bullies...
 

On 1/29/2013 2:55 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 29 Jan 2013 14:27:56 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Tue, 29 Jan 2013 11:43:41 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:




And the dumb little **** is wrong, there are laws against harassment.

Therein lies the question. When does lawful protest become harassment?
Would you feel the same way if these were "occupy" people asking about
Bloombergs financial holdings and fiscal policies?

Uh, they weren't asking, they were harassing.

... and the "occupy" people weren't?



The occupy people were raping, killing, and selling dope...

bullies...
 

In article ,
says...

On Tue, 29 Jan 2013 14:27:56 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Tue, 29 Jan 2013 11:43:41 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:




And the dumb little **** is wrong, there are laws against harassment.

Therein lies the question. When does lawful protest become harassment?
Would you feel the same way if these were "occupy" people asking about
Bloombergs financial holdings and fiscal policies?

Uh, they weren't asking, they were harassing.

... and the "occupy" people weren't?

I'm sure some were, and I'm sure some weren't. Why do you ask? What I
said was that Scotty said the people he was yapping about did nothing
illegal, and that is wrong.

bullies...
 

On 1/29/13 4:19 PM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 1/29/2013 2:55 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 29 Jan 2013 14:27:56 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Tue, 29 Jan 2013 11:43:41 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:




And the dumb little **** is wrong, there are laws against harassment.

Therein lies the question. When does lawful protest become harassment?
Would you feel the same way if these were "occupy" people asking about
Bloombergs financial holdings and fiscal policies?

Uh, they weren't asking, they were harassing.

... and the "occupy" people weren't?



The occupy people were raping, killing, and selling dope...


I know thinking things through is difficult for you, but you started
this thread by whining about someone harassing the mayor of new york,
then you said it was ok because the 2nd amendment allowed it, then you
went off on another bat**** crazy tangent elsewhere about how I was
about to "reveal" something about you, and now you are raving about "the
occupy people."

You need to ask your doctor to adjust your psychotropic drugs, eh...

bullies...
 

On 1/29/2013 4:33 PM, ESAD wrote:

then you said it was ok because the 2nd amendment allowed it,

Never, ever said anything even remotely like that..

bullies...
 

On 1/29/2013 4:31 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

On Tue, 29 Jan 2013 14:27:56 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Tue, 29 Jan 2013 11:43:41 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:




And the dumb little **** is wrong, there are laws against harassment.

Therein lies the question. When does lawful protest become harassment?
Would you feel the same way if these were "occupy" people asking about
Bloombergs financial holdings and fiscal policies?

Uh, they weren't asking, they were harassing.

... and the "occupy" people weren't?

I'm sure some were, and I'm sure some weren't. Why do you ask? What I
said was that Scotty said the people he was yapping about did nothing
illegal, and that is wrong.


Cite, cause nobody got arrested? OH, I get it, another lie...

bullies...
 

On 1/29/13 6:04 PM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 1/29/2013 4:33 PM, ESAD wrote:

then you said it was ok because the 2nd amendment allowed it,

Never, ever said anything even remotely like that..


Yeah, you did...and what was the rest of the craziness, that part you
deleted from my post? You know,

"... then you went off on another bat**** crazy tangent elsewhere about
how I was about to "reveal" something about you..."

What's that all about? Hallucinations on your part?

bullies...
 

On 1/29/2013 6:08 PM, ESAD wrote:
On 1/29/13 6:04 PM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 1/29/2013 4:33 PM, ESAD wrote:

then you said it was ok because the 2nd amendment allowed it,

Never, ever said anything even remotely like that..


Yeah, you did...and what was the rest of the craziness, that part you
deleted from my post? You know,

"... then you went off on another bat**** crazy tangent elsewhere about
how I was about to "reveal" something about you..."

What's that all about? Hallucinations on your part?

Nope, never said it, but do get hysterical, it's funny...

bullies...
 

On 1/29/13 6:09 PM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 1/29/2013 6:08 PM, ESAD wrote:
On 1/29/13 6:04 PM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 1/29/2013 4:33 PM, ESAD wrote:

then you said it was ok because the 2nd amendment allowed it,

Never, ever said anything even remotely like that..


Yeah, you did...and what was the rest of the craziness, that part you
deleted from my post? You know,

"... then you went off on another bat**** crazy tangent elsewhere about
how I was about to "reveal" something about you..."

What's that all about? Hallucinations on your part?

Nope, never said it, but do get hysterical, it's funny...


Liar.

bullies...
 

On 1/29/13 6:14 PM, ESAD wrote:
On 1/29/13 6:09 PM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 1/29/2013 6:08 PM, ESAD wrote:
On 1/29/13 6:04 PM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 1/29/2013 4:33 PM, ESAD wrote:

then you said it was ok because the 2nd amendment allowed it,

Never, ever said anything even remotely like that..


Yeah, you did...and what was the rest of the craziness, that part you
deleted from my post? You know,

"... then you went off on another bat**** crazy tangent elsewhere about
how I was about to "reveal" something about you..."

What's that all about? Hallucinations on your part?

Nope, never said it, but do get hysterical, it's funny...


Liar.


Ooooh...Snotty's lost another round, having been reduced to insulting
those who don't post here. What a cowardly little turd you are.

Hey, you are getting ready to do the same thing... what are you
waiting for?

In that phrase you are accusing me of "getting ready" to insultsomeone
apparently known to you who doesn't post here.

What did you have in mind?

bullies...
 

In article ,
says...

On 1/29/2013 2:55 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 29 Jan 2013 14:27:56 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Tue, 29 Jan 2013 11:43:41 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:




And the dumb little **** is wrong, there are laws against harassment.

Therein lies the question. When does lawful protest become harassment?
Would you feel the same way if these were "occupy" people asking about
Bloombergs financial holdings and fiscal policies?

Uh, they weren't asking, they were harassing.

... and the "occupy" people weren't?



The occupy people were raping, killing, and selling dope...

And got charged as such.