![]() |
How to blackmail Tim...
....sneak into wherever his computer is and take photos of his screen
showing he is using either Windows 2.1 or Windows 95 on his 8088-based computer with the three foot deep, 15" green phosphor monitor. Threaten to post photos. Should be worth at least a buck from Tim. :) -- I'm a *Liberal* because I knew the militant christian fundamentalist racist militaristic xenophobic corporate oligarchy wasn't going to work for me. |
How to blackmail Tim...
On Thu, 21 Feb 2013 12:19:59 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote
...sneak into wherever his computer is and take photos of his screen showing he is using either Windows 2.1 or Windows 95 on his 8088-based computer with the three foot deep, 15" green phosphor monitor. Threaten to post photos. Should be worth at least a buck from Tim. :) -- I'm a *Liberal* because I knew the militant christian fundamentalist racist militaristic xenophobic corporate oligarchy wasn't going to work for me. I seem to remember Tim said he was a Luddite and darn proud of it. |
How to blackmail Tim...
On Feb 21, 11:19*am, "F.O.A.D." wrote:
...sneak into wherever his computer is and take photos of his screen showing he is using either Windows 2.1 or Windows 95 on his 8088-based computer with the three foot deep, 15" green phosphor monitor. Threaten to post photos. Should be worth at least a buck from Tim. * :) Actually my computer was built in about 2003 and is loaded with windows 2000 and my monitor is a Compaq FS740 http://images.quebarato.com.mx/T440x...__6DDD94_1.jpg -- No, there's nothing really 'modern' about it. it doesn't even have a cd burner in it. But it's good enough for what I do with it. Somewhere around here I still have a laptop that has AOL 3.0 on it from the early 90's. One thing about ancient monitors is that if it gives me any problems, I go to the local pawnshop and get another for about $5.00 and I'm good to go, again. But I did move into the 21st century a bit. I splurged and got a new printer/scanner. a HP "Officejet J4540 All-in-one" |
How to blackmail Tim...
On Feb 23, 10:32*am, wrote:
On Sat, 23 Feb 2013 08:06:02 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote: On Feb 21, 11:19*am, "F.O.A.D." wrote: ...sneak into wherever his computer is and take photos of his screen showing he is using either Windows 2.1 or Windows 95 on his 8088-based computer with the three foot deep, 15" green phosphor monitor. Threaten to post photos. Should be worth at least a buck from Tim. * :) Actually my computer was built in about 2003 and is loaded with windows 2000 and my monitor *is a Compaq FS740 http://images.quebarato.com.mx/T440x...40+17+como+nue... -- No, there's nothing really 'modern' about it. it doesn't even have a cd burner in it. * But it's good enough for what I do with it. Somewhere around here I still have a laptop that has AOL 3.0 on it from the early 90's. One thing about ancient monitors is that if it gives me any problems, I go to the local pawnshop and get another for about *$5.00 and I'm good to go, again. But I did move into the 21st century a bit. I splurged and got a new printer/scanner. a HP "Officejet J4540 All-in-one" What's wrong with Windoze 98? Just about the time they got all he bugs out they released XP and we are about 100 updates into that. Microsoft is 3 versions of Windoze later (Vista, 7 & 8) and it is all bloated bugware that will be replaced about the time they get it fixed. I take that back, Greg. It is windows XP office edition and not 2000 I have another ancient box that has '96 on it though. I used it on dial-up. might break it back out and take it to the shop for recordkeeping etc. |
How to blackmail Tim...
On 2/23/13 11:06 AM, Tim wrote:
On Feb 21, 11:19 am, "F.O.A.D." wrote: ...sneak into wherever his computer is and take photos of his screen showing he is using either Windows 2.1 or Windows 95 on his 8088-based computer with the three foot deep, 15" green phosphor monitor. Threaten to post photos. Should be worth at least a buck from Tim. :) Actually my computer was built in about 2003 and is loaded with windows 2000 and my monitor is a Compaq FS740 http://images.quebarato.com.mx/T440x...__6DDD94_1.jpg -- No, there's nothing really 'modern' about it. it doesn't even have a cd burner in it. But it's good enough for what I do with it. Somewhere around here I still have a laptop that has AOL 3.0 on it from the early 90's. One thing about ancient monitors is that if it gives me any problems, I go to the local pawnshop and get another for about $5.00 and I'm good to go, again. But I did move into the 21st century a bit. I splurged and got a new printer/scanner. a HP "Officejet J4540 All-in-one" Hey, there. You're lucky your older version of Windoze has a driver that'll run that printer. I think I have one remaining program I rarely use that requires Windoze, though it is possible by now that there is a Mac version. It's just an "updater" utility for my Garmin GPS. I've got an older version of MS Office I'll stick with...there's just nothing in the new versions I need, and I certainly don't need an even more complex word processor with features I'll never use. -- I'm a *Liberal* because I knew the militant christian fundamentalist racist militaristic xenophobic corporate oligarchy wasn't going to work for me. |
How to blackmail Tim...
On Sat, 23 Feb 2013 11:40:28 -0500, BAR wrote:
I miss my old 19" Viewsonic monitor. It was a nice office space heater. === I just gave one away recently in perfect condition. Good monitor but it was taking up way too much space in my office - put it out on the curb and it was gone in hours. |
How to blackmail Tim...
On Feb 23, 10:55*am, "F.O.A.D." wrote:
On 2/23/13 11:06 AM, Tim wrote: On Feb 21, 11:19 am, "F.O.A.D." wrote: ...sneak into wherever his computer is and take photos of his screen showing he is using either Windows 2.1 or Windows 95 on his 8088-based computer with the three foot deep, 15" green phosphor monitor. Threaten to post photos. Should be worth at least a buck from Tim. * :) Actually my computer was built in about 2003 and is loaded with windows 2000 and my monitor *is a Compaq FS740 http://images.quebarato.com.mx/T440x...40+17+como+nue... -- No, there's nothing really 'modern' about it. it doesn't even have a cd burner in it. * But it's good enough for what I do with it. Somewhere around here I still have a laptop that has AOL 3.0 on it from the early 90's. One thing about ancient monitors is that if it gives me any problems, I go to the local pawnshop and get another for about *$5.00 and I'm good to go, again. But I did move into the 21st century a bit. I splurged and got a new printer/scanner. a HP "Officejet J4540 All-in-one" Hey, there. You're lucky your older version of Windoze has a driver that'll run that printer. XP runs it just fine. I doubt the older versions would, though. |
How to blackmail Tim...
On Saturday, 23 February 2013 12:06:02 UTC-4, Tim wrote:
On Feb 21, 11:19*am, "F.O.A.D." wrote: ...sneak into wherever his computer is and take photos of his screen showing he is using either Windows 2.1 or Windows 95 on his 8088-based computer with the three foot deep, 15" green phosphor monitor. Threaten to post photos. Should be worth at least a buck from Tim. * :) Actually my computer was built in about 2003 and is loaded with windows 2000 and my monitor is a Compaq FS740 http://images.quebarato.com.mx/T440x...__6DDD94_1.jpg -- No, there's nothing really 'modern' about it. it doesn't even have a cd burner in it. But it's good enough for what I do with it. Somewhere around here I still have a laptop that has AOL 3.0 on it from the early 90's. One thing about ancient monitors is that if it gives me any problems, I go to the local pawnshop and get another for about $5.00 and I'm good to go, again. But I did move into the 21st century a bit. I splurged and got a new printer/scanner. a HP "Officejet J4540 All-in-one" Good for you... a year and a half ago I purchased an HP Officejet 6500A and the thing works great. Only trouble..i don't print enough and the large ink cartridges are coming up to their 'best before' date. |
How to blackmail Tim...
On 2/23/2013 2:53 PM, True North wrote:
On Saturday, 23 February 2013 12:06:02 UTC-4, Tim wrote: On Feb 21, 11:19 am, "F.O.A.D." wrote: ...sneak into wherever his computer is and take photos of his screen showing he is using either Windows 2.1 or Windows 95 on his 8088-based computer with the three foot deep, 15" green phosphor monitor. Threaten to post photos. Should be worth at least a buck from Tim. :) Actually my computer was built in about 2003 and is loaded with windows 2000 and my monitor is a Compaq FS740 http://images.quebarato.com.mx/T440x...__6DDD94_1.jpg -- No, there's nothing really 'modern' about it. it doesn't even have a cd burner in it. But it's good enough for what I do with it. Somewhere around here I still have a laptop that has AOL 3.0 on it from the early 90's. One thing about ancient monitors is that if it gives me any problems, I go to the local pawnshop and get another for about $5.00 and I'm good to go, again. But I did move into the 21st century a bit. I splurged and got a new printer/scanner. a HP "Officejet J4540 All-in-one" Good for you... a year and a half ago I purchased an HP Officejet 6500A and the thing works great. Only trouble..i don't print enough and the large ink cartridges are coming up to their 'best before' date. Make sure you stop using them before the expire date. Or else. |
How to blackmail Tim...
In article om,
says... On 2/23/2013 2:53 PM, True North wrote: On Saturday, 23 February 2013 12:06:02 UTC-4, Tim wrote: On Feb 21, 11:19 am, "F.O.A.D." wrote: ...sneak into wherever his computer is and take photos of his screen showing he is using either Windows 2.1 or Windows 95 on his 8088-based computer with the three foot deep, 15" green phosphor monitor. Threaten to post photos. Should be worth at least a buck from Tim. :) Actually my computer was built in about 2003 and is loaded with windows 2000 and my monitor is a Compaq FS740 http://images.quebarato.com.mx/T440x...__6DDD94_1.jpg -- No, there's nothing really 'modern' about it. it doesn't even have a cd burner in it. But it's good enough for what I do with it. Somewhere around here I still have a laptop that has AOL 3.0 on it from the early 90's. One thing about ancient monitors is that if it gives me any problems, I go to the local pawnshop and get another for about $5.00 and I'm good to go, again. But I did move into the 21st century a bit. I splurged and got a new printer/scanner. a HP "Officejet J4540 All-in-one" Good for you... a year and a half ago I purchased an HP Officejet 6500A and the thing works great. Only trouble..i don't print enough and the large ink cartridges are coming up to their 'best before' date. Make sure you stop using them before the expire date. Or else. Just buy the under $100 printers and when the cartridges run out of ink just buy a new printer. |
How to blackmail Tim...
On Saturday, 23 February 2013 20:41:55 UTC-4, BAR wrote:
In article om, says... On 2/23/2013 2:53 PM, True North wrote: On Saturday, 23 February 2013 12:06:02 UTC-4, Tim wrote: On Feb 21, 11:19 am, "F.O.A.D." wrote: ...sneak into wherever his computer is and take photos of his screen showing he is using either Windows 2.1 or Windows 95 on his 8088-based computer with the three foot deep, 15" green phosphor monitor. Threaten to post photos. Should be worth at least a buck from Tim. :) Actually my computer was built in about 2003 and is loaded with windows 2000 and my monitor is a Compaq FS740 http://images.quebarato.com.mx/T440x...__6DDD94_1.jpg -- No, there's nothing really 'modern' about it. it doesn't even have a cd burner in it. But it's good enough for what I do with it. Somewhere around here I still have a laptop that has AOL 3.0 on it from the early 90's. One thing about ancient monitors is that if it gives me any problems, I go to the local pawnshop and get another for about $5.00 and I'm good to go, again. But I did move into the 21st century a bit. I splurged and got a new printer/scanner. a HP "Officejet J4540 All-in-one" Good for you... a year and a half ago I purchased an HP Officejet 6500A and the thing works great. Only trouble..i don't print enough and the large ink cartridges are coming up to their 'best before' date. Make sure you stop using them before the expire date. Or else. Just buy the under $100 printers and when the cartridges run out of ink just buy a new printer. That's a great idea... fill the landfills with the old ones. |
How to blackmail Tim...
|
How to blackmail Tim...
On 2/24/13 9:25 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says... On Sat, 23 Feb 2013 19:41:55 -0500, BAR wrote: In article om, says... Make sure you stop using them before the expire date. Or else. Just buy the under $100 printers and when the cartridges run out of ink just buy a new printer. The problem is, a "new printer" cartridge is less than half full. Jet printers are made to sell ink and they only start you out with enough to tease you. If you really do much printing, get a laser. Or refill your own. Pretty good low volume laser printers are available these days for about $100, and, compared to inkjet printers, you can get a lot more copies out of a laser cartridge. Plus, there are plenty of third-party suppliers of good quality refilled laser cartridges. I still think that for print quality of text on paper, laser printers are the best. |
How to blackmail Tim...
On Feb 23, 9:24*pm, wrote:
On Sat, 23 Feb 2013 19:41:55 -0500, BAR wrote: In article om, The problem is, a "new printer" cartridge is less than half full. Jet printers are made to sell ink and they only start you out with enough to tease you. If you really do much printing, get a laser. http://www.guardian.co.uk/money/2013...e-getting-less |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:59 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com