Scare Tactics? Nah...
 

.....surely the Democrats wouldn't engage in such a thing...would they?

The Washington Post, a bastion of liberalism, seems to be sick of the games...

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/fact-checker/post/4-pinocchios-for-arne-duncans-false-claim-of-pink-slips-for-teachers/2013/02/27/dac86324-8115-11e2-b99e-6baf4ebe42df_blog.html?wpisrc=nl_cuzheads

or: http://tinyurl.com/bqt66ev
--
Salmonbait

All decisions are the result of binary thinking.

Scare Tactics? Nah...
 

On Thu, 28 Feb 2013 09:09:48 -0500, J Herring
wrote
....surely the Democrats wouldn't engage in such a thing...would
they?


The Washington Post, a bastion of liberalism, seems to be sick of
the games...



http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/...pinocchios-for
-arne-duncans-false-claim-of-pink-slips-for-teachers/2013/02/27/dac8632
4-8115-11e2-b99e-6baf4ebe42df_blog.html?wpisrc=nl_cuzheads


or: http://tinyurl.com/bqt66ev
--
Salmonbait


All decisions are the result of binary thinking.

Making **** up . It,s in the left wing genes. No surprise there.

Scare Tactics? Nah...
 

On Thu, 28 Feb 2013 09:09:48 -0500, J Herring
wrote:

....surely the Democrats wouldn't engage in such a thing...would they?

The Washington Post, a bastion of liberalism, seems to be sick of the games...

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/fact-checker/post/4-pinocchios-for-arne-duncans-false-claim-of-pink-slips-for-teachers/2013/02/27/dac86324-8115-11e2-b99e-6baf4ebe42df_blog.html?wpisrc=nl_cuzheads

or: http://tinyurl.com/bqt66ev

As usual, the ****brains can't read:

"The American Association of School Administrators this week released
a report, based on a survey, that estimates that “at least 37,000
education jobs” would be lost through sequestration. That at least is
based on something more than a rough calculation, though of course it
is in the interest of this group to sound the alarm.

Moreover, note that the group refers to “education jobs,” not
teachers. We have previously found that 67 percent of education jobs
could be broadly defined as being held by teachers or teaching
assistants. That would translate into a reduction of about 25,000
teachers, based on AASA’s survey data.""

Scare Tactics? Nah...
 

On 2/28/2013 4:36 PM, Urin Asshole wrote:


25,000 people with no jobs.


Total bull****. Turns out they can not show one teacher losing their job
even though they made up some numbers for a town. The town said back,
"we don't know what the hell you are talking about".. LOL The rest of
your rant is based on that lie, so it's irrelevant really.

Well, **** that's only a tiny percentage
of the overr all working population, so it's ok.. for everyone except
those people.

Scare Tactics? Nah...
 

On Thu, 28 Feb 2013 16:44:07 -0500, JustWaitAFrekinMinute
wrote:

On 2/28/2013 4:36 PM, Urin Asshole wrote:


25,000 people with no jobs.


Total bull****. Turns out they can not show one teacher losing their job
even though they made up some numbers for a town. The town said back,
"we don't know what the hell you are talking about".. LOL The rest of
your rant is based on that lie, so it's irrelevant really.

Well, **** that's only a tiny percentage
of the overr all working population, so it's ok.. for everyone except
those people.




Well, **** is your self description.

Scare Tactics? Nah...
 

In article ,
says...

On 2/28/2013 4:36 PM, Urin Asshole wrote:


25,000 people with no jobs.


Total bull****. Turns out they can not show one teacher losing their job
even though they made up some numbers for a town. The town said back,
"we don't know what the hell you are talking about".. LOL The rest of
your rant is based on that lie, so it's irrelevant really.

Well, **** that's only a tiny percentage
of the overr all working population, so it's ok.. for everyone except
those people.


Cite?

Scare Tactics? Nah...
 

In article ,
says...

On 2/28/2013 4:36 PM, Urin Asshole wrote:


25,000 people with no jobs.


Total bull****. Turns out they can not show one teacher losing their job
even though they made up some numbers for a town. The town said back,
"we don't know what the hell you are talking about".. LOL The rest of
your rant is based on that lie, so it's irrelevant really.

Well, **** that's only a tiny percentage
of the overr all working population, so it's ok.. for everyone except
those people.


Right, idiot:

http://tinyurl.com/cqygx7t

http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R42763.pdf

http://tinyurl.com/bolfl7o

http://tinyurl.com/agahp2d