|
Feinstein's list of banned guns...
On Jan 27, 12:31*pm, wrote:
On Sun, 27 Jan 2013 13:06:51 -0500, Salmonbait wrote: ...doesn't mention silencers or flash suppressors, or did I miss something? http://tinyurl.com/a883sb7 Salmonbait She gets around it with the "threaded barrel" language. This is from the text of the bill ‘‘(47) The term ‘threaded barrel’ means a feature or *characteristic that is designed in such a manner to allow for the attachment of a device such as a firearm silencer or a flash suppressor. That could also limit shotguns that were designed with a 'poly-choke' - Because the barrel is threaded, you unscrew the 'choke' and can screw something else back on... http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v6...polychkopn.jpg |
Feinstein's list of banned guns...
On Jan 28, 12:41*am, wrote:
On Mon, 28 Jan 2013 00:29:07 -0500, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote: I doubt that is the case at all. The bitch is smart and well funded. I bet each and every gun was carefully chosen to nip a little further down the "slippery slope" in some direction... It is just to make a big splash. The list seems to be based on cosmetics more than function. The effect of these things seems to be to sell more guns to people with no particular use for them so it is definitely a failed policy. She gets most of her money from lawyers. (over $3 million since 1998) but we don't know who they represent. Probably more than a few work for "ring of fire" pistol companies in California who make cheap handguns that avoided the list. "Ring of fire" Ah! the notorious Raven .25. One of the original Saturday Night Specials, along with their sister companies. Hey. $60 bucks for a pistol? |
Feinstein's list of banned guns...
On 1/29/2013 10:05 PM, Tim wrote:
On Jan 28, 12:41 am, wrote: On Mon, 28 Jan 2013 00:29:07 -0500, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote: I doubt that is the case at all. The bitch is smart and well funded. I bet each and every gun was carefully chosen to nip a little further down the "slippery slope" in some direction... It is just to make a big splash. The list seems to be based on cosmetics more than function. The effect of these things seems to be to sell more guns to people with no particular use for them so it is definitely a failed policy. She gets most of her money from lawyers. (over $3 million since 1998) but we don't know who they represent. Probably more than a few work for "ring of fire" pistol companies in California who make cheap handguns that avoided the list. "Ring of fire" Ah! the notorious Raven .25. One of the original Saturday Night Specials, along with their sister companies. Hey. $60 bucks for a pistol? I was gifted one of these years ago. Beautiful little kit with accessories and stuff. A farmer bud of mine was gonna' shoot it with me but after talking with him for a while, I just gave it to him to keep in his garage/barn. http://www.pooshka.com/a.php?aid=11904 Never fired it, I hear he fires here and there for fun at the farm. |
Feinstein's list of banned guns...
In article ,
says... On Tue, 29 Jan 2013 17:11:00 -0500, Meyer wrote: On 1/29/2013 5:05 PM, Salmonbait wrote: On Tue, 29 Jan 2013 14:58:57 -0500, wrote: On Tue, 29 Jan 2013 14:19:53 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: In article , I really do not feel like digging through a couple hundred Trayvon Martin posts for quotes but it is encouraging that now you agree Trayvon did present a credible threat of bodily harm. We are making progress. Right.... Yes I am Show me. OK http://www.theblaze.com/wp-content/u...ot-620x410.jpg http://www.theblaze.com/wp-content/u...immerman-6.jpg Wow! You've got the boy doing some fancy tap-dancing! Salmonbait -- 'Name-calling'...the liberals' answer to a lost argument! Could have been a lot worse for poor Zimmerman if he didn't happen to have his trusty Kel Tec 9mm close at hand. I think...if I were lying on the sidewalk getting my head pounded thereon like he did, I'd be very tempted to shoot the asshole doing the pounding regardless of his clothes and race. Salmonbait Please prove that that's the way that it all happened. |
Feinstein's list of banned guns...
|
Feinstein's list of banned guns...
|
Feinstein's list of banned guns...
In article ,
says... On Wed, 30 Jan 2013 09:42:23 -0500, wrote: On Wed, 30 Jan 2013 09:05:20 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: In article , . I think...if I were lying on the sidewalk getting my head pounded thereon like he did, I'd be very tempted to shoot the asshole doing the pounding regardless of his clothes and race. Salmonbait Please prove that that's the way that it all happened. How do you think he got the cuts on his head and the broken nose? Even if you said Martin was acting in self defense when he punched Zimmerman, getting on top of him and beating him (as reported by witnesses) is still aggravated assault. Thanks. It's more fun to watch you make him do the tappin' than to put up with his antics. Salmonbait You stupid old fool, who's tap dancing? How do you automatically presume Martin was in the wrong? |
Feinstein's list of banned guns...
On 1/30/2013 11:43 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says... On Wed, 30 Jan 2013 09:05:20 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: In article , . I think...if I were lying on the sidewalk getting my head pounded thereon like he did, I'd be very tempted to shoot the asshole doing the pounding regardless of his clothes and race. Salmonbait Please prove that that's the way that it all happened. How do you think he got the cuts on his head and the broken nose? I asked for proof, not speculation. Besides, his nose wasn't broken. Even if you said Martin was acting in self defense when he punched Zimmerman, getting on top of him and beating him (as reported by witnesses) is still aggravated assault. Let's see, a man with a gun, in the night accosting Invalid premise.. thus, invalid question. Please try to refrain from making statements, in your questions... a kid and the kid isn't supposed to do anything? |
Feinstein's list of banned guns...
In article ,
says... On 1/30/2013 11:43 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 30 Jan 2013 09:05:20 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: In article , . I think...if I were lying on the sidewalk getting my head pounded thereon like he did, I'd be very tempted to shoot the asshole doing the pounding regardless of his clothes and race. Salmonbait Please prove that that's the way that it all happened. How do you think he got the cuts on his head and the broken nose? I asked for proof, not speculation. Besides, his nose wasn't broken. Even if you said Martin was acting in self defense when he punched Zimmerman, getting on top of him and beating him (as reported by witnesses) is still aggravated assault. Let's see, a man with a gun, in the night accosting Invalid premise.. thus, invalid question. Please try to refrain from making statements, in your questions... Invalid premise HOW, dip****? Zimmerman took after the kid, did you happen to hear, and thus understand the 911 tapes??? What is wrong with making correct and true statements again? |
Feinstein's list of banned guns...
On 1/30/2013 8:21 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 30 Jan 2013 12:54:05 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... Invalid premise HOW, dip****? Zimmerman took after the kid, did you happen to hear, and thus understand the 911 tapes??? What is wrong with making correct and true statements again? Nobody who was there has ever said anything but that Zimmerman was following Martin and that he had lost sight of him until Martin approached Zimmerman., Everyone else is only guessing. MY point proven again.. this is getting old. Words have meaning, "accosted" was used in this case to deliberately set a false narrative that thinking folks just shouldn't stipulate to. There is no evidence, or even credible suggestion that Zimmerman "accosted" Martin, it's a lie, it's a loogism.. Period. |
Feinstein's list of banned guns...
On 1/30/2013 8:17 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 30 Jan 2013 11:43:14 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 30 Jan 2013 09:05:20 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: In article , . I think...if I were lying on the sidewalk getting my head pounded thereon like he did, I'd be very tempted to shoot the asshole doing the pounding regardless of his clothes and race. Salmonbait Please prove that that's the way that it all happened. How do you think he got the cuts on his head and the broken nose? I asked for proof, not speculation. Besides, his nose wasn't broken. Even if you said Martin was acting in self defense when he punched Zimmerman, getting on top of him and beating him (as reported by witnesses) is still aggravated assault. Let's see, a man with a gun, in the night accosting a kid and the kid isn't supposed to do anything? Cite that Who has ever said Zimmerman approached Martin, besides people 1000-3000 miles away on TV? Nobody, it's not a question, it's a lie he is telling... |
Feinstein's list of banned guns...
|
Feinstein's list of banned guns...
In article ,
says... On Wed, 30 Jan 2013 12:54:05 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... Invalid premise HOW, dip****? Zimmerman took after the kid, did you happen to hear, and thus understand the 911 tapes??? What is wrong with making correct and true statements again? Nobody who was there has ever said anything but that Zimmerman was following Martin and that he had lost sight of him until Martin approached Zimmerman., Everyone else is only guessing. Zimmerman took after the kid. Period. |
Feinstein's list of banned guns...
In article ,
says... On 1/30/2013 8:21 PM, wrote: On Wed, 30 Jan 2013 12:54:05 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... Invalid premise HOW, dip****? Zimmerman took after the kid, did you happen to hear, and thus understand the 911 tapes??? What is wrong with making correct and true statements again? Nobody who was there has ever said anything but that Zimmerman was following Martin and that he had lost sight of him until Martin approached Zimmerman., Everyone else is only guessing. MY point proven again.. this is getting old. Words have meaning, "accosted" was used in this case to deliberately set a false narrative that thinking folks just shouldn't stipulate to. There is no evidence, or even credible suggestion that Zimmerman "accosted" Martin, it's a lie, it's a loogism.. Period. He was "accosted" by Zimmerman, Zimmerman is heard on the 911 tapes saying he is going to follow him. |
Feinstein's list of banned guns...
In article ,
says... On 1/30/2013 8:17 PM, wrote: On Wed, 30 Jan 2013 11:43:14 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 30 Jan 2013 09:05:20 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: In article , . I think...if I were lying on the sidewalk getting my head pounded thereon like he did, I'd be very tempted to shoot the asshole doing the pounding regardless of his clothes and race. Salmonbait Please prove that that's the way that it all happened. How do you think he got the cuts on his head and the broken nose? I asked for proof, not speculation. Besides, his nose wasn't broken. Even if you said Martin was acting in self defense when he punched Zimmerman, getting on top of him and beating him (as reported by witnesses) is still aggravated assault. Let's see, a man with a gun, in the night accosting a kid and the kid isn't supposed to do anything? Cite that Who has ever said Zimmerman approached Martin, besides people 1000-3000 miles away on TV? Nobody, it's not a question, it's a lie he is telling... The 911 tapes and Zimmerman's own words. THIS map tells the story, Zimmerman cut through directly confronted Martin. http://bcclist.files.wordpress.com/2...martin-george- zimmerman-path.jpg |
Feinstein's list of banned guns...
In article ,
says... On Wed, 30 Jan 2013 12:54:05 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... Invalid premise HOW, dip****? Zimmerman took after the kid, did you happen to hear, and thus understand the 911 tapes??? What is wrong with making correct and true statements again? Nobody who was there has ever said anything but that Zimmerman was following Martin and that he had lost sight of him until Martin approached Zimmerman., Everyone else is only guessing. Here's some interesting reading: http://bcclist.com/2012/03/27/trayvo...zimmerman-map/ |
Feinstein's list of banned guns...
On 1/31/2013 8:34 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says... On 1/30/2013 8:21 PM, wrote: On Wed, 30 Jan 2013 12:54:05 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... Invalid premise HOW, dip****? Zimmerman took after the kid, did you happen to hear, and thus understand the 911 tapes??? What is wrong with making correct and true statements again? Nobody who was there has ever said anything but that Zimmerman was following Martin and that he had lost sight of him until Martin approached Zimmerman., Everyone else is only guessing. MY point proven again.. this is getting old. Words have meaning, "accosted" was used in this case to deliberately set a false narrative that thinking folks just shouldn't stipulate to. There is no evidence, or even credible suggestion that Zimmerman "accosted" Martin, it's a lie, it's a loogism.. Period. He was "accosted" by Zimmerman, No he wasn't, not one piece of evidenct to prove that. Words have meaning, at most he was watched by Zimmerman... Zimmerman is heard on the 911 tapes saying he is going to follow him. |
Feinstein's list of banned guns...
On 1/31/2013 8:33 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says... On Wed, 30 Jan 2013 12:54:05 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... Invalid premise HOW, dip****? Zimmerman took after the kid, did you happen to hear, and thus understand the 911 tapes??? What is wrong with making correct and true statements again? Nobody who was there has ever said anything but that Zimmerman was following Martin and that he had lost sight of him until Martin approached Zimmerman., Everyone else is only guessing. Zimmerman took after the kid. Period. "Took after"? Are you backing off of your "accosted"? Did you finally look the word up? |
Feinstein's list of banned guns...
In article ,
says... On 1/31/2013 8:33 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 30 Jan 2013 12:54:05 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... Invalid premise HOW, dip****? Zimmerman took after the kid, did you happen to hear, and thus understand the 911 tapes??? What is wrong with making correct and true statements again? Nobody who was there has ever said anything but that Zimmerman was following Martin and that he had lost sight of him until Martin approached Zimmerman., Everyone else is only guessing. Zimmerman took after the kid. Period. "Took after"? Are you backing off of your "accosted"? Did you finally look the word up? You stupid little ****, they are synonyms!!!! |
Feinstein's list of banned guns...
In article ,
says... On 1/31/2013 8:34 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 1/30/2013 8:21 PM, wrote: On Wed, 30 Jan 2013 12:54:05 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... Invalid premise HOW, dip****? Zimmerman took after the kid, did you happen to hear, and thus understand the 911 tapes??? What is wrong with making correct and true statements again? Nobody who was there has ever said anything but that Zimmerman was following Martin and that he had lost sight of him until Martin approached Zimmerman., Everyone else is only guessing. MY point proven again.. this is getting old. Words have meaning, "accosted" was used in this case to deliberately set a false narrative that thinking folks just shouldn't stipulate to. There is no evidence, or even credible suggestion that Zimmerman "accosted" Martin, it's a lie, it's a loogism.. Period. He was "accosted" by Zimmerman, No he wasn't, not one piece of evidenct to prove that. Words have meaning, at most he was watched by Zimmerman... Zimmerman is heard on the 911 tapes saying he is going to follow him. Ever see this, idiot? http://bcclist.com/2012/03/27/trayvo...zimmerman-map/ |
Feinstein's list of banned guns...
|
Feinstein's list of banned guns...
|
Feinstein's list of banned guns...
In article ,
says... On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 08:37:17 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: The 911 tapes and Zimmerman's own words. THIS map tells the story, Zimmerman cut through directly confronted Martin. http://bcclist.files.wordpress.com/2...martin-george- zimmerman-path.jpg That is an "assumed" path. You know what ASSume means. It works just as well if Martin was hiding in that courtyard and jumped Zimmerman from behind. Uh, no, it's NOT assumed. |
Feinstein's list of banned guns...
In article ,
says... On 1/31/2013 12:12 PM, wrote: On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 08:34:17 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: He was "accosted" by Zimmerman, Zimmerman is heard on the 911 tapes saying he is going to follow him. There is a big difference between following someone and accosting them. Exactly. http://tinyurl.com/7vxtvg8 Moron. Are you really as stupid as you position yourself here or are you just toying with everyone? I ask because you may very well be the dumbest person I've ever encountered. |
Feinstein's list of banned guns...
On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 13:39:36 -0500, wrote:
On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 13:06:37 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 08:37:17 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: The 911 tapes and Zimmerman's own words. THIS map tells the story, Zimmerman cut through directly confronted Martin. http://bcclist.files.wordpress.com/2...martin-george- zimmerman-path.jpg That is an "assumed" path. You know what ASSume means. It works just as well if Martin was hiding in that courtyard and jumped Zimmerman from behind. Uh, no, it's NOT assumed. Not by the liberal left anyway. They assume Martin was harmless but we already had that discussion and you admit he wasn't. I guess my eyes are getting really bad, but it *looks* like the map is labeled. "Zimmerman's Assumed Path" and "Trayvon's Assumed Path". That would lead anyone with a glimmer of intelligence to understand that the path is 'assumed'. Salmonbait -- 'Name-calling'...the liberals' answer to a lost argument! |
Feinstein's list of banned guns...
|
Feinstein's list of banned guns...
In article ,
says... On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 13:06:37 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 08:37:17 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: The 911 tapes and Zimmerman's own words. THIS map tells the story, Zimmerman cut through directly confronted Martin. http://bcclist.files.wordpress.com/2...martin-george- zimmerman-path.jpg That is an "assumed" path. You know what ASSume means. It works just as well if Martin was hiding in that courtyard and jumped Zimmerman from behind. Uh, no, it's NOT assumed. Not by the liberal left anyway. They assume Martin was harmless but we already had that discussion and you admit he wasn't. Who said Martin was "harmless"? Far from it, he was defending himself. |
Feinstein's list of banned guns...
In article ,
says... On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 13:39:36 -0500, wrote: On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 13:06:37 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 08:37:17 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: The 911 tapes and Zimmerman's own words. THIS map tells the story, Zimmerman cut through directly confronted Martin. http://bcclist.files.wordpress.com/2...martin-george- zimmerman-path.jpg That is an "assumed" path. You know what ASSume means. It works just as well if Martin was hiding in that courtyard and jumped Zimmerman from behind. Uh, no, it's NOT assumed. Not by the liberal left anyway. They assume Martin was harmless but we already had that discussion and you admit he wasn't. I guess my eyes are getting really bad, but it *looks* like the map is labeled. "Zimmerman's Assumed Path" and "Trayvon's Assumed Path". That would lead anyone with a glimmer of intelligence to understand that the path is 'assumed'. Salmonbait Well, it would to a moron who can't think. |
Feinstein's list of banned guns...
On Thursday, January 31, 2013 2:34:16 PM UTC-5, Salmonbait wrote:
On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 13:39:36 -0500, wrote: On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 13:06:37 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 08:37:17 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: The 911 tapes and Zimmerman's own words. THIS map tells the story, Zimmerman cut through directly confronted Martin. http://bcclist.files.wordpress.com/2...martin-george- zimmerman-path.jpg That is an "assumed" path. You know what ASSume means. It works just as well if Martin was hiding in that courtyard and jumped Zimmerman from behind. Uh, no, it's NOT assumed. Not by the liberal left anyway. They assume Martin was harmless but we already had that discussion and you admit he wasn't. I guess my eyes are getting really bad, but it *looks* like the map is labeled. "Zimmerman's Assumed Path" and "Trayvon's Assumed Path". That would lead anyone with a glimmer of intelligence to understand that the path is 'assumed'. Salmonbait 'Name-calling'...the liberals' answer to a lost argument! Remember when loogy linked to a paper titled "Vision Statement" and said it contained hard facts about the smart grid? There seems to be a big disconnect between what he reads and what he actually comprehends. |
Feinstein's list of banned guns...
On 2/1/2013 9:24 AM, wrote:
On Thursday, January 31, 2013 2:34:16 PM UTC-5, Salmonbait wrote: On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 13:39:36 -0500, wrote: On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 13:06:37 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 08:37:17 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: The 911 tapes and Zimmerman's own words. THIS map tells the story, Zimmerman cut through directly confronted Martin. http://bcclist.files.wordpress.com/2...martin-george- zimmerman-path.jpg That is an "assumed" path. You know what ASSume means. It works just as well if Martin was hiding in that courtyard and jumped Zimmerman from behind. Uh, no, it's NOT assumed. Not by the liberal left anyway. They assume Martin was harmless but we already had that discussion and you admit he wasn't. I guess my eyes are getting really bad, but it *looks* like the map is labeled. "Zimmerman's Assumed Path" and "Trayvon's Assumed Path". That would lead anyone with a glimmer of intelligence to understand that the path is 'assumed'. Salmonbait 'Name-calling'...the liberals' answer to a lost argument! Remember when loogy linked to a paper titled "Vision Statement" and said it contained hard facts about the smart grid? There seems to be a big disconnect between what he reads and what he actually comprehends. That's why I "never" bother with his links.. |
Feinstein's list of banned guns...
On Friday, February 1, 2013 9:34:05 AM UTC-5, JustWaitAFrekinMinute! wrote:
On 2/1/2013 9:24 AM, wrote: Remember when loogy linked to a paper titled "Vision Statement" and said it contained hard facts about the smart grid? There seems to be a big disconnect between what he reads and what he actually comprehends. That's why I "never" bother with his links.. They often prove his own assertions wrong. |
Feinstein's list of banned guns...
JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 2/1/2013 9:24 AM, wrote: On Thursday, January 31, 2013 2:34:16 PM UTC-5, Salmonbait wrote: On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 13:39:36 -0500, wrote: On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 13:06:37 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 08:37:17 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: The 911 tapes and Zimmerman's own words. THIS map tells the story, Zimmerman cut through directly confronted Martin. http://bcclist.files.wordpress.com/2...martin-george- zimmerman-path.jpg That is an "assumed" path. You know what ASSume means. It works just as well if Martin was hiding in that courtyard and jumped Zimmerman from behind. Uh, no, it's NOT assumed. Not by the liberal left anyway. They assume Martin was harmless but we already had that discussion and you admit he wasn't. I guess my eyes are getting really bad, but it *looks* like the map is labeled. "Zimmerman's Assumed Path" and "Trayvon's Assumed Path". That would lead anyone with a glimmer of intelligence to understand that the path is 'assumed'. Salmonbait 'Name-calling'...the liberals' answer to a lost argument! Remember when loogy linked to a paper titled "Vision Statement" and said it contained hard facts about the smart grid? There seems to be a big disconnect between what he reads and what he actually comprehends. That's why I "never" bother with his links.. You don't bother with links because you are ignorant and prefer to remain that way. |
Feinstein's list of banned guns...
On 2/1/2013 9:46 AM, wrote:
On Friday, February 1, 2013 9:34:05 AM UTC-5, JustWaitAFrekinMinute! wrote: On 2/1/2013 9:24 AM, wrote: Remember when loogy linked to a paper titled "Vision Statement" and said it contained hard facts about the smart grid? There seems to be a big disconnect between what he reads and what he actually comprehends. That's why I "never" bother with his links.. They often prove his own assertions wrong. Ha, but I already know his assertions are lies... |
Feinstein's list of banned guns...
On 2/1/2013 10:00 AM, ESAD wrote:
JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote: On 2/1/2013 9:24 AM, wrote: On Thursday, January 31, 2013 2:34:16 PM UTC-5, Salmonbait wrote: On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 13:39:36 -0500, wrote: On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 13:06:37 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 08:37:17 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: The 911 tapes and Zimmerman's own words. THIS map tells the story, Zimmerman cut through directly confronted Martin. http://bcclist.files.wordpress.com/2...martin-george- zimmerman-path.jpg That is an "assumed" path. You know what ASSume means. It works just as well if Martin was hiding in that courtyard and jumped Zimmerman from behind. Uh, no, it's NOT assumed. Not by the liberal left anyway. They assume Martin was harmless but we already had that discussion and you admit he wasn't. I guess my eyes are getting really bad, but it *looks* like the map is labeled. "Zimmerman's Assumed Path" and "Trayvon's Assumed Path". That would lead anyone with a glimmer of intelligence to understand that the path is 'assumed'. Salmonbait 'Name-calling'...the liberals' answer to a lost argument! Remember when loogy linked to a paper titled "Vision Statement" and said it contained hard facts about the smart grid? There seems to be a big disconnect between what he reads and what he actually comprehends. That's why I "never" bother with his links.. You don't bother with links because you are ignorant and prefer to remain that way. This coming from someone who can barely pen a third grade level insult... |
Feinstein's list of banned guns...
JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 2/1/2013 10:00 AM, ESAD wrote: JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote: On 2/1/2013 9:24 AM, wrote: On Thursday, January 31, 2013 2:34:16 PM UTC-5, Salmonbait wrote: On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 13:39:36 -0500, wrote: On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 13:06:37 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 08:37:17 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: The 911 tapes and Zimmerman's own words. THIS map tells the story, Zimmerman cut through directly confronted Martin. http://bcclist.files.wordpress.com/2...martin-george- zimmerman-path.jpg That is an "assumed" path. You know what ASSume means. It works just as well if Martin was hiding in that courtyard and jumped Zimmerman from behind. Uh, no, it's NOT assumed. Not by the liberal left anyway. They assume Martin was harmless but we already had that discussion and you admit he wasn't. I guess my eyes are getting really bad, but it *looks* like the map is labeled. "Zimmerman's Assumed Path" and "Trayvon's Assumed Path". That would lead anyone with a glimmer of intelligence to understand that the path is 'assumed'. Salmonbait 'Name-calling'...the liberals' answer to a lost argument! Remember when loogy linked to a paper titled "Vision Statement" and said it contained hard facts about the smart grid? There seems to be a big disconnect between what he reads and what he actually comprehends. That's why I "never" bother with his links.. You don't bother with links because you are ignorant and prefer to remain that way. This coming from someone who can barely pen a third grade level insult... You are far better at using foul language. |
Feinstein's list of banned guns...
On 2/1/2013 10:26 AM, ESAD wrote:
JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote: On 2/1/2013 10:00 AM, ESAD wrote: JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote: On 2/1/2013 9:24 AM, wrote: On Thursday, January 31, 2013 2:34:16 PM UTC-5, Salmonbait wrote: On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 13:39:36 -0500, wrote: On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 13:06:37 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 08:37:17 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: The 911 tapes and Zimmerman's own words. THIS map tells the story, Zimmerman cut through directly confronted Martin. http://bcclist.files.wordpress.com/2...martin-george- zimmerman-path.jpg That is an "assumed" path. You know what ASSume means. It works just as well if Martin was hiding in that courtyard and jumped Zimmerman from behind. Uh, no, it's NOT assumed. Not by the liberal left anyway. They assume Martin was harmless but we already had that discussion and you admit he wasn't. I guess my eyes are getting really bad, but it *looks* like the map is labeled. "Zimmerman's Assumed Path" and "Trayvon's Assumed Path". That would lead anyone with a glimmer of intelligence to understand that the path is 'assumed'. Salmonbait 'Name-calling'...the liberals' answer to a lost argument! Remember when loogy linked to a paper titled "Vision Statement" and said it contained hard facts about the smart grid? There seems to be a big disconnect between what he reads and what he actually comprehends. That's why I "never" bother with his links.. You don't bother with links because you are ignorant and prefer to remain that way. This coming from someone who can barely pen a third grade level insult... You are far better at using foul language. Eat "what" and die? hypocrite... |
Feinstein's list of banned guns...
On 2/1/13 10:46 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 2/1/2013 10:26 AM, ESAD wrote: JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote: On 2/1/2013 10:00 AM, ESAD wrote: JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote: On 2/1/2013 9:24 AM, wrote: On Thursday, January 31, 2013 2:34:16 PM UTC-5, Salmonbait wrote: On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 13:39:36 -0500, wrote: On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 13:06:37 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 08:37:17 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: The 911 tapes and Zimmerman's own words. THIS map tells the story, Zimmerman cut through directly confronted Martin. http://bcclist.files.wordpress.com/2...martin-george- zimmerman-path.jpg That is an "assumed" path. You know what ASSume means. It works just as well if Martin was hiding in that courtyard and jumped Zimmerman from behind. Uh, no, it's NOT assumed. Not by the liberal left anyway. They assume Martin was harmless but we already had that discussion and you admit he wasn't. I guess my eyes are getting really bad, but it *looks* like the map is labeled. "Zimmerman's Assumed Path" and "Trayvon's Assumed Path". That would lead anyone with a glimmer of intelligence to understand that the path is 'assumed'. Salmonbait 'Name-calling'...the liberals' answer to a lost argument! Remember when loogy linked to a paper titled "Vision Statement" and said it contained hard facts about the smart grid? There seems to be a big disconnect between what he reads and what he actually comprehends. That's why I "never" bother with his links.. You don't bother with links because you are ignorant and prefer to remain that way. This coming from someone who can barely pen a third grade level insult... You are far better at using foul language. Eat "what" and die? hypocrite... Bad sushi, of course. |
Feinstein's list of banned guns...
On 2/1/13 10:18 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 2/1/2013 10:00 AM, ESAD wrote: JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote: On 2/1/2013 9:24 AM, wrote: On Thursday, January 31, 2013 2:34:16 PM UTC-5, Salmonbait wrote: On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 13:39:36 -0500, wrote: On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 13:06:37 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 08:37:17 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: The 911 tapes and Zimmerman's own words. THIS map tells the story, Zimmerman cut through directly confronted Martin. http://bcclist.files.wordpress.com/2...martin-george- zimmerman-path.jpg That is an "assumed" path. You know what ASSume means. It works just as well if Martin was hiding in that courtyard and jumped Zimmerman from behind. Uh, no, it's NOT assumed. Not by the liberal left anyway. They assume Martin was harmless but we already had that discussion and you admit he wasn't. I guess my eyes are getting really bad, but it *looks* like the map is labeled. "Zimmerman's Assumed Path" and "Trayvon's Assumed Path". That would lead anyone with a glimmer of intelligence to understand that the path is 'assumed'. Salmonbait 'Name-calling'...the liberals' answer to a lost argument! Remember when loogy linked to a paper titled "Vision Statement" and said it contained hard facts about the smart grid? There seems to be a big disconnect between what he reads and what he actually comprehends. That's why I "never" bother with his links.. You don't bother with links because you are ignorant and prefer to remain that way. This coming from someone who can barely pen a third grade level insult... This ^ from an undereducated moron who discusses cocksucking in front of his daughter? Of course, she is probably used to gutterspeak in your family. |
Feinstein's list of banned guns...
|
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:12 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com