In article ,
says...

On Wed, 26 Dec 2012 15:05:09 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Wed, 26 Dec 2012 11:14:56 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:


http://tinyurl.com/c59s6hm

Yeah, it is working great in Chicago and DC where hand guns are
virtually banned

Did you read the article and note the facts given?

Yup but I didn't see them explain Chicago or DC.
I also saw them gloss over Newtown." Connecticut has more restrictions
on gun ownership than most states", the first line of the article.


What's to explain? Chicago and DC don't show up on any mass shooter list
I've seen.
Gangbangers shooting each other, with the occasional innocent
collateral.
Mass shootings happen where gun nuts live.
A legal CT gun nut provided the guns in that case.
Not hard to figure out.
Most mass shootings happen in "gun country," not cities that discourage
gun nuts.
And what makes you think you can't legally have a handgun in Chicago?
NRA tell you that?
Gangbangers and other criminals would have a much harder time getting
guns without the "legal" gun nut purchasers around to make it all easy.
The Lanza woman is a perfect example. A gun nut providing weapons for a
mass shooter.