A couple questions...
 

....mostly for the liberals amongst us.

1. Why are we still in Afghanistan? My son-in-law just got orders to go there. I'm wondering why the
hell we're still there.

2. Why are Democrats so concerned about chemical weapons in Syria, but the ones used by Hussein
(Sadam, not Barak) were of no concern?

A couple questions...
 

In article ,
says...

...mostly for the liberals amongst us.

1. Why are we still in Afghanistan? My son-in-law just got orders to go there. I'm wondering why the
hell we're still there.

This shows that you know NOTHING other than what FOX tells you. The
strategy has ALWAYS been to be there in a "security lead" until 2014.

http://tinyurl.com/bh7tts4




2. Why are Democrats so concerned about chemical weapons in Syria, but the ones used by Hussein
(Sadam, not Barak) were of no concern?

Who told you that no one was concerned about chemical weapons in Iraq?

A couple questions...
 

On Sat, 08 Dec 2012 07:41:21 -0500, wrote:

On Fri, 07 Dec 2012 10:41:18 -0500, GuzzisRule
wrote:

...mostly for the liberals amongst us.

1. Why are we still in Afghanistan? My son-in-law just got orders to go there. I'm wondering why the
hell we're still there.

Because George Bush put us there and you didn't want to "cut-and-run,"
remember? Here's your pal on the subject:

Actually, cut'n and run'n means leaving in a quick hurry. 'Bama's had us there for quite a while -
doing nothing but getting soldiers killed and spending money.


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/0..._n_859063.html


2. Why are Democrats so concerned about chemical weapons in Syria, but the ones used by Hussein
(Sadam, not Barak) were of no concern?

Because Reagan and Bush (#1), not the Democrats, hid the facts. Are
you attempting to rewrite history for some reason?

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...501238_pf.html

The big difference is that we KNOW about Syria.

We knew about Saddam also. Many pictures of dead Kurds.

Is it dark up there?

A couple questions...
 

In article ,
says...

On Sat, 08 Dec 2012 07:41:21 -0500, wrote:

On Fri, 07 Dec 2012 10:41:18 -0500, GuzzisRule
wrote:

...mostly for the liberals amongst us.

1. Why are we still in Afghanistan? My son-in-law just got orders to go there. I'm wondering why the
hell we're still there.

Because George Bush put us there and you didn't want to "cut-and-run,"
remember? Here's your pal on the subject:

Actually, cut'n and run'n means leaving in a quick hurry. 'Bama's had us there for quite a while -
doing nothing but getting soldiers killed and spending money.


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/0..._n_859063.html


2. Why are Democrats so concerned about chemical weapons in Syria, but the ones used by Hussein
(Sadam, not Barak) were of no concern?

Because Reagan and Bush (#1), not the Democrats, hid the facts. Are
you attempting to rewrite history for some reason?

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...501238_pf.html

But what stupid insane people like you don't understand is, there was
always a plan in place and that plan wasn't to leave right away. Here,
learn something other than FOXite crap:

http://tinyurl.com/92thxtj

A couple questions...
 

On Sat, 08 Dec 2012 14:35:48 -0500, wrote:

On Sat, 08 Dec 2012 12:15:00 -0500, GuzzisRule
wrote:

On Sat, 08 Dec 2012 07:41:21 -0500, wrote:

On Fri, 07 Dec 2012 10:41:18 -0500, GuzzisRule
wrote:

...mostly for the liberals amongst us.

1. Why are we still in Afghanistan? My son-in-law just got orders to go there. I'm wondering why the
hell we're still there.

Because George Bush put us there and you didn't want to "cut-and-run,"
remember? Here's your pal on the subject:

Actually, cut'n and run'n means leaving in a quick hurry. 'Bama's had us there for quite a while -
doing nothing but getting soldiers killed and spending money.


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/0..._n_859063.html


2. Why are Democrats so concerned about chemical weapons in Syria, but the ones used by Hussein
(Sadam, not Barak) were of no concern?

Because Reagan and Bush (#1), not the Democrats, hid the facts. Are
you attempting to rewrite history for some reason?

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...501238_pf.html

The big difference is that we KNOW about Syria.

We knew about Saddam also. Many pictures of dead Kurds.

Is it dark up there?

No, it is really bright and enlightened up here! You can come on up
and look around when you get through tea bagging.

Then you must have swallowed a light bulb!