About Us

Eisboch[_8_]

"ESAD" wrote in message
...

On 1/8/13 8:19 AM, Eisboch wrote:

"ESAD" wrote in message
m...

On 1/7/13 10:24 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 07 Jan 2013 21:15:23 -0500, ESAD wrote:

Indeed. I think it is important to remind some people of Palin and
her
stupidity. She could have been an old man's heartbeat away from
the
presidency.

Well the old man is still alive so she would have just been sitting
around with nothing to do like Biden.
Sarah wasn't the scary one. The old man would very likely have us
in
a war in Iran right now.

Remember "Bomb Bomb, Bomb Iran' (to the tune of Barbara Ann)?

All the GOP nominee wannabes this last election with the exception
of
Portman were saber-rattling warmongers, and several of them
(Santorum,
Perry, Bachman, Cain) were at least as stupid as Palin. Practical
intelligence, never mind intellectual intelligence, doesn't seem to
be
an attribute much sought these days in the GOP.

Christine O'Donnell, Sarah Palin, Michele Bachmann, Jan Brewer...the
four GOP women of the apocalypse, and all bottom divers.

----------------------------------------------

Harry,

It's ok. The election is over. Your man won.
P.S. You might want to remind Big Ed, Rachel, Big Al and the others
of
the fact.
They still delight virtually every night in mocking Romney and other
Republican candidates who lost.
Doesn't contribute to developing any sense of bi-partisanship or
harmony
in the country.
Lean Forward.

We're still plagued with GOP crazies holding or seeking high political
office, and some of them will be contending for the 2016 nomination,
and
other non-candidates crazies will be attempting to "shape" the field.

I think it worthwhile to slam these individuals and the party that
supports them from time to time.

I don't see any opportunity for bipartisanship or political harmony in
this country until the current crop of bat**** crazy Republicans
wanders
in the desert for a couple more presidential election cycles and the
party loses more seats in the U.S. Senate and House.

I remember when the northeast had a plethora of reasonable,
responsible
Republicans who were willing to work in a bipartisan manner for the
good
of the country. Now, there are hardly any Republicans in that part of
the country who hold high political office, and I think one of the
major
reasons is that reasonable Republican wannabes simply cannot, for the
most part, get nominated.

While there are exceptions, the GOP these days is mostly a party
controlled by white southern men.
----------------------------------------------------------

While I agree with you about the ultra right Republicans, they will,
in time, lose influence. Politics goes in cycles.
If the MSNBC (and others) crowd wants to attack those running or who
may run, that's their choice. But to keep doing re-runs of the last
election doesn't do anybody any good in terms of creating a reasonable
or responsible debate for the future. It may end up back firing.

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Why is Sarah Palin in...	John H[_2_]	General	2	March 8th 09 05:03 PM
Why is Sarah Palin in...	[email protected]	General	0	March 8th 09 02:23 AM
Why is Sarah Palin in...	JohnH[_4_]	General	0	December 6th 08 05:37 PM
Why is Sarah Palin in...	JohnH[_4_]	General	0	December 6th 08 01:06 PM
Sarah Palin	hk	General	0	August 29th 08 12:50 PM

Menu

About Us