|
How to give insecure right-wing males the sh*ts...
On Sat, 02 Feb 2013 21:26:21 -0500, wrote:
On Sat, 02 Feb 2013 21:08:45 -0500, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote: On 2/2/2013 8:13 PM, wrote: On Sat, 02 Feb 2013 11:58:33 -0500, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote: On 2/2/2013 11:52 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 2/2/2013 10:30 AM, ESAD wrote: http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature...v=r0Be8LnuG3U#! Be careful.. While you are burying your head in the sand pro choice, pro gay rights conservatives are popping up all around you, we are more libertarian than right. We are everywhere, democrats are fuked... Oh, cool, I didn't know you were were pro gay rights. Let the marriages begin! You didn't know, because you just assume and argue.. Next time try listening... But just to **** you off I will tell you that I support gay rights, BECAUSE I am a Christian, not because I personally approve. How can you adopt such a position, when the Mormon church has clearly stated that acting upon same-sex attraction is a sin. How can you be so stupid? I told you my position, I do not speak for the Mormon Church. “What we do know is that the doctrine of the church – that sexual activity should only occur between a man and a woman who are married – has not changed and is not changing,” (Elder Quentin Cook) C'mon, name calling? You've made it clear that you are Mormon, yet you don't believe that you should follow the Mormon teachings. That is about as confusing as an atheist that believes in God. And your response is name calling. Why try to interject your feelings for religion into whether or not gays should have equal rights as non-gays. Civil rights are civil rights. The Constitution doesn't distinguish between gays and non-gays, both are entitled to the same protection under the law. That is not a religious issue. However, gays who are 'unionized' are *not* living a 'marriage'. Meriam-Webster has it correct in their primary definition: Definition of MARRIAGE 1 a (1) : the state of being united to a person of the opposite sex as husband or wife in a consensual and contractual relationship recognized by law ....all rest is designed to appease the liberals. Salmonbait -- 'Name-calling'...the liberals' answer to a lost argument! You know you live in a Country run by idiots if... You have to have your parents signature to go on a school field trip but not to get an abortion. |
How to give insecure right-wing males the sh*ts...
On 2/4/13 9:14 AM, Salmonbait wrote:
However, gays who are 'unionized' are *not* living a 'marriage'. Meriam-Webster has it correct in their primary definition: Definition of MARRIAGE 1 a (1) : the state of being united to a person of the opposite sex as husband or wife in a consensual and contractual relationship recognized by law You are in no position by education or experience to determine the validity of the definitions of words. And if you are going to "cite" a dictionary, you might at least spell its name correctly. *Meriam*-Webster, indeed. George and Charles Merriam are rolling in their graves. |
How to give insecure right-wing males the sh*ts...
On 2/4/2013 9:22 AM, ESAD wrote:
On 2/4/13 9:14 AM, Salmonbait wrote: However, gays who are 'unionized' are *not* living a 'marriage'. Meriam-Webster has it correct in their primary definition: Definition of MARRIAGE 1 a (1) : the state of being united to a person of the opposite sex as husband or wife in a consensual and contractual relationship recognized by law You are in no position by education or experience to determine the validity of the definitions of words. And if you are going to "cite" a dictionary, you might at least spell its name correctly. *Meriam*-Webster, indeed. George and Charles Merriam are rolling in their graves. So, old wise one, are you conceding that Merriam's definition of the word marriage is valid? The whole world is waiting for your proclamation. ;-) |
How to give insecure right-wing males the sh*ts...
|
How to give insecure right-wing males the sh*ts...
|
How to give insecure right-wing males the sh*ts...
|
How to give insecure right-wing males the sh*ts...
On 2/4/2013 10:06 AM, ESAD wrote:
On 2/4/13 10:02 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 2/4/13 9:14 AM, Salmonbait wrote: However, gays who are 'unionized' are *not* living a 'marriage'. Meriam-Webster has it correct in their primary definition: Definition of MARRIAGE 1 a (1) : the state of being united to a person of the opposite sex as husband or wife in a consensual and contractual relationship recognized by law You are in no position by education or experience to determine the validity of the definitions of words. And if you are going to "cite" a dictionary, you might at least spell its name correctly. *Meriam*-Webster, indeed. George and Charles Merriam are rolling in their graves. Didn't have the balls to post the WHOLE definition, which is: mar·riage noun \'mer-ij, 'ma-rij\ Definition of MARRIAGE 1 a (1) : the state of being united to a person of the opposite sex as husband or wife in a consensual and contractual relationship recognized by law (2) : the state of being united to a person of the same sex in a relationship like that of a traditional marriage same-sex marriage b : the mutual relation of married persons : wedlock c : the institution whereby individuals are joined in a marriage 2 : an act of marrying or the rite by which the married status is effected; especially : the wedding ceremony and attendant festivities or formalities 3 : an intimate or close union the marriage of painting and poetry ? J. T. Shawcross Herring's offering is not even a definition from a recognized unabridged dictionary. It's a universally accepted definition. However, a few corn holers and progressives might take exception to it. |
How to give insecure right-wing males the sh*ts...
In article m,
says... On 2/4/2013 10:06 AM, ESAD wrote: On 2/4/13 10:02 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 2/4/13 9:14 AM, Salmonbait wrote: However, gays who are 'unionized' are *not* living a 'marriage'. Meriam-Webster has it correct in their primary definition: Definition of MARRIAGE 1 a (1) : the state of being united to a person of the opposite sex as husband or wife in a consensual and contractual relationship recognized by law You are in no position by education or experience to determine the validity of the definitions of words. And if you are going to "cite" a dictionary, you might at least spell its name correctly. *Meriam*-Webster, indeed. George and Charles Merriam are rolling in their graves. Didn't have the balls to post the WHOLE definition, which is: mar·riage noun \'mer-ij, 'ma-rij\ Definition of MARRIAGE 1 a (1) : the state of being united to a person of the opposite sex as husband or wife in a consensual and contractual relationship recognized by law (2) : the state of being united to a person of the same sex in a relationship like that of a traditional marriage same-sex marriage b : the mutual relation of married persons : wedlock c : the institution whereby individuals are joined in a marriage 2 : an act of marrying or the rite by which the married status is effected; especially : the wedding ceremony and attendant festivities or formalities 3 : an intimate or close union the marriage of painting and poetry ? J. T. Shawcross Herring's offering is not even a definition from a recognized unabridged dictionary. It's a universally accepted definition. However, a few corn holers and progressives might take exception to it. "corn holers" because they believe a dictionary over Herring?? |
How to give insecure right-wing males the sh*ts...
On 2/2/2013 10:47 AM, ESAD wrote:
Gays don't try to force non-gay members of society to conform to their practices or beliefs. Gays don't try to force "creationism" and other "stuporstitious" beliefs onto gullible school children. The ones in the priesthood certainly have. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:27 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com