Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #61   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,106
Default Um..

On 2/27/2013 11:00 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 2/27/2013 10:53 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 2/27/13 10:16 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:

It was nearly 30 years ago I walked into a welfare office and
claimed paternity of my 6 month old daughter. They didn't know what to
do, had to call the home office LOL! So they took "mug" shots, and
fingerprints and told me that had never happened before. It took me
nearly ten years, but I paid the state back every penny with interest...
It was quite an experience and quite frankly, I have never regretted
that decision to give my girl, my name...


Your business is your business, but why were you subjected to mug shots
and fingerprints? Fathering a child, assuming both parents were of age,
is not a criminal act.

And, if the child was six months old when you claimed paternity, what
were you paying back for 10 years? Certainly not six months of
state-provided welfare payments.




Ok, I'll play, once... Mugshots and fingerprints, because they just
didn't know what else to do, they had "never had this happen before"
according to them.

The huge bill was because my first wife had birth issues, it was all
medical.. We never had the child on "welfare" after the birth... We were
young and it was her doctor seeing the coming problems, that told us to
put the mom on welfare until after the child was born so she would have
the best care... We were lucky we did.


So anyway, how about all those you stiffed with your bankruptcy? Did the
courts in Florida ever know about your boats, guns, vactations,
motorbikes, homes or are you still hiding from them? I know a guy who
did bankruptcy in Fla, they still watch his income and stuff but then
again, he is not hiding assets from the court.
  #62   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,106
Default Um..

On 2/27/2013 10:55 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 2/27/13 10:11 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:

You just have to make
choices. I tell you one thing.. If my wife made the money harrys wife
does, we would be paid in full in 6 months, not hiding and filing
bankruptcy...



A. I'm not hiding.
B. I'm not filing bankruptcy.
C. I earn more than my wife does.




Did you ever pay back all the folks you stiffed in your two previous
bankruptcies?
  #63   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Feb 2013
Posts: 6,605
Default Um..

On 2/27/13 11:00 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 2/27/2013 10:53 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 2/27/13 10:16 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:

It was nearly 30 years ago I walked into a welfare office and
claimed paternity of my 6 month old daughter. They didn't know what to
do, had to call the home office LOL! So they took "mug" shots, and
fingerprints and told me that had never happened before. It took me
nearly ten years, but I paid the state back every penny with interest...
It was quite an experience and quite frankly, I have never regretted
that decision to give my girl, my name...


Your business is your business, but why were you subjected to mug shots
and fingerprints? Fathering a child, assuming both parents were of age,
is not a criminal act.

And, if the child was six months old when you claimed paternity, what
were you paying back for 10 years? Certainly not six months of
state-provided welfare payments.




Ok, I'll play, once... Mugshots and fingerprints, because they just
didn't know what else to do, they had "never had this happen before"
according to them.

The huge bill was because my first wife had birth issues, it was all
medical.. We never had the child on "welfare" after the birth... We were
young and it was her doctor seeing the coming problems, that told us to
put the mom on welfare until after the child was born so she would have
the best care... We were lucky we did.


Fair enough. I wasn't even aware you had a "first wife." You won't read
anything from me bringing this up again.


  #64   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jan 2011
Posts: 5,756
Default Um..

On Wednesday, February 27, 2013 12:06:38 PM UTC-4, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 2/27/13 11:00 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:

On 2/27/2013 10:53 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:


On 2/27/13 10:16 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:




It was nearly 30 years ago I walked into a welfare office and


claimed paternity of my 6 month old daughter. They didn't know what to


do, had to call the home office LOL! So they took "mug" shots, and


fingerprints and told me that had never happened before. It took me


nearly ten years, but I paid the state back every penny with interest...


It was quite an experience and quite frankly, I have never regretted


that decision to give my girl, my name...




Your business is your business, but why were you subjected to mug shots


and fingerprints? Fathering a child, assuming both parents were of age,


is not a criminal act.




And, if the child was six months old when you claimed paternity, what


were you paying back for 10 years? Certainly not six months of


state-provided welfare payments.










Ok, I'll play, once... Mugshots and fingerprints, because they just


didn't know what else to do, they had "never had this happen before"


according to them.




The huge bill was because my first wife had birth issues, it was all


medical.. We never had the child on "welfare" after the birth... We were


young and it was her doctor seeing the coming problems, that told us to


put the mom on welfare until after the child was born so she would have


the best care... We were lucky we did.




Fair enough. I wasn't even aware you had a "first wife." You won't read

anything from me bringing this up again.



Most of us are more concerned about what he does here in this newsgroup than what he may or may not have done 20 or 30 years ago.
Besides, he's such a natural born liar that you'd have to hook him up to a polygraph machine before you could believe a word.
  #65   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Feb 2013
Posts: 6,605
Default Um..

On 2/27/13 11:55 AM, True North wrote:
On Wednesday, February 27, 2013 12:06:38 PM UTC-4, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 2/27/13 11:00 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:

On 2/27/2013 10:53 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:


On 2/27/13 10:16 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:




It was nearly 30 years ago I walked into a welfare office and


claimed paternity of my 6 month old daughter. They didn't know what to


do, had to call the home office LOL! So they took "mug" shots, and


fingerprints and told me that had never happened before. It took me


nearly ten years, but I paid the state back every penny with interest...


It was quite an experience and quite frankly, I have never regretted


that decision to give my girl, my name...




Your business is your business, but why were you subjected to mug shots


and fingerprints? Fathering a child, assuming both parents were of age,


is not a criminal act.




And, if the child was six months old when you claimed paternity, what


were you paying back for 10 years? Certainly not six months of


state-provided welfare payments.










Ok, I'll play, once... Mugshots and fingerprints, because they just


didn't know what else to do, they had "never had this happen before"


according to them.




The huge bill was because my first wife had birth issues, it was all


medical.. We never had the child on "welfare" after the birth... We were


young and it was her doctor seeing the coming problems, that told us to


put the mom on welfare until after the child was born so she would have


the best care... We were lucky we did.




Fair enough. I wasn't even aware you had a "first wife." You won't read

anything from me bringing this up again.



Most of us are more concerned about what he does here in this newsgroup than what he may or may not have done 20 or 30 years ago.
Besides, he's such a natural born liar that you'd have to hook him up to a polygraph machine before you could believe a word.


I don't even give a damn what he does now in his real life. He's made
himself a target, though, with his nasty language and never-ending
insults against those who don't post here.


  #66   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Mar 2011
Posts: 541
Default Um..

On 2/27/2013 6:20 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:

You are just mad cause neither side will fill you in


Nobody gives a **** but you, the attention starved drama queen.

  #67   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Feb 2013
Posts: 6,605
Default Um..

On 2/27/13 12:32 PM, thumper wrote:
On 2/27/2013 6:20 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:

You are just mad cause neither side will fill you in


Nobody gives a **** but you, the attention starved drama queen.



PsychoScotty's claim of being "blackmailed" transcends the level of
bizarre we usually get from him, and he's so coy about it. I did promise
him that for payment of $1.00 American, I wouldn't post those photos of
him having his way with a barnyard animal.

You're right, though: he's attention starved.
  #68   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2012
Posts: 2,107
Default Um..

On 2/27/2013 10:55 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 2/27/13 10:11 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:

You just have to make
choices. I tell you one thing.. If my wife made the money harrys wife
does, we would be paid in full in 6 months, not hiding and filing
bankruptcy...



A. I'm not hiding.
B. I'm not filing bankruptcy.
C. I earn more than my wife does.



You made more than $127,000? Doing what?
  #69   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Dec 2009
Posts: 3,267
Default Um..

On Feb 27, 10:55*am, "F.O.A.D." wrote:
On 2/27/13 10:11 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:

*You just have to make
choices. I tell you one thing.. If my wife made the money harrys wife
does, we would be paid in full in 6 months, not hiding and filing
bankruptcy...


A. I'm not hiding.
B. I'm not filing bankruptcy.
C. I earn more than my wife does.


HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH...BULL-**** !!!!!!
  #70   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Dec 2009
Posts: 3,267
Default Um..

On Feb 27, 11:55*am, True North wrote:
On Wednesday, February 27, 2013 12:06:38 PM UTC-4, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 2/27/13 11:00 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:


On 2/27/2013 10:53 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:


On 2/27/13 10:16 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:


*It was nearly 30 years ago I walked into a welfare office and


claimed paternity of my 6 month old daughter. They didn't know what to


do, had to call the home office LOL! So they took "mug" shots, and


fingerprints and told me that had never happened before. It took me


nearly ten years, but I paid the state back every penny with interest...


It was quite an experience and quite frankly, I have never regretted


that decision to give my girl, my name...


Your business is your business, but why were you subjected to mug shots


and fingerprints? Fathering a child, assuming both parents were of age,


is not a criminal act.


And, if the child was six months old when you claimed paternity, what


were you paying back for 10 years? Certainly not six months of


state-provided welfare payments.


Ok, I'll play, once... Mugshots and fingerprints, because they just


didn't know what else to do, they had "never had this happen before"


according to them.


The huge bill was because my first wife had birth issues, it was all


medical.. We never had the child on "welfare" after the birth... We were


young and it was her doctor seeing the coming problems, that told us to


put the mom on welfare until after the child was born so she would have


the best care... We were lucky we did.


Fair enough. I wasn't even aware you had a "first wife." You won't read


anything from me bringing this up again.


Most of us are more concerned about what he does here in this newsgroup than what he may or may not have done 20 or 30 years ago.
Besides, he's such a natural born liar that you'd have to hook him up to a polygraph machine before you could believe a word.


Put Harrys cock back in your mouth, you have nothing to add...GUMBY.
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:54 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017