn't even say if they were
only people on the NRA donors list.




Just more smoke and mirrors and nothing compared to the nasty grave
dancing folks like jps do every time some child gets killed.

Wonder how the narrow minded faction of the right wing likes this
 

JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 3/27/2013 11:44 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 27 Mar 2013 13:44:29 -0400, iBoaterer
wrote:

Sometimes they hit every number in the phone book, other times they
start with a prefix and hit all 10,000 numbers.

Did you READ the article?

Yes, it said nothing about the scope of the robocall campaign only
that people in Newtown got called. It didn't even say if they were
only people on the NRA donors list.




Just more smoke and mirrors and nothing compared to the nasty grave
dancing folks like jps do every time some child gets killed.

Pointing out news that reports on children murdered by guns is not grave
dancing. Minimizing it as you and your mouth-breathing cohorts want to
do...is.

How's your blackmail scam working out?

Wonder how the narrow minded faction of the right wing likes this
 

On Thursday, March 28, 2013 7:54:46 AM UTC-3, JustWaitAFrekinMinute! wrote:
On 3/27/2013 11:44 PM, wrote:

On Wed, 27 Mar 2013 13:44:29 -0400, iBoaterer

wrote:



Sometimes they hit every number in the phone book, other times they

start with a prefix and hit all 10,000 numbers.



Did you READ the article?



Yes, it said nothing about the scope of the robocall campaign only

that people in Newtown got called. It didn't even say if they were

only people on the NRA donors list.









Just more smoke and mirrors and nothing compared to the nasty grave

dancing folks like jps do every time some child gets killed.

Sez the low life who threatens to **** on another posters grave.

Wonder how the narrow minded faction of the right wing likesthis
 

On 3/28/2013 7:24 AM, True North wrote:
On Thursday, March 28, 2013 7:54:46 AM UTC-3, JustWaitAFrekinMinute! wrote:
On 3/27/2013 11:44 PM, wrote:

On Wed, 27 Mar 2013 13:44:29 -0400, iBoaterer

wrote:



Sometimes they hit every number in the phone book, other times they

start with a prefix and hit all 10,000 numbers.



Did you READ the article?



Yes, it said nothing about the scope of the robocall campaign only

that people in Newtown got called. It didn't even say if they were

only people on the NRA donors list.









Just more smoke and mirrors and nothing compared to the nasty grave

dancing folks like jps do every time some child gets killed.

Sez the low life who threatens to **** on another posters grave.

Did your goombah instruct you to say that?

Wonder how the narrow minded faction of the right wing likesthis
 

On 3/28/2013 6:52 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 3/28/2013 3:11 AM, Eisboch wrote:


"Urin Asshole" wrote in message
...

On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 00:57:48 -0400, wrote:

On Wed, 27 Mar 2013 10:20:41 -0700, Urin Asshole
wrote:

Well you come across as a ****ing stupid ****, but I try not to bring
it up. I own four. No, I'm not going to list them. One's a handgun,
one's a 20 gauge. Figure it out from there.

Hmmm, I seem to remember Plume bragging about a 20 ga.
Are you thinking about buying a sail boat too?

Who the **** is Plume? A fantasy woman of yours?

-------------------------------------

Hmmmmmm. How did you know "Plume" is a woman?

20 guage, flying with his kids, old ford tractor... It's Kevin Noble
guys, come on...

I thought it was an old Ford 100 pick me up.

Wonder how the narrow minded faction of the right wing likes this
 

In article ,
says...

On 3/27/2013 1:32 PM, Urin Asshole wrote:
On Wed, 27 Mar 2013 02:23:56 -0400, wrote:

On Tue, 26 Mar 2013 21:32:20 -0700, Urin Asshole
wrote:

We're not talking about
shotguns. We're talking about assault weapons, as you know.

"Assault weapons" are such a small part of the problem that I am not
even sure why they are talking about it.
You are talking about a couple hundred victims a year, (358 in 2010
rifles all kinds, assault and otherwise) That is less than half of the
number who get killed by unarmed murderers (fists, feet etc ... 745 )
From the FBI
http://gfretwell.com/ftp/murder%20weapon.htm

Great. Then you have no problem banning them in the extreme. Sounds
like a good start. Next stop, national registration of handguns and
instant background checks available for all.


...next stop, 2014, a democratic congress and senate, and a nice list to
start your confiscation ...

Damn you are insane.

Wonder how the narrow minded faction of the right wing likes this
 

In article ,
says...

On 3/27/2013 6:30 PM, J Herring wrote:
On Wed, 27 Mar 2013 06:47:36 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:



"Urin Asshole" wrote in message
...

On Tue, 26 Mar 2013 21:33:43 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:



"Urin Asshole" wrote in message
...


And dippy if there's a required trace on all guns, the gun runners
will have a tougher time peddling their death and destrcution.

--------------------------------

The problem is nobody knows for sure how many guns currently exist in
the US. Most states do not require registration so there's no way of
tracing them.

The best estimates are between 200 million and 350 million privately
owned guns. Even if a federal registration law was passed tomorrow,
that's quite an inventory of potentially available guns with no
record
of ownership or traceability.


Yes, true. Does that mean we should just not worry about all the new
ones and all the future deaths that might be prevented. Oh ****, I
might have to fill out a form!

---------------------------------------------

I just don't think it makes sense to pass laws just for the sake of
passing laws. Makes the politicians look good as a response to media
hype and emotional public responses but doesn't really do anything to
address the problem.

Personally, I don't have any problem with background checks. It's in
place in my state and has been for years. I don't really have any
personal gripe about a national registry of gun owners either but I
can understand the case made by those who oppose it. Frankly, doing
background checks and calling in every gun purchase made from a dealer
like they do here in Massachusetts creates the data base required for
a national registry anyway. Your name, permit number, gun type and
digital fingerprint image is taken every time you purchase a gun.
Private sale requirements are lax however. You are supposed to report
the transaction within a certain number of days, but I doubt everyone
does.

However, it still doesn't regulate the 300 million plus guns that
can't be traced now. That's why a law requiring a national registry
would have very little effect on those with criminal intent. Hell, if
private ownership of all guns were banned tomorrow, there's no way of
telling who has them and who doesn't.

I think we need to be a little realistic about gun control. As
starters, here's what I'd propose:

1. Require background checks and permits for gun ownership
nationwide.
2. Require mandatory safety training for issuance of the permit.
The training should be more extensive than a single 5 hour session.
I was very surprised at the sketchy training required in MA in
order to obtain a LTC. It should be much longer and cover more.
3. Require mental health data to be made available in the background
checks. This includes drug addiction or alcoholism.
4. Enforce current laws. Put criminals and violent people away. If
there were fewer on the streets, fewer people would feel the need to
own a gun. That said, we also have to accept the fact that we
don't live in a perfect world, never will, and the right to own a gun
for personal and family defense is justified.
5. Finally ... use your friggin' head. Make damn well sure the gun
isn't loaded when cleaning it. As you get used to handling a gun,
it's very easy to get sloppy about handling it. When cleaning,
checking, loading or unloading, turn off the damn TV, computer and
cell phone. Concentrate on what you are doing, thinking every step
through. I think people that get too cavalier about this are the
ones who cause accidents to happen.


My wife just completed a five hour course in gun safety and firing. How much more time should be
spent in telling a person that every gun is loaded, point only down range, and don't put finger on
the trigger until ready to shoot.

What kinds of things would you add to the course that should require a lot more time.


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling'...the liberals' last resort.


My dad was strict.. "There is no such thing as an unloaded gun", and
"More people are killed by *empty* guns....". Of course his point was
never ever point a gun at anything you don't want to destroy, this meant
always, even when the gun was "unloaded". Kind of like some of the
training I do with my kid, muscle train to never ever point the gun at
anything until you are ready to shoot it, just by second nature.

The guy that killed his kid the other day "cleaning" his gun, should go
to jail, period, he is a murderer.... If my dad had raised the guy, his
kid would be alive right now. I am adamant about it. Got a close
relative redneck who thinks I am a pussy to this day because I wouldn't
hold his german lugar in the house cause "I didn't intend to fire it"...
Another thing my dad said, "never touch another mans weapon unless you
are going to fire it"... Never asked him why, kept me alive this long
and Lord knows I have been around enough guns in another life:)

Please take Eisboch's advice and seek help.

Wonder how the narrow minded faction of the right wing likes this
 

In article ,
says...

On 3/27/2013 11:44 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 27 Mar 2013 13:44:29 -0400, iBoaterer
wrote:

Sometimes they hit every number in the phone book, other times they
start with a prefix and hit all 10,000 numbers.

Did you READ the article?

Yes, it said nothing about the scope of the robocall campaign only
that people in Newtown got called. It didn't even say if they were
only people on the NRA donors list.




Just more smoke and mirrors and nothing compared to the nasty grave
dancing folks like jps do every time some child gets killed.

You are a complete idiot. If you think that it's good behavior for the
NRA to target robocalls to people in Newtown, you are not only
delusional, but a lwo class scum.

Wonder how the narrow minded faction of the right wing likes this
 

In article ,
says...

On 3/28/2013 3:11 AM, Eisboch wrote:


"Urin Asshole" wrote in message
...

On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 00:57:48 -0400, wrote:

On Wed, 27 Mar 2013 10:20:41 -0700, Urin Asshole
wrote:

Well you come across as a ****ing stupid ****, but I try not to bring
it up. I own four. No, I'm not going to list them. One's a handgun,
one's a 20 gauge. Figure it out from there.

Hmmm, I seem to remember Plume bragging about a 20 ga.
Are you thinking about buying a sail boat too?

Who the **** is Plume? A fantasy woman of yours?

-------------------------------------

Hmmmmmm. How did you know "Plume" is a woman?

20 guage, flying with his kids, old ford tractor... It's Kevin Noble
guys, come on...

Everyone is Kevin Noble! And everyone is Harry too!! Insane little twit!
Funny, I didn't see anything this poster wrote about a 20 gauge, flying
with kids, ford tractors and such, will you repost please? I'm curious
where your insanity stems from...

Wonder how the narrow minded faction of the right wing likes this
 

In article m, hank57
@socialworker.net says...

On 3/28/2013 6:52 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 3/28/2013 3:11 AM, Eisboch wrote:


"Urin Asshole" wrote in message
...

On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 00:57:48 -0400, wrote:

On Wed, 27 Mar 2013 10:20:41 -0700, Urin Asshole
wrote:

Well you come across as a ****ing stupid ****, but I try not to bring
it up. I own four. No, I'm not going to list them. One's a handgun,
one's a 20 gauge. Figure it out from there.

Hmmm, I seem to remember Plume bragging about a 20 ga.
Are you thinking about buying a sail boat too?

Who the **** is Plume? A fantasy woman of yours?

-------------------------------------

Hmmmmmm. How did you know "Plume" is a woman?

20 guage, flying with his kids, old ford tractor... It's Kevin Noble
guys, come on...

I thought it was an old Ford 100 pick me up.

Yeah, that must be it......

Wonder how the narrow minded faction of the right wing likes this
 

On Wed, 27 Mar 2013 22:39:49 -0700, Urin Asshole
wrote:

Any citation for that bull****?

====

You are beginning to sound like Kevin.

Wanna bet?

Wonder how the narrow minded faction of the right wing likesthis
 

On 3/28/2013 8:19 AM, Hank© wrote:
On 3/28/2013 6:52 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 3/28/2013 3:11 AM, Eisboch wrote:


"Urin Asshole" wrote in message
...

On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 00:57:48 -0400, wrote:

On Wed, 27 Mar 2013 10:20:41 -0700, Urin Asshole
wrote:

Well you come across as a ****ing stupid ****, but I try not to bring
it up. I own four. No, I'm not going to list them. One's a handgun,
one's a 20 gauge. Figure it out from there.

Hmmm, I seem to remember Plume bragging about a 20 ga.
Are you thinking about buying a sail boat too?

Who the **** is Plume? A fantasy woman of yours?

-------------------------------------

Hmmmmmm. How did you know "Plume" is a woman?

20 guage, flying with his kids, old ford tractor... It's Kevin Noble
guys, come on...

I thought it was an old Ford 100 pick me up.

Oh that might have been it, I will have to ask... uh... snerk I find
it funny that the more he hides, the louder he gets...:)

Wonder how the narrow minded faction of the right wing likes this
 

In article ,
says...

On 3/28/2013 8:19 AM, Hank© wrote:
On 3/28/2013 6:52 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 3/28/2013 3:11 AM, Eisboch wrote:


"Urin Asshole" wrote in message
...

On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 00:57:48 -0400, wrote:

On Wed, 27 Mar 2013 10:20:41 -0700, Urin Asshole
wrote:

Well you come across as a ****ing stupid ****, but I try not to bring
it up. I own four. No, I'm not going to list them. One's a handgun,
one's a 20 gauge. Figure it out from there.

Hmmm, I seem to remember Plume bragging about a 20 ga.
Are you thinking about buying a sail boat too?

Who the **** is Plume? A fantasy woman of yours?

-------------------------------------

Hmmmmmm. How did you know "Plume" is a woman?

20 guage, flying with his kids, old ford tractor... It's Kevin Noble
guys, come on...

I thought it was an old Ford 100 pick me up.

Oh that might have been it, I will have to ask... uh... snerk I find
it funny that the more he hides, the louder he gets...:)

Kevin or Harry or Plume?

Wonder how the narrow minded faction of the right wing likes this
 

On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 03:11:03 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:



"Urin Asshole" wrote in message
.. .

On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 00:57:48 -0400, wrote:

On Wed, 27 Mar 2013 10:20:41 -0700, Urin Asshole
wrote:

Well you come across as a ****ing stupid ****, but I try not to
bring
it up. I own four. No, I'm not going to list them. One's a handgun,
one's a 20 gauge. Figure it out from there.

Hmmm, I seem to remember Plume bragging about a 20 ga.
Are you thinking about buying a sail boat too?

Who the **** is Plume? A fantasy woman of yours?

-------------------------------------

Hmmmmmm. How did you know "Plume" is a woman?

You know a lot of guys who's name is Plume? Well, ok.

Wonder how the narrow minded faction of the right wing likes this
 

On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 06:52:25 -0400, JustWaitAFrekinMinute
wrote:

On 3/28/2013 3:11 AM, Eisboch wrote:


"Urin Asshole" wrote in message
...

On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 00:57:48 -0400, wrote:

On Wed, 27 Mar 2013 10:20:41 -0700, Urin Asshole
wrote:

Well you come across as a ****ing stupid ****, but I try not to bring
it up. I own four. No, I'm not going to list them. One's a handgun,
one's a 20 gauge. Figure it out from there.

Hmmm, I seem to remember Plume bragging about a 20 ga.
Are you thinking about buying a sail boat too?

Who the **** is Plume? A fantasy woman of yours?

-------------------------------------

Hmmmmmm. How did you know "Plume" is a woman?

20 guage, flying with his kids, old ford tractor... It's Kevin Noble
guys, come on...

So, you'r back to kevin again. So which is it? There's a girl named
kevin? Your mom?

Wonder how the narrow minded faction of the right wing likes this
 

On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 11:10:35 -0400, iBoaterer
wrote:

In article ,
says...

On 3/28/2013 8:19 AM, Hank© wrote:
On 3/28/2013 6:52 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 3/28/2013 3:11 AM, Eisboch wrote:


"Urin Asshole" wrote in message
...

On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 00:57:48 -0400, wrote:

On Wed, 27 Mar 2013 10:20:41 -0700, Urin Asshole
wrote:

Well you come across as a ****ing stupid ****, but I try not to bring
it up. I own four. No, I'm not going to list them. One's a handgun,
one's a 20 gauge. Figure it out from there.

Hmmm, I seem to remember Plume bragging about a 20 ga.
Are you thinking about buying a sail boat too?

Who the **** is Plume? A fantasy woman of yours?

-------------------------------------

Hmmmmmm. How did you know "Plume" is a woman?

20 guage, flying with his kids, old ford tractor... It's Kevin Noble
guys, come on...

I thought it was an old Ford 100 pick me up.

Oh that might have been it, I will have to ask... uh... snerk I find
it funny that the more he hides, the louder he gets...:)

Kevin or Harry or Plume?

It's a boy named Sue.

Wonder how the narrow minded faction of the right wing likes this
 

On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 12:40:26 -0400, wrote:

On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 03:11:03 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:



"Urin Asshole" wrote in message
. ..

On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 00:57:48 -0400, wrote:

On Wed, 27 Mar 2013 10:20:41 -0700, Urin Asshole
wrote:

Well you come across as a ****ing stupid ****, but I try not to
bring
it up. I own four. No, I'm not going to list them. One's a handgun,
one's a 20 gauge. Figure it out from there.

Hmmm, I seem to remember Plume bragging about a 20 ga.
Are you thinking about buying a sail boat too?

Who the **** is Plume? A fantasy woman of yours?

-------------------------------------

Hmmmmmm. How did you know "Plume" is a woman?


This "guy" does sound like Plume. He showed up here opening up on me
with his first post, pretty much where Plume left off.

I thought I was kevin or are you kevin or is kevin your ****ing mom?

Wonder how the narrow minded faction of the right wing likes this
 

On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 09:00:26 -0400, Wayne B
wrote:

On Wed, 27 Mar 2013 22:39:49 -0700, Urin Asshole
wrote:

Any citation for that bull****?

====

You are beginning to sound like Kevin.

Wanna bet?

Bet what? That's youre ****ing stupid. That's not much of a bet. What
the **** is kevin? Let me rephrase... what the **** is pluume?

Who the **** cares... you and your little friends?

Wonder how the narrow minded faction of the right wing likes this
 

On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 12:37:05 -0400, wrote:

On Wed, 27 Mar 2013 22:41:28 -0700, Urin Asshole
wrote:

On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 00:36:40 -0400, wrote:

On Wed, 27 Mar 2013 10:31:21 -0700, Urin Asshole
wrote:

Since there are way too many people who would be all too happy to
press for eliminating all guns, the NRA serves as an effective
counterpoint to that line of reasoning. I think that if you actually
knew any rural gun owners, you'd find that they are almost universally
opposed to *any* increased gun control measures, mostly because they
don't trust you city/suburban folks or the type of government that you
advocate.

----------------------------------------

Yup. Sorta like imposing your religion onto others.


Not even close. Sounds like a democracy to me. Nice try though.

So you support prop 8 then?

Huh? Clearly unconstitutional. What does that have to do with people
dying from guns? Oh, I get it homosexuals are threatening.


It was the will of the people AKA the democracy you referenced above.
Are you saying the application of democracy can be selective?

I'm saying that the minority needs to be protected from the majority,
which is what the constitution is all about dickwad.

The 2d amendment defines firearms rights a lot more clearly than gay
rights. ... and I generally support gay rights.

So, you don't beleive in equal protection under the law? That's about
as clear as it gets. Has nothing to do with "gay" rights.

Back to grammar school peewee.

Wonder how the narrow minded faction of the right wing likes this
 

On 28 Mar 2013 11:03:32 GMT, F.O.A.D. wrote:

JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 3/27/2013 11:44 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 27 Mar 2013 13:44:29 -0400, iBoaterer
wrote:

Sometimes they hit every number in the phone book, other times they
start with a prefix and hit all 10,000 numbers.

Did you READ the article?

Yes, it said nothing about the scope of the robocall campaign only
that people in Newtown got called. It didn't even say if they were
only people on the NRA donors list.




Just more smoke and mirrors and nothing compared to the nasty grave
dancing folks like jps do every time some child gets killed.

Pointing out news that reports on children murdered by guns is not grave
dancing. Minimizing it as you and your mouth-breathing cohorts want to
do...is.

How's your blackmail scam working out?

Wrong again! He and his buddies breathe through their ears... nothing
there to stop the flow of hot air.

Wonder how the narrow minded faction of the right wing likes this
 

On Thursday, March 28, 2013 12:40:26 PM UTC-4, wrote:
On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 03:11:03 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:

"Urin Asshole" wrote in message


Who the **** is Plume? A fantasy woman of yours?


Hmmmmmm. How did you know "Plume" is a woman?


This "guy" does sound like Plume. He showed up here opening up on me
with his first post, pretty much where Plume left off.

I said that not long after it showed up here. Same key phrases, same old BS. It's just another sock back with a different name, and attempting (poorly) to re-invent itself. A third-rate troll at best.

Wonder how the narrow minded faction of the right wing likesthis
 

On 3/28/13 4:48 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 10:37:49 -0700, Urin Asshole
wrote:

It was the will of the people AKA the democracy you referenced above.
Are you saying the application of democracy can be selective?

I'm saying that the minority needs to be protected from the majority,
which is what the constitution is all about dickwad.

The open question is whether "gay" is a protected class then isn't it?
That is the question Scalia asked the other day.
Are bigamists going to be the next protected class?
Why can't 3 people be married?
At a certain point people may even start questioning the "age of
majority/consent" that is an arbitrary number that is not even uniform
among the states.




Many good reasons there for finally getting rid of "state's rights," and
having a uniform, national code, eh?

Wonder how the narrow minded faction of the right wing likesthis
 

On 3/28/2013 12:40 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 03:11:03 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:



"Urin Asshole" wrote in message
...

On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 00:57:48 -0400, wrote:

On Wed, 27 Mar 2013 10:20:41 -0700, Urin Asshole
wrote:

Well you come across as a ****ing stupid ****, but I try not to
bring
it up. I own four. No, I'm not going to list them. One's a handgun,
one's a 20 gauge. Figure it out from there.

Hmmm, I seem to remember Plume bragging about a 20 ga.
Are you thinking about buying a sail boat too?

Who the **** is Plume? A fantasy woman of yours?

-------------------------------------

Hmmmmmm. How did you know "Plume" is a woman?


This "guy" does sound like Plume. He showed up here opening up on me
with his first post, pretty much where Plume left off.


And plume showed up less than 24 hours after loogie left... And loogie
is kevin, there you go.

Wonder how the narrow minded faction of the right wing likes this
 

On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 16:53:59 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

Many good reasons there for finally getting rid of "state's rights," and
having a uniform, national code, eh?

=====

So you would like to overturn the constitution and Bill of Rights??

It's important to remember that there is a reason for the way things
are.

Wonder how the narrow minded faction of the right wing likesthis
 

On 3/28/2013 7:17 PM, Wayne B wrote:
On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 16:53:59 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

Many good reasons there for finally getting rid of "state's rights," and
having a uniform, national code, eh?

=====

So you would like to overturn the constitution and Bill of Rights??

It's important to remember that there is a reason for the way things
are.


Why do you think DHS is buying up all of the ammo, some 1.6 billion with
a B rounds as well as armored vehicles, drones, and other hardware until
now thought of as military gear, not "peace officer" gear?

Wonder how the narrow minded faction of the right wing likesthis
 

On 3/28/13 7:17 PM, Wayne B wrote:
On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 16:53:59 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

Many good reasons there for finally getting rid of "state's rights," and
having a uniform, national code, eh?

=====

So you would like to overturn the constitution and Bill of Rights??

It's important to remember that there is a reason for the way things
are.


We have an amendment process for changing and amending the Constitution.
Getting rid of state's rights can be accomplished by following the
process. Also, a liberal Supreme Court that is as activist as the
current conservative Supreme Court could issue rulings that abrogate
more of what are considered state's rights.

Wonder how the narrow minded faction of the right wing likesthis
 

On 3/28/13 7:27 PM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 3/28/2013 7:17 PM, Wayne B wrote:
On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 16:53:59 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

Many good reasons there for finally getting rid of "state's rights," and
having a uniform, national code, eh?

=====

So you would like to overturn the constitution and Bill of Rights??

It's important to remember that there is a reason for the way things
are.


Why do you think DHS is buying up all of the ammo, some 1.6 billion with
a B rounds as well as armored vehicles, drones, and other hardware until
now thought of as military gear, not "peace officer" gear?

Because, of course, they intend to surround your house and tell you to
come out with your hands up, and they know you'll start shooting off
your mouth or your peashooter.

Wonder how the narrow minded faction of the right wing likesthis
 

On 3/28/13 7:09 PM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 3/28/2013 12:40 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 03:11:03 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:



"Urin Asshole" wrote in message
...

On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 00:57:48 -0400, wrote:

On Wed, 27 Mar 2013 10:20:41 -0700, Urin Asshole
wrote:

Well you come across as a ****ing stupid ****, but I try not to
bring
it up. I own four. No, I'm not going to list them. One's a handgun,
one's a 20 gauge. Figure it out from there.

Hmmm, I seem to remember Plume bragging about a 20 ga.
Are you thinking about buying a sail boat too?

Who the **** is Plume? A fantasy woman of yours?

-------------------------------------

Hmmmmmm. How did you know "Plume" is a woman?


This "guy" does sound like Plume. He showed up here opening up on me
with his first post, pretty much where Plume left off.


And plume showed up less than 24 hours after loogie left... And loogie
is kevin, there you go.

As if you had the mental acuity to analyze anything.

Wonder how the narrow minded faction of the right wing likes this
 

"Wayne B" wrote in message
...

On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 16:53:59 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

Many good reasons there for finally getting rid of "state's rights,"
and
having a uniform, national code, eh?

=====

So you would like to overturn the constitution and Bill of Rights??

It's important to remember that there is a reason for the way things
are.

----------------------------------------------

"finally getting rid of state's rights"? .... Holy Moley! ... give
a liberal an inch and they'll take a mile.

Wonder how the narrow minded faction of the right wing likes this
 

"JustWaitAFrekinMinute" wrote in message
...

On 3/28/2013 7:17 PM, Wayne B wrote:
On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 16:53:59 -0400, "F.O.A.D."
wrote:

Many good reasons there for finally getting rid of "state's
rights," and
having a uniform, national code, eh?

=====

So you would like to overturn the constitution and Bill of Rights??

It's important to remember that there is a reason for the way things
are.


Why do you think DHS is buying up all of the ammo, some 1.6 billion
with
a B rounds as well as armored vehicles, drones, and other hardware
until
now thought of as military gear, not "peace officer" gear?

---------------------------------------

Where did you hear that Scott? The DHS is *not* buying up "all" the
ammo.
The bulk of the ammo is being bought by private citizens in an
unrealistic belief and panic that the "government" is going to outlaw
it or make it unavailable. It's a bunch of BS.

Wonder how the narrow minded faction of the right wing likesthis
 

On 3/28/2013 7:27 PM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 3/28/2013 7:17 PM, Wayne B wrote:
On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 16:53:59 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

Many good reasons there for finally getting rid of "state's rights," and
having a uniform, national code, eh?

=====

So you would like to overturn the constitution and Bill of Rights??

It's important to remember that there is a reason for the way things
are.


Why do you think DHS is buying up all of the ammo, some 1.6 billion with
a B rounds as well as armored vehicles, drones, and other hardware until
now thought of as military gear, not "peace officer" gear?

O'Bama instructs Holder which laws to enforce or ignore. The
Constitution is just a piece of paper, for now anyway.

I wonder If The Pres. is rethinking shutting down the left coast missle
silos?

Wonder how the narrow minded faction of the right wing likesthis
 

On 3/28/13 7:41 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 16:53:59 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 3/28/13 4:48 PM, wrote:

The open question is whether "gay" is a protected class then isn't it?
That is the question Scalia asked the other day.
Are bigamists going to be the next protected class?
Why can't 3 people be married?
At a certain point people may even start questioning the "age of
majority/consent" that is an arbitrary number that is not even uniform
among the states.




Many good reasons there for finally getting rid of "state's rights," and
having a uniform, national code, eh?

Oh, so you think DOMA should supersede state law in Connecticut, DC,
Iowa, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New York,
Vermont, and Washington?

That passed our congress by a wide margin .
85 to 14 in the Senate, 342 to 67 in the house.
It was signed by your hero

Do you really want that to be our national code?

Fortunately the SCOTUS may strike down DOMA precisely because it does
violate the concept of states rights.

I don't think the government, any government, should be granting or
taking away so called human rights. We all should have the same,
complete rights, including the right to marry whomever we please.

Wonder how the narrow minded faction of the right wing likesthis
 

On 3/28/2013 7:56 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 3/28/13 7:41 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 16:53:59 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 3/28/13 4:48 PM, wrote:

The open question is whether "gay" is a protected class then isn't it?
That is the question Scalia asked the other day.
Are bigamists going to be the next protected class?
Why can't 3 people be married?
At a certain point people may even start questioning the "age of
majority/consent" that is an arbitrary number that is not even uniform
among the states.




Many good reasons there for finally getting rid of "state's rights," and
having a uniform, national code, eh?

Oh, so you think DOMA should supersede state law in Connecticut, DC,
Iowa, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New York,
Vermont, and Washington?

That passed our congress by a wide margin .
85 to 14 in the Senate, 342 to 67 in the house.
It was signed by your hero

Do you really want that to be our national code?

Fortunately the SCOTUS may strike down DOMA precisely because it does
violate the concept of states rights.

I don't think the government, any government, should be granting or
taking away so called human rights. We all should have the same,
complete rights, including the right to marry whomever we please.

So go marry another sheep, you fool.

Wonder how the narrow minded faction of the right wing likes this
 

On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 19:35:17 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:



"Wayne B" wrote in message
.. .

On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 16:53:59 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

Many good reasons there for finally getting rid of "state's rights,"
and
having a uniform, national code, eh?

=====

So you would like to overturn the constitution and Bill of Rights??

It's important to remember that there is a reason for the way things
are.

----------------------------------------------

"finally getting rid of state's rights"? .... Holy Moley! ... give
a liberal an inch and they'll take a mile.

======

Certainly Harry and his big government brethren would. In fact they'd
take well over a mile.

Wonder how the narrow minded faction of the right wing likes this
 

In article , says...

On Wed, 27 Mar 2013 23:44:48 -0400, wrote:

On Wed, 27 Mar 2013 13:44:29 -0400, iBoaterer
wrote:

Sometimes they hit every number in the phone book, other times they
start with a prefix and hit all 10,000 numbers.

Did you READ the article?

Yes, it said nothing about the scope of the robocall campaign only
that people in Newtown got called. It didn't even say if they were
only people on the NRA donors list.



But they cannot do any wrong. The ****ing NRA are blood sucking scum
that only give a **** about where their next gun mouthful comes from.

What do you think of the local NAACP in Ohio who said that the girl was drunk and consented
to being raped?

http://www.ibtimes.com/steubenvilles...tim-was-drunk-
willing-exclusive-1149517

Wonder how the narrow minded faction of the right wing likes this
 

On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 16:49:38 -0400, wrote:

On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 13:19:15 -0700 (PDT), wrote:

On Thursday, March 28, 2013 12:40:26 PM UTC-4, wrote:
On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 03:11:03 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:

"Urin Asshole" wrote in message


Who the **** is Plume? A fantasy woman of yours?


Hmmmmmm. How did you know "Plume" is a woman?


This "guy" does sound like Plume. He showed up here opening up on me
with his first post, pretty much where Plume left off.

I said that not long after it showed up here. Same key phrases, same old BS. It's just another sock back with a different name, and attempting (poorly) to re-invent itself. A third-rate troll at best.

Maybe Plume's love child

Sound like you're in line with the stalker of teen girls. Sorry buddy.
You aint my type. ****ing sick bull****.

Wonder how the narrow minded faction of the right wing likes this
 

On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 19:09:50 -0400, JustWaitAFrekinMinute
wrote:

On 3/28/2013 12:40 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 03:11:03 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:



"Urin Asshole" wrote in message
...

On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 00:57:48 -0400, wrote:

On Wed, 27 Mar 2013 10:20:41 -0700, Urin Asshole
wrote:

Well you come across as a ****ing stupid ****, but I try not to
bring
it up. I own four. No, I'm not going to list them. One's a handgun,
one's a 20 gauge. Figure it out from there.

Hmmm, I seem to remember Plume bragging about a 20 ga.
Are you thinking about buying a sail boat too?

Who the **** is Plume? A fantasy woman of yours?

-------------------------------------

Hmmmmmm. How did you know "Plume" is a woman?


This "guy" does sound like Plume. He showed up here opening up on me
with his first post, pretty much where Plume left off.


And plume showed up less than 24 hours after loogie left... And loogie
is kevin, there you go.

I'm getting confused. There's kevin, plume, and now a loogie? Are you
a mental case or what.

Wonder how the narrow minded faction of the right wing likes this
 

On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 16:48:07 -0400, wrote:

On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 10:37:49 -0700, Urin Asshole
wrote:

It was the will of the people AKA the democracy you referenced above.
Are you saying the application of democracy can be selective?

I'm saying that the minority needs to be protected from the majority,
which is what the constitution is all about dickwad.

The open question is whether "gay" is a protected class then isn't it?
That is the question Scalia asked the other day.

That's the question Scalia asked but that's not the important
question. It's an equal protection and state's rights issue.

Are bigamists going to be the next protected class?

No idea. Are there any pending lawsuits?

Why can't 3 people be married?

No idea. Are there any pending lawsuits?

At a certain point people may even start questioning the "age of
majority/consent" that is an arbitrary number that is not even uniform
among the states.


Maybe they will. None of this has anything to do with the two current
cases. Feel free to continue your bull**** at deflections.

Wonder how the narrow minded faction of the right wing likes this
 

On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 19:17:48 -0400, Wayne B
wrote:

On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 16:53:59 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

Many good reasons there for finally getting rid of "state's rights," and
having a uniform, national code, eh?

=====

So you would like to overturn the constitution and Bill of Rights??

It's important to remember that there is a reason for the way things
are.

These two cases have nothing to do with any such action. A lot of
"reasons the way things are" have to do with antiquated views and
fear. That argument doesn't stand for very long.