hostess heads to mediation
 

Hostess management and union agree to private mediation. Federal trustee
not happy with payout to company management in face of management's
failures.

When a large company fails, it is the fault of management.
--
Sent from my iPhone 5

hostess heads to mediation
 

On 11/19/2012 5:28 PM, harry wrote:
Hostess management and union agree to private mediation. Federal trustee
not happy with payout to company management in face of management's
failures.

When a large company fails, it is the fault of management.

When Krause and Company failed, whose fault was it?

hostess heads to mediation
 

In article om,
says...

On 11/19/2012 5:28 PM, harry wrote:
Hostess management and union agree to private mediation. Federal trustee
not happy with payout to company management in face of management's
failures.

When a large company fails, it is the fault of management.

When Krause and Company failed, whose fault was it?

It was the customer fault.

hostess heads to mediation
 

In article ,
says...

On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 18:26:12 -0500, Meyer wrote:

On 11/19/2012 5:28 PM, harry wrote:
Hostess management and union agree to private mediation. Federal trustee
not happy with payout to company management in face of management's
failures.

When a large company fails, it is the fault of management.

When Krause and Company failed, whose fault was it?

He said, "large company." Krause was obviously not much of a manager,
even of a small company. Or, more likely an incompetent
"proprietorship" hiding behind a corporate shield.

Krause had to be a large company, don't you remember his fat stubby
fingers from the picture in Coronado?

hostess heads to mediation
 

On 19 Nov 2012 22:28:46 GMT, harry wrote:

Hostess management and union agree to private mediation. Federal trustee
not happy with payout to company management in face of management's
failures.

When a large company fails, it is the fault of management.

Wow, that sounds exactly like Krause!


Sent from my unpretentious desktop.

hostess heads to mediation
 

On Tuesday, November 20, 2012 8:10:49 PM UTC-5, GuzzisRule wrote:
On 19 Nov 2012 22:28:46 GMT, harry wrote:



Hostess management and union agree to private mediation. Federal trustee
not happy with payout to company management in face of management's
failures.


When a large company fails, it is the fault of management.


Wow, that sounds exactly like Krause!

Sent from my unpretentious desktop.

Remember how he used to talk about not wanting to stop in SC when traveling through here? I suspect there's some tax liens and debts he owes here as well.

hostess heads to mediation
 

In article ,
says...

On Tuesday, November 20, 2012 8:10:49 PM UTC-5, GuzzisRule wrote:
On 19 Nov 2012 22:28:46 GMT, harry wrote:



Hostess management and union agree to private mediation. Federal trustee
not happy with payout to company management in face of management's
failures.


When a large company fails, it is the fault of management.


Wow, that sounds exactly like Krause!

Sent from my unpretentious desktop.

Remember how he used to talk about not wanting to stop in SC when traveling through here? I suspect there's some tax liens and debts he owes here as well.

Probably had his wife drive in SC to reduce the chances of them running
a wants and warrants check.

hostess heads to the tank
 

http://www.bizjournals.com/triangle/...s-on-line.html

hostess heads to the tank
 

On Wed, 21 Nov 2012 04:43:19 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote:

http://www.bizjournals.com/triangle/...s-on-line.html

That should make the unions and the rest of the liberals very happy.

hostess heads to the tank
 

GuzzisRule wrote:
On Wed, 21 Nov 2012 04:43:19 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote:

http://www.bizjournals.com/triangle/...s-on-line.html

That should make the unions and the rest of the liberals very happy.

Another company ruined by management
--
Sent from my iPhone 5

hostess heads to mediation
 

In article ,
says...

On Tue, 20 Nov 2012 20:11:04 -0500, BAR wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 18:26:12 -0500, Meyer wrote:

On 11/19/2012 5:28 PM, harry wrote:
Hostess management and union agree to private mediation. Federal trustee
not happy with payout to company management in face of management's
failures.

When a large company fails, it is the fault of management.

When Krause and Company failed, whose fault was it?

He said, "large company." Krause was obviously not much of a manager,
even of a small company. Or, more likely an incompetent
"proprietorship" hiding behind a corporate shield.

Krause had to be a large company, don't you remember his fat stubby
fingers from the picture in Coronado?


No, I really don't. I've never felt the need to sniff Krause's ass
every 30 seconds so that I could stay on par with about 3/4 of the
posters still here.

I have absolutely NO interest in Krause and I have NO idea why the
rest of you are SO infatuated with him.

If he is gone, count your blessings and move on.

He isn't gone. He still lurks in the dark corners.

hostess heads to mediation
 

On 11/21/2012 6:30 PM, BAR wrote:
In article ,
says...

On Tue, 20 Nov 2012 20:11:04 -0500, BAR wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 18:26:12 -0500, Meyer wrote:

On 11/19/2012 5:28 PM, harry wrote:
Hostess management and union agree to private mediation. Federal trustee
not happy with payout to company management in face of management's
failures.

When a large company fails, it is the fault of management.

When Krause and Company failed, whose fault was it?

He said, "large company." Krause was obviously not much of a manager,
even of a small company. Or, more likely an incompetent
"proprietorship" hiding behind a corporate shield.

Krause had to be a large company, don't you remember his fat stubby
fingers from the picture in Coronado?


No, I really don't. I've never felt the need to sniff Krause's ass
every 30 seconds so that I could stay on par with about 3/4 of the
posters still here.

I have absolutely NO interest in Krause and I have NO idea why the
rest of you are SO infatuated with him.

If he is gone, count your blessings and move on.

He isn't gone. He still lurks in the dark corners.


There's a pretty good chance you just responded to him.

hostess heads to mediation
 

On 11/21/2012 6:45 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 21 Nov 2012 18:30:55 -0500, BAR wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Tue, 20 Nov 2012 20:11:04 -0500, BAR wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 18:26:12 -0500, Meyer wrote:

On 11/19/2012 5:28 PM, harry wrote:
Hostess management and union agree to private mediation. Federal trustee
not happy with payout to company management in face of management's
failures.

When a large company fails, it is the fault of management.

When Krause and Company failed, whose fault was it?

He said, "large company." Krause was obviously not much of a manager,
even of a small company. Or, more likely an incompetent
"proprietorship" hiding behind a corporate shield.

Krause had to be a large company, don't you remember his fat stubby
fingers from the picture in Coronado?


No, I really don't. I've never felt the need to sniff Krause's ass
every 30 seconds so that I could stay on par with about 3/4 of the
posters still here.

I have absolutely NO interest in Krause and I have NO idea why the
rest of you are SO infatuated with him.

If he is gone, count your blessings and move on.

He isn't gone. He still lurks in the dark corners.


Walk towards the light.

Walk towards the tax collectors office.

hostess heads to the tank
 

On 21 Nov 2012 18:04:23 GMT, harry wrote:

GuzzisRule wrote:
On Wed, 21 Nov 2012 04:43:19 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote:

http://www.bizjournals.com/triangle/...s-on-line.html

That should make the unions and the rest of the liberals very happy.

Another company ruined by management

Yup, they should have busted the union when they had a chance.

Sent from my unpretentious desktop.

hostess heads to the tank
 

In article ,
says...

On Wed, 21 Nov 2012 04:43:19 -0800 (PST), Tim
wrote:

http://www.bizjournals.com/triangle/...s-on-line.html

This lesson is NOT about unions. This lesson is all about the evils of
indebtedness. MASSIVE indebtedness, with minimal demand for the
product, and little or no capital improvement.

The massive indebtedness is due to the unions.

hostess heads to the tank
 

In article ,
says...

In article ,
says...

On Wed, 21 Nov 2012 04:43:19 -0800 (PST), Tim
wrote:

http://www.bizjournals.com/triangle/...s-on-line.html

This lesson is NOT about unions. This lesson is all about the evils of
indebtedness. MASSIVE indebtedness, with minimal demand for the
product, and little or no capital improvement.

The massive indebtedness is due to the unions.

Bull****. Prove it.

http://tinyurl.com/b77zjyu

hostess heads to the tank
 

On Thu, 22 Nov 2012 09:02:13 -0500, BAR wrote:

This lesson is NOT about unions. This lesson is all about the evils of
indebtedness. MASSIVE indebtedness, with minimal demand for the
product, and little or no capital improvement.

The massive indebtedness is due to the unions.

===

I'm not a particularly big fan of unions as you probably know but in
all fairness corporate debt is strictly a management decision. Every
business has to decide how to finance their operations and debt is
just one of the options. A business that has to repeatedly borrow
long term money to stay in business is either very capital intensive
or doomed to eventual failure.

hostess heads to the tank
 

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 22 Nov 2012 09:02:13 -0500, BAR wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Wed, 21 Nov 2012 04:43:19 -0800 (PST), Tim
wrote:

http://www.bizjournals.com/triangle/...s-on-line.html

This lesson is NOT about unions. This lesson is all about the evils of
indebtedness. MASSIVE indebtedness, with minimal demand for the
product, and little or no capital improvement.

The massive indebtedness is due to the unions.


Check and see who's name is on the promissory note.

Why did they have to get a promissory note?

hostess heads to the tank
 

In article ,
says...

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 22 Nov 2012 09:02:13 -0500, BAR wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Wed, 21 Nov 2012 04:43:19 -0800 (PST), Tim
wrote:

http://www.bizjournals.com/triangle/...s-on-line.html

This lesson is NOT about unions. This lesson is all about the evils of
indebtedness. MASSIVE indebtedness, with minimal demand for the
product, and little or no capital improvement.

The massive indebtedness is due to the unions.


Check and see who's name is on the promissory note.

Why did they have to get a promissory note?

Poor management, not keeping up with the times, etc.

hostess heads to the tank
 

On 11/23/2012 11:09 AM, wrote:
On Thu, 22 Nov 2012 21:21:59 -0500, BAR wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 22 Nov 2012 09:02:13 -0500, BAR wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Wed, 21 Nov 2012 04:43:19 -0800 (PST), Tim
wrote:

http://www.bizjournals.com/triangle/...s-on-line.html

This lesson is NOT about unions. This lesson is all about the evils of
indebtedness. MASSIVE indebtedness, with minimal demand for the
product, and little or no capital improvement.

The massive indebtedness is due to the unions.


Check and see who's name is on the promissory note.

Why did they have to get a promissory note?


Because they were spending more than they made.

You're pretty familiar with that scenario arncha Harry?

hostess heads to the tank
 

In article ,
says...

On Fri, 23 Nov 2012 12:08:35 -0500, Meyer wrote:

On 11/23/2012 11:09 AM, wrote:
On Thu, 22 Nov 2012 21:21:59 -0500, BAR wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 22 Nov 2012 09:02:13 -0500, BAR wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Wed, 21 Nov 2012 04:43:19 -0800 (PST), Tim
wrote:

http://www.bizjournals.com/triangle/...s-on-line.html

This lesson is NOT about unions. This lesson is all about the evils of
indebtedness. MASSIVE indebtedness, with minimal demand for the
product, and little or no capital improvement.

The massive indebtedness is due to the unions.


Check and see who's name is on the promissory note.

Why did they have to get a promissory note?


Because they were spending more than they made.

You're pretty familiar with that scenario arncha Harry?

Do you see Harry everywhere?

Yes, he, Scotty and John see either Harry, or Loogy, or Kevin, or Don
everywhere!!

hostess heads to the tank
 

On 11/23/2012 12:38 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 23 Nov 2012 12:08:35 -0500, Meyer wrote:

On 11/23/2012 11:09 AM, wrote:
On Thu, 22 Nov 2012 21:21:59 -0500, BAR wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 22 Nov 2012 09:02:13 -0500, BAR wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Wed, 21 Nov 2012 04:43:19 -0800 (PST), Tim
wrote:

http://www.bizjournals.com/triangle/...s-on-line.html

This lesson is NOT about unions. This lesson is all about the evils of
indebtedness. MASSIVE indebtedness, with minimal demand for the
product, and little or no capital improvement.

The massive indebtedness is due to the unions.


Check and see who's name is on the promissory note.

Why did they have to get a promissory note?


Because they were spending more than they made.

You're pretty familiar with that scenario arncha Harry?

Do you see Harry everywhere?

If it looks like a duck and quacks like a duck, you might think it's a
duck, eh Harry?

hostess heads to the tank
 

Meyer wrote:
On 11/23/2012 12:38 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 23 Nov 2012 12:08:35 -0500, Meyer wrote:

On 11/23/2012 11:09 AM, wrote:
On Thu, 22 Nov 2012 21:21:59 -0500, BAR wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 22 Nov 2012 09:02:13 -0500, BAR wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Wed, 21 Nov 2012 04:43:19 -0800 (PST), Tim
wrote:

http://www.bizjournals.com/triangle/...s-on-line.html

This lesson is NOT about unions. This lesson is all about the evils of
indebtedness. MASSIVE indebtedness, with minimal demand for the
product, and little or no capital improvement.

The massive indebtedness is due to the unions.


Check and see who's name is on the promissory note.

Why did they have to get a promissory note?


Because they were spending more than they made.

You're pretty familiar with that scenario arncha Harry?

Do you see Harry everywhere?

If it looks like a duck and quacks like a duck, you might think it's a duck, eh Harry?

If it thinks or writes like a real dumb ****, it is probably Meyer or
another right wing turd.
--
Sent from my iPhone 5

hostess heads to the tank
 

On 11/23/2012 3:45 PM, harry wrote:
Meyer wrote:
On 11/23/2012 12:38 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 23 Nov 2012 12:08:35 -0500, Meyer wrote:

On 11/23/2012 11:09 AM, wrote:
On Thu, 22 Nov 2012 21:21:59 -0500, BAR wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 22 Nov 2012 09:02:13 -0500, BAR wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Wed, 21 Nov 2012 04:43:19 -0800 (PST), Tim
wrote:

http://www.bizjournals.com/triangle/...s-on-line.html

This lesson is NOT about unions. This lesson is all about the evils of
indebtedness. MASSIVE indebtedness, with minimal demand for the
product, and little or no capital improvement.

The massive indebtedness is due to the unions.


Check and see who's name is on the promissory note.

Why did they have to get a promissory note?


Because they were spending more than they made.

You're pretty familiar with that scenario arncha Harry?

Do you see Harry everywhere?

If it looks like a duck and quacks like a duck, you might think it's a duck, eh Harry?

If it thinks or writes like a real dumb ****, it is probably Meyer or
another right wing turd.

And you call yourself a writer? Snerk. You are a joke.

hostess heads to the tank
 

Meyer wrote:
On 11/23/2012 3:45 PM, harry wrote:
Meyer wrote:
On 11/23/2012 12:38 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 23 Nov 2012 12:08:35 -0500, Meyer wrote:

On 11/23/2012 11:09 AM, wrote:
On Thu, 22 Nov 2012 21:21:59 -0500, BAR wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 22 Nov 2012 09:02:13 -0500, BAR wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Wed, 21 Nov 2012 04:43:19 -0800 (PST), Tim
wrote:

http://www.bizjournals.com/triangle/...s-on-line.html

This lesson is NOT about unions. This lesson is all about the evils of
indebtedness. MASSIVE indebtedness, with minimal demand for the
product, and little or no capital improvement.

The massive indebtedness is due to the unions.


Check and see who's name is on the promissory note.

Why did they have to get a promissory note?


Because they were spending more than they made.

You're pretty familiar with that scenario arncha Harry?

Do you see Harry everywhere?

If it looks like a duck and quacks like a duck, you might think it's a duck, eh Harry?

If it thinks or writes like a real dumb ****, it is probably Meyer or
another right wing turd.

And you call yourself a writer? Snerk. You are a joke.

You are such a dummy you think I am "the" Harry What was your job...
giving handjobs?
--
Sent from my iPhone 5

hostess heads to the tank
 

In article ,
says...

Meyer wrote:
On 11/23/2012 12:38 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 23 Nov 2012 12:08:35 -0500, Meyer wrote:

On 11/23/2012 11:09 AM, wrote:
On Thu, 22 Nov 2012 21:21:59 -0500, BAR wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 22 Nov 2012 09:02:13 -0500, BAR wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Wed, 21 Nov 2012 04:43:19 -0800 (PST), Tim
wrote:

http://www.bizjournals.com/triangle/...s-on-line.html

This lesson is NOT about unions. This lesson is all about the evils of
indebtedness. MASSIVE indebtedness, with minimal demand for the
product, and little or no capital improvement.

The massive indebtedness is due to the unions.


Check and see who's name is on the promissory note.

Why did they have to get a promissory note?


Because they were spending more than they made.

You're pretty familiar with that scenario arncha Harry?

Do you see Harry everywhere?

If it looks like a duck and quacks like a duck, you might think it's a duck, eh Harry?

If it thinks or writes like a real dumb ****, it is probably Meyer or
another right wing turd.

If they are "right wing turds", it's Harry Krause.

hostess heads to the tank
 

On 11/23/2012 5:41 PM, harry wrote:
Meyer wrote:
On 11/23/2012 3:45 PM, harry wrote:
Meyer wrote:
On 11/23/2012 12:38 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 23 Nov 2012 12:08:35 -0500, Meyer wrote:

On 11/23/2012 11:09 AM, wrote:
On Thu, 22 Nov 2012 21:21:59 -0500, BAR wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 22 Nov 2012 09:02:13 -0500, BAR wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Wed, 21 Nov 2012 04:43:19 -0800 (PST), Tim
wrote:

http://www.bizjournals.com/triangle/...s-on-line.html

This lesson is NOT about unions. This lesson is all about the evils of
indebtedness. MASSIVE indebtedness, with minimal demand for the
product, and little or no capital improvement.

The massive indebtedness is due to the unions.


Check and see who's name is on the promissory note.

Why did they have to get a promissory note?


Because they were spending more than they made.

You're pretty familiar with that scenario arncha Harry?

Do you see Harry everywhere?

If it looks like a duck and quacks like a duck, you might think it's a duck, eh Harry?

If it thinks or writes like a real dumb ****, it is probably Meyer or
another right wing turd.

And you call yourself a writer? Snerk. You are a joke.

You are such a dummy you think I am "the" Harry What was your job...
giving handjobs?

Why would anyone in his right mind impersonate a loathsome, deadbeat,
tax cheat and coward?

hostess heads to the tank
 

Meyer wrote:
On 11/23/2012 5:41 PM, harry wrote:
Meyer wrote:
On 11/23/2012 3:45 PM, harry wrote:
Meyer wrote:
On 11/23/2012 12:38 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 23 Nov 2012 12:08:35 -0500, Meyer wrote:

On 11/23/2012 11:09 AM, wrote:
On Thu, 22 Nov 2012 21:21:59 -0500, BAR wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 22 Nov 2012 09:02:13 -0500, BAR wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Wed, 21 Nov 2012 04:43:19 -0800 (PST), Tim
wrote:

http://www.bizjournals.com/triangle/...s-on-line.html

This lesson is NOT about unions. This lesson is all about the evils of
indebtedness. MASSIVE indebtedness, with minimal demand for the
product, and little or no capital improvement.

The massive indebtedness is due to the unions.


Check and see who's name is on the promissory note.

Why did they have to get a promissory note?


Because they were spending more than they made.

You're pretty familiar with that scenario arncha Harry?

Do you see Harry everywhere?

If it looks like a duck and quacks like a duck, you might think it's a duck, eh Harry?

If it thinks or writes like a real dumb ****, it is probably Meyer or
another right wing turd.

And you call yourself a writer? Snerk. You are a joke.

You are such a dummy you think I am "the" Harry What was your job...
giving handjobs?

Why would anyone in his right mind impersonate a loathsome, deadbeat, tax cheat and coward?

The only fun here in dreck boats is in annoying you right wing racist
fools.
--
Sent from my iPhone 5

hostess heads to the tank
 

On 11/24/2012 7:49 AM, harry wrote:
Meyer wrote:
On 11/23/2012 5:41 PM, harry wrote:
Meyer wrote:
On 11/23/2012 3:45 PM, harry wrote:
Meyer wrote:
On 11/23/2012 12:38 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 23 Nov 2012 12:08:35 -0500, Meyer wrote:

On 11/23/2012 11:09 AM, wrote:
On Thu, 22 Nov 2012 21:21:59 -0500, BAR wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 22 Nov 2012 09:02:13 -0500, BAR wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Wed, 21 Nov 2012 04:43:19 -0800 (PST), Tim
wrote:

http://www.bizjournals.com/triangle/...s-on-line.html

This lesson is NOT about unions. This lesson is all about the evils of
indebtedness. MASSIVE indebtedness, with minimal demand for the
product, and little or no capital improvement.

The massive indebtedness is due to the unions.


Check and see who's name is on the promissory note.

Why did they have to get a promissory note?


Because they were spending more than they made.

You're pretty familiar with that scenario arncha Harry?

Do you see Harry everywhere?

If it looks like a duck and quacks like a duck, you might think it's a duck, eh Harry?

If it thinks or writes like a real dumb ****, it is probably Meyer or
another right wing turd.

And you call yourself a writer? Snerk. You are a joke.

You are such a dummy you think I am "the" Harry What was your job...
giving handjobs?

Why would anyone in his right mind impersonate a loathsome, deadbeat, tax cheat and coward?

The only fun here in dreck boats is in annoying you right wing racist
fools.

If you can't figger out how to enjoy life, that's your problem. You're
pathetic. And I don't mind reminding you of that. ;-)

hostess heads to the tank
 

Meyer wrote:
On 11/24/2012 7:49 AM, harry wrote:
Meyer wrote:
On 11/23/2012 5:41 PM, harry wrote:
Meyer wrote:
On 11/23/2012 3:45 PM, harry wrote:
Meyer wrote:
On 11/23/2012 12:38 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 23 Nov 2012 12:08:35 -0500, Meyer wrote:

On 11/23/2012 11:09 AM, wrote:
On Thu, 22 Nov 2012 21:21:59 -0500, BAR wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 22 Nov 2012 09:02:13 -0500, BAR wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Wed, 21 Nov 2012 04:43:19 -0800 (PST), Tim
wrote:

http://www.bizjournals.com/triangle/...s-on-line.html

This lesson is NOT about unions. This lesson is all about the evils of
indebtedness. MASSIVE indebtedness, with minimal demand for the
product, and little or no capital improvement.

The massive indebtedness is due to the unions.


Check and see who's name is on the promissory note.

Why did they have to get a promissory note?


Because they were spending more than they made.

You're pretty familiar with that scenario arncha Harry?

Do you see Harry everywhere?

If it looks like a duck and quacks like a duck, you might think
it's a duck, eh Harry?

If it thinks or writes like a real dumb ****, it is probably Meyer or
another right wing turd.

And you call yourself a writer? Snerk. You are a joke.

You are such a dummy you think I am "the" Harry What was your job...
giving handjobs?

Why would anyone in his right mind impersonate a loathsome, deadbeat,
tax cheat and coward?

The only fun here in dreck boats is in annoying you right wing racist
fools.

If you can't figger out how to enjoy life, that's your problem. You're
pathetic. And I don't mind reminding you of that. ;-)

You Twinkies are so easy!
--
Save the rec.boats Twinkies!