| Page 2 of 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
|
Hey Tim!
On 1/20/2013 8:40 AM, ESAD wrote:
"In god we trust" shouldn't be on United States money. It is, but it shouldn't be. It's the price you pay for living and thriving in America. Suck it up, big boy. |
Hey Tim!
On Jan 20, 8:42*am, iBoaterer wrote:
In article b22b1543-83ae-4900-b49a-712240a2e888 @k6g2000yqf.googlegroups.com, says... Now if you'll excuse me, I have to get ready for the chicken sacrifice. It's my day to roll the JuJu beads.... ?;^ ) Don't forget the sacrificial goat!! That's next week!! ?8^ 0 |
Hey Tim!
On 1/20/13 12:33 PM, Tim wrote:
On Jan 20, 8:42 am, iBoaterer wrote: In article b22b1543-83ae-4900-b49a-712240a2e888 @k6g2000yqf.googlegroups.com, says... Now if you'll excuse me, I have to get ready for the chicken sacrifice. It's my day to roll the JuJu beads.... ?;^ ) Don't forget the sacrificial goat!! That's next week!! ?8^ 0 I had no idea you practiced kaporot. Is it common in your sect? |
Hey Tim!
On Jan 20, 11:39*am, ESAD wrote:
On 1/20/13 12:33 PM, Tim wrote: On Jan 20, 8:42 am, iBoaterer wrote: In article b22b1543-83ae-4900-b49a-712240a2e888 @k6g2000yqf.googlegroups.com, says... Now if you'll excuse me, I have to get ready for the chicken sacrifice. It's my day to roll the JuJu beads.... ?;^ ) Don't forget the sacrificial goat!! That's next week!! ?8^ 0 I had no idea you practiced kaporot. Is it common in your sect? Only when we're not burning heretics at the stake. |
Hey Tim!
On Jan 20, 12:02*pm, ESAD wrote:
On 1/20/13 12:58 PM, Tim wrote: On Jan 20, 11:39 am, ESAD wrote: On 1/20/13 12:33 PM, Tim wrote: On Jan 20, 8:42 am, iBoaterer wrote: In article b22b1543-83ae-4900-b49a-712240a2e888 @k6g2000yqf.googlegroups.com, says... Now if you'll excuse me, I have to get ready for the chicken sacrifice. It's my day to roll the JuJu beads.... ?;^ ) Don't forget the sacrificial goat!! That's next week!! ?8^ 0 I had no idea you practiced kaporot. Is it common in your sect? Only when we're not burning heretics at the stake. Or burning steaks for your fellow heretics! *:) Burning steaks over the fellow heretics, but you gotta get 'em hot enough. They work good in a char-broiler too. |
Hey Tim!
On 1/20/2013 4:15 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 1/20/2013 1:26 AM, thumper wrote: On 1/19/2013 6:03 PM, Tim wrote: Ok, so... what was he shoving then? Speaking, not shoving, the usual religious pablum intended to comfort the grieving, the same as I heard at a recent Catholic funeral. Does it offend you when he says it? Why are you making up things.. We still need to know why you lied and said "religion is being shoved down your throats" when you know it's a lie? Maybe you guy need a bit of a moral core, you should try going to church... Are you responding to me? Can you show my post you quote? I simply never said that. Are you honestly mistaken, confused, stupid, intentionally deceptive, or what? Does that make you a liar? |
Hey Tim!
On 1/20/2013 6:23 AM, Tim wrote:
Harry is the one who casts ill on religion and/or religious talk. So i demonstrated that even the president made religious talk. That's all. It's not exactly news to anyone that virtually all US politicians pander to a religious majority. I don't know anyone who gets upset by such benign examples. |
Hey Tim!
On 1/20/2013 4:34 PM, thumper wrote:
On 1/20/2013 4:15 AM, JustWait wrote: On 1/20/2013 1:26 AM, thumper wrote: On 1/19/2013 6:03 PM, Tim wrote: Ok, so... what was he shoving then? Speaking, not shoving, the usual religious pablum intended to comfort the grieving, the same as I heard at a recent Catholic funeral. Does it offend you when he says it? Why are you making up things.. We still need to know why you lied and said "religion is being shoved down your throats" when you know it's a lie? Maybe you guy need a bit of a moral core, you should try going to church... Are you responding to me? Can you show my post you quote? I simply never said that. Are you honestly mistaken, confused, stupid, intentionally deceptive, or what? Does that make you a liar? Nope, thought it was you... could have been one of your sock puppets/clones/crew... |
Hey Tim!
On Sunday, January 20, 2013 11:11:17 AM UTC-5, Meyer wrote:
On 1/20/2013 8:40 AM, ESAD wrote: "In god we trust" shouldn't be on United States money. It is, but it shouldn't be. It's the price you pay for living and thriving in America. Suck it up, big boy. Thriving? He isn't thriving. He can't pay his taxes, or have his name on the house he lives in. |
Hey Tim!
On 1/20/2013 3:18 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 1/20/2013 4:34 PM, thumper wrote: On 1/20/2013 4:15 AM, JustWait wrote: On 1/20/2013 1:26 AM, thumper wrote: On 1/19/2013 6:03 PM, Tim wrote: Ok, so... what was he shoving then? Speaking, not shoving, the usual religious pablum intended to comfort the grieving, the same as I heard at a recent Catholic funeral. Does it offend you when he says it? Why are you making up things.. We still need to know why you lied and said "religion is being shoved down your throats" when you know it's a lie? Maybe you guy need a bit of a moral core, you should try going to church... Are you responding to me? Can you show my post you quote? I simply never said that. Are you honestly mistaken, confused, stupid, intentionally deceptive, or what? Does that make you a liar? Nope, thought it was you... could have been one of your sock puppets/clones/crew... Thanks for admitting your error in calling me a liar. You may want to look into proper use of quotation marks. I have no other identity here except an old one that hasn't been used in many years. Religion does not appear to be a reliable guide to morality. How do you choose the proper moral authority if not by your own judgement? |
Hey Tim!
On Jan 20, 7:40*am, ESAD wrote:
Abortion is a medical procedure. I can understand that , that is, if it's a necessity, but not out of convenience. Oh, as for the "gay" high schools, there is Constitutional language against state support of religion. Gay is not a religion. Harvey Milk isn't being worshipped. I wasn't talking about state support of religion, I was talking about 'gay schools' being funded by tax dollars. Why should they have a separate school to put more burden on the tax payer? I can see special education programs for special needs students, but not for gays. Odd there's no separate prisons for gays, but there can be schools. |
Hey Tim!
On 1/20/13 9:36 PM, Tim wrote:
On Jan 20, 7:40 am, ESAD wrote: Abortion is a medical procedure. I can understand that , that is, if it's a necessity, but not out of convenience. Oh, as for the "gay" high schools, there is Constitutional language against state support of religion. Gay is not a religion. Harvey Milk isn't being worshipped. I wasn't talking about state support of religion, I was talking about 'gay schools' being funded by tax dollars. Why should they have a separate school to put more burden on the tax payer? I can see special education programs for special needs students, but not for gays. Odd there's no separate prisons for gays, but there can be schools. I don't know whether gays should or shouldn't have a separate school, but I do know there is no Constitutional restriction against it. Gay, after all, is not a religion. I suppose gays are less prone to attack by Herring-like "straight" students in the "straight" schools. As for abortion, the decision as to whether it is a necessity should be the woman's alone. |
Hey Tim!
On Jan 20, 8:41*pm, ESAD wrote:
On 1/20/13 9:36 PM, Tim wrote: On Jan 20, 7:40 am, ESAD wrote: Abortion is a medical procedure. I can understand that , that is, if it's a necessity, but not out of convenience. Oh, as for the "gay" high schools, there is Constitutional language against state support of religion. Gay is not a religion. Harvey Milk isn't being worshipped. I wasn't talking about state support of religion, I was talking about 'gay schools' *being funded by tax dollars. Why should they have a separate school *to put more burden on the tax payer? *I can see special education programs for special needs students, but not for gays. * Odd there's no separate prisons for gays, but there can be schools. I don't know whether gays should or shouldn't have a separate school, but I do know there is no Constitutional restriction against it. Gay, after all, is not a religion. I suppose gays are less prone to attack by Herring-like "straight" students in the "straight" schools. As for abortion, the decision as to whether it is a necessity should be the woman's alone. So, if it's a decision of convenience rather than necessity, then state monies should pay for it? |
Hey Tim!
|
Hey Tim!
On Sun, 20 Jan 2013 18:36:41 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote:
On Jan 20, 7:40*am, ESAD wrote: Abortion is a medical procedure. I can understand that , that is, if it's a necessity, but not out of convenience. Oh, as for the "gay" high schools, there is Constitutional language against state support of religion. Gay is not a religion. Harvey Milk isn't being worshipped. I wasn't talking about state support of religion, I was talking about 'gay schools' being funded by tax dollars. Why should they have a separate school to put more burden on the tax payer? I can see special education programs for special needs students, but not for gays. Odd there's no separate prisons for gays, but there can be schools. Actually, Tim, gays do have special 'needs'. Salmonbait -- 'Name-calling'...the liberals' answer to a lost argument! |
Hey Tim!
|
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:41 AM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com