Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#13
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 1/24/2013 9:42 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says... On 1/24/2013 9:16 AM, iBoaterer wrote: This from the idiot that wants to have a retired cop with a gun in a school, so if a shooter comes in, he can provide "cover fire" in a school full of kids! Yup, I do... and you still can't come up with one good reason why that would be worse than what we have now. All you have is your harryisms...LOL! I can come up with several reasons, moron. 1. Cover fire would likely kill as many or more kids than a shooter. Doubt it. Most of these shooters kill themselves as soon as they are confronted by anybody with a weapon. A shot or two toward a brick wall would probably finish most of them. 2. Who says that the very person you hire to have a loaded weapon in the school doesn't go off of his rocker and start a shooting rampage? Odds are better a retired cop has less chance after years of training and scrutiny, than an average citizen. 3. What if this person was overtaken by a person or persons, he'd just be giving the perpetrator more fire power. These shooters generally come armed, why take a chance of trying to "overtake" an armed police officer? 4. Teaching kids that violence is a good thing is never a good thing. Teaching kids to defend themselves, is always a good thing... |