On Thu, 17 Jan 2013 09:41:26 -0500, ESAD wrote:



http://tinyurl.com/bgc6y5w

'Addictinginfo.org' - you actually read such ****? And you whine about FOX?

~snerk~


Salmonbait

--

'Name-calling'...the liberals' answer to a lost argument!

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 17 Jan 2013 09:41:26 -0500, ESAD wrote:



http://tinyurl.com/bgc6y5w

'Addictinginfo.org' - you actually read such ****? And you whine about FOX?

~snerk~
So, what in the article do you disagree with and why? Please give cite
to counter any of the facts presented.

On 1/17/13 11:57 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

On Thu, 17 Jan 2013 09:41:26 -0500, ESAD wrote:



http://tinyurl.com/bgc6y5w

'Addictinginfo.org' - you actually read such ****? And you whine about FOX?

~snerk~
So, what in the article do you disagree with and why? Please give cite
to counter any of the facts presented.


Addictinginfo is just one of a number of sites that picked up the essay.
Oh, and addictinginfo doesn't try to pass itself off as a news site, as
fox does.

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 17 Jan 2013 11:57:41 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 17 Jan 2013 09:41:26 -0500, ESAD wrote:



http://tinyurl.com/bgc6y5w

'Addictinginfo.org' - you actually read such ****? And you whine about FOX?

~snerk~
So, what in the article do you disagree with and why? Please give cite
to counter any of the facts presented.

I didn't see many "facts" presented, just opinions from Hartman. Have
you ever seen his show? He is left of you.

Again, please show what you disagree with and why. Please give cite to
counter what you disagree with.

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 17 Jan 2013 13:03:17 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 17 Jan 2013 11:57:41 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 17 Jan 2013 09:41:26 -0500, ESAD wrote:



http://tinyurl.com/bgc6y5w

'Addictinginfo.org' - you actually read such ****? And you whine about FOX?

~snerk~
So, what in the article do you disagree with and why? Please give cite
to counter any of the facts presented.

I didn't see many "facts" presented, just opinions from Hartman. Have
you ever seen his show? He is left of you.

Again, please show what you disagree with and why. Please give cite to
counter what you disagree with.

http://www.earlyamerica.com/review/2...l_militia.html

http://www.historyisfun.org/militia-...ionary-war.htm

http://www.connecticutsar.org/articl...ts_militia.htm

http://faculty.umf.maine.edu/walter....%20militia.pdf

I'm sorry, how do those counter the facts previously given??

In article ,
says...

On Fri, 18 Jan 2013 09:14:43 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 17 Jan 2013 13:03:17 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 17 Jan 2013 11:57:41 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 17 Jan 2013 09:41:26 -0500, ESAD wrote:



http://tinyurl.com/bgc6y5w

'Addictinginfo.org' - you actually read such ****? And you whine about FOX?

~snerk~
So, what in the article do you disagree with and why? Please give cite
to counter any of the facts presented.

I didn't see many "facts" presented, just opinions from Hartman. Have
you ever seen his show? He is left of you.

Again, please show what you disagree with and why. Please give cite to
counter what you disagree with.

http://www.earlyamerica.com/review/2...l_militia.html

http://www.historyisfun.org/militia-...ionary-war.htm

http://www.connecticutsar.org/articl...ts_militia.htm

http://faculty.umf.maine.edu/walter....%20militia.pdf

I'm sorry, how do those counter the facts previously given??

None of them mention anything about militias chasing runaway slaves.
There is a story or two about the groups that did chase runaway slaves
but they don't say anything about militias.

So.... let me get this straight, so in your eyes, that means that the
facts given don't count????? Really?