|
Poles? Polls?
On Sep 3, 8:00*am, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says... On 9/2/2012 1:32 PM, wrote: On Sun, 02 Sep 2012 10:16:33 -0400, X ` Man wrote: If we could stop the fraud, we wouldn't need any help at all... What fraud? Please be specific. The fraud made up by the Republican governors of Ohio, Pennsylvania and Florida. One has to admit, though, that Rick Scott is an expert on fraud, since his company was fined a half billion bucks for medicare/medicaid fraud. The simple fact is that there has not really been a significant investigation of potential voter fraud. Nobody disputes a landslide and that is the case in most of our gerrymandered districts. Even in the 2000 election where they parsed hanging chads and the intent of the voter, there was never any investigation of who the voters really were. We have no idea about how many widows send in absentee ballots for their dead husband and how many aliens vote. Our local TV station had no problem finding hundreds of people who voted and then refused jury duty because they were not citizens. They even got a few on camera, admitting it. Asking us to "cite" voter fraud should be enough proof the poster doesn't have any intention of learning any facts.. So, you can't actually come up with any "voter fraud".... Got it, Mr. Insanity. http://specfriggintacular.wordpress....f-voter-fraud/ There you go Noble. My last post to you proving yet again, you just make it up as you go along... |
Poles? Polls?
On Sep 4, 9:02*am, iBoaterer wrote:
In article 7809e3a5-06c9-49f0-a4f5-110ac04d6a35 @v9g2000pbu.googlegroups.com, says... On Sep 3, 8:00*am, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 9/2/2012 1:32 PM, wrote: On Sun, 02 Sep 2012 10:16:33 -0400, X ` Man wrote: If we could stop the fraud, we wouldn't need any help at all.... What fraud? Please be specific. The fraud made up by the Republican governors of Ohio, Pennsylvania and Florida. One has to admit, though, that Rick Scott is an expert on fraud, since his company was fined a half billion bucks for medicare/medicaid fraud. The simple fact is that there has not really been a significant investigation of potential voter fraud. Nobody disputes a landslide and that is the case in most of our gerrymandered districts. Even in the 2000 election where they parsed hanging chads and the intent of the voter, there was never any investigation of who the voters really were. We have no idea about how many widows send in absentee ballots for their dead husband and how many aliens vote. Our local TV station had no problem finding hundreds of people who voted and then refused jury duty because they were not citizens. They even got a few on camera, admitting it. Asking us to "cite" voter fraud should be enough proof the poster doesn't have any intention of learning any facts.. So, you can't actually come up with any "voter fraud".... Got it, Mr. Insanity. http://specfriggintacular.wordpress....crats-arrested... There you go Noble. My last post to you proving yet again, you just make it up as you go along... Noble now? ****, I thought I was Kevin.... You insane people confuse me.. Wow kevin, you really do have us the) LOL! loser... |
Poles? Polls?
On Tue, 4 Sep 2012 09:02:45 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:
In article 7809e3a5-06c9-49f0-a4f5-110ac04d6a35 , says... On Sep 3, 8:00*am, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 9/2/2012 1:32 PM, wrote: On Sun, 02 Sep 2012 10:16:33 -0400, X ` Man wrote: If we could stop the fraud, we wouldn't need any help at all... What fraud? Please be specific. The fraud made up by the Republican governors of Ohio, Pennsylvania and Florida. One has to admit, though, that Rick Scott is an expert on fraud, since his company was fined a half billion bucks for medicare/medicaid fraud. The simple fact is that there has not really been a significant investigation of potential voter fraud. Nobody disputes a landslide and that is the case in most of our gerrymandered districts. Even in the 2000 election where they parsed hanging chads and the intent of the voter, there was never any investigation of who the voters really were. We have no idea about how many widows send in absentee ballots for their dead husband and how many aliens vote. Our local TV station had no problem finding hundreds of people who voted and then refused jury duty because they were not citizens. They even got a few on camera, admitting it. Asking us to "cite" voter fraud should be enough proof the poster doesn't have any intention of learning any facts.. So, you can't actually come up with any "voter fraud".... Got it, Mr. Insanity. http://specfriggintacular.wordpress....f-voter-fraud/ There you go Noble. My last post to you proving yet again, you just make it up as you go along... Noble now? ****, I thought I was Kevin.... You insane people confuse me.. Here, Kevin. This is what is meant by acceptable, to liberals, voter fraud. http://www.youtube.com/watch_popup?v...layer_embedded Remember, it takes an ID to drive, buy beer, get a tattoo, get food stamps, and get a library card. One must wonder why liberals are so anti-ID when it comes to voting. |
Poles? Polls?
On 9/4/2012 12:26 PM, GuzzisRule wrote:
On Tue, 4 Sep 2012 09:02:45 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article 7809e3a5-06c9-49f0-a4f5-110ac04d6a35 @v9g2000pbu.googlegroups.com, says... On Sep 3, 8:00 am, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 9/2/2012 1:32 PM, wrote: On Sun, 02 Sep 2012 10:16:33 -0400, X ` Man wrote: If we could stop the fraud, we wouldn't need any help at all... What fraud? Please be specific. The fraud made up by the Republican governors of Ohio, Pennsylvania and Florida. One has to admit, though, that Rick Scott is an expert on fraud, since his company was fined a half billion bucks for medicare/medicaid fraud. The simple fact is that there has not really been a significant investigation of potential voter fraud. Nobody disputes a landslide and that is the case in most of our gerrymandered districts. Even in the 2000 election where they parsed hanging chads and the intent of the voter, there was never any investigation of who the voters really were. We have no idea about how many widows send in absentee ballots for their dead husband and how many aliens vote. Our local TV station had no problem finding hundreds of people who voted and then refused jury duty because they were not citizens. They even got a few on camera, admitting it. Asking us to "cite" voter fraud should be enough proof the poster doesn't have any intention of learning any facts.. So, you can't actually come up with any "voter fraud".... Got it, Mr. Insanity. http://specfriggintacular.wordpress....f-voter-fraud/ There you go Noble. My last post to you proving yet again, you just make it up as you go along... Noble now? ****, I thought I was Kevin.... You insane people confuse me.. Here, Kevin. This is what is meant by acceptable, to liberals, voter fraud. http://www.youtube.com/watch_popup?v...layer_embedded Remember, it takes an ID to drive, buy beer, get a tattoo, get food stamps, and get a library card. One must wonder why liberals are so anti-ID when it comes to voting. Well, talk about denial... This is what the dims are supporting, this what they call Democracy? No wonder they don't bother passing budgets, they already know they have the ballots stuffed... |
Poles? Polls?
In article ,
says... On Tue, 4 Sep 2012 09:02:45 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article 7809e3a5-06c9-49f0-a4f5-110ac04d6a35 , says... On Sep 3, 8:00*am, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 9/2/2012 1:32 PM, wrote: On Sun, 02 Sep 2012 10:16:33 -0400, X ` Man wrote: If we could stop the fraud, we wouldn't need any help at all... What fraud? Please be specific. The fraud made up by the Republican governors of Ohio, Pennsylvania and Florida. One has to admit, though, that Rick Scott is an expert on fraud, since his company was fined a half billion bucks for medicare/medicaid fraud. The simple fact is that there has not really been a significant investigation of potential voter fraud. Nobody disputes a landslide and that is the case in most of our gerrymandered districts. Even in the 2000 election where they parsed hanging chads and the intent of the voter, there was never any investigation of who the voters really were. We have no idea about how many widows send in absentee ballots for their dead husband and how many aliens vote. Our local TV station had no problem finding hundreds of people who voted and then refused jury duty because they were not citizens. They even got a few on camera, admitting it. Asking us to "cite" voter fraud should be enough proof the poster doesn't have any intention of learning any facts.. So, you can't actually come up with any "voter fraud".... Got it, Mr. Insanity. http://specfriggintacular.wordpress....f-voter-fraud/ There you go Noble. My last post to you proving yet again, you just make it up as you go along... Noble now? ****, I thought I was Kevin.... You insane people confuse me.. Here, Kevin. This is what is meant by acceptable, to liberals, voter fraud. http://www.youtube.com/watch_popup?v...layer_embedded Remember, it takes an ID to drive, buy beer, get a tattoo, get food stamps, and get a library card. One must wonder why liberals are so anti-ID when it comes to voting. And you know that those officials were liberal how? And you know that the persons asking to vote third party wanted to vote democratic how? |
Poles? Polls?
In article , says...
On 9/4/2012 12:26 PM, GuzzisRule wrote: On Tue, 4 Sep 2012 09:02:45 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article 7809e3a5-06c9-49f0-a4f5-110ac04d6a35 @v9g2000pbu.googlegroups.com, says... On Sep 3, 8:00 am, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 9/2/2012 1:32 PM, wrote: On Sun, 02 Sep 2012 10:16:33 -0400, X ` Man wrote: If we could stop the fraud, we wouldn't need any help at all... What fraud? Please be specific. The fraud made up by the Republican governors of Ohio, Pennsylvania and Florida. One has to admit, though, that Rick Scott is an expert on fraud, since his company was fined a half billion bucks for medicare/medicaid fraud. The simple fact is that there has not really been a significant investigation of potential voter fraud. Nobody disputes a landslide and that is the case in most of our gerrymandered districts. Even in the 2000 election where they parsed hanging chads and the intent of the voter, there was never any investigation of who the voters really were. We have no idea about how many widows send in absentee ballots for their dead husband and how many aliens vote. Our local TV station had no problem finding hundreds of people who voted and then refused jury duty because they were not citizens. They even got a few on camera, admitting it. Asking us to "cite" voter fraud should be enough proof the poster doesn't have any intention of learning any facts.. So, you can't actually come up with any "voter fraud".... Got it, Mr. Insanity. http://specfriggintacular.wordpress....f-voter-fraud/ There you go Noble. My last post to you proving yet again, you just make it up as you go along... Noble now? ****, I thought I was Kevin.... You insane people confuse me.. Here, Kevin. This is what is meant by acceptable, to liberals, voter fraud. http://www.youtube.com/watch_popup?v...layer_embedded Remember, it takes an ID to drive, buy beer, get a tattoo, get food stamps, and get a library card. One must wonder why liberals are so anti-ID when it comes to voting. Well, talk about denial... This is what the dims are supporting, this what they call Democracy? No wonder they don't bother passing budgets, they already know they have the ballots stuffed... Denial? You stupid insane fool! What makes you think that either the vote officials or the one's inquiring are liberal? |
Poles? Polls?
On Tue, 4 Sep 2012 12:57:26 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says... On Tue, 4 Sep 2012 09:02:45 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article 7809e3a5-06c9-49f0-a4f5-110ac04d6a35 , says... On Sep 3, 8:00*am, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 9/2/2012 1:32 PM, wrote: On Sun, 02 Sep 2012 10:16:33 -0400, X ` Man wrote: If we could stop the fraud, we wouldn't need any help at all... What fraud? Please be specific. The fraud made up by the Republican governors of Ohio, Pennsylvania and Florida. One has to admit, though, that Rick Scott is an expert on fraud, since his company was fined a half billion bucks for medicare/medicaid fraud. The simple fact is that there has not really been a significant investigation of potential voter fraud. Nobody disputes a landslide and that is the case in most of our gerrymandered districts. Even in the 2000 election where they parsed hanging chads and the intent of the voter, there was never any investigation of who the voters really were. We have no idea about how many widows send in absentee ballots for their dead husband and how many aliens vote. Our local TV station had no problem finding hundreds of people who voted and then refused jury duty because they were not citizens. They even got a few on camera, admitting it. Asking us to "cite" voter fraud should be enough proof the poster doesn't have any intention of learning any facts.. So, you can't actually come up with any "voter fraud".... Got it, Mr. Insanity. http://specfriggintacular.wordpress....f-voter-fraud/ There you go Noble. My last post to you proving yet again, you just make it up as you go along... Noble now? ****, I thought I was Kevin.... You insane people confuse me.. Here, Kevin. This is what is meant by acceptable, to liberals, voter fraud. http://www.youtube.com/watch_popup?v...layer_embedded Remember, it takes an ID to drive, buy beer, get a tattoo, get food stamps, and get a library card. One must wonder why liberals are so anti-ID when it comes to voting. And you know that those officials were liberal how? And you know that the persons asking to vote third party wanted to vote democratic how? Kevin, no one said anything about the officials. They were simply 'explaining' the existing liberal law. The topic had to do with voter ID - the lack of which simply allows voter fraud. Democrats are the ones opposing the requirement. Didn't you know that? Why are Democrats so opposed to a voter ID requirement? |
Poles? Polls?
On 9/4/2012 2:06 PM, GuzzisRule wrote:
On Tue, 4 Sep 2012 12:57:26 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Tue, 4 Sep 2012 09:02:45 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article 7809e3a5-06c9-49f0-a4f5-110ac04d6a35 @v9g2000pbu.googlegroups.com, says... On Sep 3, 8:00 am, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 9/2/2012 1:32 PM, wrote: On Sun, 02 Sep 2012 10:16:33 -0400, X ` Man wrote: If we could stop the fraud, we wouldn't need any help at all... What fraud? Please be specific. The fraud made up by the Republican governors of Ohio, Pennsylvania and Florida. One has to admit, though, that Rick Scott is an expert on fraud, since his company was fined a half billion bucks for medicare/medicaid fraud. The simple fact is that there has not really been a significant investigation of potential voter fraud. Nobody disputes a landslide and that is the case in most of our gerrymandered districts. Even in the 2000 election where they parsed hanging chads and the intent of the voter, there was never any investigation of who the voters really were. We have no idea about how many widows send in absentee ballots for their dead husband and how many aliens vote. Our local TV station had no problem finding hundreds of people who voted and then refused jury duty because they were not citizens. They even got a few on camera, admitting it. Asking us to "cite" voter fraud should be enough proof the poster doesn't have any intention of learning any facts.. So, you can't actually come up with any "voter fraud".... Got it, Mr. Insanity. http://specfriggintacular.wordpress....f-voter-fraud/ There you go Noble. My last post to you proving yet again, you just make it up as you go along... Noble now? ****, I thought I was Kevin.... You insane people confuse me.. Here, Kevin. This is what is meant by acceptable, to liberals, voter fraud. http://www.youtube.com/watch_popup?v...layer_embedded Remember, it takes an ID to drive, buy beer, get a tattoo, get food stamps, and get a library card. One must wonder why liberals are so anti-ID when it comes to voting. And you know that those officials were liberal how? And you know that the persons asking to vote third party wanted to vote democratic how? Kevin, no one said anything about the officials. They were simply 'explaining' the existing liberal law. The topic had to do with voter ID - the lack of which simply allows voter fraud. Democrats are the ones opposing the requirement. Didn't you know that? Why are Democrats so opposed to a voter ID requirement? Because with a fair vote, they would get slaughtered... |
Poles? Polls?
In article ,
says... On Tue, 4 Sep 2012 12:57:26 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Tue, 4 Sep 2012 09:02:45 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article 7809e3a5-06c9-49f0-a4f5-110ac04d6a35 , says... On Sep 3, 8:00*am, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 9/2/2012 1:32 PM, wrote: On Sun, 02 Sep 2012 10:16:33 -0400, X ` Man wrote: If we could stop the fraud, we wouldn't need any help at all... What fraud? Please be specific. The fraud made up by the Republican governors of Ohio, Pennsylvania and Florida. One has to admit, though, that Rick Scott is an expert on fraud, since his company was fined a half billion bucks for medicare/medicaid fraud. The simple fact is that there has not really been a significant investigation of potential voter fraud. Nobody disputes a landslide and that is the case in most of our gerrymandered districts. Even in the 2000 election where they parsed hanging chads and the intent of the voter, there was never any investigation of who the voters really were. We have no idea about how many widows send in absentee ballots for their dead husband and how many aliens vote. Our local TV station had no problem finding hundreds of people who voted and then refused jury duty because they were not citizens. They even got a few on camera, admitting it. Asking us to "cite" voter fraud should be enough proof the poster doesn't have any intention of learning any facts.. So, you can't actually come up with any "voter fraud".... Got it, Mr. Insanity. http://specfriggintacular.wordpress....f-voter-fraud/ There you go Noble. My last post to you proving yet again, you just make it up as you go along... Noble now? ****, I thought I was Kevin.... You insane people confuse me.. Here, Kevin. This is what is meant by acceptable, to liberals, voter fraud. http://www.youtube.com/watch_popup?v...layer_embedded Remember, it takes an ID to drive, buy beer, get a tattoo, get food stamps, and get a library card. One must wonder why liberals are so anti-ID when it comes to voting. And you know that those officials were liberal how? And you know that the persons asking to vote third party wanted to vote democratic how? Kevin, no one said anything about the officials. They were simply 'explaining' the existing liberal law. The topic had to do with voter ID - the lack of which simply allows voter fraud. Democrats are the ones opposing the requirement. Didn't you know that? Why are Democrats so opposed to a voter ID requirement? I'm not Kevin, you old washed up senile coot. BUT, if you must ask (stupidity, or head in the sand?) The GOP leaders who implemented these laws keep admitting they intentionally did it within a few months of the election it effects to disenfranchise Democrat leaning groups (like minorities). If you want voter ID laws, at least do them right - start issuing them for free 8 years before you start requiring them in elections, and in all votings between the required one have the poll staff inform about these IDs and hand out the paperwork to be filed. Run some TV ads so everyone knows they're free, and do everything you can to make it easier. |
Poles? Polls?
In article , says...
On 9/4/2012 2:06 PM, GuzzisRule wrote: On Tue, 4 Sep 2012 12:57:26 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Tue, 4 Sep 2012 09:02:45 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article 7809e3a5-06c9-49f0-a4f5-110ac04d6a35 @v9g2000pbu.googlegroups.com, says... On Sep 3, 8:00 am, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 9/2/2012 1:32 PM, wrote: On Sun, 02 Sep 2012 10:16:33 -0400, X ` Man wrote: If we could stop the fraud, we wouldn't need any help at all... What fraud? Please be specific. The fraud made up by the Republican governors of Ohio, Pennsylvania and Florida. One has to admit, though, that Rick Scott is an expert on fraud, since his company was fined a half billion bucks for medicare/medicaid fraud. The simple fact is that there has not really been a significant investigation of potential voter fraud. Nobody disputes a landslide and that is the case in most of our gerrymandered districts. Even in the 2000 election where they parsed hanging chads and the intent of the voter, there was never any investigation of who the voters really were. We have no idea about how many widows send in absentee ballots for their dead husband and how many aliens vote. Our local TV station had no problem finding hundreds of people who voted and then refused jury duty because they were not citizens. They even got a few on camera, admitting it. Asking us to "cite" voter fraud should be enough proof the poster doesn't have any intention of learning any facts.. So, you can't actually come up with any "voter fraud".... Got it, Mr. Insanity. http://specfriggintacular.wordpress....f-voter-fraud/ There you go Noble. My last post to you proving yet again, you just make it up as you go along... Noble now? ****, I thought I was Kevin.... You insane people confuse me.. Here, Kevin. This is what is meant by acceptable, to liberals, voter fraud. http://www.youtube.com/watch_popup?v...layer_embedded Remember, it takes an ID to drive, buy beer, get a tattoo, get food stamps, and get a library card. One must wonder why liberals are so anti-ID when it comes to voting. And you know that those officials were liberal how? And you know that the persons asking to vote third party wanted to vote democratic how? Kevin, no one said anything about the officials. They were simply 'explaining' the existing liberal law. The topic had to do with voter ID - the lack of which simply allows voter fraud. Democrats are the ones opposing the requirement. Didn't you know that? Why are Democrats so opposed to a voter ID requirement? Because with a fair vote, they would get slaughtered... The GOP leaders who implemented these laws keep admitting they intentionally did it within a few months of the election it effects to disenfranchise Democrat leaning groups (like minorities). If you want voter ID laws, at least do them right - start issuing them for free 8 years before you start requiring them in elections, and in all votings between the required one have the poll staff inform about these IDs and hand out the paperwork to be filed. Run some TV ads so everyone knows they're free, and do everything you can to make it easier |
Poles? Polls?
On Tue, 4 Sep 2012 14:27:12 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says... On Tue, 4 Sep 2012 12:57:26 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Tue, 4 Sep 2012 09:02:45 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article 7809e3a5-06c9-49f0-a4f5-110ac04d6a35 , says... On Sep 3, 8:00*am, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 9/2/2012 1:32 PM, wrote: On Sun, 02 Sep 2012 10:16:33 -0400, X ` Man wrote: If we could stop the fraud, we wouldn't need any help at all... What fraud? Please be specific. The fraud made up by the Republican governors of Ohio, Pennsylvania and Florida. One has to admit, though, that Rick Scott is an expert on fraud, since his company was fined a half billion bucks for medicare/medicaid fraud. The simple fact is that there has not really been a significant investigation of potential voter fraud. Nobody disputes a landslide and that is the case in most of our gerrymandered districts. Even in the 2000 election where they parsed hanging chads and the intent of the voter, there was never any investigation of who the voters really were. We have no idea about how many widows send in absentee ballots for their dead husband and how many aliens vote. Our local TV station had no problem finding hundreds of people who voted and then refused jury duty because they were not citizens. They even got a few on camera, admitting it. Asking us to "cite" voter fraud should be enough proof the poster doesn't have any intention of learning any facts.. So, you can't actually come up with any "voter fraud".... Got it, Mr. Insanity. http://specfriggintacular.wordpress....f-voter-fraud/ There you go Noble. My last post to you proving yet again, you just make it up as you go along... Noble now? ****, I thought I was Kevin.... You insane people confuse me.. Here, Kevin. This is what is meant by acceptable, to liberals, voter fraud. http://www.youtube.com/watch_popup?v...layer_embedded Remember, it takes an ID to drive, buy beer, get a tattoo, get food stamps, and get a library card. One must wonder why liberals are so anti-ID when it comes to voting. And you know that those officials were liberal how? And you know that the persons asking to vote third party wanted to vote democratic how? Kevin, no one said anything about the officials. They were simply 'explaining' the existing liberal law. The topic had to do with voter ID - the lack of which simply allows voter fraud. Democrats are the ones opposing the requirement. Didn't you know that? Why are Democrats so opposed to a voter ID requirement? I'm not Kevin, you old washed up senile coot. BUT, if you must ask (stupidity, or head in the sand?) The GOP leaders who implemented these laws keep admitting they intentionally did it within a few months of the election it effects to disenfranchise Democrat leaning groups (like minorities). If you want voter ID laws, at least do them right - start issuing them for free 8 years before you start requiring them in elections, and in all votings between the required one have the poll staff inform about these IDs and hand out the paperwork to be filed. Run some TV ads so everyone knows they're free, and do everything you can to make it easier. Kevin, you totally miss the point. A vast majority of these 'minorities' already have ID's. They used them for the things already mentioned. Now they should be required to show them. You're acting as though an ID would be something totally new to these folks. How the hell did they get their food stamps in the first place? Or their driver's license, or proof of age for beer and tattoos? Or, since their all well educated, their library cards? And, if they're not well educated, then blame it on the liberals resistance to the No Child Left Behind act. |
Poles? Polls?
On Tue, 04 Sep 2012 14:06:00 -0400, GuzzisRule wrote:
Kevin, no one said anything about the officials. They were simply 'explaining' the existing liberal law. The topic had to do with voter ID - the lack of which simply allows voter fraud. Democrats are the ones opposing the requirement. Didn't you know that? Why are Democrats so opposed to a voter ID requirement? Maybe they have a longer memory the Republicans. They can remember all the poll taxes, and other drivel, that kept minorities from voting. They can remember, because they, the Southern Democrats, were the ones doing it. |
Poles? Polls?
On Tue, 04 Sep 2012 14:12:42 -0400, JustWait wrote:
Because with a fair vote, they would get slaughtered... Fair vote, hell, until the Republicans become something more that "white bread" they are relegated to being a regional party. It takes more than a few black faces, a couple of women, an a few Hispanic names, to win national elections. |
Poles? Polls?
On 9/4/2012 5:02 PM, thunder wrote:
On Tue, 04 Sep 2012 14:12:42 -0400, JustWait wrote: Because with a fair vote, they would get slaughtered... Fair vote, hell, until the Republicans become something more that "white bread" they are relegated to being a regional party. It takes more than a few black faces, a couple of women, an a few Hispanic names, to win national elections. Yeah, by what, a few thousand votes... Less than the amount of illegal votes cast all together... |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:56 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com