| Page 2 of 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
|
Um..
On 2/26/2013 7:21 PM, Urin Asshole wrote:
On Tue, 26 Feb 2013 17:10:05 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 2/26/13 4:56 PM, Urin Asshole wrote: On Tue, 26 Feb 2013 16:11:37 -0500, wrote: On Tue, 26 Feb 2013 10:16:13 -0800, Urin Asshole wrote: On Tue, 26 Feb 2013 01:16:09 -0500, wrote: It figures, I doubt you could navigate the clerk's web site. Why don't you tell us all about your experiencee at IBM again. I'm sure that'll win over some of your right-wing buddies. We never hear about your experiences, I suppose that is because you don't have any. I imagine you were bullied all through school and your snarky attitude is how you strike back ... while safely hiding in the dark. Now go away the grownups are talking. Yeah, no experience. Whatever ****tard. You're "experience" is all in your little pea brain. Youi're no adult and from what I can tell even your IBM "experience" is a bunch of bs. Why not save your anger and strong language for posters deserving of it? I disagree a lot with Greg, but hardly ever disagreeably. I understand that argument. Sort of like going after the westboro baptist church ****heads. My argument against that is that the right-wing crazy sounding posters are easy to identify. People like Greg, who come across as agreeable, are the more dangerous varient of the same ****swerl. I thought this was a boating group. Are you telling me that all the men here are offended by strong ****ing language. My mistake, strike ****ing. Only when it comes from the conservatives.... |
Um..
On 2/26/13 7:42 PM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 2/26/2013 7:21 PM, Urin Asshole wrote: On Tue, 26 Feb 2013 17:10:05 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 2/26/13 4:56 PM, Urin Asshole wrote: On Tue, 26 Feb 2013 16:11:37 -0500, wrote: On Tue, 26 Feb 2013 10:16:13 -0800, Urin Asshole wrote: On Tue, 26 Feb 2013 01:16:09 -0500, wrote: It figures, I doubt you could navigate the clerk's web site. Why don't you tell us all about your experiencee at IBM again. I'm sure that'll win over some of your right-wing buddies. We never hear about your experiences, I suppose that is because you don't have any. I imagine you were bullied all through school and your snarky attitude is how you strike back ... while safely hiding in the dark. Now go away the grownups are talking. Yeah, no experience. Whatever ****tard. You're "experience" is all in your little pea brain. Youi're no adult and from what I can tell even your IBM "experience" is a bunch of bs. Why not save your anger and strong language for posters deserving of it? I disagree a lot with Greg, but hardly ever disagreeably. I understand that argument. Sort of like going after the westboro baptist church ****heads. My argument against that is that the right-wing crazy sounding posters are easy to identify. People like Greg, who come across as agreeable, are the more dangerous varient of the same ****swerl. I thought this was a boating group. Are you telling me that all the men here are offended by strong ****ing language. My mistake, strike ****ing. Only when it comes from the conservatives.... "Urin" is not a conservative, and I complained about his language. Therefore, you once again are just plain wrong. How's that blackmail thingie working out for you? |
Um..
On 2/26/2013 7:46 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
How's that blackmail thingie working out for you? for those of you who don't know.. this (harrys question above) is a further continuation of the blackmail, every time harry asks this question above...That's why he in particular keeps harping on this when there is so much else he could bring up. Those of you who saw the evidence understand how this all realates. The rest, well you just have to decide if you believe me or harry krause... Just sayin'... |
Um..
On 2/26/13 7:52 PM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 2/26/2013 7:46 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote: How's that blackmail thingie working out for you? for those of you who don't know.. this (harrys question above) is a further continuation of the blackmail, every time harry asks this question above...That's why he in particular keeps harping on this when there is so much else he could bring up. Those of you who saw the evidence understand how this all realates. The rest, well you just have to decide if you believe me or harry krause... Just sayin'... A further continuation of what? You're lying. The only contact I've ever initiated with you has been here. I've never phoned you or mailed anything to you, ever. You called me once, years ago. I've never had any contact with any member of your family. All I know about you is what you have posted or commented upon publicly. I bring up your charge of blackmail because as foolish as you are, your charge of blackmail makes you look even more foolish. Put up the evidence or withdraw the charge and apologize, dirtbag. What's your next trip, calling me the "n" word? |
Um..
On Tue, 26 Feb 2013 19:43:18 -0400, Wayne B wrote:
On Tue, 26 Feb 2013 16:11:37 -0500, wrote: Now go away the grownups are talking. ====== The group reads a *lot* better if you put "urinal" in the KF. Absolutely correct. -- Salmonbait All decisions are the result of binary thinking. |
Um..
"Urin Asshole" wrote in message ... I thought this was a boating group. Are you telling me that all the men here are offended by strong ****ing language. My mistake, strike ****ing. --------------------------------------- I doubt few are bothered with strong ****ing language. It's when strong ****ing language is used as adjectives to describe people with whom you disagree, it becomes bothersome ... to me anyway. No need for it and it really distracts from any credible point one may be making. |
Um..
On Tue, 26 Feb 2013 19:27:04 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote:
On 2/26/13 7:21 PM, Urin Asshole wrote: On Tue, 26 Feb 2013 17:10:05 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 2/26/13 4:56 PM, Urin Asshole wrote: On Tue, 26 Feb 2013 16:11:37 -0500, wrote: On Tue, 26 Feb 2013 10:16:13 -0800, Urin Asshole wrote: On Tue, 26 Feb 2013 01:16:09 -0500, wrote: It figures, I doubt you could navigate the clerk's web site. Why don't you tell us all about your experiencee at IBM again. I'm sure that'll win over some of your right-wing buddies. We never hear about your experiences, I suppose that is because you don't have any. I imagine you were bullied all through school and your snarky attitude is how you strike back ... while safely hiding in the dark. Now go away the grownups are talking. Yeah, no experience. Whatever ****tard. You're "experience" is all in your little pea brain. Youi're no adult and from what I can tell even your IBM "experience" is a bunch of bs. Why not save your anger and strong language for posters deserving of it? I disagree a lot with Greg, but hardly ever disagreeably. I understand that argument. Sort of like going after the westboro baptist church ****heads. My argument against that is that the right-wing crazy sounding posters are easy to identify. People like Greg, who come across as agreeable, are the more dangerous varient of the same ****swerl. I thought this was a boating group. Are you telling me that all the men here are offended by strong ****ing language. My mistake, strike ****ing. Well, we disagree about Greg. He has strong opinions, but he presents them in a reasonable manner. You don't have to agree with what he posts to engage him in conversation here. Posting the way PsychoScotty does doesn't help anything. We agree to disagree. For the record, he doesn't present them in a reasonable manner unless you include confusing facts with opinion that sounds reasonable. You can't really engage someone who does that. What's so offensive about using the word ****? It's certainly less offensive than some of the foul-mouth **** that those crazies use. |
Um..
|
Um..
On Tue, 26 Feb 2013 20:28:38 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote:
"Urin Asshole" wrote in message .. . I thought this was a boating group. Are you telling me that all the men here are offended by strong ****ing language. My mistake, strike ****ing. --------------------------------------- I doubt few are bothered with strong ****ing language. It's when strong ****ing language is used as adjectives to describe people with whom you disagree, it becomes bothersome ... to me anyway. No need for it and it really distracts from any credible point one may be making. Well, I think there are plenty here that have called people worse than a ****head or a dip****? |
Um..
|
Um..
On 2/26/2013 10:14 PM, Urin Asshole wrote:
On Tue, 26 Feb 2013 19:46:41 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 2/26/13 7:42 PM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote: On 2/26/2013 7:21 PM, Urin Asshole wrote: On Tue, 26 Feb 2013 17:10:05 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 2/26/13 4:56 PM, Urin Asshole wrote: On Tue, 26 Feb 2013 16:11:37 -0500, wrote: On Tue, 26 Feb 2013 10:16:13 -0800, Urin Asshole wrote: On Tue, 26 Feb 2013 01:16:09 -0500, wrote: It figures, I doubt you could navigate the clerk's web site. Why don't you tell us all about your experiencee at IBM again. I'm sure that'll win over some of your right-wing buddies. We never hear about your experiences, I suppose that is because you don't have any. I imagine you were bullied all through school and your snarky attitude is how you strike back ... while safely hiding in the dark. Now go away the grownups are talking. Yeah, no experience. Whatever ****tard. You're "experience" is all in your little pea brain. Youi're no adult and from what I can tell even your IBM "experience" is a bunch of bs. Why not save your anger and strong language for posters deserving of it? I disagree a lot with Greg, but hardly ever disagreeably. I understand that argument. Sort of like going after the westboro baptist church ****heads. My argument against that is that the right-wing crazy sounding posters are easy to identify. People like Greg, who come across as agreeable, are the more dangerous varient of the same ****swerl. I thought this was a boating group. Are you telling me that all the men here are offended by strong ****ing language. My mistake, strike ****ing. Only when it comes from the conservatives.... "Urin" is not a conservative, and I complained about his language. Therefore, you once again are just plain wrong. How's that blackmail thingie working out for you? I'm a super-duper conservative, but not if that means gutting programs that help people or imposing my religious or non-religious beliefs on people, or bull****ting around about guns. So, as long as the other 48% of the country goes right along with you and 52%, you are cool? Do I have that right? |
Um..
On Tue, 26 Feb 2013 22:24:36 -0500, JustWaitAFrekinMinute
wrote: On 2/26/2013 10:14 PM, Urin Asshole wrote: On Tue, 26 Feb 2013 19:46:41 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 2/26/13 7:42 PM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote: On 2/26/2013 7:21 PM, Urin Asshole wrote: On Tue, 26 Feb 2013 17:10:05 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 2/26/13 4:56 PM, Urin Asshole wrote: On Tue, 26 Feb 2013 16:11:37 -0500, wrote: On Tue, 26 Feb 2013 10:16:13 -0800, Urin Asshole wrote: On Tue, 26 Feb 2013 01:16:09 -0500, wrote: It figures, I doubt you could navigate the clerk's web site. Why don't you tell us all about your experiencee at IBM again. I'm sure that'll win over some of your right-wing buddies. We never hear about your experiences, I suppose that is because you don't have any. I imagine you were bullied all through school and your snarky attitude is how you strike back ... while safely hiding in the dark. Now go away the grownups are talking. Yeah, no experience. Whatever ****tard. You're "experience" is all in your little pea brain. Youi're no adult and from what I can tell even your IBM "experience" is a bunch of bs. Why not save your anger and strong language for posters deserving of it? I disagree a lot with Greg, but hardly ever disagreeably. I understand that argument. Sort of like going after the westboro baptist church ****heads. My argument against that is that the right-wing crazy sounding posters are easy to identify. People like Greg, who come across as agreeable, are the more dangerous varient of the same ****swerl. I thought this was a boating group. Are you telling me that all the men here are offended by strong ****ing language. My mistake, strike ****ing. Only when it comes from the conservatives.... "Urin" is not a conservative, and I complained about his language. Therefore, you once again are just plain wrong. How's that blackmail thingie working out for you? I'm a super-duper conservative, but not if that means gutting programs that help people or imposing my religious or non-religious beliefs on people, or bull****ting around about guns. So, as long as the other 48% of the country goes right along with you and 52%, you are cool? Do I have that right? Hey ****weed.. I'm one of the 47% your buddy romnie put down. Yeah, you are too. ********.. we have something in common. |
Um..
|
Um..
|
Um..
On 2/27/2013 9:16 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says... On 2/26/2013 7:46 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote: How's that blackmail thingie working out for you? for those of you who don't know.. this (harrys question above) is a further continuation of the blackmail, every time harry asks this question above...That's why he in particular keeps harping on this when there is so much else he could bring up. Those of you who saw the evidence understand how this all realates. The rest, well you just have to decide if you believe me or harry krause... Just sayin'... Asking a question about blackmail is blackmail???? You've lied too many times to be taken seriously. You are just mad cause neither side will fill you in:) |
Um..
On 2/27/13 9:20 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 2/27/2013 9:16 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 2/26/2013 7:46 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote: How's that blackmail thingie working out for you? for those of you who don't know.. this (harrys question above) is a further continuation of the blackmail, every time harry asks this question above...That's why he in particular keeps harping on this when there is so much else he could bring up. Those of you who saw the evidence understand how this all realates. The rest, well you just have to decide if you believe me or harry krause... Just sayin'... Asking a question about blackmail is blackmail???? You've lied too many times to be taken seriously. You are just mad cause neither side will fill you in:) Neither side? The only "side" here is the one your psychosis has conjured. |
Um..
On 2/27/13 10:16 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
It was nearly 30 years ago I walked into a welfare office and claimed paternity of my 6 month old daughter. They didn't know what to do, had to call the home office:) LOL! So they took "mug" shots, and fingerprints and told me that had never happened before. It took me nearly ten years, but I paid the state back every penny with interest... It was quite an experience and quite frankly, I have never regretted that decision to give my girl, my name... Your business is your business, but why were you subjected to mug shots and fingerprints? Fathering a child, assuming both parents were of age, is not a criminal act. And, if the child was six months old when you claimed paternity, what were you paying back for 10 years? Certainly not six months of state-provided welfare payments. |
Um..
On 2/27/13 10:11 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
You just have to make choices. I tell you one thing.. If my wife made the money harrys wife does, we would be paid in full in 6 months, not hiding and filing bankruptcy... A. I'm not hiding. B. I'm not filing bankruptcy. C. I earn more than my wife does. |
Um..
On 2/27/2013 10:53 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 2/27/13 10:16 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote: It was nearly 30 years ago I walked into a welfare office and claimed paternity of my 6 month old daughter. They didn't know what to do, had to call the home office:) LOL! So they took "mug" shots, and fingerprints and told me that had never happened before. It took me nearly ten years, but I paid the state back every penny with interest... It was quite an experience and quite frankly, I have never regretted that decision to give my girl, my name... Your business is your business, but why were you subjected to mug shots and fingerprints? Fathering a child, assuming both parents were of age, is not a criminal act. And, if the child was six months old when you claimed paternity, what were you paying back for 10 years? Certainly not six months of state-provided welfare payments. Ok, I'll play, once... Mugshots and fingerprints, because they just didn't know what else to do, they had "never had this happen before" according to them. The huge bill was because my first wife had birth issues, it was all medical.. We never had the child on "welfare" after the birth... We were young and it was her doctor seeing the coming problems, that told us to put the mom on welfare until after the child was born so she would have the best care... We were lucky we did. |
Um..
On 2/27/2013 11:00 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 2/27/2013 10:53 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote: On 2/27/13 10:16 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote: It was nearly 30 years ago I walked into a welfare office and claimed paternity of my 6 month old daughter. They didn't know what to do, had to call the home office:) LOL! So they took "mug" shots, and fingerprints and told me that had never happened before. It took me nearly ten years, but I paid the state back every penny with interest... It was quite an experience and quite frankly, I have never regretted that decision to give my girl, my name... Your business is your business, but why were you subjected to mug shots and fingerprints? Fathering a child, assuming both parents were of age, is not a criminal act. And, if the child was six months old when you claimed paternity, what were you paying back for 10 years? Certainly not six months of state-provided welfare payments. Ok, I'll play, once... Mugshots and fingerprints, because they just didn't know what else to do, they had "never had this happen before" according to them. The huge bill was because my first wife had birth issues, it was all medical.. We never had the child on "welfare" after the birth... We were young and it was her doctor seeing the coming problems, that told us to put the mom on welfare until after the child was born so she would have the best care... We were lucky we did. So anyway, how about all those you stiffed with your bankruptcy? Did the courts in Florida ever know about your boats, guns, vactations, motorbikes, homes or are you still hiding from them? I know a guy who did bankruptcy in Fla, they still watch his income and stuff but then again, he is not hiding assets from the court. |
Um..
On 2/27/2013 10:55 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 2/27/13 10:11 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote: You just have to make choices. I tell you one thing.. If my wife made the money harrys wife does, we would be paid in full in 6 months, not hiding and filing bankruptcy... A. I'm not hiding. B. I'm not filing bankruptcy. C. I earn more than my wife does. Did you ever pay back all the folks you stiffed in your two previous bankruptcies? |
Um..
On 2/27/13 11:00 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 2/27/2013 10:53 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote: On 2/27/13 10:16 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote: It was nearly 30 years ago I walked into a welfare office and claimed paternity of my 6 month old daughter. They didn't know what to do, had to call the home office:) LOL! So they took "mug" shots, and fingerprints and told me that had never happened before. It took me nearly ten years, but I paid the state back every penny with interest... It was quite an experience and quite frankly, I have never regretted that decision to give my girl, my name... Your business is your business, but why were you subjected to mug shots and fingerprints? Fathering a child, assuming both parents were of age, is not a criminal act. And, if the child was six months old when you claimed paternity, what were you paying back for 10 years? Certainly not six months of state-provided welfare payments. Ok, I'll play, once... Mugshots and fingerprints, because they just didn't know what else to do, they had "never had this happen before" according to them. The huge bill was because my first wife had birth issues, it was all medical.. We never had the child on "welfare" after the birth... We were young and it was her doctor seeing the coming problems, that told us to put the mom on welfare until after the child was born so she would have the best care... We were lucky we did. Fair enough. I wasn't even aware you had a "first wife." You won't read anything from me bringing this up again. |
Um..
On Wednesday, February 27, 2013 12:06:38 PM UTC-4, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 2/27/13 11:00 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote: On 2/27/2013 10:53 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote: On 2/27/13 10:16 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote: It was nearly 30 years ago I walked into a welfare office and claimed paternity of my 6 month old daughter. They didn't know what to do, had to call the home office:) LOL! So they took "mug" shots, and fingerprints and told me that had never happened before. It took me nearly ten years, but I paid the state back every penny with interest... It was quite an experience and quite frankly, I have never regretted that decision to give my girl, my name... Your business is your business, but why were you subjected to mug shots and fingerprints? Fathering a child, assuming both parents were of age, is not a criminal act. And, if the child was six months old when you claimed paternity, what were you paying back for 10 years? Certainly not six months of state-provided welfare payments. Ok, I'll play, once... Mugshots and fingerprints, because they just didn't know what else to do, they had "never had this happen before" according to them. The huge bill was because my first wife had birth issues, it was all medical.. We never had the child on "welfare" after the birth... We were young and it was her doctor seeing the coming problems, that told us to put the mom on welfare until after the child was born so she would have the best care... We were lucky we did. Fair enough. I wasn't even aware you had a "first wife." You won't read anything from me bringing this up again. Most of us are more concerned about what he does here in this newsgroup than what he may or may not have done 20 or 30 years ago. Besides, he's such a natural born liar that you'd have to hook him up to a polygraph machine before you could believe a word. |
Um..
On 2/27/13 11:55 AM, True North wrote:
On Wednesday, February 27, 2013 12:06:38 PM UTC-4, F.O.A.D. wrote: On 2/27/13 11:00 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote: On 2/27/2013 10:53 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote: On 2/27/13 10:16 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote: It was nearly 30 years ago I walked into a welfare office and claimed paternity of my 6 month old daughter. They didn't know what to do, had to call the home office:) LOL! So they took "mug" shots, and fingerprints and told me that had never happened before. It took me nearly ten years, but I paid the state back every penny with interest... It was quite an experience and quite frankly, I have never regretted that decision to give my girl, my name... Your business is your business, but why were you subjected to mug shots and fingerprints? Fathering a child, assuming both parents were of age, is not a criminal act. And, if the child was six months old when you claimed paternity, what were you paying back for 10 years? Certainly not six months of state-provided welfare payments. Ok, I'll play, once... Mugshots and fingerprints, because they just didn't know what else to do, they had "never had this happen before" according to them. The huge bill was because my first wife had birth issues, it was all medical.. We never had the child on "welfare" after the birth... We were young and it was her doctor seeing the coming problems, that told us to put the mom on welfare until after the child was born so she would have the best care... We were lucky we did. Fair enough. I wasn't even aware you had a "first wife." You won't read anything from me bringing this up again. Most of us are more concerned about what he does here in this newsgroup than what he may or may not have done 20 or 30 years ago. Besides, he's such a natural born liar that you'd have to hook him up to a polygraph machine before you could believe a word. I don't even give a damn what he does now in his real life. He's made himself a target, though, with his nasty language and never-ending insults against those who don't post here. |
Um..
On 2/27/2013 6:20 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
You are just mad cause neither side will fill you in:) Nobody gives a **** but you, the attention starved drama queen. |
Um..
On 2/27/13 12:32 PM, thumper wrote:
On 2/27/2013 6:20 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote: You are just mad cause neither side will fill you in:) Nobody gives a **** but you, the attention starved drama queen. PsychoScotty's claim of being "blackmailed" transcends the level of bizarre we usually get from him, and he's so coy about it. I did promise him that for payment of $1.00 American, I wouldn't post those photos of him having his way with a barnyard animal. You're right, though: he's attention starved. |
Um..
On 2/27/2013 10:55 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 2/27/13 10:11 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote: You just have to make choices. I tell you one thing.. If my wife made the money harrys wife does, we would be paid in full in 6 months, not hiding and filing bankruptcy... A. I'm not hiding. B. I'm not filing bankruptcy. C. I earn more than my wife does. You made more than $127,000? Doing what? |
Um..
On Feb 27, 10:55*am, "F.O.A.D." wrote:
On 2/27/13 10:11 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote: *You just have to make choices. I tell you one thing.. If my wife made the money harrys wife does, we would be paid in full in 6 months, not hiding and filing bankruptcy... A. I'm not hiding. B. I'm not filing bankruptcy. C. I earn more than my wife does. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH...BULL-**** !!!!!! |
Um..
On Feb 27, 11:55*am, True North wrote:
On Wednesday, February 27, 2013 12:06:38 PM UTC-4, F.O.A.D. wrote: On 2/27/13 11:00 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote: On 2/27/2013 10:53 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote: On 2/27/13 10:16 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote: *It was nearly 30 years ago I walked into a welfare office and claimed paternity of my 6 month old daughter. They didn't know what to do, had to call the home office:) LOL! So they took "mug" shots, and fingerprints and told me that had never happened before. It took me nearly ten years, but I paid the state back every penny with interest... It was quite an experience and quite frankly, I have never regretted that decision to give my girl, my name... Your business is your business, but why were you subjected to mug shots and fingerprints? Fathering a child, assuming both parents were of age, is not a criminal act. And, if the child was six months old when you claimed paternity, what were you paying back for 10 years? Certainly not six months of state-provided welfare payments. Ok, I'll play, once... Mugshots and fingerprints, because they just didn't know what else to do, they had "never had this happen before" according to them. The huge bill was because my first wife had birth issues, it was all medical.. We never had the child on "welfare" after the birth... We were young and it was her doctor seeing the coming problems, that told us to put the mom on welfare until after the child was born so she would have the best care... We were lucky we did. Fair enough. I wasn't even aware you had a "first wife." You won't read anything from me bringing this up again. Most of us are more concerned about what he does here in this newsgroup than what he may or may not have done 20 or 30 years ago. Besides, he's such a natural born liar that you'd have to hook him up to a polygraph machine before you could believe a word. Put Harrys cock back in your mouth, you have nothing to add...GUMBY. |
Um..
|
Um..
|
Um..
|
Um..
In article ,
says... On 2/27/2013 9:16 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 2/26/2013 7:46 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote: How's that blackmail thingie working out for you? for those of you who don't know.. this (harrys question above) is a further continuation of the blackmail, every time harry asks this question above...That's why he in particular keeps harping on this when there is so much else he could bring up. Those of you who saw the evidence understand how this all realates. The rest, well you just have to decide if you believe me or harry krause... Just sayin'... Asking a question about blackmail is blackmail???? You've lied too many times to be taken seriously. You are just mad cause neither side will fill you in:) You are a liar, plain and simple. Want examples? |
Um..
|
Um..
On Thu, 28 Feb 2013 10:36:36 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says... On Tue, 26 Feb 2013 13:56:39 -0800, Urin Asshole wrote: ****tard 15 year old I have to agree, it would be nice to try to make a point without all of the childish name calling. Maybe he can call me a racist again? |
Um..
|
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:57 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com