![]() |
Hey Tim!
On Jan 20, 7:40*am, ESAD wrote:
Abortion is a medical procedure. I can understand that , that is, if it's a necessity, but not out of convenience. Oh, as for the "gay" high schools, there is Constitutional language against state support of religion. Gay is not a religion. Harvey Milk isn't being worshipped. I wasn't talking about state support of religion, I was talking about 'gay schools' being funded by tax dollars. Why should they have a separate school to put more burden on the tax payer? I can see special education programs for special needs students, but not for gays. Odd there's no separate prisons for gays, but there can be schools. |
Hey Tim!
On 1/20/13 9:36 PM, Tim wrote:
On Jan 20, 7:40 am, ESAD wrote: Abortion is a medical procedure. I can understand that , that is, if it's a necessity, but not out of convenience. Oh, as for the "gay" high schools, there is Constitutional language against state support of religion. Gay is not a religion. Harvey Milk isn't being worshipped. I wasn't talking about state support of religion, I was talking about 'gay schools' being funded by tax dollars. Why should they have a separate school to put more burden on the tax payer? I can see special education programs for special needs students, but not for gays. Odd there's no separate prisons for gays, but there can be schools. I don't know whether gays should or shouldn't have a separate school, but I do know there is no Constitutional restriction against it. Gay, after all, is not a religion. I suppose gays are less prone to attack by Herring-like "straight" students in the "straight" schools. As for abortion, the decision as to whether it is a necessity should be the woman's alone. |
Hey Tim!
On Jan 20, 8:41*pm, ESAD wrote:
On 1/20/13 9:36 PM, Tim wrote: On Jan 20, 7:40 am, ESAD wrote: Abortion is a medical procedure. I can understand that , that is, if it's a necessity, but not out of convenience. Oh, as for the "gay" high schools, there is Constitutional language against state support of religion. Gay is not a religion. Harvey Milk isn't being worshipped. I wasn't talking about state support of religion, I was talking about 'gay schools' *being funded by tax dollars. Why should they have a separate school *to put more burden on the tax payer? *I can see special education programs for special needs students, but not for gays. * Odd there's no separate prisons for gays, but there can be schools. I don't know whether gays should or shouldn't have a separate school, but I do know there is no Constitutional restriction against it. Gay, after all, is not a religion. I suppose gays are less prone to attack by Herring-like "straight" students in the "straight" schools. As for abortion, the decision as to whether it is a necessity should be the woman's alone. So, if it's a decision of convenience rather than necessity, then state monies should pay for it? |
Hey Tim!
|
Hey Tim!
On Sun, 20 Jan 2013 18:36:41 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote:
On Jan 20, 7:40*am, ESAD wrote: Abortion is a medical procedure. I can understand that , that is, if it's a necessity, but not out of convenience. Oh, as for the "gay" high schools, there is Constitutional language against state support of religion. Gay is not a religion. Harvey Milk isn't being worshipped. I wasn't talking about state support of religion, I was talking about 'gay schools' being funded by tax dollars. Why should they have a separate school to put more burden on the tax payer? I can see special education programs for special needs students, but not for gays. Odd there's no separate prisons for gays, but there can be schools. Actually, Tim, gays do have special 'needs'. Salmonbait -- 'Name-calling'...the liberals' answer to a lost argument! |
Hey Tim!
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:53 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com