On 1/28/2013 12:20 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 28 Jan 2013 10:21:52 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On 1/28/2013 1:41 AM, wrote:
On Mon, 28 Jan 2013 00:29:07 -0500, JustWaitAFrekinMinute
wrote:



I doubt that is the case at all. The bitch is smart and well funded. I
bet each and every gun was carefully chosen to nip a little further down
the "slippery slope" in some direction...

It is just to make a big splash. The list seems to be based on
cosmetics more than function.
The effect of these things seems to be to sell more guns to people
with no particular use for them so it is definitely a failed policy.

She gets most of her money from lawyers. (over $3 million since 1998)
but we don't know who they represent. Probably more than a few work
for "ring of fire" pistol companies in California who make cheap
handguns that avoided the list.


A lot of her money comes from her husbands heavy weapons sale too...

Cite?

The vulture capital company he runs has a big chunk of E,G&G, a
Raytheon partner. Those guys sell "heavy weapons" to the government.
Every time we kill a goat herder in Afghanistan with a Hellfire
missile, Feinstein gets a taste.


You need to learn the language of "loogie"..

Cite = "I know you are right, and I can't argue that."

In article ,
says...

On Mon, 28 Jan 2013 10:21:52 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On 1/28/2013 1:41 AM, wrote:
On Mon, 28 Jan 2013 00:29:07 -0500, JustWaitAFrekinMinute
wrote:



I doubt that is the case at all. The bitch is smart and well funded. I
bet each and every gun was carefully chosen to nip a little further down
the "slippery slope" in some direction...

It is just to make a big splash. The list seems to be based on
cosmetics more than function.
The effect of these things seems to be to sell more guns to people
with no particular use for them so it is definitely a failed policy.

She gets most of her money from lawyers. (over $3 million since 1998)
but we don't know who they represent. Probably more than a few work
for "ring of fire" pistol companies in California who make cheap
handguns that avoided the list.


A lot of her money comes from her husbands heavy weapons sale too...

Cite?

The vulture capital company he runs has a big chunk of E,G&G, a
Raytheon partner. Those guys sell "heavy weapons" to the government.
Every time we kill a goat herder in Afghanistan with a Hellfire
missile, Feinstein gets a taste.

Cite?

On Jan 28, 12:41*am, wrote:
On Mon, 28 Jan 2013 00:29:07 -0500, JustWaitAFrekinMinute

wrote:
I doubt that is the case at all. The bitch is smart and well funded. I
bet each and every gun was carefully chosen to nip a little further down
the "slippery slope" in some direction...

It is just to make a big splash. The list seems to be based on
cosmetics more than function.
The effect of these things seems to be to sell more guns to people
with no particular use for them so it is definitely a failed policy.

She gets most of her money from lawyers. (over $3 million since 1998)
but we don't know who they represent. Probably more than a few work
for "ring of fire" pistol companies in California who make cheap
handguns that avoided the list.

"Ring of fire" Ah! the notorious Raven .25. One of the original
Saturday Night Specials, along with their sister companies.

Hey. $60 bucks for a pistol?

On 1/29/2013 10:05 PM, Tim wrote:
On Jan 28, 12:41 am, wrote:
On Mon, 28 Jan 2013 00:29:07 -0500, JustWaitAFrekinMinute

wrote:
I doubt that is the case at all. The bitch is smart and well funded. I
bet each and every gun was carefully chosen to nip a little further down
the "slippery slope" in some direction...

It is just to make a big splash. The list seems to be based on
cosmetics more than function.
The effect of these things seems to be to sell more guns to people
with no particular use for them so it is definitely a failed policy.

She gets most of her money from lawyers. (over $3 million since 1998)
but we don't know who they represent. Probably more than a few work
for "ring of fire" pistol companies in California who make cheap
handguns that avoided the list.

"Ring of fire" Ah! the notorious Raven .25. One of the original
Saturday Night Specials, along with their sister companies.

Hey. $60 bucks for a pistol?


I was gifted one of these years ago. Beautiful little kit with
accessories and stuff. A farmer bud of mine was gonna' shoot it with me
but after talking with him for a while, I just gave it to him to keep in
his garage/barn.

http://www.pooshka.com/a.php?aid=11904

Never fired it, I hear he fires here and there for fun at the farm.

In article ,
says...

On Sun, 27 Jan 2013 16:49:39 -0500, ESAD wrote:

On 1/27/13 1:57 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 27 Jan 2013 13:06:51 -0500, Salmonbait
wrote:

...doesn't mention silencers or flash suppressors, or did I miss something?

http://tinyurl.com/a883sb7


Salmonbait

As usual from this gun dumb bimbo

Please. She's neither dumb nor a bimbo. You're simply on different
sides. It's not like she's crazy like Wayne LaPierre.

She doesn't seem to know much about the guns she wants to ban.

Probably not. It doesn't take an expert to see that we have a huge gun
violence problem in the U.S. though.


Does one have to be an expert in nuclear fusion to know that a
thermonuclear bomb kills a lot of innocent people when used.

In article ,
says...

On Mon, 28 Jan 2013 10:21:21 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...


She doesn't seem to know much about the guns she wants to ban.

Probably not. It doesn't take an expert to see that we have a huge gun
violence problem in the U.S. though.

But this is handgun violence, not rifles, assault or otherwise.
Twice as many people were killed by people with their bare hands than
people with a rifle and you think "unarmed" people are harmless.

Where did I say that I think unarmed people are harmless?? But, please
give cite to that notion about twice as many people killed with "bare
hands than people with a rifle"... How about school aged children?

This legislation is as cosmetic as the features on the guns they want
to ban. The reality is it will sell MORE guns.

And silencers, don't forget those, the NRA wants them to keep children's
hearing loss at bay!!



Does one have to be an expert in nuclear fusion to know that a
thermonuclear bomb kills a lot of innocent people when used.

... yet even in the only war where they were used, the conventional
air raids killed a lot more people in the same length of time.
The fire bombing of Tokyo 9-10 March 1945 was far more deadly than
Hiroshima or Nagasaki..

So?

In article ,
says...

On Mon, 28 Jan 2013 12:53:29 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:

here did I say that I think unarmed people are harmless??

Trayvonn Martin

Cite?

In article ,
says...

On Mon, 28 Jan 2013 16:19:10 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Mon, 28 Jan 2013 12:53:29 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:

here did I say that I think unarmed people are harmless??

Trayvonn Martin

Cite?

How many times did you write that Martin was only armed with Iced Tea
and Skittles?

Several, why? You said that *I* said that "unarmed people are harmless",
that is bull**** and a lie.