Whoohooo, I shot my own kid!
 

On Fri, 28 Sep 2012 22:45:51 -0400, wrote:

On Fri, 28 Sep 2012 20:59:15 -0400, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Fri, 28 Sep 2012 13:57:23 -0400, wrote:

So every kid who ever stole something should be shot dead? Or just this
kid?

It is an occupational hazard for "night time" burglars.

===

As well it should be, punishment fitting the crime. It is tragic for
the father however, although it's entirely possible that some of the
blame ultimately rests with him.

He certainly has to rethink his parenting skills.
His 15 year old is skulking around at 1AM in a ski mask on a school
night.

Yes, he's going to have to improve on those, in his next life.

Did your kids never do anything insanely stupid? You most likely just
never knew about it.

Whoohooo, I shot my own kid!
 

On Sat, 29 Sep 2012 10:06:13 -0700, "Califbill"
wrote:

"jps" wrote in message ...

On Fri, 28 Sep 2012 21:03:12 -0400, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Fri, 28 Sep 2012 14:54:15 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

It is an occupational hazard for "night time" burglars.

I'll ask again, should all kids who are out at night be killed?

===

The ones who are masked, armed, and trying to break into someone's
home?

I think it's perfectly reasonable.

The best part?

No repeat offenders.

Even if you don't believe in Darwin there's a certain poetic justice
to it.

Armed with what? A pair of pliers? Did you even bother to read the
article or anything related before passing judgment?

Sheesh.


----------------------
The report said a knife. As to being shot. Did you go out late at night
when you were 15, dressed in black with a black head covering? Looks like a
duck, quacks like a duck, probably is a duck. Did not really need a weapon,
but something shiny in the hands of a person dressed as a cat burglar in the
middle of the night, should be assumed to be a weapon.

Assuming the worst, a 15 year old kid on the wrong path. Bet his
father wishes he never bought a gun. But you wouldn't know how that
feels, you're another compassionate conservative who cannot fathom
walking in another's shoes. Just like Mitt.

Whoohooo, I shot my own kid!
 

On Sat, 29 Sep 2012 10:06:13 -0700, Califbill wrote:


The report said a knife. As to being shot. Did you go out late at
night when you were 15, dressed in black with a black head covering?
Looks like a duck, quacks like a duck, probably is a duck. Did not
really need a weapon,
but something shiny in the hands of a person dressed as a cat burglar in
the middle of the night, should be assumed to be a weapon.

However, Connecticut is a Castle Doctrine state not a Stand Your Ground
state. Without the knife, you have a duty to retreat. With the knife,
it's self defense. When you go outside the safety of your home, with a
gun, you run the risk.


http://www.cga.ct.gov/2007/rpt/2007-r-0052.htm

Whoohooo, I shot my own kid!
 

On Sat, 29 Sep 2012 02:24:49 -0400, JustWait
wrote:

On 9/29/2012 2:10 AM, jps wrote:
On Fri, 28 Sep 2012 15:18:53 -0400, JustWait
wrote:

On 9/28/2012 2:50 PM, jps wrote:
On Fri, 28 Sep 2012 12:16:30 -0400, JustWait
wrote:

On 9/28/2012 12:00 PM, wrote:


No charges have been filed. An autopsy on the boy is planned.

He saved society a lot of money in prison costs. The kid was a thief.


As bad as it is, I hope that turns out to be the case. Turns out the
house he was "breaking into" was his Aunt, his Fathers Sister. Would be
pretty bad if it turned out to be a prank, or other family drama.

I am not suggesting it was, and I haven't heard anything that would lead
me to believe that... I do wonder what kind of "weapon" the kid had, and
why he wouldn't know his dad would probably be armed with a firearm... I
know I would not have "moved toward" a known armed person, I would yell,
"dad, don't shoot".... Just sayin'.

Surprising analysis from the freak. My bet is on family trauma with a
kid who's half out of his mind and acting stupid.

Mistakes with guns aren't easily taken back.


Don't even try to justify your trolling. You actually used this awful
event to troll posters here (me) earlier in the thread.. Figures...

Got the hook set firmly in your cheek. You've reacted by posting
twice the number I have.


Wow, you can count. Now what kind of handgun do you carry again?

Snotty, posts 3X anyone else in here and accuses me of trolling.

Like a heroin junkie who knows he's sick but can't stop shooting junk.

Whoohooo, I shot my own kid!
 

"jps" wrote in message ...

On Sat, 29 Sep 2012 10:06:13 -0700, "Califbill"
wrote:

"jps" wrote in message ...

On Fri, 28 Sep 2012 21:03:12 -0400, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Fri, 28 Sep 2012 14:54:15 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

It is an occupational hazard for "night time" burglars.

I'll ask again, should all kids who are out at night be killed?

===

The ones who are masked, armed, and trying to break into someone's
home?

I think it's perfectly reasonable.

The best part?

No repeat offenders.

Even if you don't believe in Darwin there's a certain poetic justice
to it.

Armed with what? A pair of pliers? Did you even bother to read the
article or anything related before passing judgment?

Sheesh.


----------------------
The report said a knife. As to being shot. Did you go out late at night
when you were 15, dressed in black with a black head covering? Looks like
a
duck, quacks like a duck, probably is a duck. Did not really need a
weapon,
but something shiny in the hands of a person dressed as a cat burglar in
the
middle of the night, should be assumed to be a weapon.

Assuming the worst, a 15 year old kid on the wrong path. Bet his
father wishes he never bought a gun. But you wouldn't know how that
feels, you're another compassionate conservative who cannot fathom
walking in another's shoes. Just like Mitt.
----------------------------------

Nope, I would feel bad, feel bad for the dad. But it was brought on by the
kid! 15 years old, climbing out a window, dressed as a cat burglar and you
too could be killed. Not by the dad, but by someone else, cop included, or
the aunt where you were going to B&E. Just because the kid lives in a nice
neighborhood, does not mean he is not a scum ball thief. The biggest
thieves we have these days graduated from Harvard Univ. Have PhD's even.
Makes the local stop and rob robber look like a piker. Madoff stole how
many millions? GoldmanSackus has ripped off its clients and the taxpayers
for how many billion? Hell Bernanke has cost all of us trillions with his
printing bogus money.

Whoohooo, I shot my own kid!
 

On 9/29/2012 2:28 PM, thunder wrote:
On Sat, 29 Sep 2012 10:06:13 -0700, Califbill wrote:


The report said a knife. As to being shot. Did you go out late at
night when you were 15, dressed in black with a black head covering?
Looks like a duck, quacks like a duck, probably is a duck. Did not
really need a weapon,
but something shiny in the hands of a person dressed as a cat burglar in
the middle of the night, should be assumed to be a weapon.

However, Connecticut is a Castle Doctrine state not a Stand Your Ground
state. Without the knife, you have a duty to retreat. With the knife,
it's self defense. When you go outside the safety of your home, with a
gun, you run the risk.


http://www.cga.ct.gov/2007/rpt/2007-r-0052.htm


Well, it's pretty clear the guy had every legal right to shoot here in
CT based on what we (who actually looked) know so far. Should be a wash
as CT is not a swing state, the DNC doesn't need an election prop here
like in the Florida case...

Whoohooo, I shot my own kid!
 

In article ,
says...

In article om,
says...

On 9/29/2012 12:29 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 9/29/2012 12:23 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 29 Sep 2012 12:09:35 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:


Stop playing Dick Tracy. You will be shown the truth by the expert
investigators..........................in due time.

But Scotty said, and I quote: "The cops said it was a weapon". So he
really should be able to show me, wouldn't you think?

A police statement released by Lieutenant J. Paul Vance, a spokesman
for the Connecticut State Police, explains what happened next.
?Believing the suspect was armed with a weapon and about to attack
him, the (father) discharged his personal handgun at the suspect.? The
father then found the victim ?lying on the ground in the driveway with
obvious gunshot injuries, holding a weapon?.


"holding a weapon"


Now can we write the stupid **** off?

But...But Looky hasn't finished his cross examination.

None needed. I guess you and Scotty and Greg aren't bright enough to
understand the difference in what a reporter said and Scotty's assertion
that " COP" said he had a weapon.

You are too stupid and words cannot describe your ignorance.

yahoooo, kevin and JPS get to rub blood on their shirts again!
 

On 9/29/2012 3:37 PM, BAR wrote:
In article ,
says...

In article om,
says...

On 9/29/2012 12:29 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 9/29/2012 12:23 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 29 Sep 2012 12:09:35 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:


Stop playing Dick Tracy. You will be shown the truth by the expert
investigators..........................in due time.

But Scotty said, and I quote: "The cops said it was a weapon". So he
really should be able to show me, wouldn't you think?

A police statement released by Lieutenant J. Paul Vance, a spokesman
for the Connecticut State Police, explains what happened next.
?Believing the suspect was armed with a weapon and about to attack
him, the (father) discharged his personal handgun at the suspect.? The
father then found the victim ?lying on the ground in the driveway with
obvious gunshot injuries, holding a weapon?.


"holding a weapon"


Now can we write the stupid **** off?

But...But Looky hasn't finished his cross examination.

None needed. I guess you and Scotty and Greg aren't bright enough to
understand the difference in what a reporter said and Scotty's assertion
that " COP" said he had a weapon.

You are too stupid and words cannot describe your ignorance.




Seems the kid had no record and was adopted by the family a few years
back. Sounds like kind of a nerdy kid, and was a Civil Air Patrol Cadet
from what I am getting in local reports... Played on line games, but not
"shoot 'em up" stuff... Just something missing here unless the kid
really didn't know his adopted father had firearms??

Whoohooo, I shot my own kid!
 

In article om,
says...


Stop playing Dick Tracy. You will be shown the truth by the expert
investigators..........................in due time.

But Scotty said, and I quote: "The cops said it was a weapon". So he
really should be able to show me, wouldn't you think?

It's none of your business, is what I think.

Well, sure it is, it's to make a point, that you can't believe a thing
he says here.


He who?

Holy ****! Try to follow a thread! Look up above, who said "the cops
said it was a weapon"????? That would be your answer. Sometimes I feel
like I"m talking to my sister's 3 year old.

Whoohooo, I shot my own kid!
 

In article om,
says...

On 9/29/2012 12:50 PM, iBoaterer wrote:

A police statement released by Lieutenant J. Paul Vance, a spokesman
for the Connecticut State Police, explains what happened next.
?Believing the suspect was armed with a weapon and about to attack
him, the (father) discharged his personal handgun at the suspect.? The
father then found the victim ?lying on the ground in the driveway with
obvious gunshot injuries, holding a weapon?.


"holding a weapon"


Now can we write the stupid **** off?

Hell no! Again, that is what a damned REPORTER said. YOU said that the
COPS said he had a weapon. Are you too stupid to understand the
difference?


Did the reporter lie?

Could well be, but again, because of your unusual inability to follow a
thread, I've stated over and over that I don't give a damned what a
reporter said. SCOTTY SAID "THE COPS SAID IT WAS A WEAPON". That is a
lie.

Whoohooo, I shot my own kid!
 

In article ,
says...

In article ,
says...

In article om,
says...

On 9/29/2012 12:29 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 9/29/2012 12:23 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 29 Sep 2012 12:09:35 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:


Stop playing Dick Tracy. You will be shown the truth by the expert
investigators..........................in due time.

But Scotty said, and I quote: "The cops said it was a weapon". So he
really should be able to show me, wouldn't you think?

A police statement released by Lieutenant J. Paul Vance, a spokesman
for the Connecticut State Police, explains what happened next.
?Believing the suspect was armed with a weapon and about to attack
him, the (father) discharged his personal handgun at the suspect.? The
father then found the victim ?lying on the ground in the driveway with
obvious gunshot injuries, holding a weapon?.


"holding a weapon"


Now can we write the stupid **** off?

But...But Looky hasn't finished his cross examination.

None needed. I guess you and Scotty and Greg aren't bright enough to
understand the difference in what a reporter said and Scotty's assertion
that " COP" said he had a weapon.

You are too stupid and words cannot describe your ignorance.

Well, then oh, so smart, show me where a COP said that the kid had a
weapon.

yahoooo, kevin and JPS get to rub blood on their shirts again!
 

In article , says...

On 9/29/2012 3:37 PM, BAR wrote:
In article ,
says...

In article om,
says...

On 9/29/2012 12:29 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 9/29/2012 12:23 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 29 Sep 2012 12:09:35 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:


Stop playing Dick Tracy. You will be shown the truth by the expert
investigators..........................in due time.

But Scotty said, and I quote: "The cops said it was a weapon". So he
really should be able to show me, wouldn't you think?

A police statement released by Lieutenant J. Paul Vance, a spokesman
for the Connecticut State Police, explains what happened next.
?Believing the suspect was armed with a weapon and about to attack
him, the (father) discharged his personal handgun at the suspect.? The
father then found the victim ?lying on the ground in the driveway with
obvious gunshot injuries, holding a weapon?.


"holding a weapon"


Now can we write the stupid **** off?

But...But Looky hasn't finished his cross examination.

None needed. I guess you and Scotty and Greg aren't bright enough to
understand the difference in what a reporter said and Scotty's assertion
that " COP" said he had a weapon.

You are too stupid and words cannot describe your ignorance.




Seems the kid had no record and was adopted by the family a few years
back. Sounds like kind of a nerdy kid, and was a Civil Air Patrol Cadet
from what I am getting in local reports... Played on line games, but not
"shoot 'em up" stuff... Just something missing here unless the kid
really didn't know his adopted father had firearms??

Please show where the cops said that he had a weapon, liar.

Whoohooo, I shot my own kid!
 

In article om,
says...

On 9/29/2012 12:51 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article om,
says...

On 9/29/2012 12:23 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 29 Sep 2012 12:09:35 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:


Stop playing Dick Tracy. You will be shown the truth by the expert
investigators..........................in due time.

But Scotty said, and I quote: "The cops said it was a weapon". So he
really should be able to show me, wouldn't you think?

A police statement released by Lieutenant J. Paul Vance, a spokesman
for the Connecticut State Police, explains what happened next.
?Believing the suspect was armed with a weapon and about to attack
him, the (father) discharged his personal handgun at the suspect.? The
father then found the victim ?lying on the ground in the driveway with
obvious gunshot injuries, holding a weapon?.


"holding a weapon"

I wonder what the kid's rap sheet looks like? A peek at it might reveal
certain traits that might have a bearing on the case. It certainly did
in the Martin case.

Yep, true to FOXites everywhere, tried, convicted, hung without any
evidence.

Who told you there isn't any evidence?

Can't be, there hasn't been a trial yet.

Whoohooo, I shot my own kid!
 

In article ,
says...

"iBoaterer" wrote in message
...

In article m,
says...

On 9/29/2012 10:43 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article m,
says...

On 9/29/2012 10:11 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article m,
says...

On 9/29/2012 8:29 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

On 9/28/2012 5:45 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 28 Sep 2012 14:54:59 -0400, iBoaterer
wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Fri, 28 Sep 2012 12:47:18 -0400, JustWait

wrote:

On 9/28/2012 12:32 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 28 Sep 2012 09:08:07 -0700, jps
wrote:

You have any idea what happens in a 15 year old brain?
Idiocy, that's
what. Kid's brains are rewiring and their frontal cortex is
missing.
The brain stem is in control, immediate gratification.
Instead of
shooting him to death, perhaps he should have just taken him
to the
local police and have him experience the reality of being in
jail.

You assume the kid's only motive was to steal this woman's
Ipod

I find it troubling that he is going into a neighbor's home
wearing a
mask at 1 AM when he knows there is a woman in there alone.



... and it was his aunt...

I am sure there is more to this story than we know right now.

How are you so sure of that?

There is always more to the story when you are going from an
internet
post .


I saw a couple of the reports, and watch local news... It just
"seems"
to me like they are not telling the whole story. Very careful not
to
mention what the "weapon" was for one thing.

Amazing!!! The kid was carrying something so you just to the wild,
unfounded conclusion that it was a "weapon". What an insane fool!

Are you saying that what the kid was carrying couldn't be considered
a
weapon?

Your hand can be considered a weapon, dumbass. Should I shoot you dead
if you are out at night?

I love it when you contradict yourself.
I never wore a burglar costume when I was a kid.
Nowadays cops will shoot you for carrying a plastic gun replica.

What I asked, and you failed to answer was that your hand can be a
weapon, ie: anything could be called (by stupid people) a weapon,
therefore, should I shoot and kill you if you are out at night? OR do
you have to be a teenager in order for me to shoot you?

Learn one thing, dummy. You can't go around shooting people without
justification.

But where does this justification stop? It's been said in this thread
that someone should be shot and killed for doing... WHAT?

-----------------------------
For stupidity maybe. Stupidly being 15 years old, and outside in a burglary
outfit when you should be in bed. Then not surrendering when the other
person has a bigger weapon than you and does not know it is their son out to
pillage the neighbor.

Really? Someone should have the right to shoot and kill someone for
"stupidity"???? And where did you get this information that the kid was
out to "pillage the neighbor"??

Whoohooo, I shot my own kid!
 

In article ,
says...

On Sat, 29 Sep 2012 12:12:17 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article m,


But where does this justification stop? It's been said in this thread
that someone should be shot and killed for doing... WHAT?

When police officers arrived, Tyler was lying dead in the driveway
with a knife in his hand,

Cite?

Whoohooo, I shot my own kid!
 

In article ,
says...

On Sat, 29 Sep 2012 10:06:13 -0700, "Califbill"
wrote:

"jps" wrote in message ...

On Fri, 28 Sep 2012 21:03:12 -0400, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Fri, 28 Sep 2012 14:54:15 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

It is an occupational hazard for "night time" burglars.

I'll ask again, should all kids who are out at night be killed?

===

The ones who are masked, armed, and trying to break into someone's
home?

I think it's perfectly reasonable.

The best part?

No repeat offenders.

Even if you don't believe in Darwin there's a certain poetic justice
to it.

Armed with what? A pair of pliers? Did you even bother to read the
article or anything related before passing judgment?

Sheesh.


----------------------
The report said a knife. As to being shot. Did you go out late at night
when you were 15, dressed in black with a black head covering? Looks like a
duck, quacks like a duck, probably is a duck. Did not really need a weapon,
but something shiny in the hands of a person dressed as a cat burglar in the
middle of the night, should be assumed to be a weapon.

Assuming the worst, a 15 year old kid on the wrong path. Bet his
father wishes he never bought a gun. But you wouldn't know how that
feels, you're another compassionate conservative who cannot fathom
walking in another's shoes. Just like Mitt.

But the alleged passionate christian conservatives here think you should
be able to shoot and kill someone without any justification. I wonder
how these alleged christian conservatives would like it if someone shot
their child for doing something stupid?

Whoohooo, I shot my own kid!
 

In article , says...

On 9/29/2012 2:28 PM, thunder wrote:
On Sat, 29 Sep 2012 10:06:13 -0700, Califbill wrote:


The report said a knife. As to being shot. Did you go out late at
night when you were 15, dressed in black with a black head covering?
Looks like a duck, quacks like a duck, probably is a duck. Did not
really need a weapon,
but something shiny in the hands of a person dressed as a cat burglar in
the middle of the night, should be assumed to be a weapon.

However, Connecticut is a Castle Doctrine state not a Stand Your Ground
state. Without the knife, you have a duty to retreat. With the knife,
it's self defense. When you go outside the safety of your home, with a
gun, you run the risk.


http://www.cga.ct.gov/2007/rpt/2007-r-0052.htm


Well, it's pretty clear the guy had every legal right to shoot here in
CT based on what we (who actually looked) know so far. Should be a wash
as CT is not a swing state, the DNC doesn't need an election prop here
like in the Florida case...

What if in the near future someone did the same to your kid? We would
then see how justified you think it is.

Whoohooo, I shot my own kid!
 

On 9/30/2012 8:38 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article om,
says...


Stop playing Dick Tracy. You will be shown the truth by the expert
investigators..........................in due time.

But Scotty said, and I quote: "The cops said it was a weapon". So he
really should be able to show me, wouldn't you think?

It's none of your business, is what I think.

Well, sure it is, it's to make a point, that you can't believe a thing
he says here.


He who?

Holy ****! Try to follow a thread! Look up above, who said "the cops
said it was a weapon"????? That would be your answer. Sometimes I feel
like I"m talking to my sister's 3 year old.

Sometimes you act like a 3 year old.

Whoohooo, I shot my own kid!
 

On 9/30/2012 8:47 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

On Sat, 29 Sep 2012 10:06:13 -0700, "Califbill"
wrote:

"jps" wrote in message ...

On Fri, 28 Sep 2012 21:03:12 -0400, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Fri, 28 Sep 2012 14:54:15 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

It is an occupational hazard for "night time" burglars.

I'll ask again, should all kids who are out at night be killed?

===

The ones who are masked, armed, and trying to break into someone's
home?

I think it's perfectly reasonable.

The best part?

No repeat offenders.

Even if you don't believe in Darwin there's a certain poetic justice
to it.

Armed with what? A pair of pliers? Did you even bother to read the
article or anything related before passing judgment?

Sheesh.


----------------------
The report said a knife. As to being shot. Did you go out late at night
when you were 15, dressed in black with a black head covering? Looks like a
duck, quacks like a duck, probably is a duck. Did not really need a weapon,
but something shiny in the hands of a person dressed as a cat burglar in the
middle of the night, should be assumed to be a weapon.

Assuming the worst, a 15 year old kid on the wrong path. Bet his
father wishes he never bought a gun. But you wouldn't know how that
feels, you're another compassionate conservative who cannot fathom
walking in another's shoes. Just like Mitt.

But the alleged passionate christian conservatives here think you should
be able to shoot and kill someone without any justification. I wonder
how these alleged christian conservatives would like it if someone shot
their child for doing something stupid?

Why are you making these allegations?

Whoohooo, I shot my own kid!
 

On 9/30/2012 8:40 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article om,
says...

On 9/29/2012 12:50 PM, iBoaterer wrote:

A police statement released by Lieutenant J. Paul Vance, a spokesman
for the Connecticut State Police, explains what happened next.
?Believing the suspect was armed with a weapon and about to attack
him, the (father) discharged his personal handgun at the suspect.? The
father then found the victim ?lying on the ground in the driveway with
obvious gunshot injuries, holding a weapon?.


"holding a weapon"


Now can we write the stupid **** off?

Hell no! Again, that is what a damned REPORTER said. YOU said that the
COPS said he had a weapon. Are you too stupid to understand the
difference?


Did the reporter lie?

Could well be, but again, because of your unusual inability to follow a
thread, I've stated over and over that I don't give a damned what a
reporter said. SCOTTY SAID "THE COPS SAID IT WAS A WEAPON". That is a
lie.

Have a cookie, as she would say.

Whoohooo, I shot my own kid!
 

On 9/30/2012 8:42 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article om,
says...

On 9/29/2012 12:51 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article om,
says...

On 9/29/2012 12:23 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 29 Sep 2012 12:09:35 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:


Stop playing Dick Tracy. You will be shown the truth by the expert
investigators..........................in due time.

But Scotty said, and I quote: "The cops said it was a weapon". So he
really should be able to show me, wouldn't you think?

A police statement released by Lieutenant J. Paul Vance, a spokesman
for the Connecticut State Police, explains what happened next.
?Believing the suspect was armed with a weapon and about to attack
him, the (father) discharged his personal handgun at the suspect.? The
father then found the victim ?lying on the ground in the driveway with
obvious gunshot injuries, holding a weapon?.


"holding a weapon"

I wonder what the kid's rap sheet looks like? A peek at it might reveal
certain traits that might have a bearing on the case. It certainly did
in the Martin case.

Yep, true to FOXites everywhere, tried, convicted, hung without any
evidence.

Who told you there isn't any evidence?

Can't be, there hasn't been a trial yet.

What? You really are dumb.

Whoohooo, I shot my own kid!
 

In article m,
says...

On 9/30/2012 8:42 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article om,
says...

On 9/29/2012 12:51 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article om,
says...

On 9/29/2012 12:23 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 29 Sep 2012 12:09:35 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:


Stop playing Dick Tracy. You will be shown the truth by the expert
investigators..........................in due time.

But Scotty said, and I quote: "The cops said it was a weapon". So he
really should be able to show me, wouldn't you think?

A police statement released by Lieutenant J. Paul Vance, a spokesman
for the Connecticut State Police, explains what happened next.
?Believing the suspect was armed with a weapon and about to attack
him, the (father) discharged his personal handgun at the suspect.? The
father then found the victim ?lying on the ground in the driveway with
obvious gunshot injuries, holding a weapon?.


"holding a weapon"

I wonder what the kid's rap sheet looks like? A peek at it might reveal
certain traits that might have a bearing on the case. It certainly did
in the Martin case.

Yep, true to FOXites everywhere, tried, convicted, hung without any
evidence.

Who told you there isn't any evidence?

Can't be, there hasn't been a trial yet.

What? You really are dumb.

You have to wait and see what is ADMISSIBLE.

Whoohooo, I shot my own kid!
 

In article m,
says...

On 9/30/2012 8:38 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article om,
says...


Stop playing Dick Tracy. You will be shown the truth by the expert
investigators..........................in due time.

But Scotty said, and I quote: "The cops said it was a weapon". So he
really should be able to show me, wouldn't you think?

It's none of your business, is what I think.

Well, sure it is, it's to make a point, that you can't believe a thing
he says here.


He who?

Holy ****! Try to follow a thread! Look up above, who said "the cops
said it was a weapon"????? That would be your answer. Sometimes I feel
like I"m talking to my sister's 3 year old.

Sometimes you act like a 3 year old.

To anyone with a working brain, my sentences make complete sense.

Whoohooo, I shot my own kid!
 

On 9/30/2012 10:22 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article m,
says...

On 9/30/2012 8:42 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article om,
says...

On 9/29/2012 12:51 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article om,
says...

On 9/29/2012 12:23 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 29 Sep 2012 12:09:35 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:


Stop playing Dick Tracy. You will be shown the truth by the expert
investigators..........................in due time.

But Scotty said, and I quote: "The cops said it was a weapon". So he
really should be able to show me, wouldn't you think?

A police statement released by Lieutenant J. Paul Vance, a spokesman
for the Connecticut State Police, explains what happened next.
?Believing the suspect was armed with a weapon and about to attack
him, the (father) discharged his personal handgun at the suspect.? The
father then found the victim ?lying on the ground in the driveway with
obvious gunshot injuries, holding a weapon?.


"holding a weapon"

I wonder what the kid's rap sheet looks like? A peek at it might reveal
certain traits that might have a bearing on the case. It certainly did
in the Martin case.

Yep, true to FOXites everywhere, tried, convicted, hung without any
evidence.

Who told you there isn't any evidence?

Can't be, there hasn't been a trial yet.

What? You really are dumb.

You have to wait and see what is ADMISSIBLE.
Who told you there isn't any evidence?

Can't be, there hasn't been a trial yet.

What? You really are dumb.

Whoohooo, I shot my own kid!
 

On 9/30/2012 10:23 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article m,
says...

On 9/30/2012 8:38 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article om,
says...


Stop playing Dick Tracy. You will be shown the truth by the expert
investigators..........................in due time.

But Scotty said, and I quote: "The cops said it was a weapon". So he
really should be able to show me, wouldn't you think?

It's none of your business, is what I think.

Well, sure it is, it's to make a point, that you can't believe a thing
he says here.


He who?

Holy ****! Try to follow a thread! Look up above, who said "the cops
said it was a weapon"????? That would be your answer. Sometimes I feel
like I"m talking to my sister's 3 year old.

Sometimes you act like a 3 year old.

To anyone with a working brain, my sentences make complete sense.


I showed your post to my dog and he wagged his tail. I guess you are
correct.

Whoohooo, I shot my own kid!
 

On 9/30/2012 10:52 AM, Meyer wrote:
On 9/30/2012 10:23 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article m,
says...

On 9/30/2012 8:38 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article om,
says...


Stop playing Dick Tracy. You will be shown the truth by the expert
investigators..........................in due time.

But Scotty said, and I quote: "The cops said it was a weapon".
So he
really should be able to show me, wouldn't you think?

It's none of your business, is what I think.

Well, sure it is, it's to make a point, that you can't believe a
thing
he says here.


He who?

Holy ****! Try to follow a thread! Look up above, who said "the cops
said it was a weapon"????? That would be your answer. Sometimes I feel
like I"m talking to my sister's 3 year old.

Sometimes you act like a 3 year old.

To anyone with a working brain, my sentences make complete sense.


I showed your post to my dog and he wagged his tail. I guess you are
correct.

Ok, now that was funny...

Whoohooo, I shot my own kid!
 

In article ,
says...

On Sun, 30 Sep 2012 08:41:17 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

Well, then oh, so smart, show me where a COP said that the kid had a
weapon.

I gave you the quote from Vance, the investigating officer who said
the kid was laying dead with a knife in his hand when the cops
arrived.

I suppose dad might have planted the knife on him, is that your
assertion?

How do you know his intent was to use the knife as a weapon? As I stated
before, anything can be a weapon if there is INTENT to use it as a
weapon, even your head. Oh, and your assertion before that he probably
had a record, etc. was dead wrong.

Whoohooo, I shot my own kid!
 

In article , says...

On 9/30/2012 10:52 AM, Meyer wrote:
On 9/30/2012 10:23 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article m,
says...

On 9/30/2012 8:38 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article om,
says...


Stop playing Dick Tracy. You will be shown the truth by the expert
investigators..........................in due time.

But Scotty said, and I quote: "The cops said it was a weapon".
So he
really should be able to show me, wouldn't you think?

It's none of your business, is what I think.

Well, sure it is, it's to make a point, that you can't believe a
thing
he says here.


He who?

Holy ****! Try to follow a thread! Look up above, who said "the cops
said it was a weapon"????? That would be your answer. Sometimes I feel
like I"m talking to my sister's 3 year old.

Sometimes you act like a 3 year old.

To anyone with a working brain, my sentences make complete sense.


I showed your post to my dog and he wagged his tail. I guess you are
correct.

Ok, now that was funny...

I guess to a moron.

Whoohooo, I shot my own kid!
 

On 9/30/2012 11:57 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

On Sun, 30 Sep 2012 08:41:17 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

Well, then oh, so smart, show me where a COP said that the kid had a
weapon.

I gave you the quote from Vance, the investigating officer who said
the kid was laying dead with a knife in his hand when the cops
arrived.

I suppose dad might have planted the knife on him, is that your
assertion?

How do you know his intent was to use the knife as a weapon? As I stated
before, anything can be a weapon if there is INTENT to use it as a
weapon, even your head. Oh, and your assertion before that he probably
had a record, etc. was dead wrong.

There is certainly a pile of circumstantial EVIDENCE here that will
undoubtedly be used to steer an investigation which could lead to a
charge of some sort and possibly a trial.
(See if Loogy can pick up on the subtle reference to a stupid remark he
made recently)

Whoohooo, I shot my own kid!
 

In article ,
says...

In article ,
says...

On Sun, 30 Sep 2012 08:41:17 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

Well, then oh, so smart, show me where a COP said that the kid had a
weapon.

I gave you the quote from Vance, the investigating officer who said
the kid was laying dead with a knife in his hand when the cops
arrived.

I suppose dad might have planted the knife on him, is that your
assertion?

How do you know his intent was to use the knife as a weapon? As I stated
before, anything can be a weapon if there is INTENT to use it as a
weapon, even your head. Oh, and your assertion before that he probably
had a record, etc. was dead wrong.

The kid didn't have a bag of apples he was going to peal.

Whoohooo, I shot my own kid!
 

On 9/30/2012 1:56 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 30 Sep 2012 12:19:08 -0400, Meyer wrote:

On 9/30/2012 11:57 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

On Sun, 30 Sep 2012 08:41:17 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

Well, then oh, so smart, show me where a COP said that the kid had a
weapon.

I gave you the quote from Vance, the investigating officer who said
the kid was laying dead with a knife in his hand when the cops
arrived.

I suppose dad might have planted the knife on him, is that your
assertion?

How do you know his intent was to use the knife as a weapon? As I stated
before, anything can be a weapon if there is INTENT to use it as a
weapon, even your head. Oh, and your assertion before that he probably
had a record, etc. was dead wrong.

There is certainly a pile of circumstantial EVIDENCE here that will
undoubtedly be used to steer an investigation which could lead to a
charge of some sort and possibly a trial.
(See if Loogy can pick up on the subtle reference to a stupid remark he
made recently)

A trial for what? Shooting someone who is coming at you with a knife?

Well maybe in Connecticut.

Yes maybe. Ct. is a Castle Doctrine state.

Whoohooo, I shot my own kid!
 

"iBoaterer" wrote in message
...

In article ,
says...

"iBoaterer" wrote in message
...

In article m,
says...

On 9/29/2012 10:43 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article m,
says...

On 9/29/2012 10:11 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article m,
says...

On 9/29/2012 8:29 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

On 9/28/2012 5:45 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 28 Sep 2012 14:54:59 -0400, iBoaterer
wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Fri, 28 Sep 2012 12:47:18 -0400, JustWait

wrote:

On 9/28/2012 12:32 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 28 Sep 2012 09:08:07 -0700, jps
wrote:

You have any idea what happens in a 15 year old brain?
Idiocy, that's
what. Kid's brains are rewiring and their frontal cortex
is
missing.
The brain stem is in control, immediate gratification.
Instead of
shooting him to death, perhaps he should have just taken
him
to the
local police and have him experience the reality of being
in
jail.

You assume the kid's only motive was to steal this woman's
Ipod

I find it troubling that he is going into a neighbor's home
wearing a
mask at 1 AM when he knows there is a woman in there alone.



... and it was his aunt...

I am sure there is more to this story than we know right now.

How are you so sure of that?

There is always more to the story when you are going from an
internet
post .


I saw a couple of the reports, and watch local news... It just
"seems"
to me like they are not telling the whole story. Very careful not
to
mention what the "weapon" was for one thing.

Amazing!!! The kid was carrying something so you just to the wild,
unfounded conclusion that it was a "weapon". What an insane fool!

Are you saying that what the kid was carrying couldn't be
considered
a
weapon?

Your hand can be considered a weapon, dumbass. Should I shoot you
dead
if you are out at night?

I love it when you contradict yourself.
I never wore a burglar costume when I was a kid.
Nowadays cops will shoot you for carrying a plastic gun replica.

What I asked, and you failed to answer was that your hand can be a
weapon, ie: anything could be called (by stupid people) a weapon,
therefore, should I shoot and kill you if you are out at night? OR do
you have to be a teenager in order for me to shoot you?

Learn one thing, dummy. You can't go around shooting people without
justification.

But where does this justification stop? It's been said in this thread
that someone should be shot and killed for doing... WHAT?

-----------------------------
For stupidity maybe. Stupidly being 15 years old, and outside in a
burglary
outfit when you should be in bed. Then not surrendering when the other
person has a bigger weapon than you and does not know it is their son out
to
pillage the neighbor.

Really? Someone should have the right to shoot and kill someone for
"stupidity"???? And where did you get this information that the kid was
out to "pillage the neighbor"??


------------------------------------
Dressed in black, head covered in black, carrying a knife at 1 am in the
morning, not on the sidewalk, but sneaking around a house, and should have
been in bed. You are having to really stretch or you really are dumb as a
rock to make a case the kid was doing nothing but being stupid in his
pranks.

Whoohooo, I shot my own kid!
 

In article ,
says...

On Sun, 30 Sep 2012 11:57:46 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Sun, 30 Sep 2012 08:41:17 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

Well, then oh, so smart, show me where a COP said that the kid had a
weapon.

I gave you the quote from Vance, the investigating officer who said
the kid was laying dead with a knife in his hand when the cops
arrived.

I suppose dad might have planted the knife on him, is that your
assertion?

How do you know his intent was to use the knife as a weapon? As I stated
before, anything can be a weapon if there is INTENT to use it as a
weapon, even your head. Oh, and your assertion before that he probably
had a record, etc. was dead wrong.

Careful now, you are running backward so fast you might go back in
time.

First he didn't have a weapon, then it wasn't a knife, now you are
saying he didn't really mean to hurt anyone with the knife. Pretty
soon it will be "well he didn't stab anyone"

Look up Tueller drill. Pop did exactly what you would learn in a
handgun class. A person advancing with a knife is an imminent threat.
At 21 feet, you have about a second to a second and a half before you
are stabbed.

Try this. It's only a weapon if it's the users intent to use it as such.
What is so hard to understand about that?

Whoohooo, I shot my own kid!
 

"iBoaterer" wrote in message
...

In article ,
says...

On Sat, 29 Sep 2012 10:06:13 -0700, "Califbill"
wrote:

"jps" wrote in message
.. .

On Fri, 28 Sep 2012 21:03:12 -0400, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Fri, 28 Sep 2012 14:54:15 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

It is an occupational hazard for "night time" burglars.

I'll ask again, should all kids who are out at night be killed?

===

The ones who are masked, armed, and trying to break into someone's
home?

I think it's perfectly reasonable.

The best part?

No repeat offenders.

Even if you don't believe in Darwin there's a certain poetic justice
to it.

Armed with what? A pair of pliers? Did you even bother to read the
article or anything related before passing judgment?

Sheesh.


----------------------
The report said a knife. As to being shot. Did you go out late at night
when you were 15, dressed in black with a black head covering? Looks
like a
duck, quacks like a duck, probably is a duck. Did not really need a
weapon,
but something shiny in the hands of a person dressed as a cat burglar in
the
middle of the night, should be assumed to be a weapon.

Assuming the worst, a 15 year old kid on the wrong path. Bet his
father wishes he never bought a gun. But you wouldn't know how that
feels, you're another compassionate conservative who cannot fathom
walking in another's shoes. Just like Mitt.

But the alleged passionate christian conservatives here think you should
be able to shoot and kill someone without any justification. I wonder
how these alleged christian conservatives would like it if someone shot
their child for doing something stupid?


-------------------------------
Most everyone would feel bad their son was killed. Even if the kid was in
the middle of a robbery at the local stop and rob with a shotgun in his
hands. Does not mean the kid did not deserve to be eliminated from the gene
pool.

Whoohooo, I shot my own kid!
 

In article ,
says...

In article ,
says...

In article ,
says...

On Sun, 30 Sep 2012 08:41:17 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

Well, then oh, so smart, show me where a COP said that the kid had a
weapon.

I gave you the quote from Vance, the investigating officer who said
the kid was laying dead with a knife in his hand when the cops
arrived.

I suppose dad might have planted the knife on him, is that your
assertion?

How do you know his intent was to use the knife as a weapon? As I stated
before, anything can be a weapon if there is INTENT to use it as a
weapon, even your head. Oh, and your assertion before that he probably
had a record, etc. was dead wrong.

The kid didn't have a bag of apples he was going to peal.

So in your mind he had a knife to use to commit a crime? Damn, that's a
stretch! No wonder you think that Zimmerman was accosted by a kid with a
bag of Skittles.

Whoohooo, I shot my own kid!
 

"iBoaterer" wrote in message
...

In article , says...

On 9/29/2012 2:28 PM, thunder wrote:
On Sat, 29 Sep 2012 10:06:13 -0700, Califbill wrote:


The report said a knife. As to being shot. Did you go out late at
night when you were 15, dressed in black with a black head covering?
Looks like a duck, quacks like a duck, probably is a duck. Did not
really need a weapon,
but something shiny in the hands of a person dressed as a cat burglar
in
the middle of the night, should be assumed to be a weapon.

However, Connecticut is a Castle Doctrine state not a Stand Your Ground
state. Without the knife, you have a duty to retreat. With the knife,
it's self defense. When you go outside the safety of your home, with a
gun, you run the risk.


http://www.cga.ct.gov/2007/rpt/2007-r-0052.htm


Well, it's pretty clear the guy had every legal right to shoot here in
CT based on what we (who actually looked) know so far. Should be a wash
as CT is not a swing state, the DNC doesn't need an election prop here
like in the Florida case...

What if in the near future someone did the same to your kid? We would
then see how justified you think it is.


----------------------

My kids did not sneak out at night and look to be robbing people. They were
raised with morals.

Whoohooo, I shot my own kid!
 

"iBoaterer" wrote in message
...

In article , says...

On 9/30/2012 10:52 AM, Meyer wrote:
On 9/30/2012 10:23 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article m,
says...

On 9/30/2012 8:38 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article om,
says...


Stop playing Dick Tracy. You will be shown the truth by the
expert
investigators..........................in due time.

But Scotty said, and I quote: "The cops said it was a weapon".
So he
really should be able to show me, wouldn't you think?

It's none of your business, is what I think.

Well, sure it is, it's to make a point, that you can't believe a
thing
he says here.


He who?

Holy ****! Try to follow a thread! Look up above, who said "the cops
said it was a weapon"????? That would be your answer. Sometimes I
feel
like I"m talking to my sister's 3 year old.

Sometimes you act like a 3 year old.

To anyone with a working brain, my sentences make complete sense.


I showed your post to my dog and he wagged his tail. I guess you are
correct.

Ok, now that was funny...

I guess to a moron.
------------------
Then you should have been rotflol.

Whoohooo, I shot my own kid!
 

On 9/30/2012 3:08 PM, Califbill wrote:
"iBoaterer" wrote in message
...

In article ,
says...

On Sat, 29 Sep 2012 10:06:13 -0700, "Califbill"
wrote:

"jps" wrote in message
.. .

On Fri, 28 Sep 2012 21:03:12 -0400, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Fri, 28 Sep 2012 14:54:15 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

It is an occupational hazard for "night time" burglars.

I'll ask again, should all kids who are out at night be killed?

===

The ones who are masked, armed, and trying to break into someone's
home?

I think it's perfectly reasonable.

The best part?

No repeat offenders.

Even if you don't believe in Darwin there's a certain poetic justice
to it.

Armed with what? A pair of pliers? Did you even bother to read the
article or anything related before passing judgment?

Sheesh.


----------------------
The report said a knife. As to being shot. Did you go out late at
night
when you were 15, dressed in black with a black head covering? Looks
like a
duck, quacks like a duck, probably is a duck. Did not really need a
weapon,
but something shiny in the hands of a person dressed as a cat burglar
in the
middle of the night, should be assumed to be a weapon.

Assuming the worst, a 15 year old kid on the wrong path. Bet his
father wishes he never bought a gun. But you wouldn't know how that
feels, you're another compassionate conservative who cannot fathom
walking in another's shoes. Just like Mitt.

But the alleged passionate christian conservatives here think you should
be able to shoot and kill someone without any justification. I wonder
how these alleged christian conservatives would like it if someone shot
their child for doing something stupid?


-------------------------------
Most everyone would feel bad their son was killed. Even if the kid was
in the middle of a robbery at the local stop and rob with a shotgun in
his hands. Does not mean the kid did not deserve to be eliminated from
the gene pool.


The lie is the assertion he makes that anybody thinks "it's ok to shoot
somebody **without any justification**.. I could sit here and say,
"kevin says it's ok to rape little children as long as they don't speak
english"... and would be as dishonest as the silly arguments this kevin
retard makes here...

Whoohooo, I shot my own kid!
 

On Sun, 30 Sep 2012 15:09:04 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

So in your mind he had a knife to use to commit a crime? Damn, that's a
stretch!

===

The analysis is really very simple:

- A masked intruder advances towards you with a knife in his hand.

- A knife is a deadly weapon.

- You have a split second to make a decision: Try to outrun them;
Defend yourself (which you are prepared to do); Take a chance on being
attacked with a deadly weapon.

Your choice.

Whoohooo, I shot my own kid!
 

"iBoaterer" wrote in message
...

In article ,
says...

On Sun, 30 Sep 2012 11:57:46 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Sun, 30 Sep 2012 08:41:17 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

Well, then oh, so smart, show me where a COP said that the kid had a
weapon.

I gave you the quote from Vance, the investigating officer who said
the kid was laying dead with a knife in his hand when the cops
arrived.

I suppose dad might have planted the knife on him, is that your
assertion?

How do you know his intent was to use the knife as a weapon? As I stated
before, anything can be a weapon if there is INTENT to use it as a
weapon, even your head. Oh, and your assertion before that he probably
had a record, etc. was dead wrong.

Careful now, you are running backward so fast you might go back in
time.

First he didn't have a weapon, then it wasn't a knife, now you are
saying he didn't really mean to hurt anyone with the knife. Pretty
soon it will be "well he didn't stab anyone"

Look up Tueller drill. Pop did exactly what you would learn in a
handgun class. A person advancing with a knife is an imminent threat.
At 21 feet, you have about a second to a second and a half before you
are stabbed.

Try this. It's only a weapon if it's the users intent to use it as such.
What is so hard to understand about that?


-------------------------------
Carry a conceal gun without a permit and convince the judge it is not a
weapon. Tell him you only carried for self defense. See what progresses.