Uh Oh...
 

ORLANDO, Fla. -- Forensic tests made public Wednesday show that George
Zimmerman's was the only DNA that could be identified on the grip of
the gun used to fatally shoot 17-year-old Trayvon Martin.

The results rule out Martin's DNA from being on the gun's grip.
Zimmerman's DNA also was identified on the gun's holster, but no
determination could be made as to whether Martin's DNA was on the
gun's holster, according to the report from the Florida Department of
Law Enforcement.


Looks like no "struggle for the gun" argument to be made.

Uh Oh...
 

In article ,
says...

ORLANDO, Fla. -- Forensic tests made public Wednesday show that George
Zimmerman's was the only DNA that could be identified on the grip of
the gun used to fatally shoot 17-year-old Trayvon Martin.

The results rule out Martin's DNA from being on the gun's grip.
Zimmerman's DNA also was identified on the gun's holster, but no
determination could be made as to whether Martin's DNA was on the
gun's holster, according to the report from the Florida Department of
Law Enforcement.


Looks like no "struggle for the gun" argument to be made.

You've been watching too many TV shows.

Uh Oh...
 

On Wed, 19 Sep 2012 19:41:06 -0400, BAR wrote:

In article ,
says...

ORLANDO, Fla. -- Forensic tests made public Wednesday show that George
Zimmerman's was the only DNA that could be identified on the grip of
the gun used to fatally shoot 17-year-old Trayvon Martin.

The results rule out Martin's DNA from being on the gun's grip.
Zimmerman's DNA also was identified on the gun's holster, but no
determination could be made as to whether Martin's DNA was on the
gun's holster, according to the report from the Florida Department of
Law Enforcement.


Looks like no "struggle for the gun" argument to be made.

You've been watching too many TV shows.

===

Yes, and furthermore no struggle for the gun is necessary for
Zimmerman to have felt "threatened" although it would certainly help
his defense.

Uh Oh...
 

In article ,
says...

On Wed, 19 Sep 2012 16:31:53 -0700, jps wrote:


ORLANDO, Fla. -- Forensic tests made public Wednesday show that George
Zimmerman's was the only DNA that could be identified on the grip of
the gun used to fatally shoot 17-year-old Trayvon Martin.

The results rule out Martin's DNA from being on the gun's grip.
Zimmerman's DNA also was identified on the gun's holster, but no
determination could be made as to whether Martin's DNA was on the
gun's holster, according to the report from the Florida Department of
Law Enforcement.


Looks like no "struggle for the gun" argument to be made.

If Zimmerman was even slightly trained in gun retention, there could
be a hell of a struggle and Martin would still have never touched the
gun.

Did you hear, Omara got Lester tossed. The immunity hearing will be in
front of another judge.

Intersting!

Uh Oh...
 

On Sep 19, 7:41*pm, BAR wrote:
In article ,
says...



ORLANDO, Fla. -- Forensic tests made public Wednesday show that George
Zimmerman's was the only DNA that could be identified on the grip of
the gun used to fatally shoot 17-year-old Trayvon Martin.

The results rule out Martin's DNA from being on the gun's grip.
Zimmerman's DNA also was identified on the gun's holster, but no
determination could be made as to whether Martin's DNA was on the
gun's holster, according to the report from the Florida Department of
Law Enforcement.

Looks like no "struggle for the gun" argument to be made.

You've been watching too many TV shows.

" It " wants to be on CSI Miami....as a floor sweeper.

Uh Oh...
 

In article ,
says...

On Wed, 19 Sep 2012 16:31:53 -0700, jps wrote:


ORLANDO, Fla. -- Forensic tests made public Wednesday show that George
Zimmerman's was the only DNA that could be identified on the grip of
the gun used to fatally shoot 17-year-old Trayvon Martin.

The results rule out Martin's DNA from being on the gun's grip.
Zimmerman's DNA also was identified on the gun's holster, but no
determination could be made as to whether Martin's DNA was on the
gun's holster, according to the report from the Florida Department of
Law Enforcement.


Looks like no "struggle for the gun" argument to be made.

There was an article in the paper about this today.
It turns out that not only was there no Martin DNA on the gun, there
was also NO Zimmerman DNA on the gun. (the only identifiable DNA was
on the holster)


Maybe Zimmerman didn't do it ;-)

We know that Zimmerman kept his weapon clean.

Uh Oh...
 

On Thu, 20 Sep 2012 18:14:53 -0400, BAR wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Wed, 19 Sep 2012 16:31:53 -0700, jps wrote:


ORLANDO, Fla. -- Forensic tests made public Wednesday show that George
Zimmerman's was the only DNA that could be identified on the grip of
the gun used to fatally shoot 17-year-old Trayvon Martin.

The results rule out Martin's DNA from being on the gun's grip.
Zimmerman's DNA also was identified on the gun's holster, but no
determination could be made as to whether Martin's DNA was on the
gun's holster, according to the report from the Florida Department of
Law Enforcement.


Looks like no "struggle for the gun" argument to be made.

There was an article in the paper about this today.
It turns out that not only was there no Martin DNA on the gun, there
was also NO Zimmerman DNA on the gun. (the only identifiable DNA was
on the holster)


Maybe Zimmerman didn't do it ;-)

We know that Zimmerman kept his weapon clean.

Clean weapons are happy weapons!

Uh Oh...
 

On 9/21/2012 12:49 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 21 Sep 2012 11:04:49 -0400, Wayne.B
wrote:

Whether or not Zimmerman is guilty of a crime is something the courts
will have to decide. It has become pretty clear however that he is
not exactly a model citizen or a paragon of good judgement. In
addition to that he has cast a lot of unwanted attention onto the
stand your ground law.

It also increased the number of people who simply do not want to be
involved.
Why would you want to take the chance of paying too much attention to
a thug who can beat you senseless and you can't defend yourself. It is
better to just look the other way.


Well, when you get down to it, that's what folks like Sharpton and
Jackson, Enfume want. They want to take the pressure off of the
criminals to keep the cycle that feeds them, going...

Uh Oh...
 

In article ,
says...

On Fri, 21 Sep 2012 11:04:49 -0400, Wayne.B
wrote:

Whether or not Zimmerman is guilty of a crime is something the courts
will have to decide. It has become pretty clear however that he is
not exactly a model citizen or a paragon of good judgement. In
addition to that he has cast a lot of unwanted attention onto the
stand your ground law.

It also increased the number of people who simply do not want to be
involved.
Why would you want to take the chance of paying too much attention to
a thug who can beat you senseless and you can't defend yourself. It is
better to just look the other way.

And that's what Martin tried to do!

Uh Oh...
 

In article , says...

On 9/21/2012 12:49 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 21 Sep 2012 11:04:49 -0400, Wayne.B
wrote:

Whether or not Zimmerman is guilty of a crime is something the courts
will have to decide. It has become pretty clear however that he is
not exactly a model citizen or a paragon of good judgement. In
addition to that he has cast a lot of unwanted attention onto the
stand your ground law.

It also increased the number of people who simply do not want to be
involved.
Why would you want to take the chance of paying too much attention to
a thug who can beat you senseless and you can't defend yourself. It is
better to just look the other way.


Well, when you get down to it, that's what folks like Sharpton and
Jackson, Enfume want. They want to take the pressure off of the
criminals to keep the cycle that feeds them, going...

Damn you are insane.

Uh Oh...
 

In article ,
says...

On Fri, 21 Sep 2012 13:21:50 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Fri, 21 Sep 2012 11:04:49 -0400, Wayne.B
wrote:

Whether or not Zimmerman is guilty of a crime is something the courts
will have to decide. It has become pretty clear however that he is
not exactly a model citizen or a paragon of good judgement. In
addition to that he has cast a lot of unwanted attention onto the
stand your ground law.

It also increased the number of people who simply do not want to be
involved.
Why would you want to take the chance of paying too much attention to
a thug who can beat you senseless and you can't defend yourself. It is
better to just look the other way.

And that's what Martin tried to do!

Bull**** He confronted Zimmerman. "why are you following me" remember?


After Zimmerman confronted him, he asked why.

It is ludicrous to assume that a teenaged football star could not
outrun an old fat guy if he was trying to get away.

So he didn't retreat just like the no retreat law, huh?

Uh Oh...
 

On Friday, September 21, 2012 4:22:59 PM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,

says...



On Fri, 21 Sep 2012 13:21:50 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:



In article ,

says...



On Fri, 21 Sep 2012 11:04:49 -0400, Wayne.B

wrote:



Whether or not Zimmerman is guilty of a crime is something the courts

will have to decide. It has become pretty clear however that he is

not exactly a model citizen or a paragon of good judgement. In

addition to that he has cast a lot of unwanted attention onto the

stand your ground law.



It also increased the number of people who simply do not want to be

involved.

Why would you want to take the chance of paying too much attention to

a thug who can beat you senseless and you can't defend yourself. It is

better to just look the other way.



And that's what Martin tried to do!



Bull**** He confronted Zimmerman. "why are you following me" remember?


After Zimmerman confronted him, he asked why.

Oh, you were there?

Uh Oh...
 

On 9/21/2012 3:01 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 21 Sep 2012 13:21:50 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Fri, 21 Sep 2012 11:04:49 -0400, Wayne.B
wrote:

Whether or not Zimmerman is guilty of a crime is something the courts
will have to decide. It has become pretty clear however that he is
not exactly a model citizen or a paragon of good judgement. In
addition to that he has cast a lot of unwanted attention onto the
stand your ground law.

It also increased the number of people who simply do not want to be
involved.
Why would you want to take the chance of paying too much attention to
a thug who can beat you senseless and you can't defend yourself. It is
better to just look the other way.

And that's what Martin tried to do!

Bull**** He confronted Zimmerman. "why are you following me" remember?

It is ludicrous to assume that a teenaged football star could not
outrun an old fat guy if he was trying to get away.

Seems like the gun malfunctioned and went off on it's own, at just the
right time. There was no human DNA on it. Case closed.

Uh Oh...
 

In article ,
says...

On Friday, September 21, 2012 4:22:59 PM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,

says...



On Fri, 21 Sep 2012 13:21:50 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:



In article ,

says...



On Fri, 21 Sep 2012 11:04:49 -0400, Wayne.B

wrote:



Whether or not Zimmerman is guilty of a crime is something the courts

will have to decide. It has become pretty clear however that he is

not exactly a model citizen or a paragon of good judgement. In

addition to that he has cast a lot of unwanted attention onto the

stand your ground law.



It also increased the number of people who simply do not want to be

involved.

Why would you want to take the chance of paying too much attention to

a thug who can beat you senseless and you can't defend yourself. It is

better to just look the other way.



And that's what Martin tried to do!



Bull**** He confronted Zimmerman. "why are you following me" remember?


After Zimmerman confronted him, he asked why.

Oh, you were there?

The phone conversation, dip****.

Uh Oh...
 

In article ,
says...

On Fri, 21 Sep 2012 16:22:51 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:


And that's what Martin tried to do!

Bull**** He confronted Zimmerman. "why are you following me" remember?


After Zimmerman confronted him, he asked why.

That is just in your mind, there is no evidence to support that.

It is really looking more like this is going to be tossed in the
immunity hearing. At this point, I think everyone is going to wait
until after the election, just for political cover. Nobody wants the
inevitable riots when Zimmerman walks, before an election.

The phone conversation.

Uh Oh...
 

In article m,
says...

On 9/21/2012 3:01 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 21 Sep 2012 13:21:50 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Fri, 21 Sep 2012 11:04:49 -0400, Wayne.B
wrote:

Whether or not Zimmerman is guilty of a crime is something the courts
will have to decide. It has become pretty clear however that he is
not exactly a model citizen or a paragon of good judgement. In
addition to that he has cast a lot of unwanted attention onto the
stand your ground law.

It also increased the number of people who simply do not want to be
involved.
Why would you want to take the chance of paying too much attention to
a thug who can beat you senseless and you can't defend yourself. It is
better to just look the other way.

And that's what Martin tried to do!

Bull**** He confronted Zimmerman. "why are you following me" remember?

It is ludicrous to assume that a teenaged football star could not
outrun an old fat guy if he was trying to get away.

Seems like the gun malfunctioned and went off on it's own, at just the
right time. There was no human DNA on it. Case closed.

Moron.

Uh Oh...
 

In article ,
says...

On Fri, 21 Sep 2012 20:54:11 -0400, Meyer wrote:

On 9/21/2012 3:01 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 21 Sep 2012 13:21:50 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Fri, 21 Sep 2012 11:04:49 -0400, Wayne.B
wrote:

Whether or not Zimmerman is guilty of a crime is something the courts
will have to decide. It has become pretty clear however that he is
not exactly a model citizen or a paragon of good judgement. In
addition to that he has cast a lot of unwanted attention onto the
stand your ground law.

It also increased the number of people who simply do not want to be
involved.
Why would you want to take the chance of paying too much attention to
a thug who can beat you senseless and you can't defend yourself. It is
better to just look the other way.

And that's what Martin tried to do!

Bull**** He confronted Zimmerman. "why are you following me" remember?

It is ludicrous to assume that a teenaged football star could not
outrun an old fat guy if he was trying to get away.

Seems like the gun malfunctioned and went off on it's own, at just the
right time. There was no human DNA on it. Case closed.


No, they recovered some "male DNA" but it was not enough to be tied to
any particular person. Maybe Martin shot himself.

It certainly could have been Martin's, blowing the hell out of JP's
assertion..

For that matter it was probably from the cop who put the gun in the
evidence bag but since it didn't match Martin or Zimmerman they said
it was unidentified just to avoid that controversy in an already
controversial case. If the evidence was contaminated, it won't help
Angie's case.

Couldn't be that Zimmerman cleaned up the gun after the cops let him go,
eh? Nah......

Uh Oh...
 

On 9/22/2012 7:46 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

On Fri, 21 Sep 2012 20:54:11 -0400, Meyer wrote:

On 9/21/2012 3:01 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 21 Sep 2012 13:21:50 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Fri, 21 Sep 2012 11:04:49 -0400, Wayne.B
wrote:

Whether or not Zimmerman is guilty of a crime is something the courts
will have to decide. It has become pretty clear however that he is
not exactly a model citizen or a paragon of good judgement. In
addition to that he has cast a lot of unwanted attention onto the
stand your ground law.

It also increased the number of people who simply do not want to be
involved.
Why would you want to take the chance of paying too much attention to
a thug who can beat you senseless and you can't defend yourself. It is
better to just look the other way.

And that's what Martin tried to do!

Bull**** He confronted Zimmerman. "why are you following me" remember?

It is ludicrous to assume that a teenaged football star could not
outrun an old fat guy if he was trying to get away.

Seems like the gun malfunctioned and went off on it's own, at just the
right time. There was no human DNA on it. Case closed.


No, they recovered some "male DNA" but it was not enough to be tied to
any particular person. Maybe Martin shot himself.

It certainly could have been Martin's, blowing the hell out of JP's
assertion..

For that matter it was probably from the cop who put the gun in the
evidence bag but since it didn't match Martin or Zimmerman they said
it was unidentified just to avoid that controversy in an already
controversial case. If the evidence was contaminated, it won't help
Angie's case.

Couldn't be that Zimmerman cleaned up the gun after the cops let him go,
eh? Nah......

Would have been a brilliant move, but I don't think he did.

Uh Oh...
 

In article ,
says...

On Sat, 22 Sep 2012 07:46:09 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

It certainly could have been Martin's, blowing the hell out of JP's
assertion..

For that matter it was probably from the cop who put the gun in the
evidence bag but since it didn't match Martin or Zimmerman they said
it was unidentified just to avoid that controversy in an already
controversial case. If the evidence was contaminated, it won't help
Angie's case.

Couldn't be that Zimmerman cleaned up the gun after the cops let him go,
eh? Nah......

Zimmerman never saw his gun again after he was arrested (the night of
the shooting). It is still in evidence.

Cite?

Uh Oh...
 

In article ,
says...

On Sun, 23 Sep 2012 07:49:52 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

And you are taking the word of a KNOWN liar!

Sherrie was the one who was accused of lying not George

Really? Are you that blind by FOX telling you he's innocent??

http://www.thedailybeast.com/article...osecutors-say-
zimmerman-hid-second-passport-lied-about-money.html

http://blogs.chicagotribune.com/news.../06/zimmerman-
back-behind-bars-for-lying-about-money.html



Who was CHARGED?

Whoa, YOU were the one who said that Zimmerman was not "accused of
lying"....

Uh Oh...
 

In article ,
says...

On Sun, 23 Sep 2012 14:19:22 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...


Sherrie was the one who was accused of lying not George

Really? Are you that blind by FOX telling you he's innocent??

http://www.thedailybeast.com/article...osecutors-say-
zimmerman-hid-second-passport-lied-about-money.html

http://blogs.chicagotribune.com/news.../06/zimmerman-
back-behind-bars-for-lying-about-money.html



Who was CHARGED?

Whoa, YOU were the one who said that Zimmerman was not "accused of
lying"....

I don't care what the Daily Beast or the Chicago tribune accuses
anyone of. It is clear that Angie is throwing whatever she thinks will
stick at George and she didn't throw this particular piece of
bull****.

Um, did you notice "the prosecuter said he lied" AND

"in addition to the passport allegations, prosecutors also disclosed on
Friday what the state?s attorney called an elaborate scheme by Zimmerman
and his wife, Shelly, to conceal their true financial status from the
court.

Zimmerman ?intentionally deceived the court with the assistance of his
wife,? according to the prosecution?s motion to revoke his bail."

Uh Oh...
 

On Sat, 22 Sep 2012 16:36:37 -0400, wrote:

On Sat, 22 Sep 2012 15:33:05 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...



Zimmerman never saw his gun again after he was arrested (the night of
the shooting). It is still in evidence.

Cite?


Jesus, if you don't have even the basic facts why are you trying to
play the game?

Google it

Y'all can keep this up forever, but there are a couple facts to consider:

1. Kevin doesn't even know who *he* is; and,

2. Clean weapons are happy weapons. Don't ever forget that. I learned it from my dad, and also from
my drill sergeant at Fort Leonard Wood.