|
Feinstein's list of banned guns...
On 1/30/2013 8:17 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 30 Jan 2013 11:43:14 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 30 Jan 2013 09:05:20 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: In article , . I think...if I were lying on the sidewalk getting my head pounded thereon like he did, I'd be very tempted to shoot the asshole doing the pounding regardless of his clothes and race. Salmonbait Please prove that that's the way that it all happened. How do you think he got the cuts on his head and the broken nose? I asked for proof, not speculation. Besides, his nose wasn't broken. Even if you said Martin was acting in self defense when he punched Zimmerman, getting on top of him and beating him (as reported by witnesses) is still aggravated assault. Let's see, a man with a gun, in the night accosting a kid and the kid isn't supposed to do anything? Cite that Who has ever said Zimmerman approached Martin, besides people 1000-3000 miles away on TV? Nobody, it's not a question, it's a lie he is telling... |
Feinstein's list of banned guns...
|
Feinstein's list of banned guns...
In article ,
says... On Wed, 30 Jan 2013 12:54:05 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... Invalid premise HOW, dip****? Zimmerman took after the kid, did you happen to hear, and thus understand the 911 tapes??? What is wrong with making correct and true statements again? Nobody who was there has ever said anything but that Zimmerman was following Martin and that he had lost sight of him until Martin approached Zimmerman., Everyone else is only guessing. Zimmerman took after the kid. Period. |
Feinstein's list of banned guns...
In article ,
says... On 1/30/2013 8:21 PM, wrote: On Wed, 30 Jan 2013 12:54:05 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... Invalid premise HOW, dip****? Zimmerman took after the kid, did you happen to hear, and thus understand the 911 tapes??? What is wrong with making correct and true statements again? Nobody who was there has ever said anything but that Zimmerman was following Martin and that he had lost sight of him until Martin approached Zimmerman., Everyone else is only guessing. MY point proven again.. this is getting old. Words have meaning, "accosted" was used in this case to deliberately set a false narrative that thinking folks just shouldn't stipulate to. There is no evidence, or even credible suggestion that Zimmerman "accosted" Martin, it's a lie, it's a loogism.. Period. He was "accosted" by Zimmerman, Zimmerman is heard on the 911 tapes saying he is going to follow him. |
Feinstein's list of banned guns...
In article ,
says... On 1/30/2013 8:17 PM, wrote: On Wed, 30 Jan 2013 11:43:14 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 30 Jan 2013 09:05:20 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: In article , . I think...if I were lying on the sidewalk getting my head pounded thereon like he did, I'd be very tempted to shoot the asshole doing the pounding regardless of his clothes and race. Salmonbait Please prove that that's the way that it all happened. How do you think he got the cuts on his head and the broken nose? I asked for proof, not speculation. Besides, his nose wasn't broken. Even if you said Martin was acting in self defense when he punched Zimmerman, getting on top of him and beating him (as reported by witnesses) is still aggravated assault. Let's see, a man with a gun, in the night accosting a kid and the kid isn't supposed to do anything? Cite that Who has ever said Zimmerman approached Martin, besides people 1000-3000 miles away on TV? Nobody, it's not a question, it's a lie he is telling... The 911 tapes and Zimmerman's own words. THIS map tells the story, Zimmerman cut through directly confronted Martin. http://bcclist.files.wordpress.com/2...martin-george- zimmerman-path.jpg |
Feinstein's list of banned guns...
In article ,
says... On Wed, 30 Jan 2013 12:54:05 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... Invalid premise HOW, dip****? Zimmerman took after the kid, did you happen to hear, and thus understand the 911 tapes??? What is wrong with making correct and true statements again? Nobody who was there has ever said anything but that Zimmerman was following Martin and that he had lost sight of him until Martin approached Zimmerman., Everyone else is only guessing. Here's some interesting reading: http://bcclist.com/2012/03/27/trayvo...zimmerman-map/ |
Feinstein's list of banned guns...
On 1/31/2013 8:34 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says... On 1/30/2013 8:21 PM, wrote: On Wed, 30 Jan 2013 12:54:05 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... Invalid premise HOW, dip****? Zimmerman took after the kid, did you happen to hear, and thus understand the 911 tapes??? What is wrong with making correct and true statements again? Nobody who was there has ever said anything but that Zimmerman was following Martin and that he had lost sight of him until Martin approached Zimmerman., Everyone else is only guessing. MY point proven again.. this is getting old. Words have meaning, "accosted" was used in this case to deliberately set a false narrative that thinking folks just shouldn't stipulate to. There is no evidence, or even credible suggestion that Zimmerman "accosted" Martin, it's a lie, it's a loogism.. Period. He was "accosted" by Zimmerman, No he wasn't, not one piece of evidenct to prove that. Words have meaning, at most he was watched by Zimmerman... Zimmerman is heard on the 911 tapes saying he is going to follow him. |
Feinstein's list of banned guns...
On 1/31/2013 8:33 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says... On Wed, 30 Jan 2013 12:54:05 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... Invalid premise HOW, dip****? Zimmerman took after the kid, did you happen to hear, and thus understand the 911 tapes??? What is wrong with making correct and true statements again? Nobody who was there has ever said anything but that Zimmerman was following Martin and that he had lost sight of him until Martin approached Zimmerman., Everyone else is only guessing. Zimmerman took after the kid. Period. "Took after"? Are you backing off of your "accosted"? Did you finally look the word up? |
Feinstein's list of banned guns...
In article ,
says... On 1/31/2013 8:33 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 30 Jan 2013 12:54:05 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... Invalid premise HOW, dip****? Zimmerman took after the kid, did you happen to hear, and thus understand the 911 tapes??? What is wrong with making correct and true statements again? Nobody who was there has ever said anything but that Zimmerman was following Martin and that he had lost sight of him until Martin approached Zimmerman., Everyone else is only guessing. Zimmerman took after the kid. Period. "Took after"? Are you backing off of your "accosted"? Did you finally look the word up? You stupid little ****, they are synonyms!!!! |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:07 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com