In article ,
says...

On 3/14/2013 4:53 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

On 3/14/2013 12:45 PM, Wayne B wrote:
On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 09:59:30 -0400, Meyer wrote:

On 3/14/2013 8:05 AM, Wayne B wrote:
On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 07:29:55 -0400, J Herring
wrote:

No woman should be forced to bring an unwanted child ino the world.

Think about that.

There is always birth control and the morning after pill.


====

Clearly a good start but for various reasons some women do not have
access to either option. Of course one of the reasons for limited
access is that your church has been adamant about trying to suppress
availability.


Lame excuse Wayne. If they were creative enough to gain access to the
old woodie, against church doctrine, they should be able to gain access
to remedies for their sins.
t
====

And therein lies the problem: Viewing pregnancy and childbirth as a

punishment. That's a very old fasioned notion which has been
carefully fostered by various societies and religions throughout the
ages. We already have more than enough unwanted children running
around with little or no parental leadership. It is a mystery to me
why anyone would wish for more.


And therein lies the strawman... I think John was addressing the same
lame "church supression" jab you made making your point. It's bs unless
you can tell us just exactly where in the US outside the walls of the
churches, "Church Suppression" is keeping women from getting birth
control pills or having an abortion?

I know you don't like facts, but:

http://www.womenshealthmag.com/healt...control-rights

http://www.unmaskingchoice.ca/active/churches



There, I read one of your links and it's bs... First off the lady is
"terrified" that she won't have the 150 dollars every two years for a
birth control shot, and then we find out she can get it for 59 dollars
anyway at Planned Abortionhood... So, still, no examples of any woman
that can not get birth control because of Religion... Just more hype.

Holy ****, that's what you gleaned? Can you even read?????

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religio..._birth_control

"The Catholic Church is opposed to artificial contraception and orgasmic
acts outside of the context of marital intercourse"

"Author and FamilyLife Today radio host Dennis Rainey suggests four
categories as useful in understanding current Protestant attitudes
concerning birth control. These are the "children in abundance" group,
such as Quiverfull adherents who view all birth control and natural
family planning as wrong; the "children in managed abundance" group,
which accept only natural family planning; the "children in moderation"
group which accepts prudent use of a wide range of contraceptives; and,
the "no children" group which sees itself as within their Biblical
rights to define their lives around non-natal concerns"

http://www.denverpost.com/news/ci_20664414

So there, you stupid fool, you are dead wrong, as usual.