On 1/31/2013 8:31 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

On 1/30/2013 4:47 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

On 1/30/2013 1:15 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

On 1/30/2013 12:54 PM, ESAD wrote:
On 1/30/13 12:41 PM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
Quite frankly, this is what I am talking about. Resistance of any kind
usually stops mass killings, in their tracks. Notice this guard never
had to fire her weapon.. I understand she is very brave, but based on
everything we know about these cowards, most could be held at bay, from
good cover too... I don't give a **** what loogie or harry say, this
proves I was right, period...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DEDEi8ZZ--E

This guard stopped this man for 10 minutes until swat came and shot
him...

Nuff, said...



It doesn't prove anything, Mr. Science.

It absolutely proves my idea of hiring trained police officer to work in
the system, will and does work, period..

Again, dip****, what if that guard was at the other end of the school?
And, Mr. Theoretical Science, how does one instance "prove" that it
works?

The it might not have worked in this case, so is the one principals life
saved that day, and the possiblity of who knows how many others not
worth the risk that "the guard will be on the other end of the school"..
To me it is..

I guess in your stupid mind, problem solved, eh? Idiot.


It works, it worked, I proved it works.. I was right, period!

You stupid moron!!! Have you ever taken a science class? A statistics
class? Studied anything about probabilities? Here's your stupid,
uninformed analogy. It worked once, so that means it will always work
and the problem is solved. Again, if I was as stupid as you, I could
flip a penny ONE TIME, when it lands on, say, heads, I would then, just
like you, say, okay, it landed on heads, that means that when you flip a
coin, it lands on heads. Idiot.


So do the research, and I mean you do it, and show me the instance where
it didn't slow a shooter down... I got time?